![]() |
O/T: Last Word
Enjoy
Lew ------------------------------------------------------- The Last Word - Rewriting the Romney cheerleaders http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ahsiP...layer_embedded |
O/T: Last Word
On 11/11/2012 12:43 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
Repeatedly succeeded? It's been replaced everywhere by a mix of capitalism and socialism. Most have a little more socialism in the mix than we do and some of those, like Germany, Japan, Canada, and more, are doing better than we are. In the last several thousand years every time the socialist turn their head or a socialist state has failed a Capitalist state has returned. Even today is place where socialism is the rule, like Russia, Cuba, etc. the capitalist i.e black market is keeping the economies going |
O/T: Last Word
On 11/11/2012 11:43 AM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
It's been replaced everywhere by a mix of capitalism and socialism. Most have a little more socialism in the mix than we do and some of those, like Germany, Japan, Canada, and more, are doing better than we are. An excellent argument can be made that they are doing better because they can market to those who don't have that mix. ;) -- www.eWoodShop.com Last update: 4/15/2010 KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) http://gplus.to/eWoodShop |
O/T: Last Word
Keith Nuttle wrote:
As for the Medicare that I receive I am paying over %1200 per year for that insurance plus the private insurance I care. Most people even those on Social Security do not know they pay it, but it is deducted from the SS check. Just FYI, it does not have to be. Mine isn't deducted, neither is my wife's. -- dadiOH ____________________________ Winters getting colder? Tired of the rat race? Maybe just ready for a change? Check it out... http://www.floridaloghouse.net |
O/T: Last Word
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:13:40 -0500, "dadiOH"
wrote: Keith Nuttle wrote: As for the Medicare that I receive I am paying over %1200 per year for that insurance plus the private insurance I care. Most people even those on Social Security do not know they pay it, but it is deducted from the SS check. Just FYI, it does not have to be. Mine isn't deducted, neither is my wife's. Can you explain how it isn't deducted? |
O/T: Last Word
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 17:22:24 -0600, Gordon Shumway wrote:
Just FYI, it does not have to be. Mine isn't deducted, neither is my wife's. Can you explain how it isn't deducted? Maybe he doesn't take part B? -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
O/T: Last Word
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:13:40 -0500, "dadiOH" wrote: Keith Nuttle wrote: As for the Medicare that I receive I am paying over %1200 per year for that insurance plus the private insurance I care. Most people even those on Social Security do not know they pay it, but it is deducted from the SS check. Just FYI, it does not have to be. Mine isn't deducted, neither is my wife's. Can you explain how it isn't deducted? If it's Part B I'd like to know myself. I thought that Part B, which IIRC is mandatory to get the other parts, had to be deducted? And, its supposed to go up another $7 in January, which will just about wipe out the proposed COLA. *******s .... -- www.ewoodshop.com (Mobile) |
O/T: Last Word
Gordon Shumway wrote:
On Sun, 11 Nov 2012 15:13:40 -0500, "dadiOH" wrote: Keith Nuttle wrote: As for the Medicare that I receive I am paying over %1200 per year for that insurance plus the private insurance I care. Most people even those on Social Security do not know they pay it, but it is deducted from the SS check. Just FYI, it does not have to be. Mine isn't deducted, neither is my wife's. Can you explain how it isn't deducted? By using a Medicare Advantage plan. Not all of same return the deduction but many do, in full. Some return part, some return none, some even charge an additional amount. I choose one that returns the full amount. http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&t...ved =0CEQQkQ4 http://www.medicare.gov/sign-up-chan...age-plans.html -- dadiOH ____________________________ Winters getting colder? Tired of the rat race? Maybe just ready for a change? Check it out... http://www.floridaloghouse.net |
O/T: Last Word
On 11/12/2012 9:19 AM, dadiOH wrote:
While I think it may be prudent of individuals to purchase medical insurance I don't like them being required to do so. Yeah, I know...the employer is going to provide it. That will either increase costs to consumers or the employers will reduce working hours low enough so they don't have to purchase it in which case the lucky worker will have to buy it out of HIS pocket. Or both. While I'm sure there will be those employers who dodge the new law by watching the hours worked, the bigger issue will likely be just ignoring the law and paying the fine. I have spoken with CPA's who've told me that their world is all abuzz with that very thought. For many of their clients - especially the big companies - it will be cheaper (as the law presently stands - for them to simply say NO! and pay the fine. You can bet your sweet patootie that aspect of the law will change quickly. |
O/T: Last Word
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:13:37 -0500, dadiOH wrote:
Check the prices on some of those cute little motorized chairs sometime. Or diabetic supplies. Ever price a hearing aid? -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
O/T: Last Word
On 11/12/2012 11:13 AM, dadiOH wrote:
