Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
Michael Koblic wrote:
"J Burns" wrote in message ... After I pressed SEND, I saw that I'd misread you. Well, a sundial takes more than two pieces of wood. A shadow clock is easy to make and mark. Not true. An equatorial dial can be made from a flat board and a stick. It is inherently more accurate than the said stick and considerably easier to "calibrate". Putting sticks together with right angles and measuring millimeters to make four marks is easier than inscribing and marking arcs on a board and setting a gnomon at a particular angle. However, it looks excellent for dividing the daylight into 12 hours. That was what people wanted before mechanical timers and neon lights. The shadow clock handled "daylight savings" beautifully. In Cairo, summer hours were 70 minutes and winter hours 51 minutes, changing gradually through the year. Yes. And you can also discuss Babylonian hours, Italian hours etc. You can measure anything with anything if you define the quantities any way you want. If you want to measure recognized quantities, however, you have to follow some constraints. This shadow stick does not do that. In that case, I think a clock must have a digital display, a stopwatch with 99 lap times, a countdown timer, a calendar, and an alarm. Your sundial does none of that. No, all it has to do is measure time in equal increments . The shadow stick *shown* does not do that. I'm talking about *real* shadow clocks, used to this day. The Jewish calender used equal increments: lunar months. They Egyptian calendar used a 365-day year. Our calendar does not have equal months or years. Does that mean it's not a real calendar? A shadow clock would show hours as mentioned in the Bible: divisions of the time between sunup and sundown. Egyptian monuments had east-west walls. All you had to do was spot such a landmark, move until you were looking along an east-west wall, shim your card table so your wine jug didn't roll off, put your shadow clock on the table, and aim it at the landmark. The shadow would tell you the time of day (accurate within minutes throughout the year) and if the livestock dealer who had agreed to show you his ass was late. Depends which side of the east-west wall you park your table. You could be out of luck on the north side. Also you calculations above do not really support the accuracy statement. If you were on the north side of an east-west wall, you wouldn't be looking along it, would you? I calculated the accuracy of a shadow clock marked for 60-minute hours in Cairo at equinox. summer solstice: day length 838 minutes, mean hour 70 minutes dawn first second third fourth fifth sixth noon 62 66 69 74 73 75 winter solstice: day length 604 minutes, mean hour 50 minutes dawn first second third fourth fifth sixth noon 57 54 51 49 42 49 So even at the solstices, the hours are within 8 minutes of 1/12th of a day. Are you saying that these figures correspond to the equal divisions on the shadow stick? I do not think so. You're catching on. Although you answered several of my posts where I showed the calculated measurements, apparently you did not read them. Furthermore, for the stick to show "6 o'clock" correctly the stick would have to be several yards long to even catch the end of the shadow. That's why I said "counting direct observations of the sun." A farmer doesn't need a shadow clock to see when the sun rises and sets. Sun's altitude in Cairo at summer solstice is about 11 degrees (various calculators give slightly different results). You lost me there. Given that on the same day at noon the sun is about 84 degrees high the noon to 6 interval is whopping 43 times that of noon to 1. Counting direct observations of the sun, the hours were numbered from sunup to sundown, which would suit an ancient farmer. It was far easier to make and set up than a sun dial. The shadow of the edge of a T on a bar could probably be read more precisely than a sundial. Why? Which sundial? The edge of a T casts a shadow through an angle of less than 90 degrees. A gnomon casts a shadow as the sun moves more than 180 degrees. That sounds like a source of error. As I said before, you can measure anything if you make up your own definitions. I believe you're making up your own definitions. The Egyptians used a 10-hour day and a 12-hour night. At night they used celestial observations. If you want time in equal divisions, hourglasses synced with celestial observations is much better than sundials. If you want to divide the day into 10 hours, a sundial won't do it. Finally, here is what I take to be the artifacts themselves: http://members.aon.at/sundials/berlin-egypt_e.htm The labeling is somewhat confusing in places but I think in general the pictures and the description are fairly conclusive. Here's a page for you. http://library.thinkquest.org/C00817...ichistory.html " The Egyptians were the first people who created a twenty-four hour day. Time was a little bit different in those days. The night was divided up into twelve hours, which were designated by the position of stars in the sky. The day was divided into ten hours and a shadow clock was used to keep track of these hours. The twilight hours were the hours before dawn and after sunset." " The Egyptians thought they were the first to invent the shadow clock, but they were mistaken. At the same time, the Chinese, Babylonians, Greeks and the Romans were using instruments to tell time. Sundials were used in some of these groups, not because they work better, just because that's how they decided to tell time." |
#2
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
On Aug 11, 1:10*am, J Burns wrote:
Michael Koblic wrote: "J Burns" wrote in message ... After I pressed SEND, I saw that I'd misread you. *Well, a sundial takes more than two pieces of wood. *A shadow clock is easy to make and mark. Not true. An equatorial dial can be made from a flat board and a stick. It is inherently more accurate than the said stick and considerably easier to "calibrate". Putting sticks together with right angles and measuring millimeters to make four marks is easier than inscribing and marking arcs on a board and setting a gnomon at a particular angle. However, it looks excellent for dividing the daylight into 12 hours. That was what people wanted before mechanical timers and neon lights. The shadow clock handled "daylight savings" beautifully. *In Cairo, summer hours were 70 minutes and winter hours 51 minutes, changing gradually through the year. Yes. And you can also discuss Babylonian hours, Italian hours etc. You can measure anything with anything if you define the quantities any way you want. If you want to measure recognized quantities, however, you have to follow some constraints. This shadow stick does not do that. In that case, I think a clock must have a digital display, a stopwatch with 99 lap times, a countdown timer, a calendar, and an alarm. *Your sundial does none of that. No, all it has to do is measure time in equal increments . The shadow stick *shown* does not do that. I'm talking about *real* shadow clocks, used to this day. The Jewish calender used equal increments: lunar months. *They Egyptian calendar used a 365-day year. *Our calendar does not have equal months or years. *Does that mean it's not a real calendar? A shadow clock would show hours as mentioned in the Bible: divisions of the time between sunup and sundown. Egyptian monuments had east-west walls. *All you had to do was spot such a landmark, move until you were looking along an east-west wall, shim your card table so your wine jug didn't roll off, put your shadow clock on the table, and aim it at the landmark. *The shadow would tell you the time of day (accurate within minutes throughout the year) and if the livestock dealer who had agreed to show you his ass was late. Depends which side of the east-west wall you park your table. You could be out of luck on the north side. Also you calculations above do not really support the accuracy statement. If you were on the north side of an east-west wall, you wouldn't be looking along it, would you? I calculated the accuracy of a shadow clock marked for 60-minute hours in Cairo at equinox. summer solstice: day length 838 minutes, mean hour 70 minutes dawn first * second *third fourth fifth sixth noon * * * 62 * * * 66 * * 69 * *74 * * 73 * *75 winter solstice: day length 604 minutes, mean hour 50 minutes dawn first * second *third fourth fifth sixth noon * * * 57 * * * 54 * * 51 * * 49 * *42 * *49 So even at the solstices, the hours are within 8 minutes of 1/12th of a day. Are you saying that these figures correspond to the equal divisions on the shadow stick? I do not think so. You're catching on. *Although you answered several of my posts where I showed the calculated measurements, apparently you did not read them. Furthermore, for the stick to show "6 o'clock" correctly the stick would have to be several yards long to even catch the end of the shadow. That's why I said "counting direct observations of the sun." *A farmer doesn't need a shadow clock to see when the sun rises and sets. Sun's altitude in Cairo at summer solstice is about 11 degrees (various calculators give slightly different results). You lost me there. Given that on the same day at noon the sun is about 84 degrees high the noon to 6 interval is whopping 43 times that of noon to 1. Counting direct observations of the sun, the hours were numbered from sunup to sundown, which would suit an ancient farmer. *It was far easier to make and set up than a sun dial. *The shadow of the edge of a T on a bar could probably be read more precisely than a sundial. Why? Which sundial? The edge of a T casts a shadow through an angle of less than 90 degrees. * A gnomon casts a shadow as the sun moves more than 180 degrees. *That sounds like a source of error. As I said before, you can measure anything if you make up your own definitions. I believe you're making up your own definitions. *The Egyptians used a 10-hour day and a 12-hour night. *At night they used celestial observations. *If you want time in equal divisions, hourglasses synced with celestial observations is much better than sundials. *If you want to divide the day into 10 hours, a sundial won't do it. Finally, here is what I take to be the artifacts themselves: http://members.aon.at/sundials/berlin-egypt_e.htm The labeling is somewhat confusing in places but I think in general the pictures and the description are fairly conclusive. Here's a page for you.http://library.thinkquest.org/C00817...ichistory.html " * The Egyptians were the first people who created a twenty-four hour day. *Time was a little bit different in those days. *The night was divided up into twelve hours, which were designated by the position of stars in the sky. *The day was divided into ten hours and a shadow clock was used to keep track of these hours. *The twilight hours were the hours before dawn and after sunset." " * The Egyptians thought they were the first to invent the shadow clock, but they were mistaken. *At the same time, the Chinese, Babylonians, Greeks and the Romans were using instruments to tell time. * Sundials were used in some of these groups, not because they work better, just because that's how they decided to tell time." Well, its not rocket science, but if you google "shadow clock" you get some very good pictures and websites discussing them. So either everyone out there is wrong, or a couple of folks here are. --riverman |
#3
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
riverman wrote:
On Aug 11, 1:10 am, J Burns wrote: Michael Koblic wrote: "J Burns" wrote in message ... After I pressed SEND, I saw that I'd misread you. Well, a sundial takes more than two pieces of wood. A shadow clock is easy to make and mark. Not true. An equatorial dial can be made from a flat board and a stick. It is inherently more accurate than the said stick and considerably easier to "calibrate". Putting sticks together with right angles and measuring millimeters to make four marks is easier than inscribing and marking arcs on a board and setting a gnomon at a particular angle. However, it looks excellent for dividing the daylight into 12 hours. That was what people wanted before mechanical timers and neon lights. The shadow clock handled "daylight savings" beautifully. In Cairo, summer hours were 70 minutes and winter hours 51 minutes, changing gradually through the year. Yes. And you can also discuss Babylonian hours, Italian hours etc. You can measure anything with anything if you define the quantities any way you want. If you want to measure recognized quantities, however, you have to follow some constraints. This shadow stick does not do that. In that case, I think a clock must have a digital display, a stopwatch with 99 lap times, a countdown timer, a calendar, and an alarm. Your sundial does none of that. No, all it has to do is measure time in equal increments . The shadow stick *shown* does not do that. I'm talking about *real* shadow clocks, used to this day. The Jewish calender used equal increments: lunar months. They Egyptian calendar used a 365-day year. Our calendar does not have equal months or years. Does that mean it's not a real calendar? A shadow clock would show hours as mentioned in the Bible: divisions of the time between sunup and sundown. Egyptian monuments had east-west walls. All you had to do was spot such a landmark, move until you were looking along an east-west wall, shim your card table so your wine jug didn't roll off, put your shadow clock on the table, and aim it at the landmark. The shadow would tell you the time of day (accurate within minutes throughout the year) and if the livestock dealer who had agreed to show you his ass was late. Depends which side of the east-west wall you park your table. You could be out of luck on the north side. Also you calculations above do not really support the accuracy statement. If you were on the north side of an east-west wall, you wouldn't be looking along it, would you? I calculated the accuracy of a shadow clock marked for 60-minute hours in Cairo at equinox. summer solstice: day length 838 minutes, mean hour 70 minutes dawn first second third fourth fifth sixth noon 62 66 69 74 73 75 winter solstice: day length 604 minutes, mean hour 50 minutes dawn first second third fourth fifth sixth noon 57 54 51 49 42 49 So even at the solstices, the hours are within 8 minutes of 1/12th of a day. Are you saying that these figures correspond to the equal divisions on the shadow stick? I do not think so. You're catching on. Although you answered several of my posts where I showed the calculated measurements, apparently you did not read them. Furthermore, for the stick to show "6 o'clock" correctly the stick would have to be several yards long to even catch the end of the shadow. That's why I said "counting direct observations of the sun." A farmer doesn't need a shadow clock to see when the sun rises and sets. Sun's altitude in Cairo at summer solstice is about 11 degrees (various calculators give slightly different results). You lost me there. Given that on the same day at noon the sun is about 84 degrees high the noon to 6 interval is whopping 43 times that of noon to 1. Counting direct observations of the sun, the hours were numbered from sunup to sundown, which would suit an ancient farmer. It was far easier to make and set up than a sun dial. The shadow of the edge of a T on a bar could probably be read more precisely than a sundial. Why? Which sundial? The edge of a T casts a shadow through an angle of less than 90 degrees. A gnomon casts a shadow as the sun moves more than 180 degrees. That sounds like a source of error. As I said before, you can measure anything if you make up your own definitions. I believe you're making up your own definitions. The Egyptians used a 10-hour day and a 12-hour night. At night they used celestial observations. If you want time in equal divisions, hourglasses synced with celestial observations is much better than sundials. If you want to divide the day into 10 hours, a sundial won't do it. Finally, here is what I take to be the artifacts themselves: http://members.aon.at/sundials/berlin-egypt_e.htm The labeling is somewhat confusing in places but I think in general the pictures and the description are fairly conclusive. Here's a page for you.http://library.thinkquest.org/C00817...ichistory.html " The Egyptians were the first people who created a twenty-four hour day. Time was a little bit different in those days. The night was divided up into twelve hours, which were designated by the position of stars in the sky. The day was divided into ten hours and a shadow clock was used to keep track of these hours. The twilight hours were the hours before dawn and after sunset." " The Egyptians thought they were the first to invent the shadow clock, but they were mistaken. At the same time, the Chinese, Babylonians, Greeks and the Romans were using instruments to tell time. Sundials were used in some of these groups, not because they work better, just because that's how they decided to tell time." Well, its not rocket science, but if you google "shadow clock" you get some very good pictures and websites discussing them. So either everyone out there is wrong, or a couple of folks here are. --riverman Wrong about what? |
#4
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
"J Burns" wrote Wrong about what? What is really wrong is that nobody in this thread over the past several posts has taken the time to trim out all the totally unnecessary previous posts. Sombody please step up, next time? 8 kb for a three word reply? Really? -- Jim in NC |
#5
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
These are usually the ones that whine about their reader not understanding
top posting. Just plain laziness. "Morgans" wrote in message ... What is really wrong is that nobody in this thread over the past several posts has taken the time to trim out all the totally unnecessary previous posts. Sombody please step up, next time? 8 kb for a three word reply? Really? -- Jim in NC "J Burns" wrote Wrong about what? -- Have your accounts been removed by other's complaints? Do you like to force your opinions on others? Do you need to use multiple names due to shame and fear? Better rates for those requiring anonymity to survive! ******** easynews.com, trolling made easy ********** |
#6
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
On 08/11/2010 10:13 PM, Josepi wrote:
These are usually the ones that whine about their reader not understanding top posting. Just plain laziness. Congratulations. That far and away takes the cake as the stupidest post I've read all day. -- Free bad advice available here. To reply, eat the taco. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/ |
#7
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
Josepi wrote:
These are usually the ones that whine about their reader not understanding top posting. Just plain laziness. .... More like plain rudeness... (including top-posting) -- |
#8
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT What is it? Set 348
Morgans wrote:
"J Burns" wrote Wrong about what? What is really wrong is that nobody in this thread over the past several posts has taken the time to trim out all the totally unnecessary previous posts. Sombody please step up, next time? 8 kb for a three word reply? Really? I did not know what Riverman's remark had to do with the topic. Something about everybody with a web page agreeing on something and two unnamed people being wrong. I left the material he quoted so he could point it out. Your trimming leaves no connection to the topic. You really should have started a new thread and marked it OT. |
#9
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
On Aug 12, 8:56*am, J Burns wrote:
riverman wrote: On Aug 11, 1:10 am, J Burns wrote: Michael Koblic wrote: "J Burns" wrote in message ... After I pressed SEND, I saw that I'd misread you. *Well, a sundial takes more than two pieces of wood. *A shadow clock is easy to make and mark. Not true. An equatorial dial can be made from a flat board and a stick. It is inherently more accurate than the said stick and considerably easier to "calibrate". Putting sticks together with right angles and measuring millimeters to make four marks is easier than inscribing and marking arcs on a board and setting a gnomon at a particular angle. However, it looks excellent for dividing the daylight into 12 hours. That was what people wanted before mechanical timers and neon lights. The shadow clock handled "daylight savings" beautifully. *In Cairo, summer hours were 70 minutes and winter hours 51 minutes, changing gradually through the year. Yes. And you can also discuss Babylonian hours, Italian hours etc. You can measure anything with anything if you define the quantities any way you want. If you want to measure recognized quantities, however, you have to follow some constraints. This shadow stick does not do that. In that case, I think a clock must have a digital display, a stopwatch with 99 lap times, a countdown timer, a calendar, and an alarm. *Your sundial does none of that. No, all it has to do is measure time in equal increments . The shadow stick *shown* does not do that. I'm talking about *real* shadow clocks, used to this day. The Jewish calender used equal increments: lunar months. *They