Staining
When staining wood, how many coats are normal? Do some stain and nothing
more or do some lacquer over it? I understand it will probably depend on several variables such as stain color, stain type, sanding prep (final grit) and wood but is there a general rule for staining? I'm encountering an slight concern after staining cedar with two coats though I'm uncertain if it's normal. When viewing the wood directly, it looks fine. When I lay it down and view it with light reflection, I can see some shiny spots and dull spots, which I simply think it's just the way the stain absorbed into the wood based on it's texture/grain. I'm trying to determine if I should add another coat or lacquer over it and be done. What say the experts? Thank you |
Staining
On 12/31/2013 8:58 AM, Meanie wrote:
When staining wood, how many coats are normal? Do some stain and nothing more or do some lacquer over it? I understand it will probably depend on several variables such as stain color, stain type, sanding prep (final grit) and wood but is there a general rule for staining? I'm encountering an slight concern after staining cedar with two coats though I'm uncertain if it's normal. When viewing the wood directly, it looks fine. When I lay it down and view it with light reflection, I can see some shiny spots and dull spots, which I simply think it's just the way the stain absorbed into the wood based on it's texture/grain. I'm trying to determine if I should add another coat or lacquer over it and be done. What say the experts? Thank you To date there are 1,233,367 correct answers and as many incorrect answers. The most common of stains require one coat and multiple coats of clear to protect the finish. Some stains have a finish built in. That sounds like what you might be using. Minwax by any chance? The trouble with a built in finish/varnish is that you are essentially staining wood and then staining varnish with each successive coat. The trouble also is that while you might not want to go any darker with successive coats the surface may not be properly protected, this is often visible by the appearance of shinny and dull spots. For best results, read the directions on the can. If you don't like the results, try another brand. Not all stains and varnishes are created equal and you absolutely will get different results. A few rules to consider. 1. Don't scrimp on the finish. The quality of the stain/finish can make a great looking project look terrible. This is no time to start trying to save a few dollars. 2. Don't try a, new to you, product on your project piece, always practice on scraps of the same wood. It is much better to change brands before apply to your project if you don't like the results. |
Staining
On 12/31/2013 9:58 AM, Meanie wrote:
When staining wood, how many coats are normal? Do some stain and nothing more or do some lacquer over it? I understand it will probably depend on several variables such as stain color, stain type, sanding prep (final grit) and wood but is there a general rule for staining? I'm encountering an slight concern after staining cedar with two coats though I'm uncertain if it's normal. When viewing the wood directly, it looks fine. When I lay it down and view it with light reflection, I can see some shiny spots and dull spots, which I simply think it's just the way the stain absorbed into the wood based on it's texture/grain. I'm trying to determine if I should add another coat or lacquer over it and be done. What say the experts? Thank you Appearance is subjective. Normally, one coat is right, but some woods don't absorb the stain evenly. In that case, you either like the blotch or you use a pre-stain (mineral spirits will do) to help even it out. I think you are right about the shiny versus dull spots. If you like the overall appearance, let it dry and top coat it. If you don't like it, go back and wipe some stain on the lighter parts. There are entire books dedicated to finishing written by people far more knowledgeable than me. You may want to check them out at some point. |
Staining
"Meanie" wrote in message
When staining wood, how many coats are normal? Do some stain and nothing more or do some lacquer over it? I understand it will probably depend on several variables such as stain color, stain type, sanding prep (final grit) and wood but is there a general rule for staining? I'm encountering an slight concern after staining cedar with two coats though I'm uncertain if it's normal. When viewing the wood directly, it looks fine. When I lay it down and view it with light reflection, I can see some shiny spots and dull spots, which I simply think it's just the way the stain absorbed into the wood based on it's texture/grain. I'm trying to determine if I should add another coat or lacquer over it and be done. What say the experts? Stain isn't a finish. Its purpose is to color the wood before applying a finish. When top coating stained wood with lacquer, be sure the stain is completely dry else the lacquer may mess up the stain. -- dadiOH ____________________________ Winters getting colder? Tired of the rat race? Taxes out of hand? Maybe just ready for a change? Check it out... http://www.floridaloghouse.net |
Staining
On 12/31/2013 10:42 AM, Leon wrote:
