G.W. wrote:

I agree, for the most part, but I just hope that when we are "expanding
the definition" of the Constitution that we don't take it too far. For
example, the idea that "free speech" equals pornography. Maybe that
idea was expanded a tiny bit too far.

And the idea that "free speech" included the right to shout FIRE in a
crowed theatre has already been put in proper perspective. So just
how far can the judiciary go? ??? :-)
...lew...