View Single Post
  #33   Report Post  
Tom
 
Posts: n/a
Default Tungsten electrodes for armor piercing bullets

Gunner Asch wrote:

On Tue, 01 Nov 2005 09:56:14 +1300, Tom wrote:


The diameter of the bullet is 7.62, indeed, but its NOT the same as
the CARTRIDGE designated as the 7.62 x51, which is what the FN-FAL
fired..the basiclly equivelent of our 308 Winchester......


I don't think so, that is the bore of the barrel..

Gunner

Tom


7.62, is .308 diameter. The 7.62 Cartridge (x 51) is physically
identical to the commercial civilian version we call the .308
Winchester. There are some minor differences between the throating of
a x51 weapon and the civilian 308. Btw...the usual name for the
military cartridge is the 7.62 Nato..as its one of the common rounds
for Nato usage.

Like the 5.56 Nato..we in the States call the .223 Remington, when
fired from sporting arms.

Ive owned and fired enough FN-Fals to know what goes down the tube G

Gunner


The calibre of a gun is not the diameter of the projectile..
7.62mm does not equate to .308" 7.62 relates to the .30
calibre bore which it shares with a myriad of cartridges
which also use a .308 projectile. 30.06, .30 Rem, 30-30Win,
..300 Sav. etc etc..
That Winchester went against convention when they named the
..308 is beside the point, this is a metalworking newsgroup and
you made a sloppy statement. Please step up! :-)
As for firing the weapon in particular, where I come from it
was standard issue, albeit Australian made, so possibly my
experience may exceed yours..:-(
BTW, the 5.56 Nato also relates to the calibre rather than the
bullet diameter..

Tom