OT----Opinions requested on a moral dillema
"Jon Danniken" wrote in message
...
"Harold and Susan Vordos" wrote:
"Jon Danniken" wrote:
"Harold and Susan Vordos" wrote:
Perhaps you're right, but I was thinking of the studies some time
ago
(sorry, no cites. Just recalling what I saw on TV) where white rats
were
kept in heavy concentration. As they became more and more
overpopulated,
they became very aggressive towards one another.
Lack of privacy does that to humans, also. Think about that the next
time
you're scoping out strangers at the market.
I can only assume that you're not making reference to the ordeal at HD
in
this instance. I was hardly *scoping* anyone---but it wasn't too hard
to
see what was going on when you understand the fittings as I do. It all
began very innocently----which is what created the dilemma for me. I
know
what's right from wrong, but what should one do in a circumstance such
as
this? Stand by as if it didn't happen? I'd be grateful if it was my
store
and someone spoke up. That's how I made my decision.
Having said that,
Yeah, I agree. It's amazing how private some people are. We asked some
new
neighbors, after "knowing" them for several weeks, how they met. She
was
highly insulted. Must have had something to hide.
Defnitely. My guess is they met at a coven during a demonic ritual,
probably while eating the flesh of an unbaptized child. You should burn
down their house, just to be on the safe side (make sure they are in it,
of
course, wouldn't want them casting any spells on you).
Jon
Consider it done. Not only is the house burned to the ground, I enjoyed a
feast of the roasted flesh of the wife. Let me tell you, that gal was
tough.g
Harold
|