Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 454
Default Multi-joint

http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.
  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,223
Default Multi-joint

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong way :-(

--
Jeff
  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,559
Default Multi-joint

woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper
--
Make it to fit, don't make it fit.
  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,155
Default Multi-joint

On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.
  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,013
Default Multi-joint

It would be nice to have a cut sequence.
Is it computer cut only or how the joints are made.

Martin

On 8/5/2015 5:37 PM, Leon wrote:
On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.



  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 898
Default Multi-joint

On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:37:23 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.


If the glue is stronger than the wood, more surface area doesn't help.
I wouldn't think it would take anything near that much surface area
for the above to be true.
  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,155
Default Multi-joint

On 8/5/2015 7:26 PM, krw wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:37:23 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.


If the glue is stronger than the wood, more surface area doesn't help.
I wouldn't think it would take anything near that much surface area
for the above to be true.


Certainly it helps, it keeps the joint from sliding apart. Jeez!



  #8   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,155
Default Multi-joint

On 8/7/2015 9:02 AM, Leon wrote:
On 8/5/2015 7:26 PM, krw wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:37:23 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.


If the glue is stronger than the wood, more surface area doesn't help.
I wouldn't think it would take anything near that much surface area
for the above to be true.


Certainly it helps, it keeps the joint from sliding apart. Jeez!



And just to add to that. The less glue on the surface, the more the
area that does have glue has to support the rest of the joint.
Read that as a small portion of the wood surface at the glue can break
and the joint becomes loose. More glue surface and you have more more
wood working at the joint.

Which brings up the question, if you are gluing a panel edge to another
panel face do you use a drop of glue or the entire mating surface?
  #9   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 898
Default Multi-joint

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:09:10 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/7/2015 9:02 AM, Leon wrote:
On 8/5/2015 7:26 PM, krw wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:37:23 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.

If the glue is stronger than the wood, more surface area doesn't help.
I wouldn't think it would take anything near that much surface area
for the above to be true.


Certainly it helps, it keeps the joint from sliding apart. Jeez!



And just to add to that. The less glue on the surface, the more the
area that does have glue has to support the rest of the joint.
Read that as a small portion of the wood surface at the glue can break
and the joint becomes loose. More glue surface and you have more more
wood working at the joint.

Which brings up the question, if you are gluing a panel edge to another
panel face do you use a drop of glue or the entire mating surface?


I see your point but you've hogged out half of the wood, too. The
"neck" (for lack of a better word) may not be as strong as another
type of joint.
  #10   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 12,155
Default Multi-joint

On 8/7/2015 6:59 PM, krw wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:09:10 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/7/2015 9:02 AM, Leon wrote:
On 8/5/2015 7:26 PM, krw wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:37:23 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.

If the glue is stronger than the wood, more surface area doesn't help.
I wouldn't think it would take anything near that much surface area
for the above to be true.


Certainly it helps, it keeps the joint from sliding apart. Jeez!



And just to add to that. The less glue on the surface, the more the
area that does have glue has to support the rest of the joint.
Read that as a small portion of the wood surface at the glue can break
and the joint becomes loose. More glue surface and you have more more
wood working at the joint.

Which brings up the question, if you are gluing a panel edge to another
panel face do you use a drop of glue or the entire mating surface?


I see your point but you've hogged out half of the wood, too. The
"neck" (for lack of a better word) may not be as strong as another
type of joint.



That is entirely possible but the beauty to the joint is that it can be
cut the same way and used in multiple directions/orientations.
Probably totally way too much trouble but interesting.


  #11   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 898
Default Multi-joint

On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 19:41:21 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/7/2015 6:59 PM, krw wrote:
On Fri, 7 Aug 2015 09:09:10 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/7/2015 9:02 AM, Leon wrote:
On 8/5/2015 7:26 PM, krw wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 17:37:23 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote:

On 8/5/2015 4:41 PM, Puckdropper wrote:
woodchucker wrote in
:

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.

yes, pretty cool.
But it would be easy to screw up your assembly and glue it the wrong
way :-(


Why would you glue a joint like that?

Puckdropper


With all those glue surfaces it should be extremely strong.

If the glue is stronger than the wood, more surface area doesn't help.
I wouldn't think it would take anything near that much surface area
for the above to be true.


Certainly it helps, it keeps the joint from sliding apart. Jeez!



And just to add to that. The less glue on the surface, the more the
area that does have glue has to support the rest of the joint.
Read that as a small portion of the wood surface at the glue can break
and the joint becomes loose. More glue surface and you have more more
wood working at the joint.

Which brings up the question, if you are gluing a panel edge to another
panel face do you use a drop of glue or the entire mating surface?


I see your point but you've hogged out half of the wood, too. The
"neck" (for lack of a better word) may not be as strong as another
type of joint.



That is entirely possible but the beauty to the joint is that it can be
cut the same way and used in multiple directions/orientations.


Not after the glue dries! ;-)

Probably totally way too much trouble but interesting.


Sure. I'd like to see what it took to make.
  #12   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 171
Default Multi-joint

On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.



How is it cut?

All I can find is https://instagram.com/p/tQwU-_xEZa/

Claims cut with saw and plane, shows how the cuts are marked out.
  #13   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 269
Default Multi-joint

That is beautiful. I would love to see a step by step on how that is cut.

On Saturday, August 8, 2015 at 11:28:54 AM UTC-5, Larry Kraus wrote:
On 8/5/2015 4:08 PM, Michael wrote:
http://i.imgur.com/Lcn5sUV.gifv

Pretty nifty.



How is it cut?

All I can find is https://instagram.com/p/tQwU-_xEZa/

Claims cut with saw and plane, shows how the cuts are marked out.


  #14   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 2,143
Default Multi-joint

On Wed, 5 Aug 2015 13:08:21 -0700 (PDT)
Michael wrote:

Pretty nifty.


it is a beautiful joint
done by a japanese artisan

if you have the chance check out a show called artisan x designer
pronounced artisan times designer

they share a significant amount of detail about their craft








Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
T+G Joint From Wreck Discussion - Bottom Of Shelf - Middle Of Joint Line From Below.jpg (1/1) Tom Watson Woodworking Plans and Photos 0 May 26th 08 01:41 AM
T+G Joint From Wreck Discussion - Bottom Of Shelf - Middle Of Joint Line From Below.jpg (0/1) Tom Watson Woodworking Plans and Photos 0 May 26th 08 01:41 AM
T+G Joint From Wreck Discussion - Close Up Of Middle Of Joint Line - Middle Of Joint Line From Above.jpg (1/1) Tom Watson Woodworking Plans and Photos 0 May 26th 08 01:39 AM
Need help finding a "Rosette" joint (toothed, round joint) Ronnie Metalworking 12 January 23rd 05 10:12 AM
Scarf joint or butt joint your choice on crown molding? Bay Area Dave Woodworking 16 October 11th 03 05:06 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:01 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"