Steve Spence wrote:
wrote:
Yes, 1/3 of the traditional top loader of equivalent size.
Dont think ours have used that much since the 1960s, they've come a
long way.
Define "that much".
what it says above! JC. Shall I requote for you?
1/3 of the traditional top loader of equivalent size.
These are both under 5 years old. The front loader
uses 1/3rd the water and electric that the top loader does.
why are you repeating yourself anyway? Whats that going to achieve?