|
Another project
On 4/11/2014 8:52 AM, Leon wrote:
Actually they have steel string too. In fact, if you put steel strings on a classical, you'll probably break it (so I hear), because they are not made for the same amount of tension. I think you might be in a bit over your head here Bill, I certainly am, but do know you are doing a lot of guessing.:-( Take a look here, this is the brand guitar that Linda Lowe owns. Scroll down to the close up of the strings. http://artisanguitars.com/collings-o...-appointments/ I'm pretty sure that the "metallic-looking" strings on a nylon-string guitar are a nylon core with some sort of metal wound around it. They were on the one nylon-string guitar I ever owned, anyway. That metal is likely there to add mass, but it's the nylon that is the source of the tension, which I believe is lower than that of steel strings. --- This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active. http://www.avast.com |
Another project
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:52:13 -0500, Leon wrote:
There are alot of different guitar playing styles. Amen to that! http://www.youtube.com/embed/Ddn4MGaS3N4 http://www.youtube.com/embed/b1GZC0GQKOA http://www.youtube.com/embed/ORMsYWJ6fLI http://www.youtube.com/embed/QcanWkRbnwQ http://www.youtube.com/embed/rV6SmY04WdE |
Another project completed and set up
Swingman wrote:
On 4/11/2014 10:03 AM, -MIKE- wrote: On 4/11/14, 8:15 AM, Swingman wrote: Mostly a bass player by trade, playing both upright and electric bass ... I do love tickling your wives and girlfriend's bottom ends, and making them move. ;) Bass players are always such pervs. :-p Bofus have to be ... drummers and bass players only get to see the chick singers from behind. Consider yerself lucky. Us guitar players get to see what they look like when their false teeth fall out, their fake eye lashes come un-glued, and god-forbid, when they pull their damned shirts up... -- -Mike- |
Another project completed and set up
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 10:03:44 -0500, -MIKE-
wrote: On 4/11/14, 8:15 AM, Swingman wrote: Mostly a bass player by trade, playing both upright and electric bass ... I do love tickling your wives and girlfriend's bottom ends, and making them move. ;) Bass players are always such pervs. :-p I work for one. You're right. ;-) |
Another project
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:09:34 +0000, Spalted Walt
wrote: On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:52:13 -0500, Leon wrote: There are alot of different guitar playing styles. Amen to that! Here's a nylon and steel string playing together. The nylon string guitar takes the lead starting at 2:28 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTFh0OYh-cI |
Another project
Leon wrote:
Bill wrote: IIRC some of the chords require a thumb to wrap around and press the string/strings. To many, using the thumb that way is considered poor technique. So, it's absolutely not required. Strings on an electric guitar are probably easiest to push down. Classical guitar strings may require less force to hold them down, I'm not sure; I know they are strung under much less tension. Ummm how do you tune the guitar correctly if under less tension? Do you actually play a guitar? Classical guitars have nylon strings, thus lower tension. Actually they have steel string too. In fact, if you put steel strings on a classical, you'll probably break it (so I hear), because they are not made for the same amount of tension. I think you might be in a bit over your head here Bill, I certainly am, but do know you are doing a lot of guessing. :-( I don't think I am doing so much guessing as you might think. I am not sure what you want me to see at your link below. There are several types of guitar strings. Even many several sizes within a particular type, and a dozen different labels and alloys, I suppose. I found this online (in several places) to corroborate what I was saying: A typical set of regular-gauge steel acoustic guitar strings puts 179 lbs (81.3kg) of tension on a guitar. A typical set of nylon strings puts 83.6 lbs (37.9kg) of tension on a guitar. -- So steel strings put much more tension on a guitar. Did I claim anything more? A classical guitar and a steel string guitar are two different instruments. And to a classical player, holding strings down with the thumb is considered poor technique (it impairs the reach of your fingers)--look it up, or ask Swingman. Bill Take a look here, this is the brand guitar that Linda Lowe owns. Scroll down to the close up of the strings. http://artisanguitars.com/collings-o...-appointments/ Regardless, Most of what I build I never use, I would not have a problem with building a guitar and not using it.. I would have a problem with building something that resembled a guitar and sounded terrible. I highly suspect that knowing how to play a guitar would be instrumental in building one that might be at least a cut above average. |
Another project
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 18:23:28 -0500, Gray_Wolf
wrote: On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:09:34 +0000, Spalted Walt wrote: On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 07:52:13 -0500, Leon wrote: There are alot of different guitar playing styles. Amen to that! Here's a nylon and steel string playing together. The nylon string guitar takes the lead starting at 2:28 Here's a newer version played on two nylon string guitars. Al Di Meola has traditionally played a steel string guitar but is playing a nylon string using a flat pick on this. I like it better. I think the steel string guitar's sustain can turn some things into a roaring mess. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v35YhhzCrYk |
Another project completed and set up
Kevin Miller wrote:
On 04/10/2014 07:48 PM, Leon wrote: Ummm how do you tune the guitar correctly if under less tension? Do you actually play a guitar? Some years back, Richy Furey did a concert here. He tuned his guitar a half step low (maybe to match his vocal range?), and would just capo up if he needed to. One can also, of course, use light gauge strings instead of medium or heavy gauge... For my own entertainment, I use light strings and I don't bring my strings all the way up to pitch, so I can bend them easier (that would be a problem playing as part of a group). As everyone here knows, putting your fingers in the right place at the right time is one thing, but sounding good is all about the nuances that no one can see. And even the player making those nuances is making half of them subconsciously. I pulled out my guitar in December and tried to play a song I hadn't played in a numbers of years ("Windy & Warm", one of my few strongest pieces). And though I had totally forgotten it, my fingers slowly remembered it with an hour and a half of coaxing (which included listening to the recording). Especially the next day. I subscribed to "Finger Style Guitar" magazine for a couple of years. And maybe I was able to eek one piece from every-other issue. "As a friend says, it's not how good you are, it's how much you like it." Just like woodworking, huh? Just like a lot of things. Sex, for instance.. ; ) Bill ...Kevin |
Another project
Gray_Wolf wrote:
Here's a nylon and steel string playing together. The nylon string guitar takes the lead starting at 2:28 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTFh0OYh-cI With regard to a comment made earlier, observe (if desired) that the player playing the nylon stringed guitar "did not fret a single note with his thumb" the whole time! |
Another project completed and set up
On 4/11/14, 1:10 PM, Swingman wrote:
On 4/11/2014 10:03 AM, -MIKE- wrote: On 4/11/14, 8:15 AM, Swingman wrote: Mostly a bass player by trade, playing both upright and electric bass ... I do love tickling your wives and girlfriend's bottom ends, and making them move. ;) Bass players are always such pervs. :-p Bofus have to be ... drummers and bass players only get to see the chick singers from behind. You saw the pics from that last chick group I played for, right? :-D -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
Another project
On 4/11/2014 6:23 PM, Bill wrote:
Leon wrote: Bill wrote: IIRC some of the chords require a thumb to wrap around and press the string/strings. To many, using the thumb that way is considered poor technique. So, it's absolutely not required. Strings on an electric guitar are probably easiest to push down. Classical guitar strings may require less force to hold them down, I'm not sure; I know they are strung under much less tension. Ummm how do you tune the guitar correctly if under less tension? Do you actually play a guitar? Classical guitars have nylon strings, thus lower tension. Actually they have steel string too. In fact, if you put steel strings on a classical, you'll probably break it (so I hear), because they are not made for the same amount of tension. I think you might be in a bit over your head here Bill, I certainly am, but do know you are doing a lot of guessing. :-( I don't think I am doing so much guessing as you might think. I am not sure what you want me to see at your link below. There are several types of guitar strings. Even many several sizes within a particular type, and a dozen different labels and alloys, I suppose. I found this online (in several places) to corroborate what I was saying: A typical set of regular-gauge steel acoustic guitar strings puts 179 lbs (81.3kg) of tension on a guitar. A typical set of nylon strings puts 83.6 lbs (37.9kg) of tension on a guitar. -- So steel strings put much more tension on a guitar. Did I claim anything more? A classical guitar and a steel string guitar are two different instruments. And to a classical player, holding strings down with the thumb is considered poor technique (it impairs the reach of your fingers)--look it up, or ask Swingman. I was simply pointing out that there are/can be steel strings on a standard/non electric guitar. The link I provided plus the mention to scroll down to the picture showing the steel strings on the classical guitar was to show you that this is true. You said, Classical guitars have nylon strings, thus lower tension. In fact, if you put steel strings on a classical, you'll probably break it (so I hear). I really don't care one way or another. I am absolutely not interested in playing or building a guitar. I am not an expert, not even close to very knowledgeable about a guitar. So when you referred that classical guitars have nylon, not steel strings, it seemed to me that you were guessing. |
Another project completed and set up
On 4/11/2014 2:38 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Swingman wrote: BTW, Mike Marlow is a good guitar player and songwriter, if you didn't know that. Geezus - thanks Karl! I consider myself something of a hack - sort of a mediocre kind of thing. I like playing and writing, but never expected anyone to call what I do "good". Now I need to get down to Houston - gotta go where my freakin' fans are... Hey, if Karl says you are good, you are good! Every one is good at something. ;~) |
Another project
On 4/11/2014 11:31 PM, Leon wrote:
On 4/11/2014 6:23 PM, Bill wrote: Leon wrote: Bill wrote: IIRC some of the chords require a thumb to wrap around and press the string/strings. To many, using the thumb that way is considered poor technique. So, it's absolutely not required. Strings on an electric guitar are probably easiest to push down. Classical guitar strings may require less force to hold them down, I'm not sure; I know they are strung under much less tension. Ummm how do you tune the guitar correctly if under less tension? Do you actually play a guitar? Classical guitars have nylon strings, thus lower tension. Actually they have steel string too. In fact, if you put steel strings on a classical, you'll probably break it (so I hear), because they are not made for the same amount of tension. I think you might be in a bit over your head here Bill, I certainly am, but do know you are doing a lot of guessing. :-( I don't think I am doing so much guessing as you might think. I am not sure what you want me to see at your link below. There are several types of guitar strings. Even many several sizes within a particular type, and a dozen different labels and alloys, I suppose. I found this online (in several places) to corroborate what I was saying: A typical set of regular-gauge steel acoustic guitar strings puts 179 lbs (81.3kg) of tension on a guitar. A typical set of nylon strings puts 83.6 lbs (37.9kg) of tension on a guitar. -- So steel strings put much more tension on a guitar. Did I claim anything more? A classical guitar and a steel string guitar are two different instruments. And to a classical player, holding strings down with the thumb is considered poor technique (it impairs the reach of your fingers)--look it up, or ask Swingman. I was simply pointing out that there are/can be steel strings on a standard/non electric guitar. The link I provided plus the mention to scroll down to the picture showing the steel strings on the classical guitar was to show you that this is true. You said, Classical guitars have nylon strings, thus lower tension. In fact, if you put steel strings on a classical, you'll probably break it (so I hear). I really don't care one way or another. I am absolutely not interested in playing or building a guitar. I am not an expert, not even close to very knowledgeable about a guitar. So when you referred that classical guitars have nylon, not steel strings, it seemed to me that you were guessing. And just as a last comment, the link below points to a randomly picked set of strings for an acoustical guitar. This particular set has no non-metallic strings. http://www.guitarcenter.com/Ernie-Ba...61-i1447197.gc |
Another project
Bill wrote:
Leon wrote: Bill wrote: IIRC some of the chords require a thumb to wrap around and press the string/strings. To many, using the thumb that way is considered poor technique. So, it's absolutely not required. Strings on an electric guitar are probably easiest to push down. Classical guitar strings may require less force to hold them down, I'm not sure; I know they are strung under much less tension. Ummm how do you tune the guitar correctly if under less tension? Do you actually play a guitar? Classical guitars have nylon strings, thus lower tension. Actually they have steel string too. In fact, if you put steel strings on a classical, you'll probably break it (so I hear), because they are not made for the same amount of tension. I think you might be in a bit over your head here Bill, I certainly am, but do know you are doing a lot of guessing. :-( I don't think I am doing so much guessing as you might think. I am not sure what you want me to see at your link below. There are several types of guitar strings. Even many several sizes within a particular type, and a dozen different labels and alloys, I suppose. I found this online (in several places) to corroborate what I was saying: A typical set of regular-gauge steel acoustic guitar strings puts 179 lbs (81.3kg) of tension on a guitar. A typical set of nylon strings puts 83.6 lbs (37.9kg) of tension on a guitar. -- So steel strings put much more tension on a guitar. Did I claim anything more? A classical guitar and a steel string guitar are two different instruments. And to a classical player, holding strings down with the thumb is considered poor technique (it impairs the reach of your fingers)--look it up, or ask Swingman. Bill Take a look here, this is the brand guitar that Linda Lowe owns. Scroll down to the close up of the strings. http://artisanguitars.com/collings-o...-appointments/ Regardless, Most of what I build I never use, I would not have a problem with building a guitar and not using it.. I would have a problem with building something that resembled a guitar and sounded terrible. I highly suspect that knowing how to play a guitar would be instrumental in building one that might be at least a cut above average. Ok, a bit or research has revealed to me that an acoustical guitar is not necessarily a classic or steel string guitar. Knowing little about either as previously stated I assumed that a traditional looking, non electric guitar, was both classical and acoustical. I assumed that both came in both nylon and steel string varieties. I now stand corrected.. |
Another project
Leon wrote:
Bill wrote: Ok, a bit or research has revealed to me that an acoustical guitar is not necessarily a classic or steel string guitar. Knowing little about either as previously stated I assumed that a traditional looking, non electric guitar, was both classical and acoustical. I assumed that both came in both nylon and steel string varieties. I now stand corrected.. Thanks Leon. The only thing I'll add is that since they can be built lighter, the price of a starter "classical" nylon string guitar can be less than its corresponding one with steel strings. It just depends what you want. I bought a new electric guitar and amp and never really warmed up to it at all. I didn't find it "relaxing" to play to me like acoustic. If you want to try "Amazing Grace", and "Country Roads (John Denver)", you can be up and running pretty fast. Anyway, that's what I started with. Bill |
Another project
On 4/12/2014 10:44 AM, Bill wrote:
Leon wrote: Bill wrote: Ok, a bit or research has revealed to me that an acoustical guitar is not necessarily a classic or steel string guitar. Knowing little about either as previously stated I assumed that a traditional looking, non electric guitar, was both classical and acoustical. I assumed that both came in both nylon and steel string varieties. I now stand corrected.. Thanks Leon. The only thing I'll add is that since they can be built lighter, the price of a starter "classical" nylon string guitar can be less than its corresponding one with steel strings. It just depends what you want. I bought a new electric guitar and amp and never really warmed up to it at all. I didn't find it "relaxing" to play to me like acoustic. If you want to try "Amazing Grace", and "Country Roads (John Denver)", you can be up and running pretty fast. Anyway, that's what I started with. Bill I think I would be more inclined with Def Leopard or Twisted Sister style music. :~0 OMG! |
Another project completed and set up
On Monday, April 7, 2014 5:11:39 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
3 weeks after buying the materials for the sewing desk it is complete and ready for my wife to clutter up. ;~) The only thing real fancy is the joinery, which you cannot see, and the soft close 24" full extension soft close drawer slides. The desk top is approximately 97" x 30" total. Because of the shorter 8' ceilings and hair pin turn at the top of the stairs I felt it best to make the top into two sections, split in half front to back. The gap is hardly noticeable. Two draw latches on the bottom and 5 Domino tenons, on the mating edges of the tops hold the halves together and in registration to each other. The front and back apron/bridges are attached to the end cabinets with 5/16" bolts threaded into eight threaded inserts on the sides of both cabinets. Empty https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/13703016725/ Left View with $5k worth of sewing machines, The one on the left is simply a HD Viking Husqvarna sewing machine and the one on the right is a Husqvarna Topaz embroidery machine. https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ Right View https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Thanks. |