Egyptian calendar used a 365-day year. *Our calendar does not have equal months or years. *Does that mean it's not a real calendar? A shadow clock would show hours as mentioned in the Bible: divisions of the time between sunup and sundown. Egyptian monuments had east-west walls. *All you had to do was spot such a landmark, move until you were looking along an east-west wall, shim your card table so your wine jug didn't roll off, put your shadow clock on the table, and aim it at the landmark. *The shadow would tell you the time of day (accurate within minutes throughout the year) and if the livestock dealer who had agreed to show you his ass was late. Depends which side of the east-west wall you park your table. You could be out of luck on the north side. Also you calculations above do not really support the accuracy statement. If you were on the north side of an east-west wall, you wouldn't be looking along it, would you? I calculated the accuracy of a shadow clock marked for 60-minute hours in Cairo at equinox. summer solstice: day length 838 minutes, mean hour 70 minutes dawn first * second *third fourth fifth sixth noon * * * 62 * * * 66 * * 69 * *74 * * 73 * *75 winter solstice: day length 604 minutes, mean hour 50 minutes dawn first * second *third fourth fifth sixth noon * * * 57 * * * 54 * * 51 * * 49 * *42 * *49 So even at the solstices, the hours are within 8 minutes of 1/12th of a day. Are you saying that these figures correspond to the equal divisions on the shadow stick? I do not think so. You're catching on. *Although you answered several of my posts where I showed the calculated measurements, apparently you did not read them. Furthermore, for the stick to show "6 o'clock" correctly the stick would have to be several yards long to even catch the end of the shadow. That's why I said "counting direct observations of the sun." *A farmer doesn't need a shadow clock to see when the sun rises and sets. Sun's altitude in Cairo at summer solstice is about 11 degrees (various calculators give slightly different results). You lost me there. Given that on the same day at noon the sun is about 84 degrees high the noon to 6 interval is whopping 43 times that of noon to 1. Counting direct observations of the sun, the hours were numbered from sunup to sundown, which would suit an ancient farmer. *It was far easier to make and set up than a sun dial. *The shadow of the edge of a T on a bar could probably be read more precisely than a sundial. Why? Which sundial? The edge of a T casts a shadow through an angle of less than 90 degrees. * A gnomon casts a shadow as the sun moves more than 180 degrees. *That sounds like a source of error. As I said before, you can measure anything if you make up your own definitions. I believe you're making up your own definitions. *The Egyptians used a 10-hour day and a 12-hour night. *At night they used celestial observations. *If you want time in equal divisions, hourglasses synced with celestial observations is much better than sundials. *If you want to divide the day into 10 hours, a sundial won't do it. Finally, here is what I take to be the artifacts themselves: http://members.aon.at/sundials/berlin-egypt_e.htm The labeling is somewhat confusing in places but I think in general the pictures and the description are fairly conclusive. Here's a page for you.http://library.thinkquest.org/C00817...ichistory.html " * The Egyptians were the first people who created a twenty-four hour day. *Time was a little bit different in those days. *The night was divided up into twelve hours, which were designated by the position of stars in the sky. *The day was divided into ten hours and a shadow clock was used to keep track of these hours. *The twilight hours were the hours before dawn and after sunset." " * The Egyptians thought they were the first to invent the shadow clock, but they were mistaken. *At the same time, the Chinese, Babylonians, Greeks and the Romans were using instruments to tell time.. * Sundials were used in some of these groups, not because they work better, just because that's how they decided to tell time." Well, its not rocket science, but if you google "shadow clock" you get some very good pictures and websites discussing them. So either everyone out there is wrong, or a couple of folks here are. --riverman Wrong about what? I was reading an unspoken inference that this thing wasn't really for telling time, as it would be too inaccurate to be useful. --riverman |
#10
Posted to rec.crafts.metalworking,rec.puzzles,rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
What is it? Set 348
riverman wrote:
On Aug 12, 8:56 am, J Burns wrote: Wrong about what? I was reading an unspoken inference that this thing wasn't really for telling time, as it would be too inaccurate to be useful. --riverman I like what library.thinkquest.org said, that the sundial wasn't necessarily better. For centuries, longitudes in the New World were unknown because ships didn't know the "real time." Still, sailors turning hourglasses maintained watch schedules. When I was a kid in Rutland VT, the fire whistle blew daily at 8:50 AM and 8:50 PM. The morning whistle told every kid it was time to get to school. The evening whistle said it was time to get home. I'd say those whistles functioned like marks on a shadow clock. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|