To date there are 1,233,367 correct answers and as many incorrect answers. The most common of stains require one coat and multiple coats of clear to protect the finish. Some stains have a finish built in. That sounds like what you might be using. Minwax by any chance? Oh oh, you're on to me. Any brand recommendation? The trouble with a built in finish/varnish is that you are essentially staining wood and then staining varnish with each successive coat. The trouble also is that while you might not want to go any darker with successive coats the surface may not be properly protected, this is often visible by the appearance of shinny and dull spots. For best results, read the directions on the can. If you don't like the results, try another brand. Not all stains and varnishes are created equal and you absolutely will get different results. A few rules to consider. 1. Don't scrimp on the finish. The quality of the stain/finish can make a great looking project look terrible. This is no time to start trying to save a few dollars. I don't have a problem paying for a good product. I just need to learn what they are. 2. Don't try a, new to you, product on your project piece, always practice on scraps of the same wood. It is much better to change brands before apply to your project if you don't like the results. On scraps of the same wood, it looks good, but with a small piece, it's difficult to grasp the color as a whole or to discover the shiny and dull mixtures. I understand I'll need to practice with varying techniques and products, I'm hoping some tips would help me avoid minor catastrophes. Thanks |
Staining
Meanie wrote:
On 12/31/2013 10:42 AM, Leon wrote: To date there are 1,233,367 correct answers and as many incorrect answers. The most common of stains require one coat and multiple coats of clear to protect the finish. Some stains have a finish built in. That sounds like what you might be using. Minwax by any chance? Oh oh, you're on to me. Any brand recommendation? The trouble with a built in finish/varnish is that you are essentially staining wood and then staining varnish with each successive coat. The trouble also is that while you might not want to go any darker with successive coats the surface may not be properly protected, this is often visible by the appearance of shinny and dull spots. For best results, read the directions on the can. If you don't like the results, try another brand. Not all stains and varnishes are created equal and you absolutely will get different results. A few rules to consider. 1. Don't scrimp on the finish. The quality of the stain/finish can make a great looking project look terrible. This is no time to start trying to save a few dollars. I don't have a problem paying for a good product. I just need to learn what they are. 2. Don't try a, new to you, product on your project piece, always practice on scraps of the same wood. It is much better to change brands before apply to your project if you don't like the results. On scraps of the same wood, it looks good, but with a small piece, it's difficult to grasp the color as a whole or to discover the shiny and dull mixtures. You just need "bigger" small pieces! I bought Jeff Jewitt's book on finishing based upon it's excellent reputation (you might like it?) and opportune pricing, but haven't really started it. It's great to learn a bit about finishing/woodworking here today. It appears many are away from their computers this week. Cheers, Bill I understand I'll need to practice with varying techniques and products, I'm hoping some tips would help me avoid minor catastrophes. Thanks |
Staining
In article , Meanie
wrote: When staining wood, how many coats are normal? Do some stain and nothing more or do some lacquer over it? I understand it will probably depend on several variables such as stain color, stain type, sanding prep (final grit) and wood but is there a general rule for staining? I'm encountering an slight concern after staining cedar with two coats though I'm uncertain if it's normal. When viewing the wood directly, it looks fine. When I lay it down and view it with light reflection, I can see some shiny spots and dull spots, which I simply think it's just the way the stain absorbed into the wood based on it's texture/grain. I'm trying to determine if I should add another coat or lacquer over it and be done. What say the experts? When I stain, I usually use General Finishes' water-based stains, then finish with spraying a topcoat of their pre-cat poly. I apply the stain by hand, with as many coats as needed to get the color I want. Typically 2 or 3, but as many as 5 or 6. However, there is no finish in the stain... |
Staining
On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 9:42:28 AM UTC-6, Leon wrote:
Meanie wrote: .... is there a general rule for staining? LOL (laughing with/at Leon's answer). How about let's just concentrate on the issue you are now having. When viewing the wood directly, it looks fine. When I lay it down and view it with light reflection, I can see some shiny spots and dull spots, which I simply think it's just the way the stain absorbed into the wood based on it's texture/grain. For best results, read the directions on the can. If you don't like the results, try another brand. Not all stains and varnishes are created equal and you absolutely will get different results. Stain, not a dye: Some/most instructions state to wipe off the excess. We may comprehend "wiping" differently. Often times, I wipe and rub hard, to absolutely get all the obvious wetness off the surface. Even very little or slight wetness/"puddling" (thicker in some spots, because of non-uniform wiping off of the excess) can result in the results you describe, hence, one cause of those results. For our better understanding, what stain did you use, what was your application technique, and what type of wood? Sonny |
Staining
On 12/31/2013 6:37 PM, Meanie wrote:
On 12/31/2013 10:42 AM, Leon wrote: To date there are 1,233,367 correct answers and as many incorrect answers. The most common of stains require one coat and multiple coats of clear to protect the finish. Some stains have a finish built in. That sounds like what you might be using. Minwax by any chance? Oh oh, you're on to me. Any brand recommendation? Well from me, anything but Minwax. I have never had any good experiences with it. Now that I have said that, others have had stellar results with the product. It may be that I expect much more from a product. Brand recommendations and top on my list is Old Masters gel varnish. I understand that their gel varnishes are top shelf however I have not yet used their stains yet. Next down on my list is General Finishes. I have used their stains for many years and recently have been using their water based dyes. FWIW I would advise going with oil based over water based any time you have the choice. With any gel stain or varnish, read the directions. But specifically with Old Masters gel "varnishes" apply one to two square feet at a time and IMMEDIATELY wipe that area down with a new clean lent free cloth to remove the excess, you might use 2~3 of the initial wiping clothes during an application. I wipe quickly enough that I get away using Scott Blue shop paper towels. Now this is key, after wiping the excess off, wipe it again lightly with a different clean cloth. 2~3 coats will normally be necessary to get an even sheen. Alternatively if you want to build a heavier thicker coat more quickly, I use General Finishes Arm-R-Seal oil based varnish. I apply the first coat with a rag as indicated on the directions. I apply the second coat with, now this is key, A "Wooster" brand foam brush. DO NOT USE a cheap inexpensive foam brush!. I find these Wooster brand brushes at Home Depot. http://www.homedepot.com/p/Wooster-2...0020/204302391 I buy General Finishes at my local Woodcraft and Rockler stores. I buy Old Masters gel varnish by the case from my local paint Store. The trouble with a built in finish/varnish is that you are essentially staining wood and then staining varnish with each successive coat. The trouble also is that while you might not want to go any darker with successive coats the surface may not be properly protected, this is often visible by the appearance of shinny and dull spots. For best results, read the directions on the can. If you don't like the results, try another brand. Not all stains and varnishes are created equal and you absolutely will get different results. A few rules to consider. 1. Don't scrimp on the finish. The quality of the stain/finish can make a great looking project look terrible. This is no time to start trying to save a few dollars. I don't have a problem paying for a good product. I just need to learn what they are. 2. Don't try a, new to you, product on your project piece, always practice on scraps of the same wood. It is much better to change brands before apply to your project if you don't like the results. On scraps of the same wood, it looks good, but with a small piece, it's difficult to grasp the color as a whole or to discover the shiny and dull mixtures. ;~) Use a bigger scrap. Shiny and dull is part of the process of applying a clear finish. With a stain mixed in the finish tends to get darker as you apply more coats. I understand I'll need to practice with varying techniques and products, I'm hoping some tips would help me avoid minor catastrophes. Thanks Gel Finishes tend to be extremely easy to use providing you IMMEDIATELY remove the excess as indicated in the directions. Typically you do not need to sand between coats. |
Staining
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:36:35 -0600, Leon wrote:
Gel Finishes tend to be extremely easy to use providing you IMMEDIATELY remove the excess as indicated in the directions. Typically you do not need to sand between coats. One of the advantages claimed for gel finishes is that they blotch less. I tried out one of the General ones shortly after they came out. A good finish, but it blotched just as much as the liquid ones. I still like a dye followed by a clear coat (usually Tried&True) or a dye mixed in with dewaxed shellac (SealCoat). -- This message was for rec.woodworking - if it appears in homeownershub they ripped it off. |
Staining
On 1/1/2014 12:45 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:36:35 -0600, Leon wrote: Gel Finishes tend to be extremely easy to use providing you IMMEDIATELY remove the excess as indicated in the directions. Typically you do not need to sand between coats. One of the advantages claimed for gel finishes is that they blotch less. I tried out one of the General ones shortly after they came out. A good finish, but it blotched just as much as the liquid ones. I still like a dye followed by a clear coat (usually Tried&True) or a dye mixed in with dewaxed shellac (SealCoat). I started appreciating the gel when I had to do my slider replacement. The wood is yellow pine. I do have splotching, but it's a minimum, and looks quite acceptable since it didn't run rampant. I blame myself for rubbing it in. I have since started using it in other finishing projects, and can say it works well. -- Jeff |
Staining
On 1/1/2014 11:45 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:36:35 -0600, Leon wrote: Gel Finishes tend to be extremely easy to use providing you IMMEDIATELY remove the excess as indicated in the directions. Typically you do not need to sand between coats. One of the advantages claimed for gel finishes is that they blotch less. I tried out one of the General ones shortly after they came out. A good finish, but it blotched just as much as the liquid ones. I still like a dye followed by a clear coat (usually Tried&True) or a dye mixed in with dewaxed shellac (SealCoat). I have never been a fan of General Finishes "Gel Anything" I have not used the General Finishes gel stains, only their gel varnish, and it was pretty sad IMHO. My past favorites were Bartelys, Lawrence McFadden, and Verathane gel stains. Lately I have not been staining unless absolutely necessary and IIRC have only used General Finishes Dye stain Which got the job done but I was not impressed with the way it raised the grain. I prefer the General Finishes liquid oil stains and finishes. |
Staining
When staining wood, how many coats are normal? Do some stain and
nothing more or do some lacquer over it? I understand it will probably depend on several variables such as stain color, stain type, sanding prep (final grit) and wood but is there a general rule for staining? I'm encountering an slight concern after staining cedar with two coats though I'm uncertain if it's normal. I've built several projects with cedar and usually just put an oil based poly on the bare wood. I think cedar looks great with no stain. However, most of the projects I build are made with pine or poplar that I get from the home center. Stain is a necessity with these, but they're also very prone to splotching. I'm sure everyone has their own favorite brands and techniques, but here's mine: 1. Sand the bare wood to 150 or 180 grit. I've tried sanding to finer grits, but didn't see any signficant difference in the final product. Then use a shop vac with a dust brush attachment to remove all dust. 2. Apply a "pre-conditioner" to the wood. I use the regular Min-Wax version you can find at any home center. The preconditioner helps seal the wood and really helps reduce blotching with soft woods like pine and poplar. There's nothing finicky about this step, I just grab a paper towel and wipe it on. If there's any excess, I wipe it off with a paper towel. 3. Apply the stain within an hour or two of applying the conditioner. Gel-stains blotch less than oil stains, but I've used both with good results. I like the General Finishes gel stains, but they can be a bit pricey. Ordinary Min-Wax oil stains work OK too. I like to use stain applicators that you can find in the paint section at the home center. Basically it's a sponge covered with a soft cloth. I find it helps even out the stain application. Oh, and I always wear blue nitrile gloves when staining so I don't end up with stained fingers. :) 4. Let the stain dry over night, then apply your first coat of polyurethane. I've been using General Finishes oil based polyurethanes recently, but can't say the results have been significantly different than the Min-Wax versions. 5. Let the first coat of poly dry overnight, then sand lightly with 220 grit. Don't get crazy and sand through to the stain, you're just trying to knock off all the little dust nibs that settle in the finish. The clear finish will usually look dull and white after sanding. Then use the shop vac brush to clean up any dust on the surface. 6. Apply a second coat of poly. Let it dry overnight, then lightly sand with 220 grit again. Shop vac the dust again. 7. Apply a third coat of poly. Let it dry overnight before handling. I normally use oil based polyurethanes. However, they have a strong odor and dry slowly (more dust gets trapped in the finish). Sometimes the oil based poly tends to act as a solvent and picks up some of the stain. Also, projects that I have finished with oil based poly can have a strong smell for a couple weeks. This is more noticeable with projects that are closed up like drawers and cabinets. I am currently trying the water based Min-Wax brand polyurethane, over the General Finish gel stain. So far I've been rather impressed. It brushes on nicely, has virtually no odor, and dries quickly. I didn't notice any of the stain being pulled up like the oil based poly does, and there's practically no dust nibs in the finish since it dries so fast. Otherwise, I'm using the same three coat method I normally use. The water based poly is more "clear" than the slight amber color of the oil based poly. This isn't much of an issue on stained wood, but could be a factor if applied to bare wood. I don't have enough experience with the water based poly to know how it will hold up long term. By the way, avoid those stain and poly in one mixes. I had horrible results with those. They go on streaky and additional coats just make it look worse. Anthony Watson www.watsondiy.com www.mountainsoftware.com |
Staining
On 1/1/2014 9:45 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:36:35 -0600, Leon wrote: Gel Finishes tend to be extremely easy to use providing you IMMEDIATELY remove the excess as indicated in the directions. Typically you do not need to sand between coats. One of the advantages claimed for gel finishes is that they blotch less. I tried out one of the General ones shortly after they came out. A good finish, but it blotched just as much as the liquid ones. I still like a dye followed by a clear coat (usually Tried&True) or a dye mixed in with dewaxed shellac (SealCoat). +1 for the dewaxed shellac and dye. Personally I have used SealCoat and TransTint with decent effect. Rigorous testing is a must. Take notes. Label everything. Buy a decent eyedropper to make matching colors from one batch to the next a bit more likely. You can then add protective coatings (or not) to taste and the environment the piece will live in. Have fun. mahalo, jo4hn |
Staining
On Thu, 02 Jan 2014 06:45:58 -0800, jo4hn wrote:
Label everything. Buy a decent eyedropper to make matching colors from one batch to the next a bit more likely. Amen! -- This message was for rec.woodworking - if it appears in homeownershub they ripped it off. |
Staining
On Thursday, January 2, 2014 8:30:31 AM UTC-6, HerHusband wrote:
5. Let the first coat of poly dry overnight, then sand lightly with 220 grit. Don't get crazy and sand through to the stain, you're just trying to knock off all the little dust nibs that settle in the finish. The clear finish will usually look dull and white after sanding. Then use the shop vac brush to clean up any dust on the surface. At this point you should advise those that are seeking advice to read the directions on their specific brand of poly for its application. Generic instructions won't serve well for all brands of poly. Some have recoat times of 12 hours, some 8, and some are as little as 2 to 4. Failure to follow the specific instructions of the manufacturer can lead to lack of adhesion, witness lines and a list of other problems. 6. Apply a second coat of poly. Let it dry overnight, then lightly sand with 220 grit again. Shop vac the dust again. See above for recoat times. 7. Apply a third coat of poly. Let it dry overnight before handling. See above for application timing. I normally use oil based polyurethanes. However, they have a strong odor and dry slowly (more dust gets trapped in the finish). Sometimes the oil based poly tends to act as a solvent and picks up some of the stain. Also, projects that I have finished with oil based poly can have a strong smell for a couple weeks. This is more noticeable with projects that are closed up like drawers and cabinets. I am currently trying the water based Min-Wax brand polyurethane, over the General Finish gel stain. So far I've been rather impressed. It brushes on nicely, has virtually no odor, and dries quickly. I didn't notice any of the stain being pulled up like the oil based poly does, and there's practically no dust nibs in the finish since it dries so fast. Otherwise, I'm using the same three coat method I normally use. Read those instructions! I do a fair amount of finishing professionally through my contracting company and I have never found it wise to work outside the parameters and instructive directions given by the manufacturer. For example: With Minwax oil poly, Minwax specifically says a 2 hr recoat: http://goo.gl/fV6Rzu For Minwax waterborne poly, Minwax states 2 hr recoat as well: http://goo.gl/SRrhGS These are a world apart from the oil based GF finishes you reference. And when discussing waterborne finishes, overnight is simply too long. Take a look at the Varathane site which also says 2 hrs. to recoat: http://www.rustoleumibg.com/images/t...lyurethane.pdf Sherwin Williams waterborne poly is a ONE hr recoat: http://www.sherwin-williams.com/docu.../035777464212/ You get the idea. Many other manufacturers have their own times for recoats and their application. One should completely familiarize themselves with the product they are using before they apply it to their prized wood working project. Giving advice in an off handed way can ruin projects for the folks that read these messages and follow their instructions... Robert |
Staining
Hi Robert,
At this point you should advise those that are seeking advice to read the directions on their specific brand of poly for its application. Generic instructions won't serve well for all brands of poly. Some have recoat times of 12 hours, some 8, and some are as little as 2 to 4. Failure to follow the specific instructions of the manufacturer can lead to lack of adhesion, witness lines and a list of other problems. True, but my own time constraints limit me to one coat each day. So faster recoat times are never an issue for me. The only exception is if it is really cold, in which case I might need to let the finish dry another day. These are a world apart from the oil based GF finishes you reference. And when discussing waterborne finishes, overnight is simply too long. Take a look at the Varathane site which also says 2 hrs. to recoat: http://www.rustoleumibg.com/images/t...terior%20WB%20 Polyurethane.pdf I haven't used Varathane poly, but I took a look: "Allow finish to dry minimum of 2 hours before recoating. Lower temperatures and/or higher humidity may cause slower dry times. Re-coat only when previous coats have dried clear and feel hard. (Should no longer feel tacky to the touch.) A powder should develop when lightly sanded. If any coat has dried more than 24 hours, lightly sand before re- coating to avoid brush marks." That's no different than any other poly I have used, other than I "can" recoat after two hours if I wish. I always wait 24 hours and sand between coats anyway, nothing unusual there. You get the idea. Many other manufacturers have their own times for recoats and their application. One should completely familiarize themselves with the product they are using before they apply it to their prized wood working project. Agreed, that seems like a given. Still, I was simply describing "my" method of applying finish. It's certainly not the best or only way to do it, but it works well for me. Giving advice in an off handed way can ruin projects for the folks that read these messages and follow their instructions... And remember to wear these, safety glasses. :) Take care, Anthony Watson www.watsondiy.com www.mountainsoftware.com |
Ping Leon Staining
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:36:35 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
I apply the second coat with, now this is key, A "Wooster" brand foam brush. DO NOT USE a cheap inexpensive foam brush!. I find these Wooster brand brushes at Home Depot. http://www.homedepot.com/p/Wooster-2...0020/204302391 Hi Leon. I saved this message you posted in January. Apparently, the Canadian Home Depot stores do not carry the Wooster brand of foam brush. (not that I could find) Lowes do carry the Wooster brand, but not the specific foam brush you quoted above. I guess my question is: What constitutes a good or poor foam brush? Can you determine a good foam brush by looking at them in the store? Or, do you have to buy and use various brands to see how well they work? Barring my finding decent foam brushes, I'll have to go with a good bristle brush. |
Ping Leon Staining
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:43:37 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
wrote: Having said all of that, can you order from Amazon? http://www.amazon.com/Wooster-Brush-.../dp/B0019F06DG Yes. Amazon.ca has them for $6.17. Considering the price gouge, it would almost be cheaper to order them from amazon.com. But, either way, I can get them. Thanks. |
Ping Leon Staining
On 4/21/2014 8:57 AM, wrote:
On Mon, 21 Apr 2014 07:43:37 -0500, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet wrote: Having said all of that, can you order from Amazon? http://www.amazon.com/Wooster-Brush-.../dp/B0019F06DG Yes. Amazon.ca has them for $6.17. Considering the price gouge, it would almost be cheaper to order them from amazon.com. But, either way, I can get them. Thanks. You can almost drive across the border just ont he price difference. $2,58 here. |
Staining
I skimmed through the posts pretty quickly, but I don't think anyone mentioned Watco. It's my go-to stain. Wipe it on heavy so it soaks in, wait the directed amount of time and wipe off the excess. Recoat in about 30 minutes. Give it 24 hours to cure and top off with your choice of oil-based top coats.
Larry On Tuesday, December 31, 2013 8:58:47 AM UTC-6, SBH wrote: When staining wood, how many coats are normal? Do some stain and nothing more or do some lacquer over it? I understand it will probably depend on several variables such as stain color, stain type, sanding prep (final grit) and wood but is there a general rule for staining? I'm encountering an slight concern after staining cedar with two coats though I'm uncertain if it's normal. When viewing the wood directly, it looks fine. When I lay it down and view it with light reflection, I can see some shiny spots and dull spots, which I simply think it's just the way the stain absorbed into the wood based on it's texture/grain. I'm trying to determine if I should add another coat or lacquer over it and be done. What say the experts? Thank you |
Staining
On Wed, 01 Jan 2014 08:36:35 -0600, Leon lcb11211@swbelldotnet
Gel Finishes tend to be extremely easy to use providing you IMMEDIATELY remove the excess as indicated in the directions. Typically you do not need to sand between coats. Leon, got a question about your gel finishes advice. When you say to immediately remove the excess finishes, as in a table top, are you saying to remove just the section you've just applied the finish to? Or, are you saying to cover the whole table top and then remove the excess. Hope I've made my question understandable... I'd guess that much of your advise depends on the size of the wood surface that one would be finishing. |
Staining
On 6/29/2014 9:47 AM, wrote:
When you say to immediately remove the excess finishes, as in a table top, are you saying to remove just the section you've just applied the finish to? Or, are you saying to cover the whole table top and then remove the excess. Depends upon how big the table top is (and also the temperature and humidity), but IME with gel stains it is best to do a small area, say an area no larger than couple of square feet, wipe that down immediately, then overlap to next same size area. As your wiping rag gets impregnated a bit, you may be able to stretch that somewhat, before you change to a new rag, but then it's back to the smaller area with a new wipe down rag. As always, YMMV. -- eWoodShop: www.eWoodShop.com Wood Shop: www.e-WoodShop.net https://www.google.com/+eWoodShop https://plus.google.com/+KarlCaillouet/posts http://www.custommade.com/by/ewoodshop/ KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) |
Staining
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:43 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter