Abby Normal wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Abby Normal wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Abby Normal wrote
Rod Speed wrote
Abby Normal wrote
Rod Speed wrote

Corse it will work fine. No reason why the secondary
system cant have a slightly lower than normal temperature
set so it recovers from the setback in a decent time and
then stops and leaves the primary system to get the temp
back up to normal. Thats going to happen fine since the
temp difference is well within its capabilitys.

If you shut the booster off before the central area
gets up to temp and rely on the primary system
then bringing it up to temperature then, this central
area catches up quick compared to the rest of the house.

Wrong. The primary system which keeps the house at a uniform
temp when setback isnt used keeps doing that fine when you
use anything to get the central area back off setback.

Okay, the setback period ends, the primary system is running
steady trying to bring the whole house back up to temperature.
Maybe has to try and bring the whole house up by 5 degrees.

But a second system only serving in the central area also turns on.

So perhaps in one half hours time, the primary system has brought
the whole house temperature up by a degree and the secondary
system has brought up the central area by another 3 degrees.

The secondary system cycles off,

No it doesnt, it hasnt got the central area up to the normal temp, stupid.

and the primary system runs for another hour
has fianlly recovered the 5 degrees of set back.

You are setting the secondary system lower than the
primary system, so the secondary system cylces off first.

ONLY when its got back to the normal temp.

See without clearly summarizing what you are trying to do, you can
keep up this three card monte. At least it expands your vocabulary.

Couldnt bull**** its way out of a wet paper bag.

None of the rest of your pathetic excuse for a troll
worth bothering with, all flushed where it belongs.

No surprise that the best you have ever managed is drunken unemployable HVAC
ape.