"RicodJour" wrote
Don wrote:
"RicodJour" wrote
If they're not licensed I don't see any reason to go any further.

One day you were unlicensed, uneducated and inexperienced.

True.

Then you plopped your ransom on the counter and magically you were
educated,
experienced and LICENSED!

You've got the timeline wrong. I was educated, got experience working
for others, learned I needed to be licensed and insured to do business
and did just that.

Please Rico, you can do better than that, I know you can.

I believe that licensing doesn't guaranty problem-free contracting,

Good, we're in agreement so far.

and
I also believe that unlicensed contractors are breaking the law,

So?
Unjust laws are meant to be broken.
If there was a law against eating you'd break it.

cutting corners and a risk that most people don't need to take.

Don't get me started on people that cut corners.
Don't forget, I built a home in recent memory and am more than knowledgeable
in what licensed contractors are capable of.
Quality control by licensed contractors and their earringed on-site
employees?
Please.

My
question to you Don: You don't believe licensing is either necessary
nor moral, yet you're licensed, why?

It ain't about me Rico.
Its about your silly assed assertion that people that haven't paid ransom to
the state are inompetent and prone to error MORE so than people that have
paid the ransom.

("The day before I paid ransom I was incapable, but the day I paid ransom I
instantly became capable!")

You, and all the other asserters in this thread have failed big time to show
why your licenses make you better than people that aren't.
What you folks have done though is demonstrate in a public forum your
questionable character and your extreme fear that persons better than you
will put you out of business. Whining like little girls.
This is specifically addressed to you, Rico, in response to your attempt
above to smear me because you are unable to intelligently prove your faulty
assertion.