Another project completed and set up
On 4/12/2014 4:56 PM, Michael wrote:
Right View https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Thanks. Thank you. Poplar for the solid wood and paint grade maple plywood for the panels. Baltic birch for the drawers. Green Paint. ;~) Sherwin Williams Pro Classic Oil based on top of the same brand primer, presanded before primer and after primer then the top coat. Wooster 4" sash brush for cutting in and for drawer fronts. 4" foam roller for the wide panels. http://www.sherwin-williams.com/home...oatings/paint/ and http://www.sherwin-williams.com/home...tings/primers/ |
Another project completed and set up
On 4/12/2014 6:01 PM, Leon wrote:
On 4/12/2014 4:56 PM, Michael wrote: Right View https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Thanks. Thank you. Poplar for the solid wood and paint grade maple plywood for the panels. Baltic birch for the drawers. Green Paint. ;~) Sherwin Williams Pro Classic Oil based on top of the same brand primer, presanded before primer and after primer then the top coat. Wooster 4" sash brush for cutting in and for drawer fronts. 4" foam roller for the wide panels. http://www.sherwin-williams.com/home...oatings/paint/ and http://www.sherwin-williams.com/home...tings/primers/ Make that a 3" sash brush. |
Another project completed and set up
On 4/12/2014 6:15 PM, Mike Marlow wrote:
Michael wrote: Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Leon always uses OSB with a skim coat of Tightbond II mixed with sawdust for a filler. He follows that up with nothing less than Home Depot's best latex paint - rolled on, of course. LOL, I was just thinking of announcing phase III of the sewing room, the wall cabinets. OSB of course. |
Another project completed and set up
Michael wrote:
Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Leon always uses OSB with a skim coat of Tightbond II mixed with sawdust for a filler. He follows that up with nothing less than Home Depot's best latex paint - rolled on, of course. -- -Mike- |
Another project completed and set up
Leon wrote:
On 4/12/2014 6:15 PM, Mike Marlow wrote: Michael wrote: Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Leon always uses OSB with a skim coat of Tightbond II mixed with sawdust for a filler. He follows that up with nothing less than Home Depot's best latex paint - rolled on, of course. LOL, I was just thinking of announcing phase III of the sewing room, the wall cabinets. OSB of course. And of course, you're planning on covering over that ugly sheetrock with a durable OSB, filled and flattened as well - right? -- -Mike- |
Another project completed and set up
On 4/12/14, 6:01 PM, Leon wrote:
On 4/12/2014 4:56 PM, Michael wrote: Right View https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Thanks. Thank you. Poplar for the solid wood and paint grade maple plywood for the panels. Baltic birch for the drawers. Green Paint. ;~) Sherwin Williams Pro Classic Oil based on top of the same brand primer, presanded before primer and after primer then the top coat. Wooster 4" sash brush for cutting in and for drawer fronts. 4" foam roller for the wide panels. http://www.sherwin-williams.com/home...oatings/paint/ That's what I use on built-ins. Probably from your recommendation at one time. :-) -- -MIKE- "Playing is not something I do at night, it's my function in life" --Elvin Jones (1927-2004) -- http://mikedrums.com ---remove "DOT" ^^^^ to reply |
Another project completed and set up
On Saturday, April 12, 2014 6:01:56 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
On 4/12/2014 4:56 PM, Michael wrote: Right View https://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb112...n/photostream/ Looks terrific! What kind of wood did you use and what was your finishing technique to get that great consistent look? Thanks. Thank you. Poplar for the solid wood and paint grade maple plywood for the panels. Baltic birch for the drawers. Green Paint. ;~) Sherwin Williams Pro Classic Oil based on top of the same brand primer, presanded before primer and after primer then the top coat. Wooster 4" sash brush for cutting in and for drawer fronts. 4" foam roller for the wide panels. http://www.sherwin-williams.com/home...oatings/paint/ and http://www.sherwin-williams.com/home...tings/primers/ Thanks, Leon! I'll give it a try. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:21 PM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter