On 26 Feb 2006, Leon spake unto rec.woodworking:


"Pete C." wrote in message
...

Technologically it is interesting, however it has failed miserably
from a business perspective since the public doesn't want it.

Do you have finantial figures to back up you claim here? LOL
Since the saw is in production and selling within a few years of
having been introduced I would say it is a success despite personal
feelings about the saw.

Further reason to not patronize the company is the fact that in their
desperation to recover the development costs for their failed product
they are attempting to get the government to require manufacturers to
license and incorporate their technology in new saws.

Any law against that? I believe that is called ummmm Capitolism.

This of course is essentially trying to get the government to force
consumers to purchase the product. Not only should you not patronize
a company as unethical as the sawstop folks, you should actively
oppose their corrupt efforts.

Oh you have a hard on... I see.

A quick googling of "sawstop" brings your name up 290 times to Pete
C.'s once. Check your own pants.