Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
So my recent article on the Jet 18" caused me to go back and pick up FWW
170, where they reviewed 18" bandsaws. And it got me thinking - does it make any sense *at all* to rate these things on wheel size? They do a head-to-head comparison of (among others) a $1,200 Jet with a 1.5 HP motor and 10" cutting capacity against a $2,900, 5 HP, 18" capacity Laguna machine. GUESS WHICH WON? Why did they even need to write an article to figure that one out? How is it useful to even _compare_ these machines? They're obviously in completely different leagues! It's like grouping tablesaws by miter gauge width, or something... Wouldn't it make more sense to compare bandsaws by cutting capacity, since there seems to be such a wide variation in the capabilities of machines that are the same wheel size? Or am I just showing my bandsaw ignorance, here? -BAT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Laguna Bandsaws | Woodworking |