You need to look around a bit. Mine have decreased :) No premium either. Double :) I am currently looking, but my current plan still appears to be a better fit than the others available for my area. The zero premium plans here make it hardly worth giving up the basic Medicare. I momentarily considered simply reverting to basic Medicare, but they make that damned difficult if you went with a MA during your first 12 months of eligibility. Since I originally went with an MA, any Medigap insurance would come at a much higher cost ... if you can even get it without some exclusions they might come up with during the required physical. Whoever makes up some of these seemingly arbitrary "rules" most definitely did not make them to benefit the folks. A word to those coming up on 65 ... making an informed choice about Medicare options is NOT something you want to leave until the last minute. You damned well better start making a massive effort to understand the options and their nuances ... they can be confusing, and are seemingly written to trap the unwary. Get some expert advice, but don't count on anyone being an expert on your particular situation ... make an effort to understand it first, before talking to that expert. Basically, ".... don't try this at home!" -- www.eWoodShop.com Last update: 4/15/2010 KarlCaillouet@ (the obvious) http://gplus.to/eWoodShop |
O/T: Last Word
Larry Blanchard, wrote the following at or about 11/12/2012 11:39 AM:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:13:37 -0500, dadiOH wrote: Check the prices on some of those cute little motorized chairs sometime. Or diabetic supplies. Ever price a hearing aid? LOL! How about just a regular wheelchair. My late father required one towards the end. Medicare paid for it (as did we all). Medicare requires a lease arrangement for a certain period of time (maybe 18 months, maybe 12). Don't recall the time frame exactly. The way it worked was if he needed it for that period, the lease was terminated (as were the payments) and it was his to keep. Terminate the need (or, in his case, life) and it was returned to the medical supply company. Whatever the time frame, if he kept it the required time Medicare (read US) paid ~ $1,960 for that chair. Imagine my joy when I found that I could go to eBay, click "Buy it Now" and have the EXACT SAME BRAND & MODEL DELIVERED to his home for less than $500! No lease, no screwing around. As it was, the medical supply company took it back (no strings attached) after collecting about $1,600 in "lease" payments from Medicare. We need government managing this stuff like Custer needed more ****ed off Native Americans! |
O/T: Last Word
Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 12:13:37 -0500, dadiOH wrote: Check the prices on some of those cute little motorized chairs sometime. Or diabetic supplies. Ever price a hearing aid? Those too. Ridiculous prices. Have you noticed that the vendors of same tend to take full page newspaper ads? -- dadiOH ____________________________ Winters getting colder? Tired of the rat race? Maybe just ready for a change? Check it out... http://www.floridaloghouse.net |
O/T: Last Word
Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 09:55:00 -0500, Keith Nuttle wrote: ******"The only thing that's changing is the cost. The plans had been getting paid a lot more than the traditional Medicare program, and the Affordable Care Act is slowly trying to reduce that."**** MedAdvantage is an HMO under another name. Not necessarily. There are numerous structures. -- dadiOH ____________________________ Winters getting colder? Tired of the rat race? Maybe just ready for a change? Check it out... http://www.floridaloghouse.net |
O/T: Last Word
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:46:43 -0500, Keith Nuttle wrote:
Since you made the statement about "fleecing the elderly", it is obvious you are less than 40 and have never had any dealings with the Med Advantage plans. Keith, thank you for my laugh of the day. Talk about unwarranted assumptions! I'm 75. I went from regular Medicare with a supplement to a MedAdvantage plan for two years - then I went back. So despite your assumption, I do know whereof I speak. Better luck next time :-). -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
O/T: Last Word
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:15:26 -0600, Swingman wrote:
I momentarily considered simply reverting to basic Medicare, but they make that damned difficult if you went with a MA during your first 12 months of eligibility. Since I originally went with an MA, any Medigap insurance would come at a much higher cost ... if you can even get it without some exclusions they might come up with during the required physical. The rules must have changed since I reverted. IIRC, the insurer *could* require a physical, but mine did not. And my cost was the same as everyone else's for the company I chose, as is required - policies are either age-rated or community-rated. If you don't believe me, see: https://medicare.gov/find-a-plan/sta...how-insurance- companies-price-policies.aspx?AspxAutoDetectCookieSupport=1 The above explains the pricing, but does not address the reversion issue. I couldn't find anything definitive on that, but there was some indications that your rights might vary from state to state. -- When fascism comes to America, it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross. |
O/T: Last Word
On 11/12/2012 7:03 PM, Larry Blanchard wrote:
On Mon, 12 Nov 2012 13:46:43 -0500, Keith Nuttle wrote: Since you made the statement about "fleecing the elderly", it is obvious you are less than 40 and have never had any dealings with the Med Advantage plans. Keith, thank you for my laugh of the day. Talk about unwarranted assumptions! I'm 75. I went from regular Medicare with a supplement to a MedAdvantage plan for two years - then I went back. So despite your assumption, I do know whereof I speak. Better luck next time :-). I Worked with my mother and her finances for 10 year until she died and only know what it meant to her. |
I read this forum it's really nice and informative i really like it i get most of useful information from it which can prove beneficial for me i was need some similar post's but i get your post on first search on Google search engine it's fulfil my need i really appreciate it and keep it up!!
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:33 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter