| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Latest Project
The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other
than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ |
Latest Project
Looks great. Good job.
What brand/kind of hinges did you use for the cabinet's bottom doors? Sonny |
Latest Project
On Jun 9, 12:47*am, Leon wrote:
The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, *quite a stark change from my old white Jet. *One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. *If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. *The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. *I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. *The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ That's a heckuva lot of pegs you've got there. It has a certain medieval quality to it when it's open. They never expect the Spanish Inquisition. |
Latest Project
Greg Guarino wrote:
On Jun 9, 12:47 am, Leon wrote: Snip That's a heckuva lot of pegs you've got there. It has a certain medieval quality to it when it's open. They never expect the Spanish Inquisition. Remember, I did not build that portion, the customer supplied that. But yes when I had it laying down on its back side you were instantly reminded of one of those bed of nails when you opened the doors. I have to think the maker probably used some style of gang boring accessory on his DP. There are in excess of 400 dowels. |
Latest Project
Sonny wrote:
Looks great. Good job. Thank you What brand/kind of hinges did you use for the cabinet's bottom doors? I used Blum compact 38N compact Euro style hinges, screw in, 1/2" overlay. I buy these in lots of 50 and have literally used several hundreds of them. Lifetime warranty and this batch cost me $1.28 per hinge. Smaller quantities from my supplier are $1.82, IIRC Sonny |
Latest Project
Leon wrote:
The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ Gorgeous. As usual. -- GW Ross Do not call up that which you cannot put on hold. |
Latest Project
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 9:23:16 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
I have to think the maker probably used some style of gang boring accessory on his DP. There are in excess of 400 dowels. Actually, it doesn't take too long to drill the holes, using a simple jig. My thread racks have about 250 pegs, angled 15 degrees, so the spools don't easily slide off. My dowels aren't glued in, either, which makes for easy replacement if one breaks. They're 3/16" in diameter, small enough to hold bobbins, also, under the large (same color thread) spool. A neighbor does alterations, uses smaller spools, than I. I made her rack, also, a couple hundred pegs.... however many fit onto the allotted space. Open front (no doors), wall mounted framed rack, not cabinet type racks. Sonny |
Latest Project
Leon wrote:
The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ Great workmanship! I don't see why the spool cabinet and the bookcase needed to be physically attached, but I suppose one shouldn't argue with the customer bout what they want! I won't go into detail about what I learned from your photos--but I did. Thanks for sharing! Bill |
Latest Project
On 6/8/2013 11:47 PM, Leon wrote:
.... waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. .... What's the point of the doors on the sides of the upper? Can't figure out what the client is planning for those tall/skinny spaces??? -- |
Latest Project
On 6/9/2013 10:27 AM, Sonny wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 9:23:16 AM UTC-5, Leon wrote: I have to think the maker probably used some style of gang boring accessory on his DP. There are in excess of 400 dowels. Actually, it doesn't take too long to drill the holes, using a simple jig. My thread racks have about 250 pegs, angled 15 degrees, so the spools don't easily slide off. My dowels aren't glued in, either, which makes for easy replacement if one breaks. They're 3/16" in diameter, small enough to hold bobbins, also, under the large (same color thread) spool. A neighbor does alterations, uses smaller spools, than I. I made her rack, also, a couple hundred pegs.... however many fit onto the allotted space. Open front (no doors), wall mounted framed rack, not cabinet type racks. Sonny But how many do you produce? |
Latest Project
On 6/9/2013 10:25 AM, G. Ross wrote:
Leon wrote: The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ Gorgeous. As usual. Thank you |
Latest Project
On 6/9/2013 11:54 AM, Bill wrote:
Leon wrote: The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ Great workmanship! I don't see why the spool cabinet and the bookcase needed to be physically attached, but I suppose one shouldn't argue with the customer bout what they want! Not sure why you would not see why they would be attached, the spool cabinet would easily topple over when you open the doors. I won't go into detail about what I learned from your photos--but I did. Thanks for sharing! Bill Thank yoou |
Latest Project
On 6/9/2013 12:03 PM, dpb wrote:
On 6/8/2013 11:47 PM, Leon wrote: ... waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. ... What's the point of the doors on the sides of the upper? Can't figure out what the client is planning for those tall/skinny spaces??? -- This is a lady is a quilter, the top back cabinet will house a portable ironing board, cutting mats and cutting rules. FWIW the upper cabinet has 4 doors, 2 on the ends and 2 around the corners from the ends, on the front, just beside the spool cabinet. The unit will set in the corner against a wall just inches wider than the cabinet. Therefore I added the front door on the left front as the left side door will probably not ever be used because of the side wall restriction. If the cabinet is ever moved to another location the left side door might possibly be used. And it looks better being symetrical. ;~) Oh and FWIW, the back upper cabinet is open all the way through, from side to side. |
Latest Project
Leon wrote:
On 6/9/2013 11:54 AM, Bill wrote: Leon wrote: The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ Great workmanship! I don't see why the spool cabinet and the bookcase needed to be physically attached, but I suppose one shouldn't argue with the customer bout what they want! Not sure why you would not see why they would be attached, the spool cabinet would easily topple over when you open the doors. No, I thought the spool cabinet should basically be anchored to a wall. I won't go into detail about what I learned from your photos--but I did. Thanks for sharing! Bill Thank yoou |
Latest Project
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 1:00:37 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
But how many do you produce? I've made 3 for myself, about 250 pegs total. One for my neighbor, with at least 200 pegs. One for my sister, with about 150 pegs. One each for 2 upholstery school classmates, with about 75 pegs each. All pegs angled. Sonny |
Latest Project
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 1:42:28 PM UTC-5, Sonny wrote:
All pegs angled. Check that. The boards/shelves of the rack are angled about 15 degrees, onto the frame's sides. The pegs are perpendicular to the boards/shelves. I did use a custom made jig for drilling and spacing the peg holes. Sonny |
Latest Project
Bill wrote:
Leon wrote: On 6/9/2013 11:54 AM, Bill wrote: Leon wrote: The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ Great workmanship! I don't see why the spool cabinet and the bookcase needed to be physically attached, but I suppose one shouldn't argue with the customer bout what they want! Not sure why you would not see why they would be attached, the spool cabinet would easily topple over when you open the doors. No, I thought the spool cabinet should basically be anchored to a wall. It is designed to be hung from the wall but the husband thought it would pull the wall down. LOL It basically sets on top of the front step and both the spool cabinet and step up are attached to the upper back cabinet, back cab attached to lower cab. The upper back cab will be anchored to the wall |
Latest Project
Leon wrote:
Bill wrote: Leon wrote: On 6/9/2013 11:54 AM, Bill wrote: Leon wrote: The new SawStop is performing well and is extremely smooth. No issues other than I have not yet had a chance to get my stuff back under the right extension table so nothing is where I expect it to be. As I suspected the black color shows all the saw dust, quite a stark change from my old white Jet. One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Anyway at least one of you thought that I may not be busy, eh Mike? I am on my second paying job since getting the SawStop and have at least 4 projects waiting in line. I am just finishing up on a unique sewing cabinet. The customer wanted an elevated book case with doors and on top of that a short platform to set a 50" tall sewing spool cabinet, which she supplied. I designed and built the lower cabinet and the upper cabinet behind spool cabinet. The unit is about 94" tall.. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991167821/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992363858/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8991171141/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8992367050/ http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/8993185484/ Great workmanship! I don't see why the spool cabinet and the bookcase needed to be physically attached, but I suppose one shouldn't argue with the customer bout what they want! Not sure why you would not see why they would be attached, the spool cabinet would easily topple over when you open the doors. No, I thought the spool cabinet should basically be anchored to a wall. It is designed to be hung from the wall but the husband thought it would pull the wall down. LOL It basically sets on top of the front step and both the spool cabinet and step up are attached to the upper back cabinet, back cab attached to lower cab. The upper back cab will be anchored to the wall Just don't pull the wall down (LOL)!!! : ) |
Latest Project
Sonny wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 1:00:37 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: But how many do you produce? I've made 3 for myself, about 250 pegs total. One for my neighbor, with at least 200 pegs. One for my sister, with about 150 pegs. One each for 2 upholstery school classmates, with about 75 pegs each. All pegs angled. Sonny Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? |
Latest Project
"Leon" wrote: Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? ---------------------------------------------------- Which reminds me, what ever happened to the guy from Jersey who was in the specialty drilling machine business? Name was Joe Argo maybe? Lew |
Completed
I have now finished adding the backs and door pulls and the unit is
ready for delivery. I added a couple of pictures showing what most hide, the back side. I started using back face frames on all of my cabinets about 18 months ago and while similar to the front face frames the back face frame joints are rabbet on rabbet reinforced with floating tenon's/Domino's. This rabbet on rabbet joint naturally forms a rebate/recess all the way around the in side back of the face frame that accepts the 1/4" back panels. It makes for a very clean looking back and probably doubles the cabinet's resistance to rack. So far I have built 34 front and back face frames for 17 cabinets in the last 18 months. The back view http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9000688447/ And the inside view of the upper back cabinet. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9001873934/ |
Latest Project
On 6/9/2013 4:12 PM, Leon wrote:
Sonny wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2013 1:00:37 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: But how many do you produce? I've made 3 for myself, about 250 pegs total. One for my neighbor, with at least 200 pegs. One for my sister, with about 150 pegs. One each for 2 upholstery school classmates, with about 75 pegs each. All pegs angled. Sonny Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? Here is the maker of the thread cabinet http://romwoodworking.com/enclosed-thread-cabinets.htm |
Latest Project
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 4:12:58 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? Well, yes, when they're being mass produced. Sonny |
Completed
Looks nice. I think I would have put on 4 legs on the bottom -
maybe half circles cut out of he side feet. Likely it will have feet to keep it from rocking or such. Martin On 6/9/2013 6:50 PM, Leon wrote: I have now finished adding the backs and door pulls and the unit is ready for delivery. I added a couple of pictures showing what most hide, the back side. I started using back face frames on all of my cabinets about 18 months ago and while similar to the front face frames the back face frame joints are rabbet on rabbet reinforced with floating tenon's/Domino's. This rabbet on rabbet joint naturally forms a rebate/recess all the way around the in side back of the face frame that accepts the 1/4" back panels. It makes for a very clean looking back and probably doubles the cabinet's resistance to rack. So far I have built 34 front and back face frames for 17 cabinets in the last 18 months. The back view http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9000688447/ And the inside view of the upper back cabinet. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9001873934/ |
Completed
Martin Eastburn wrote:
Looks nice. Thank you I think I would have put on 4 legs on the bottom - maybe half circles cut out of he side feet. That suggestion was offered but declined by the customer. The wide side legs have another function of hiding from side view the stuff that will be stored on the floor. Likely it will have feet to keep it from rocking or s Screw adjustable felt pad feet. Martin On 6/9/2013 6:50 PM, Leon wrote: I have now finished adding the backs and door pulls and the unit is ready for delivery. I added a couple of pictures showing what most hide, the back side. I started using back face frames on all of my cabinets about 18 months ago and while similar to the front face frames the back face frame joints are rabbet on rabbet reinforced with floating tenon's/Domino's. This rabbet on rabbet joint naturally forms a rebate/recess all the way around the in side back of the face frame that accepts the 1/4" back panels. It makes for a very clean looking back and probably doubles the cabinet's resistance to rack. So far I have built 34 front and back face frames for 17 cabinets in the last 18 months. The back view http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9000688447/ And the inside view of the upper back cabinet. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9001873934/ |
Latest Project
"Lew Hodgett" wrote:
"Leon" wrote: Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? ---------------------------------------------------- Which reminds me, what ever happened to the guy from Jersey who was in the specialty drilling machine business? Name was Joe Argo maybe? Lew He still posts here on occasion. |
Latest Project
Sonny wrote:
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 4:12:58 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? Well, yes, when they're being mass produced. Sonny I do agree that probably with less setup trouble and cost, drilling holes for a hand full of cabinets would best be done with already available tools. But I knew that these particular cabinets were being mass produced. The cabinet appears to be pretty well constructed and the joints are very good but the use of the piano hinges and lack of a decent finish is a little hard on the eyes. The piano hinges used in this orientation is an open invitation for sag, and the doors already have a bit of sag. In anticipation of this I beveled the front and extended the front of the "step up" to help realign the door fronts when returning them to the closed position. |
Latest Project
On Sunday, June 9, 2013 9:31:29 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote:
I do agree that probably with less setup trouble and cost, drilling holes for a hand full of cabinets would best be done with already available tools. But I knew that these particular cabinets were being mass produced. The cabinet appears to be pretty well constructed and the joints are very good but the use of the piano hinges and lack of a decent finish is a little hard on the eyes. The piano hinges used in this orientation is an open invitation for sag, and the doors already have a bit of sag. In anticipation of this I beveled the front and extended the front of the "step up" to help realign the door fronts when returning them to the closed position. I did initially noticed that bevel on the lower edges (close-up pic of the bottom), but didn't give it a second thought as to why. Sometimes, the idea of "bigger is better" is not better. For someone's personal thread rack, as that, an enclosed cabinet is a piece of furniture, so I can understand having doors, for looks. For the doors to store spools of thread, also, may be weight-loading the units too much, IMO. When opened, it becomes a display cabinet, with showy (numerous) spools, and contributes very little, if anything, when in actual use for sewing or quilting. If the doors/hinges are a little weak, the builder sacrificed sturdiness for asthetics (for show?). Might be best to eliminate the doors' rack aspect and just have doors with no pegs. That's a heck of a lot of spool storage on the doors. Not even all my pegs have spools on them and quite a few pairs of pegs have same color spools. Even for hanging on the wall, I made sure the hanger aspect, of my racks, were strong/secure enough not to pull out from the wall. Another aspect of my rack use: It's not so neat and clean looking. I grab a spool, use it, put it back with end-thread hanging down, so there are ends of threads hanging from almost every used spool... some end threads hang from the bobbins, also. No doubt those quilters and other like-sewers are more neat, than I am, that way. As per your observations, I think you're suggesting the cabinets could be designed a little better (for sturdiness, at least), a few tweaks here and there, and still be asthetically nice and presentable. Yep, I'd likely agree. Sonny |
Latest Project
One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Hmm, I wonder is the pro model different. I change the blades form the top, no side door to open. Do you maybe mean the access door to set the clearance of the brake? I did that once and it works for every blade so far. |
Latest Project
On 6/10/2013 1:40 PM, SonomaProducts.com wrote:
One thing that I could suggest as an improvement would to put a switch on the internal dust cover door that has to be swung open to change blades. It is hard for me to remember to close it and sawdust goes everywhere inside when I forget. If the saw motor cover door or the belt access door are left open the saw will not start. I think the same should be true for that dust cover. Hmm, I wonder is the pro model different. I change the blades form the top, no side door to open. Do you maybe mean the access door to set the clearance of the brake? I did that once and it works for every blade so far. I change the blade from the top too but between the end of the arbor, the end that receives the blade and nut, to the plastic swing door that helps contain the dust there is about 1" clearance. I can't put my hand down there to remove or replace the arbor nut without opening that cover door. Not talking external doors. If yu look at this first picture you will see the cover door in the close position, it is directly above the dust hose. It has a single hinge bolt on the front just to the left, in the picture, of the top of the dust hose. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb1121...n/photostream/ In this second picture you see the cover door opened at about a 30 degree angle. This is the door that I often forget to close after changing blades. BTW the yellow bolt just behind the arbor is the one I adjust the brake clearance with. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb1121...n/photostream/ I have resorted to immediately opening the outer motor cover door when I open the dust cover door to remove the blade. This prevents the saw from starting until I close it. When I close it I remember to check the cover door. On the industrial you have access to the brake adjustment hex bolt by simply removing the throat plate. |
Latest Project
On 6/10/2013 1:57 PM, Leon wrote:
Sometimes a picture is worth a thousand words, This thing, LOL Although the picture shows the cover clocked 90 degrees counter clockwise. https://sawstop.3dcartstores.com/Dus...-095_p_49.html |
Now: Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
OK, I need some help understanding why piano hinges could be a problem due to sag. I'm a hobbyist and have used piano hinges a few times, but never with the hinge in the vertical position. I recall a couple magazine articles about building your own big roll around storage cabinet that used full length (6-7 feet) piano hinges to open up multiple sets of shelves depicted as having heavy jars of screws, etc. And as I think of it, each of these sets of shelves had a caster supporting the non-hinged side. So I guess I just answered my own question about this piece of shop furniture. But I'd still like to understand how a piano hinge would sag when used for a thread cabinet. Thanks for the info. Roy On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:31:29 -0500, Leon wrote: Sonny wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2013 4:12:58 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? Well, yes, when they're being mass produced. Sonny I do agree that probably with less setup trouble and cost, drilling holes for a hand full of cabinets would best be done with already available tools. But I knew that these particular cabinets were being mass produced. The cabinet appears to be pretty well constructed and the joints are very good but the use of the piano hinges and lack of a decent finish is a little hard on the eyes. The piano hinges used in this orientation is an open invitation for sag, and the doors already have a bit of sag. In anticipation of this I beveled the front and extended the front of the "step up" to help realign the door fronts when returning them to the closed position. |
Now: Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
Roy wrote:
OK, I need some help understanding why piano hinges could be a problem due to sag. I'm a hobbyist and have used piano hinges a few times, but never with the hinge in the vertical position. I don't have the experience to say whether it would sag or not. But I can see that the forces exerted on the hinges, by the open doors of the cabinet, stress it in the worst possible way--particularly the little "feet" that wrap around the rod (please excuse my terminology). Bill I recall a couple magazine articles about building your own big roll around storage cabinet that used full length (6-7 feet) piano hinges to open up multiple sets of shelves depicted as having heavy jars of screws, etc. And as I think of it, each of these sets of shelves had a caster supporting the non-hinged side. So I guess I just answered my own question about this piece of shop furniture. But I'd still like to understand how a piano hinge would sag when used for a thread cabinet. Thanks for the info. Roy On Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:31:29 -0500, Leon wrote: Sonny wrote: On Sunday, June 9, 2013 4:12:58 PM UTC-5, Leon wrote: Now think of making hundreds as the company that builds this unit does, think gang boring might ease production effort? Well, yes, when they're being mass produced. Sonny I do agree that probably with less setup trouble and cost, drilling holes for a hand full of cabinets would best be done with already available tools. But I knew that these particular cabinets were being mass produced. The cabinet appears to be pretty well constructed and the joints are very good but the use of the piano hinges and lack of a decent finish is a little hard on the eyes. The piano hinges used in this orientation is an open invitation for sag, and the doors already have a bit of sag. In anticipation of this I beveled the front and extended the front of the "step up" to help realign the door fronts when returning them to the closed position. |
Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
Roy wrote:
OK, I need some help understanding why piano hinges could be a problem due to sag. I'm a hobbyist and have used piano hinges a few times, but never with the hinge in the vertical position. I recall a couple magazine articles about building your own big roll around storage cabinet that used full length (6-7 feet) piano hinges to open up multiple sets of shelves depicted as having heavy jars of screws, etc. And as I think of it, each of these sets of shelves had a caster supporting the non-hinged side. So I guess I just answered my own question about this piece of shop furniture. But I'd still like to understand how a piano hinge would sag when used for a thread cabinet. Thanks for the info. Roy " Piano hinges are designed to be used in a horizontal orientation where the load is placed mostly evenly in the same direction on the hinge pin and along its entire length to maintain alignment. Used vertically that load is transferred unevenly along its length. Add to that most piano hinges are relatively inexpensive for their size and are not typically of a high quality, they are easily bent out of shape. |
Now: Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
"Roy" wrote in message ... OK, I need some help understanding why piano hinges could be a problem due to sag. I'm a hobbyist and have used piano hinges a few times, but never with the hinge in the vertical position. I recall a couple magazine articles about building your own big roll around storage cabinet that used full length (6-7 feet) piano hinges to open up multiple sets of shelves depicted as having heavy jars of screws, etc. And as I think of it, each of these sets of shelves had a caster supporting the non-hinged side. So I guess I just answered my own question about this piece of shop furniture. But I'd still like to understand how a piano hinge would sag when used for a thread cabinet. ================================================== =================================== The difference between a regular hinge and a piano hinge is length. That is it. |
Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
On 6/16/2013 3:34 AM, Leon wrote:
Roy wrote: OK, I need some help understanding why piano hinges could be a problem due to sag. I'm a hobbyist and have used piano hinges a few times, but never with the hinge in the vertical position. I recall a couple magazine articles about building your own big roll around storage cabinet that used full length (6-7 feet) piano hinges to open up multiple sets of shelves depicted as having heavy jars of screws, etc. And as I think of it, each of these sets of shelves had a caster supporting the non-hinged side. So I guess I just answered my own question about this piece of shop furniture. But I'd still like to understand how a piano hinge would sag when used for a thread cabinet. Thanks for the info. Roy " Piano hinges are designed to be used in a horizontal orientation where the load is placed mostly evenly in the same direction on the hinge pin and along its entire length to maintain alignment. Used vertically that load is transferred unevenly along its length. Add to that most piano hinges are relatively inexpensive for their size and are not typically of a high quality, they are easily bent out of shape. Not sure I understand that. Piano hinges have been used to hold heavy tool doors on work cabinets for a long time. I would think they actually reduce sag since there are more points of contact. While not as robust as a regular door hinge you would not be able to fit a door hin in this instance. So I'm not so sure I think they lead to sag.. I think it depends on what the load is, and how it's used. I think having a slight rebate for the hinge helps avoid issues. -- Jeff who has to work today. No time to play in the shop. |
Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
On 6/16/2013 1:09 PM, woodchucker wrote:
On 6/16/2013 3:34 AM, Leon wrote: Roy wrote: OK, I need some help understanding why piano hinges could be a problem due to sag. I'm a hobbyist and have used piano hinges a few times, but never with the hinge in the vertical position. I recall a couple magazine articles about building your own big roll around storage cabinet that used full length (6-7 feet) piano hinges to open up multiple sets of shelves depicted as having heavy jars of screws, etc. And as I think of it, each of these sets of shelves had a caster supporting the non-hinged side. So I guess I just answered my own question about this piece of shop furniture. But I'd still like to understand how a piano hinge would sag when used for a thread cabinet. Thanks for the info. Roy " Piano hinges are designed to be used in a horizontal orientation where the load is placed mostly evenly in the same direction on the hinge pin and along its entire length to maintain alignment. Used vertically that load is transferred unevenly along its length. Add to that most piano hinges are relatively inexpensive for their size and are not typically of a high quality, they are easily bent out of shape. Not sure I understand that. Piano hinges have been used to hold heavy tool doors on work cabinets for a long time. I would think they actually reduce sag since there are more points of contact. While not as robust as a regular door hinge you would not be able to fit a door hin in this instance. So I'm not so sure I think they lead to sag.. I think it depends on what the load is, and how it's used. I think having a slight rebate for the hinge helps avoid issues. Reread all of what I said, typically the ones you buy are not of high quality and easily bend. The ones you refer to on steel cabinet doors are normally welded in place so that there is no give where attached and are a better quality hinge that you normally find at a ww store or the big box. FWIW the piano hinges used on both of the 45" doors on the spool cabinet that the builder used are still firmly fixed with all 44 screws on each side but there is wiggle on both sides. As a result one side sags more than the other. Had the builder used 3 pair of Euro style hinges for about the "same price" there would have been no play/wiggle and any sag that may develop over the years, for what ever reason, could be easily adjusted out. I am paying $1.28 for each Euro style hinge and they come with a life time warranty. |
Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
On 6/16/2013 1:09 PM, woodchucker wrote:
Not sure I understand that. Piano hinges have been used to hold heavy tool doors on work cabinets for a long time. I would think they actually reduce sag since there are more points of contact. While not as robust as a regular door hinge you would not be able to fit a door hin in this instance. So I'm not so sure I think they lead to sag.. I think it depends on what the load is, and how it's used. I think having a slight rebate for the hinge helps avoid issues. OK, a picture is worth a thousand words. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9061338634/ If you will notice, the brand new piano hinge pictured, has gaps between the "ears" on each side of the hinge. Because of this gap the "ears" that are actually supporting all of the weight are going to wear more quickly and or the ones carrying the weight will distort until some of the other ears begin to engage and help carry the load. The the gap closes, the door settles/sags. When used in a horizontal position the ill fitting halves do not matter because most of the load is then placed on the hinge pin vs. the ear tops and bottoms when used vertically. |
Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
On 6/16/2013 3:54 PM, Leon wrote:
On 6/16/2013 1:09 PM, woodchucker wrote: Not sure I understand that. Piano hinges have been used to hold heavy tool doors on work cabinets for a long time. I would think they actually reduce sag since there are more points of contact. While not as robust as a regular door hinge you would not be able to fit a door hin in this instance. So I'm not so sure I think they lead to sag.. I think it depends on what the load is, and how it's used. I think having a slight rebate for the hinge helps avoid issues. OK, a picture is worth a thousand words. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9061338634/ If you will notice, the brand new piano hinge pictured, has gaps between the "ears" on each side of the hinge. Because of this gap the "ears" that are actually supporting all of the weight are going to wear more quickly and or the ones carrying the weight will distort until some of the other ears begin to engage and help carry the load. The the gap closes, the door settles/sags. When used in a horizontal position the ill fitting halves do not matter because most of the load is then placed on the hinge pin vs. the ear tops and bottoms when used vertically. I see your point, but not all piano hinges are made equally. These are very high in quality by comparision to what you would get in HD. http://imgur.com/frcIm3K I got them from a cabinet shop going out of business. I like the undrilled ones, as I can do anything I want with them. The down side to your euro hinge is that you are always in 3/4 or thicker stock, whereas with the piano hinge it's possible to use 1/2 or thicker. But I understand. -- Jeff |
Piano Hinges. Was == Latest Project
On 6/16/2013 3:54 PM, Leon wrote:
On 6/16/2013 1:09 PM, woodchucker wrote: Not sure I understand that. Piano hinges have been used to hold heavy tool doors on work cabinets for a long time. I would think they actually reduce sag since there are more points of contact. While not as robust as a regular door hinge you would not be able to fit a door hin in this instance. So I'm not so sure I think they lead to sag.. I think it depends on what the load is, and how it's used. I think having a slight rebate for the hinge helps avoid issues. OK, a picture is worth a thousand words. http://www.flickr.com/photos/lcb11211/9061338634/ If you will notice, the brand new piano hinge pictured, has gaps between the "ears" on each side of the hinge. Because of this gap the "ears" that are actually supporting all of the weight are going to wear more quickly and or the ones carrying the weight will distort until some of the other ears begin to engage and help carry the load. The the gap closes, the door settles/sags. When used in a horizontal position the ill fitting halves do not matter because most of the load is then placed on the hinge pin vs. the ear tops and bottoms when used vertically. I see your point, but not all piano hinges are made equally. These are very high in quality by comparision to what you would get in HD. http://imgur.com/frcIm3K I got them from a cabinet shop going out of business. I like the undrilled ones, as I can do anything I want with them. The down side to your euro hinge is that you are always in 3/4 or thicker stock, whereas with the piano hinge it's possible to use 1/2 or thicker. But I understand. -- Jeff |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:28 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter