Strabo wrote:
In OT - Spanking...Should You or Shouldn't You? on Mon, 21
Nov 2005 14:47:35 -0500, by Spehro Pefhany, we read:


On Mon, 21 Nov 2005 11:08:50 -0800, the renowned Stuart Grey
wrote:


Too_Many_Tools wrote:

snip

Jennifer Lansford, a research scientist from the Center for Child and
Family Policy at Duke University spearheaded the survey.


I wouldn't call anyone a scientist who uses methods that are known to
produce bogus results. They are propagandists.


Does it prove that kids that are spanked act up more than kids who are
not, or that kids who act like little monsters are more likely to get
their bums paddled?

That's the problem with statistical analysis as opposed to using the
scientifically sound experiments with control groups etc. It is a heck
of a lot cheaper and easier to use statistics, but you can only show
correlation. Correlation does not prove causality.


Feminism, the core psychology of a new world socialism, isn't
concerned with facts or causality, only control.

True enough. The agenda of the communist is to bring down the decadent
capitalist west. Ensuring that children are not raised properly is part
of that effort; destroy the culture, and the people will fall.

To that end, they would fake the data, using known bogus techniques, so
as to discourage and eventually outlaw the proper raising of children.