|
When Giants Walked the Wreck - and the proper use of Google
Once upon a time there were giants.
You may not believe this but it is surely true. They went by sobriquet such as Leach, Olquin, Radovanic, Duke of Urls, Bennett (including both B the Wise and B the Foolish), Uncle Jessie, Self, Bitchslap Bob, TurdBarge Al - and continue in a litany of fine madness. They were the abstract geniuses of their time - but they are no more. True, there are some smatterings of revelation from time to time - but the good old days are gone. The all consuming swamp of Lurkdom has consumed most of them. Absolute disinterest has taken the rest. And there was so much to be learned. Hearken ye, my children, and punch some of those names into a Google search - using the advanced search function, as Author's name, within the Groups category, within the specific parameter of rec.woodworking. You will soon see how far we have fallen. There was a Dark Age once in Western History. A time of indolent madness driven by the religiosity of madmen, leading to a stoppage of real thought. But there was also a, "rose fingered dawn", there was a time of rebirth, regrouping, Renaissance. As against the creeping Darkness of this Darkened Wreck, this age consumed by Miller, Hinz and Clarke - which sounds all to much like the bottom of a bad batting order - replace them in your thoughts with the Murderer's Row of Radovanic, Leach and Olguin (who is batting third here but whom I understand to be a damned fine cleanup hitter). Look them up in Google. Look them up and say a coven's prayer, so as to raise them up in your minds. For, some can indeed be raised up - and some might visit you with their wisdom. There were giants once among us, strong and tall - I would see them back again. Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email) http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage) |
In article , Tom Watson wrote:
Once upon a time there were giants. Ya know, Tom, nobody's forcing you to read the OT posts... I sure do miss Tom Gauldin's humor, though. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt. And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time? |
"Doug Miller" wrote in message m... In article , Tom Watson wrote: Once upon a time there were giants. Ya know, Tom, nobody's forcing you to read the OT posts... I sure do miss Tom Gauldin's humor, though. Or Walt Akers. I'm guessing Tom is complaining again about what he does. |
"Tom Watson" wrote in message
... On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:18:12 GMT, (Doug Miller) wrote: In article , Tom Watson wrote: Once upon a time there were giants. Ya know, Tom, nobody's forcing you to read the OT posts... Doug - you are one of the prime movers of this political horse**** that is being visited upon the Wreck. snip Asking me to ignore or filter you is like asking me to wear a gas mask in a bar, if I do not choose to smoke. I'd say it's more akin to knowing that there is a back room where smoking is allowed, then going back there on purpose and complaining about the smoke. There are some bars that are interesting enough that i will choose to be there, regardless of the smoke - until I begin to cough. You, and your brethren, have made me begin to cough. I just did an informal and impromptu study of the last several handfulls of threads posted to this group. Of the last 50-ish, I came up with 50 that were related to woodworking (some loosely) and 6 that were unrelated to woodworking. Ironically, 2 of the 6 that were unrelated were started by you. todd |
Todd Fatheree wrote:
I just did an informal and impromptu study of the last several handfull= s of threads posted to this group. Of the last 50-ish, I came up with 50 th= at were related to woodworking (some loosely) and 6 that were unrelated to= woodworking. Ironically, 2 of the 6 that were unrelated were started b= y you. =20 todd =20 Regardless of that he just made a public confession as to the errors of=20 his way and his willingness to move on. That should be enough -- unless=20 we find him guilty of recidivism -- or worse -- he offers to moderate... Tom is right. We should be discussing things like -- oh say -- the best=20 way to stain cherry -- not the best way to hang political leaders. And=20 please -- nothing more on acetone... So -- to celebrate this "new spirit" I will do a comparative study of=20 all my stains on a nice piece of cherry and post the results on a.b.p.w=20 - so we have something pleasant to talk about... ducks and runs --=20 Will R. Jewel Boxes and Wood Art http://woodwork.pmccl.com The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those=20 who have not got it.=94 George Bernard Shaw |
In article , Todd Fatheree
wrote: Of the last 50-ish, I came up with 50 that were related to woodworking (some loosely) and 6 that were unrelated to woodworking. Ironically, 2 of the 6 that were unrelated were started by you. The vast majority of threads in the last two months have been woodworking related, on-topic threads. I think that if Tom had nothing to complain about, he'd likely complain about that... -- "I'm a man, but I can change... If I have to... I guess." -- Red Green |
