1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .

"Daniel Turner" wrote in message
.uk...
1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .



Wow. Does anybody use alt.test anymore?
--

-Mike-

In article , "Daniel Turner" danet at blueyonder dot co dot uk wrote:
1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .

Your test failed - it wound up in rec.woodworking instead of alt.test :-)

--
Regards,
Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com)

Nobody ever left footprints in the sands of time by sitting on his butt.
And who wants to leave buttprints in the sands of time?

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:43:15 -0500, "Mike Marlow"
wrote:


"Daniel Turner" wrote in message
o.uk...
1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .



Wow. Does anybody use alt.test anymore?


no need to .... it is accepted practice here

On Wed, 2 Mar 2005 13:43:15 -0500, Mike Marlow wrote:

"Daniel Turner" wrote in message
.uk...
1 2 3 4 5 . . . . .

Wow. Does anybody use alt.test anymore?

Apparently not. And now prepare for a dozen responses calling you
a net-nazi for mentioning it. (ask me how I know this...)