Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Troll alert, and request for filtering help
The following threads in rec.woodworking are trolls:
- Best infant formula for newborns - Is woodturning considered woodworking? In each case, the original post in the thread was made through Google Groups, with a forged From header purporting the post to have been made by Dave Balderstone. Also in each case, the original post was made to some *other* group (misc.kids and rec.crafts.woodturning, respectively) with followups set to rec.woodworking. It seems that someone has figured out a very effective way of trolling this group: drop a stinkbomb, or even a legitimate on-topic post, in some other group with followups set here. There doesn't seem to be a way to stop the replies from coming here, as the headers of the replies do not indicate that the original posts were not directed at this group. If anyone has any ideas regarding ways of filtering the replies to these troll posts, I'd love to hear them. Filtering the originals is trivial, but pointless, as they do not appear in this group to begin with. The best I've come up with so far is: (a) Complain to Google, and request that they disable setting followups to other groups. I'm guessing that won't get too far, for at least two reasons: first, there are legitimate reasons for setting followups, and second, Google isn't too responsive to complaints in any event. (b) Drop all posts that originate from, or reference posts that originate from, googlegroups.com. (c) Plead with everyone reading this group to IGNORE all trolls. Do not respond _at_all_, PLEASE. Not even to say "go away". -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com) Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com You must use your REAL email address to get a response. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Don't go filtering GoogleGroups posts. I love their interface and use
it exclusively, and yes I've tried numerous other newsreaders. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Balderstone wrote:
(c) Plead with everyone reading this group to IGNORE all trolls. This works for me, but the turning discussion actually seemed like a valid topic. Barry |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com, "damian penney" wrote:
Don't go filtering GoogleGroups posts. I love their interface and use it exclusively, and yes I've tried numerous other newsreaders. So much garbage comes through Google Groups, that it may be necessary to do that. Of course, the filters remove those posts only for those people who are actually using the filters -- they don't actually affect the news feed. So if I update the filters to remove Google Groups, anyone using the filters will, for good or ill, no longer be able to see any of your posts. Anyone not using my filters would still be able to see them. If that troubles you, perhaps you could complain to Google that the fact that they permit garbage to be posted through their servers is causing people to filter out any content that came through Google, including your presumably worthwhile posts. Or you could post through a real newsreader. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com) Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com You must use your REAL email address to get a response. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
In article , B a r r y
wrote: This works for me, but the turning discussion actually seemed like a valid topic. Which it could be if it wasn't deliberately started by the troll. Same with the infant formula thread... valid (though off-topic for rww). With this particular troll, if you filter for "zzn" in the "from" header you will catch all their posts though not the replies from wreck members who should know better. djb -- "The thing about saying the wrong words is that A, I don't notice it, and B, sometimes orange water gibbon bucket and plastic." -- Mr. Burrows |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
In article . com,
damian penney wrote: Don't go filtering GoogleGroups posts. I love their interface and use it exclusively, and yes I've tried numerous other newsreaders. Personally, I think Google Groups should be under a Usenet Death Penalty until they smarten up and start taking abuse complaints seriously. -- "The thing about saying the wrong words is that A, I don't notice it, and B, sometimes orange water gibbon bucket and plastic." -- Mr. Burrows |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Miller wrote:
I agree. I can't understand their refusal to implement even the most basic content filtering; for example, any post with the racial slur n****r in either the title or the body should be dropped, unconditionally. There is *no* context in which that word is appropriate. There is in some slang, typically used in inner city areas. Barry |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I agree. At work I have NNTP filtering, so google is really my only
option. I use the wreck in the same way that others take smoke breaks. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
If you change the filters for this Doug, I'll use them.
I don't see any other workable options. How's that tooth doing? [G] John, in Minnesota On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:38:12 GMT, (Doug Miller) wrote: The following threads in rec.woodworking are trolls: - Best infant formula for newborns - Is woodturning considered woodworking? [snip] |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "John, in MN" wrote:
If you change the filters for this Doug, I'll use them. Coming soon... (next ten minutes or so) I don't see any other workable options. How's that tooth doing? [G] LOL John, in Minnesota On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:38:12 GMT, (Doug Miller) wrote: The following threads in rec.woodworking are trolls: - Best infant formula for newborns - Is woodturning considered woodworking? [snip] Also these threads: - Root canal or extraction - Good undergraduate physics departments - Behavior and dog foods - Good college for accounting MBA - Nursing school for my daughter - Best 3-Chip MiniDV Cam -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com) Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com You must use your REAL email address to get a response. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
I could post through another newsreader but like I said I prefer this
interface and nntp is blocked in a lot of places so a good web interface can be peoples only route to usenet. It's not like you can't post trolls via any newsreader, it's not a ggroups specific thing. To be honest I find this group to be almost exclusively spam free (does ggroups filter?). Anyway filter me away if you like but then I might be tempted to fire up News Xpress 2.01 and fire off a few trolls via Prodigy ;-) |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Hmm didn't see the latest post. Lame. As always just don't feed the
troll. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
In article , John, in MN
wrote: If you change the filters for this Doug, I'll use them. I don't see any other workable options. How's that tooth doing? [G] I just changed my filters to kill anything that even references google. There will be collateral damage and I know I'll miss posts I would otherwise be interested in seeing but I don't have an alternative. Bye-bye Google Groups. -- "The thing about saying the wrong words is that A, I don't notice it, and B, sometimes orange water gibbon bucket and plastic." -- Mr. Burrows |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Doug
Miller wrote: In article , "John, in MN" wrote: If you change the filters for this Doug, I'll use them. Coming soon... (next ten minutes or so) I'm now killing any message that even includes google in the References header. Killing gnats with cruise missles, I know... -- "The thing about saying the wrong words is that A, I don't notice it, and B, sometimes orange water gibbon bucket and plastic." -- Mr. Burrows |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Balderstone wrote:
(c) Plead with everyone reading this group to IGNORE all trolls. B a r r y wrote: This works for me, but the turning discussion actually seemed like a valid topic. I'd agree with both of the above. I replied to it since it was ON-topic and a legit question. Checking all headers against a certified list of real addys makes it WAY too much like work. Any good ideas on how to get around the problem? Dave in Fairfax -- Dave Leader reply-to doesn't work use: daveldr at att dot net American Association of Woodturners http://www.woodturner.org Capital Area Woodturners http://www.capwoodturners.org/ PATINA http://www.Patinatools.org/ |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Miller wrote:
In article .ca, wrote: In article . com, damian penney wrote: Don't go filtering GoogleGroups posts. I love their interface and use it exclusively, and yes I've tried numerous other newsreaders. Personally, I think Google Groups should be under a Usenet Death Penalty until they smarten up and start taking abuse complaints seriously. I agree. I can't understand their refusal to implement even the most basic content filtering; for example, any post with the racial slur n****r in either the title or the body should be dropped, unconditionally. There is *no* context in which that word is appropriate. (a) black people often use it in discussions with other black people (b) a thread discussing, say, the psychological or sociological harm in racial epithets might very well contain discussion of that particular epithet. And their "Safe Search" filter for browsing newsgroups isn't worth much, either: it drops posts with offensive *content* but completely ignores offensive "subject* lines. -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek-at-milmac-dot-com) Get a copy of my NEW AND IMPROVED TrollFilter for NewsProxy/Nfilter by sending email to autoresponder at filterinfo-at-milmac-dot-com You must use your REAL email address to get a response. -- --John Reply to jclarke at ae tee tee global dot net (was jclarke at eye bee em dot net) |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Miller wrote:
So much garbage comes through Google Groups, that it may be necessary to do that. Of course, the filters remove those posts only for those people who are actually using the filters -- they don't actually affect the news feed. Oh, c'mon, that is completely ridiculous. That is like the ridiculous assertions that AOL is full of losers. On top of that, you make it sound like Google is doing some especially poor job, which they are not. In fact Google is one of the very few do not allow you to set any return address you want, they are actually more strict. BTW, there is nothing forged in the headers or elsehere. The troll has simply put in an email address as his username. PK |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Balderstone wrote:
With this particular troll, if you filter for "zzn" in the "from" header you will catch all their posts though not the replies from wreck members who should know better. No. He is using free e-mail accounts to create google groups accounts and then posting from them. He has already moved on to other domains. PK |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Dave Balderstone wrote:
I just changed my filters to kill anything that even references google. There will be collateral damage and I know I'll miss posts I would otherwise be interested in seeing but I don't have an alternative. Bye-bye Google Groups. Bye Dave. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 13:38:12 GMT, Doug Miller wrote:
The following threads in rec.woodworking are trolls: - Best infant formula for newborns - Is woodturning considered woodworking? For a while, I've been dropping any message crossposted to more than 3 groups. I may reduce that to "crossposted at all", because rarely do I see a legitimate message that is crossposted. Just look for a comma in the newsgroups line, as syntax. Right now, if I see 3 commas in that line, it's gone. Dave Hinz |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005 09:19:50 -0600, Dave Balderstone wrote:
In article . com, damian penney wrote: Don't go filtering GoogleGroups posts. I love their interface and use it exclusively, and yes I've tried numerous other newsreaders. Personally, I think Google Groups should be under a Usenet Death Penalty until they smarten up and start taking abuse complaints seriously. They used to be prety good about it, but I think they've fallen down on that lately. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Killing crossposts is indeed a decent way to reduce the spam.
Bye Doug |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Doug Miller wrote: I agree. I can't understand their refusal to implement even the most basic content filtering; for example, any post with the racial slur n****r in either the title or the body should be dropped, unconditionally. There is *no* context in which that word is appropriate. And their "Safe Search" filter for browsing newsgroups isn't worth much, either: it drops posts with offensive *content* but completely ignores offensive "subject* lines. It is completely appropriate for discussion of the slur itself as well as the etymology of the word. Tiis is why server-side content filters are always a bad idea. I know you mean well, but your aproach is identical to the famous AOL filter that blocked the breast-cancer survivor's mailist forcing them to temporarily change the name of the disease to 'hooter cancer' to evade the filtering. Or AOL's refusal to deliver email sent from S****horpe, England. -- FF |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
wrote in message ups.com... Doug Miller wrote: I agree. I can't understand their refusal to implement even the most basic content filtering; for example, any post with the racial slur n****r in either the title or the body should be dropped, unconditionally. There is *no* context in which that word is appropriate. And their "Safe Search" filter for browsing newsgroups isn't worth much, either: it drops posts with offensive *content* but completely ignores offensive "subject* lines. It is completely appropriate for discussion of the slur itself as well as the etymology of the word. Tiis is why server-side content filters are always a bad idea. I know you mean well, but your aproach is identical to the famous AOL filter that blocked the breast-cancer survivor's mailist forcing them to temporarily change the name of the disease to 'hooter cancer' to evade the filtering. Or AOL's refusal to deliver email sent from S****horpe, England. Amen on the "mass filter". Do a lot of research and presentation work for the teacher I volunteer with in school. I make extensive use of Google Images, but the school system, in their ultimate "wisdom" has blocked Google images because some students were finding "prurient content". I complained, was told there are "other" image sources. True, but what a PITA to use them. The kids will find the prurient content on their own anyway. -- Nahmie Those on the cutting edge bleed a lot. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|