"Dave Balderstone" wrote in message tone.ca... In article , Todd Fatheree wrote: Of the last 50-ish, I came up with 50 that were related to woodworking (some loosely) and 6 that were unrelated to woodworking. Ironically, 2 of the 6 that were unrelated were started by you. The vast majority of threads in the last two months have been woodworking related, on-topic threads. I think that if Tom had nothing to complain about, he'd likely complain about that... Possibly. But I cut Tom a little more slack than most folks. When he complains, he does it with such panache and style. This is a more classy joint with him as a member. |
"Dave Balderstone" wrote in message
tone.ca... In article , Todd Fatheree wrote: Of the last 50-ish, I came up with 50 that were related to woodworking (some loosely) and 6 that were unrelated to woodworking. Ironically, 2 of the 6 that were unrelated were started by you. The vast majority of threads in the last two months have been woodworking related, on-topic threads. I think that if Tom had nothing to complain about, he'd likely complain about that... I haven't been using Usenet as long as some, but I've been using it for 20 years. Off-topic posts are not a new phenomenon, and anyone who thinks the wreck is awash with them hasn't been around much. todd |
In article , Tom Watson wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 01:18:12 GMT, (Doug Miller) wrote: In article , Tom Watson wrote: Once upon a time there were giants. Ya know, Tom, nobody's forcing you to read the OT posts... Well, we'll get to that in a moment. I sure do miss Tom Gauldin's humor, though. As do I. And I also miss your good sense. (I think that we are getting back to it now) Doug - you are one of the prime movers of this political horse**** that is being visited upon the Wreck. I must take issue with you there. I have never *started* one of those threads. But I do find it difficult to sit idly by, when fantasies and outright lies are put forward as "facts". I have tremendous respect for you when you speak about wooddorking, Thanks; that's mutual, BTW. but much less so when you turn off into the political lane. Well, you can't expect to agree with everyone you know. I do find it a bit odd, though, that you complained about several of us, by name, who post both on- and off-topic, but didn't even mention others who almost *never* post anything *except* in political threads. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt. And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time? |
"Todd Fatheree" wrote in message
I haven't been using Usenet as long as some, but I've been using it for 20 years. Off-topic posts are not a new phenomenon, and anyone who thinks the wreck is awash with them hasn't been around much. Dude, you're obviously living in the future past! ... surely you believe the reports that the wRECdorker's of yore, unlike the girly men who apparently frequent the place now, shaved with their jointer blades and poured shellac over walnut sawdust for breakfast?? -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 11/06/04 |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:55:58 -0600, "Todd Fatheree"
wrote: I haven't been using Usenet as long as some, but I've been using it for 20 years. Off-topic posts are not a new phenomenon, and anyone who thinks the wreck is awash with them hasn't been around much. That's because the percentage of idiots in this world will never change. |
Lee Michaels wrote:
But I cut Tom a little more slack than most folks. When he complains, he does it with such panache and style. This is a more classy joint with him as a member. Agreed and even though I've been around here a short time I can see that his panache and style add a lot to this group. Josie |
In article ,
WillR wrote: [brevitized] Tom is right. We should be discussing things like -- oh say -- the best way to stain cherry -- not the best way to hang political leaders. And please -- nothing more on acetone... Newsgroups are, if they're any good, somewhat like a neighbourhood pub. Some patrons are here to refresh themselves. Some are here to tell tall tales. Some have a new (to them) joke to share. Some talk about yesterday. (They don't make 'm like they used to) Some talk about tomorrow. (One day, somebody is going to make a glue dispenser that works) Some just stroll in to take a whizz. Some are just plain assholes looking for a fight. Some sit in a corner and just want to be left-the-hell alone. Some come in to meet up with a specific like-minded patron. Some are here to discuss the day's events, either in their personal lives, or on a world-wide scale. Some patrons are cantankerous old farts. Some patrons need to re-assert their own manliness by pushing other men down so that they may look like they are 'better' or' winners', at least in their own minds. ( A true winner's glory is elevated by the strength of the contender who ended up in second place.) Anybody with half a brain can beat up on a trollin' idiot. The common interest, unlike the BikerBar down the street, or Plumber's Pool Hall, up the road, in here, it's wooddorking. We try to help each other. In my case, when I feel pretty sure I have a solution, I'll offer it up. When I don't have a solution, why endanger somebody's life by telling him, with certainty, to connect the blue wire to terminal 6? I like it here, warts and all. And to hell with politics and religion. There are pubs on the other side of town that deal with those subjects...they're easy to spot..there's a lot of blood on the floors. 0¿0 Rob PS. I decided not to participate in the 100+-post 220 volt discussion for two reasons: LRod was doing just fine by himself and why would I confuse everybody with facts? A two-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 3600 RPM not 3450 or 3500 A four-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 1800 RPM, not 1760 or 1745 Put a strobe on the shaft. Slippage doesn't occur till a load is put on. When you take an amp-probe of a 2 HP Baldor(Quality) motor, with nothing on the shaft, it can draw as little as 1 amp. When you add a load, increasing it bit by bit (say..a clutch..or a sawblade in a piece of wood), all that happens is that the current will increase to the point where either the breaker blows or the motor bursts into flames. It is the point at which the motor bursts into flames (preventable with bigger gauge windings and better cooling) which tell you the rated HP. (Just prior to the motor stalling there will be a reduction of RPM under somewhat controlable conditions. If your motor, under no load, say at 120 volts, draws 1.5 amp then, when it puts out 2 HP it will draw 750x2/120= 12.5 amps PLUS 1.5 amp = 14 amps. Period. That will happen if the breaker is rated at 15 or 20 or 30 amps. (No semantics, please) None of this works on universal (brushed) motors. |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:24:02 -0500, Robatoy
wrote: When I don't have a solution, why endanger somebody's life by telling him, with certainty, to connect the blue wire to terminal 6? NOOOO!!!!! For the love of god, NOT terminal 6!!!!!! PS. I decided not to participate in the 100+-post 220 volt discussion for two reasons: LRod was doing just fine by himself... Heh, heh. Thanks. -- LRod Master Woodbutcher and seasoned termite Shamelessly whoring my website since 1999 http://www.woodbutcher.net |
LRod wrote:
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 10:24:02 -0500, Robatoy wrote: =20 =20 When I don't have a solution, why endanger somebody's life by=20 telling him, with certainty, to connect the blue wire to terminal 6? =20 =20 NOOOO!!!!! For the love of god, NOT terminal 6!!!!!! Glad you picked up on that I was going to make a post and decided it was = best that a long time friend break the news to him -- that he screwed up = again. People are often offended when these corrections come from a recent=20 acquaintance. Terminal six! ???%#$%$#*^??? Watta weenie!!! ROTFLMAO =20 PS. I decided not to participate in the 100+-post 220 volt discussion=20 for two reasons: LRod was doing just fine by himself... =20 =20 Heh, heh. Thanks. =20 Don't think I wanna touch that. :-) It did provide some interesting diversion while working on a difficult=20 problem and I had my feet up thinking... So it wasn't wasted. --=20 Will R. Jewel Boxes and Wood Art http://woodwork.pmccl.com The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those=20 who have not got it.=94 George Bernard Shaw |
Guess who wrote in
: On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:55:58 -0600, "Todd Fatheree" wrote: I haven't been using Usenet as long as some, but I've been using it for 20 years. Off-topic posts are not a new phenomenon, and anyone who thinks the wreck is awash with them hasn't been around much. That's because the percentage of idiots in this world will never change. While the percentage of idiots with Usenet access seems to be trending upwards? |
|
WillR wrote:
We should be discussing things like -- oh say -- the best way to stain cherry That's easy. You take the blood of the person wishing to stain the cherry (five liters - litres, Jeff - is generally adequate), thin it with 200 proof anhydrous denatured alcohol, mix it with a #1.5 cut of your favorite shellac and apply with a pad lubed with mineral oil. On a somewhat related note, I had the opportunity to examine close to 200 solid cherry side chairs while rehearsing in the sanctuary of The Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, here in Los Angeles (that's Spanish for "The Angels," Will). I noticed that, while the finish on the cherry had a slight tint to it, there had been no attempt to stain all those chairs to match. What a refreshing change from the muddy, dull dreck that I generally encounter, posing as fine furniture. The subtle variances in color were not unlike the variations of the trees in the forest... as though it were a celebration of all the hues of cherry. It was an unexpected pleasure, and I marveled at its beauty for quite a while; a cherry sanctuary. O'Deen |
Robatoy wrote in
: snip of a good analogy Rob PS. I decided not to participate in the 100+-post 220 volt discussion for two reasons: LRod was doing just fine by himself and why would I confuse everybody with facts? A two-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 3600 RPM not 3450 or 3500 A four-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 1800 RPM, not 1760 or 1745 Put a strobe on the shaft. Slippage doesn't occur till a load is put on. When you take an amp-probe of a 2 HP Baldor(Quality) motor, with nothing on the shaft, it can draw as little as 1 amp. When you add a load, increasing it bit by bit (say..a clutch..or a sawblade in a piece of wood), all that happens is that the current will increase to the point where either the breaker blows or the motor bursts into flames. It is the point at which the motor bursts into flames (preventable with bigger gauge windings and better cooling) which tell you the rated HP. (Just prior to the motor stalling there will be a reduction of RPM under somewhat controlable conditions. If your motor, under no load, say at 120 volts, draws 1.5 amp then, when it puts out 2 HP it will draw 750x2/120= 12.5 amps PLUS 1.5 amp = 14 amps. Period. That will happen if the breaker is rated at 15 or 20 or 30 amps. (No semantics, please) None of this works on universal (brushed) motors. Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! ;-) |
Patriarch wrote:
Guess who wrote in :=2 0 =20 =20 On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 00:55:58 -0600, "Todd Fatheree" wrote: I haven't been using Usenet as long as some, but I've been using it for 20 years. Off-topic posts are not a new phenomenon, and anyone who thinks the wreck is awash with them hasn't been around much. That's because the percentage of idiots in this world will never change. =20 =20 While the percentage of idiots with Usenet access seems to be trending = upwards? Umm yeah.. Just remember the bell curve and the definition of a standard=20 distribution and recall that half the people are at and below the line=20 and half are at the "normal" line and above... (Not even trying to get=20 the formal definition correct here guys just flow with it for a minute...= ) It's why the "Jig-a-loo" (and swiffer) commercial succeeds. Not sure if=20 that is only in Canukistan that it runs... Not sure if it would be acceptable to deny access to the other half --=20 not even sure which "side" has physical control anymore. So not even=20 sure what I mean by "the other half" now that I contemplate the situation= =2E Selling to the "smart" people appeals to at best less than half the=20 audience. Selling to "the other half" lets you access (almost) all the=20 audience. (Despite any offense taken -- watching the ads that is...) That explains why people buy and use things they don't understand --=20 plus a whole lot of other things... like advertising trends for consumer = products... and what level they are written to... And if you think about it you can extend it to "packaging trends" in=20 marketing... And current sales tactics in "big box appliance stores"...=20 No info cause the assume that most people are clueless... (And they are=20 probably right eh?) Since the people using the internet are "a large sample set" -- guess wha= t? ******************** 20% of your customers bring you 80% of your profit etc... Likewise 20% of your customers bring you 80% of your grief... etc. Pareto's (sp?) law (80/20 rule) -- it could also describe a lot of=20 things that concern you -- but I suspect you already know that. LOL ********************** Just some random loosely connected thoughts I guess... :-) Just enjoy and laugh -- don't get offended. ***************************** Present company excepted on all examples as a professional courtesy. ************************** Point being that if you let current trends offend and upset you you will= : a: Die sooner b. Die angry. c. Die frustrated d. (Fill the rest in) and so on... --=20 Will R. Jewel Boxes and Wood Art http://woodwork.pmccl.com The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those=20 who have not got it.=94 George Bernard Shaw |
Odeen wrote:
WillR wrote: =20 We should be discussing things like -- oh say -- the best way to stain cherry =20 =20 That's easy. You take the blood of the person wishing to stain the cherry (five liters - litres, Jeff - is generally adequate), thin it with 200 proof anhydrous denatured alcohol, mix it with a #1.5 cut of your favorite shellac and apply with a pad lubed with mineral oil. =20 relax - I just went an hurriedly threw out all my stain OK!!!!!???? =20 O'Deen =20 --=20 Will R. Jewel Boxes and Wood Art http://woodwork.pmccl.com The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those=20 who have not got it.=94 George Bernard Shaw |
Patriarch wrote:
Robatoy wrote in :=20 =20 snip of a good analogy=20 =20 Rob PS. I decided not to participate in the 100+-post 220 volt discussion=20 for two reasons: LRod was doing just fine by himself and why would I=20 confuse everybody with facts? A two-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 3600 RPM not 3450 or 3500 A four-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 1800 RPM, not 1760 or 1745 Put a strobe on the shaft. Slippage doesn't occur till a load is put on. When you take an amp-probe of a 2 HP Baldor(Quality) motor, with nothing on the shaft, it can draw as little as 1 amp. When you add a load, increasing it bit by bit (say..a clutch..or a sawblade in a piece of wood), all that happens is that the current will increase to the point where either the breaker blows or the motor bursts into flames. It is the point at which the motor bursts into flames (preventable with bigger gauge windings and better cooling) which tell you the rated HP. (Just prior to the motor stalling there will be a reduction of RPM under somewhat controlable conditions. If your motor, under no load, say at 120 volts, draws 1.5 amp then, when it puts out 2 HP it will draw 750x2/120=3D 12.5 amps PLUS 1.5 amp = =3D 14 amps. Period. That will happen if the breaker is rated at 15 or 20 or 30 amps. (No semantics, please) None of this works on universal (brushed) motors. =20 =20 Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! ;-)=20 Actually that was comedy -- get with the program. ROTFLMAO NOT that he was wrong... Gotta be careful here. --=20 Will R. Jewel Boxes and Wood Art http://woodwork.pmccl.com The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those=20 who have not got it.=94 George Bernard Shaw |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:26:58 -0600, Patriarch
wrote: Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! ;-) That really made me laugh. Thanks. Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email) http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage) |
On Thu, 17 Mar 2005 21:31:52 -0600, "Todd Fatheree"
wrote: snipparectomy Of course, there have always been a few midgets wandering around, too. Thomas J. Watson - WoodDorker tjwatson1ATcomcastDOTnet (real email) http://home.comcast.net/~tjwatson1 (webpage) |
Odeen wrote:
WillR wrote: =20 We should be discussing things like -- oh say -- the best way to stain cherry =20 =20 That's easy. You take the blood of the person wishing to stain the cherry (five liters - litres, Jeff - is generally adequate), thin it with 200 proof anhydrous denatured alcohol, mix it with a #1.5 cut of your favorite shellac and apply with a pad lubed with mineral oil. =20 On a somewhat related note, I had the opportunity to examine close to 200 solid cherry side chairs while rehearsing in the sanctuary of The Cathedral of Our Lady of the Angels, here in Los Angeles (that's Spanish for "The Angels," Will).=20 Si senor. Muchas gracias. No hay problemas con parablas faciles. " I noticed that, while the finish on the cherry had a slight tint to it, there had been no attempt to stain all those chairs to match. What a refreshing change from the muddy, dull dreck that I generally encounter, posing as fine furniture. The subtle variances in color were not unlike the variations of the trees in the forest... as though it were a celebration of all the hues of cherry. =20 It was an unexpected pleasure, and I marveled at its beauty for quite a= while; a cherry sanctuary. =20 O'Deen =20 If I ever get back there I will look. Thank you for the thoughts. Sounds = like a "bit of heaven" in more than one sense of the word. :-) --=20 Will R. Jewel Boxes and Wood Art http://woodwork.pmccl.com The power of accurate observation is commonly called cynicism by those=20 who have not got it.=94 George Bernard Shaw |
On 18 Mar 2005 09:26:42 -0800, Odeen wrote:
WillR wrote: We should be discussing things like -- oh say -- the best way to stain cherry That's easy. You take the blood of the person wishing to stain the cherry (five liters - litres, Jeff - is generally adequate), But, isn't 5 liters all you have? Ahhhh, nevermind. Yes. It was an unexpected pleasure, and I marveled at its beauty for quite a while; a cherry sanctuary. There's a joke in there somewhere, maybe about "but you can only go in once", but damned if I'm gonna make it. |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:26:58 -0600, Patriarch wrote:
Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! Wire you bringing it up, then? |
Dave Hinz wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:26:58 -0600, Patriarch wrote: Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! Wire you bringing it up, then? So he can plug his agenda. |
In article ,
WillR wrote: Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! ;-) Actually that was comedy -- get with the program. ROTFLMAO Ohhh Ye of little faith!!! The Popiel PocketFisherman LIVES!!!!! |
wrote in message oups.com...
Dave Hinz wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:26:58 -0600, Patriarch wrote: Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! Wire you bringing it up, then? So he can plug his agenda. A shocking turn of events! Watts the matter with you guys? |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:08:23 -0500, Al Reid wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... Dave Hinz wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:26:58 -0600, Patriarch wrote: Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! Wire you bringing it up, then? So he can plug his agenda. A shocking turn of events! Watts the matter with you guys? We're just going through a phase, I think. |
Or maybe it's just an outlet for us.
|
In article 36,
Patriarch wrote: While the percentage of idiots with Usenet access seems to be trending upwards? With AOL's dropping usenet I think we'll see a sudden decline. -- "I'm a man, but I can change... If I have to... I guess." -- Red Green |
In article ,
Dave Hinz wrote: On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 11:26:58 -0600, Patriarch wrote: Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! Wire you bringing it up, then? Because he doesn't have the capacity to resist the temptation? To each his ohm, I guess. |
|
In article .com,
wrote: Or maybe it's just an outlet for us. I'll have to meditate on that. OHMMMMMMMM... -- "I'm a man, but I can change... If I have to... I guess." -- Red Green |
On Fri, 18 Mar 2005 12:31:37 -0600, Dave Balderstone wrote:
In article .com, wrote: Or maybe it's just an outlet for us. I'll have to meditate on that. OHMMMMMMMM... Jokes like that will get you inducted into the Hall of shame. |
Patriarch wrote:
Robatoy wrote in : snip of a good analogy Rob PS. I decided not to participate in the 100+-post 220 volt discussion for two reasons: LRod was doing just fine by himself and why would I confuse everybody with facts? A two-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 3600 RPM not 3450 or 3500 A four-pole induction motor, with no load, in North America will run at 1800 RPM, not 1760 or 1745 Put a strobe on the shaft. Slippage doesn't occur till a load is put on. When you take an amp-probe of a 2 HP Baldor(Quality) motor, with nothing on the shaft, it can draw as little as 1 amp. When you add a load, increasing it bit by bit (say..a clutch..or a sawblade in a piece of wood), all that happens is that the current will increase to the point where either the breaker blows or the motor bursts into flames. It is the point at which the motor bursts into flames (preventable with bigger gauge windings and better cooling) which tell you the rated HP. (Just prior to the motor stalling there will be a reduction of RPM under somewhat controlable conditions. If your motor, under no load, say at 120 volts, draws 1.5 amp then, when it puts out 2 HP it will draw 750x2/120= 12.5 amps PLUS 1.5 amp = 14 amps. Period. That will happen if the breaker is rated at 15 or 20 or 30 amps. (No semantics, please) None of this works on universal (brushed) motors. Does EVERY THREAD need to devolve into an electricity discussion?!!! ;-) Relax, if it wasn't for electricity you'd have to read this by candlelight, or put the computer by the window;-) Joe |
|
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:58 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter