"IMM" wrote in message
...

"Clive Summerfield" wrote in message
...

"IMM" wrote in message
...

"Andy Hall" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 23:16:40 +0100, "Dave Plowman (News)"
wrote:

In article ,
IMM wrote:
Don't want to go down the combi route so please don't suggest
removing
the tank and fitting a combi!

Fit a high flow combi. The Alpha CB50 storeed water model will
do.
All
in one box, all solved.

The needle's stuck again...

Best solution for this man. The best. You don't know about these
things.


And you obviously can't read. Try looking at the first line quoted
above,
with particular reference to the negatives.

The OP, and yourself, doesn't know, he is being educated.

A bit of advice for you. If you're going to criticise a person's education,
then try to use acceptable English, rather than the nightmare construct of
poor grammar above. And don't assume that a person is uneducated simply
because they have already ruled out your prefered solution. After all, the
original poster knows more about his requirements than you do. Actually, the
original poster probably knows more than you, period. However, we'll skip
that for now.


Furthermore, given that the
original poster has provide absolutely
zero information regarding the type
of property, occupancy, hot water usage,
heating requirements,

If he is considering putting the cylinder in a wardrobe that tells me a
lot.
he needs a combi. That is easy for him to do if he is DIYing, takes up
less
space, instant gushing water, etc.


Wow, what a deductive genius you are. That the original poster wishes to
move the cylinder from a cupboard in the bathroom to a wardrobe in the
bedroom tells me a couple of things. Firstly that he needs more space in the
bathroom, and secondly that he is happy to sacrifice some space in the
bedroom. As I said before, the original poster gave no indication of his
other requirements, so the proposed solution of a combi is fundamentally
flawed.

Cheers
Clive