O/T: Such A Deal
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:06:03 -0700, the infamous "Lew Hodgett"
scrawled the following: Such a deal from the RNC, home of Family_Values. Call toll free: 1-800-Bondage Or: 1-800-Sex-Games Tell me again, Lew, what party "Blowjobs aren't sex" Bill Clinton belonged to. See http://www.google.com/search?q=democrat+moral+scandal for 21,800,000 hits. Repugs have only 14.2mil. See http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypocrite for a portrait of your high horse. tsk tsk tsk -- In order that people may be happy in their work, these three things are needed: They must be fit for it. They must not do too much of it. And they must have a sense of success in it. -- John Ruskin, Pre-Raphaelitism, 1850 |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 9:38 am, Larry Jaques wrote:
On Mon, 5 Apr 2010 22:06:03 -0700, the infamous "Lew Hodgett" scrawled the following: Such a deal from the RNC, home of Family_Values. Call toll free: 1-800-Bondage Or: 1-800-Sex-Games Tell me again, Lew, what party "Blowjobs aren't sex" Bill Clinton belonged to. Seehttp://www.google.com/search?q=democrat+moral+scandalfor 21,800,000 hits. Repugs have only 14.2mil. Seehttp://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/hypocritefor a portrait of your high horse. tsk tsk tsk -- In order that people may be happy in their work, these three things are needed: They must be fit for it. They must not do too much of it. And they must have a sense of success in it. -- John Ruskin, Pre-Raphaelitism, 1850 Hey Lew - Larry Craig, etc..., etc...., ad nauseum. All smoke the bone (or other anonymous same-sex coupling) in private and publicly decry their own 'perversion.' These are all people, with people's failings. However, Republicans seem much more likely to turn theirs into platform planks. D'ohBoy |
O/T: Such A Deal
D'ohBoy wrote:
Tell me again, Lew, what party "Blowjobs aren't sex" Bill Clinton belonged to. Hey Lew - Larry Craig, etc..., etc...., ad nauseum. Larry Craig did not engage in any sex act or anything that could be called a sex act. Care to fill in the "etc..., etc...." portion of your claim? While there are exceptions, Republicans tend to stray using things above the neck; Democrats tend to stray using things below the belt. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 11:17*am, "HeyBub" wrote:
While there are exceptions, Republicans tend to stray using things above the neck; Democrats tend to stray using things below the belt. I tend to agree with you but it's like I have been telling my teenage son, God blessed us men with two heads. The problem is that blood only flows to one at a time and it is up to you to determine which one gets the blood. Actually, money, power, , drugs/alcohol, and sex is the downfall of a lot of people. I don't think any political party nor race nor social class is more or less prone to these vices--they are all equal opportunity destroyers. Whenever somebody paints an entire group of people based upon the action of one individual, it tends to color the painter, too. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 11:49*am, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 4/6/2010 10:17 AM, HeyBub wrote: D'ohBoy wrote: Tell me again, Lew, what party "Blowjobs aren't sex" Bill Clinton belonged to. Hey Lew - Larry Craig, etc..., etc...., ad nauseum. Larry Craig did not engage in any sex act or anything that could be called a sex act. Care to fill in the "etc..., etc...." portion of your claim? While there are exceptions, Republicans tend to stray using things above the neck; Democrats tend to stray using things below the belt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. The big difference between the R and D politicians is that the Rs end up looking like hypocrites because they lecture everyone on topics of moral rectitude while doing the very same things themselves. Ayup. The D politicians don't have that problem since, as a group, they have no concept of morality, right-, wrong, or appropriate behavior. When they behave like pigs, like Republicans they're merely being consistent with their worldview. There, fixed it for you. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 12:56*pm, Robatoy wrote:
The D politicians don't have that problem since, as a group, they have no concept of morality, right-, wrong, or appropriate behavior. When they behave like pigs, like Republicans they're merely being consistent with their worldview. There, fixed it for you. Wow. Seriously: this is getting out of hand. Insults are flying around this group from both sides and it makes everybody seem like they are in the third grade. Somebody else asked the question: What in the hell are we coming to? I know it was on a somewhat different topic but the rhetoric is such that nobody is permitted to have a different point of view. And it seems like neither side has the decency to just stop the pot shots. Who the hell cares if we all agree? Do we have to all agree? Isn't it *stupid* to think that everybody will always agree? What a boring life it would be to be! Sort of like people fighting about using corded tools vs. only hand tools vs. something in-between. Opinions are like noses: everybody has a different one. This used to be an incredibly congenial group and now people are at each other's throats over political idealogy. Can we just get back to what this group is intended for? I know I contribute much more to these OT things but thta is because I am still really wet behind the ears as far as woodworking goes. I would like to read things here that I can put to practical use whenver I try to hack some wood. And I don't care if the suggesitons come from the right or the left or the top or the bottom or out of nowhere. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 1:47*pm, busbus wrote:
On Apr 6, 12:56*pm, Robatoy wrote: The D politicians don't have that problem since, as a group, they have no concept of morality, right-, wrong, or appropriate behavior. When they behave like pigs, like Republicans they're merely being consistent with their worldview. There, fixed it for you. Wow. *Seriously: this is getting out of hand. *Insults are flying around this group from both sides and it makes everybody seem like they are in the third grade. *Somebody else asked the question: What in the hell are we coming to? *I know it was on a somewhat different topic but the rhetoric is such that nobody is permitted to have a different point of view. *And it seems like neither side has the decency to just stop the pot shots. Who the hell cares if we all agree? *Do we have to all agree? *Isn't it *stupid* to think that everybody will always agree? *What a boring life it would be to be! *Sort of like people fighting about using corded tools vs. only hand tools vs. something in-between. Opinions are like noses: everybody has a different one. This used to be an incredibly congenial group and now people are at each other's throats over political idealogy. *Can we just get back to what this group is intended for? *I know I contribute much more to these OT things but thta is because I am still really wet behind the ears as far as woodworking goes. *I would like to read things here that I can put to practical use whenver I try to hack some wood. And I don't care if the suggesitons come from the right or the left or the top or the bottom or out of nowhere. The key lies in the recognition that 'sides' must exist to keep us occupied lest we all wake up and revolt. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 2:00*pm, Robatoy wrote:
The key lies in the recognition that 'sides' must exist to keep us occupied lest we all wake up and revolt. That's actually kinda funny. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 3:35*pm, busbus wrote:
On Apr 6, 2:00*pm, Robatoy wrote: The key lies in the recognition that 'sides' must exist to keep us occupied lest we all wake up and revolt. That's actually kinda funny. 'Democracies' run on the premise to keep us divided. Read the Bankers Manifesto. It will give you some insight. Gun-totin' jesus freaks versus the socialist *******s. Now, if religion is the opiate of the masses, who is stoned all the time? |
O/T: Such A Deal
On 04/06/2010 12:47 PM, busbus wrote:
This used to be an incredibly congenial group and now people are at each other's throats over political idealogy. Can we just get back to what this group is intended for? looks around to see if I'm in the right place I don't know what group YOU'VE been following, but... "incredibly congenial"? Hell, in the ten years I've wandered in and out of here there's never been a time when people *haven't* been at each other's throats over political ideology. Has your newsreader only been showing you every third post or something? -- Free bad advice available here. To reply, eat the taco. http://www.flickr.com/photos/bbqboyee/ |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 6, 11:49*am, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
On 4/6/2010 10:17 AM, HeyBub wrote: D'ohBoy wrote: Tell me again, Lew, what party "Blowjobs aren't sex" Bill Clinton belonged to. Hey Lew - Larry Craig, etc..., etc...., ad nauseum. Larry Craig did not engage in any sex act or anything that could be called a sex act. Care to fill in the "etc..., etc...." portion of your claim? While there are exceptions, Republicans tend to stray using things above the neck; Democrats tend to stray using things below the belt. Absolute power corrupts absolutely. The big difference between the R and D politicians is that the Rs end up looking like hypocrites because they lecture everyone on topics of moral rectitude while doing the very same things themselves. The D politicians don't have that problem since, as a group, they have no concept of morality, right-, wrong, or appropriate behavior. When they behave like pigs, they're merely being consistent with their worldview. Oh, Timmy. Thank you. I do love it when assholes like you describe my moral failings and general world view. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:26:02 -0700 (PDT), Charlie Self
Oh, Timmy. Thank you. I do love it when assholes like you describe my moral failings and general world view. And considering that hypocrisy laden Timbo did not support either major party in the last election, I'm willing to wager that as usual, he specifically excludes himself from any of those failings or world views. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 7, 10:55*am, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
*It's always nice to watch people who have to resort to schoolyard cursing because they haven't got a rational counterpoint. You just keep on hiding under that illusion. Somebody calling you an asshole by using that word does not make it untrue because that word was used. When I have a valid counterpoint, I will express any it ****ing way I want. If you want to plug your ears and cover your eyes in a "you can't seeee meeee" fashion, go for it. My selection of words doesn't disqualify the truth therein. You are an asshole, Tim. |
O/T: Such A Deal
"Robatoy" wrote in message ... On Apr 7, 10:55 am, Tim Daneliuk wrote: It's always nice to watch people who have to resort to schoolyard cursing because they haven't got a rational counterpoint. You just keep on hiding under that illusion. Somebody calling you an **** by using that word does not make it untrue because that word was used. When I have a valid counterpoint, I will express any it *** way I want. If you want to plug your ears and cover your eyes in a "you can't seeee meeee" fashion, go for it. My selection of words doesn't disqualify the truth therein. You are an **** , Tim. Anyone besides me offended by the flagrant use of profanity? Using it as an offensive weapon somehow makes it worse. Of course, sensitve me, I'm offended by anyone trying to be hurtful... |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 7, 1:27*pm, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
There you go again attacking the method of the messengers again. "I don't like the message you brought me because I don't like the colour of your horse." Well that, and blaming "those bankers" ... and we know who THEY are, don't we (wink)... Who are you talking about, Tim? What are you insinuating? Having a problem with straight talk? Must you bob and weave so much? |
O/T: Such A Deal
D'ohBoy wrote:
On Apr 6, 10:17 am, "HeyBub" wrote: D'ohBoy wrote: Tell me again, Lew, what party "Blowjobs aren't sex" Bill Clinton belonged to. Hey Lew - Larry Craig, etc..., etc...., ad nauseum. Larry Craig did not engage in any sex act or anything that could be called a sex act. Ummm... yep, he got busted before he got caught at what he had been doing for years. Care to fill in the "etc..., etc...." portion of your claim? Sure, I could list a buncha Repugs like that one from FL, or any number of Religious right duuders. Smoking meth, then the bone.... Here are just a few of these scumbags: * Republican aide Alan David Berlin was arrested on charges that he wanted to engage in sex acts with a 15-year-old boy while dressed in a panda costume. [snip] While there are exceptions, Republicans tend to stray using things above the neck; Democrats tend to stray using things below the belt. Exactly, read what I wrote: "All smoke the bone...." Have fun with that list, kay? Wow! Thanks. I don't feel like such a loner anymore. |
O/T: Such A Deal
"Bill" wrote in message ... "Robatoy" wrote in message ... On Apr 7, 10:55 am, Tim Daneliuk wrote: It's always nice to watch people who have to resort to schoolyard cursing because they haven't got a rational counterpoint. You just keep on hiding under that illusion. Somebody calling you an **** by using that word does not make it untrue because that word was used. When I have a valid counterpoint, I will express any it *** way I want. If you want to plug your ears and cover your eyes in a "you can't seeee meeee" fashion, go for it. My selection of words doesn't disqualify the truth therein. You are an **** , Tim. Anyone besides me offended by the flagrant use of profanity? Using it as an offensive weapon somehow makes it worse. Of course, sensitve me, I'm offended by anyone trying to be hurtful... Please allow me to correct myself. I can tolerate a little profanity, especially if used humorously. But, I don't have much room in my life for mean-ness. What's the point... |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 09:55:21 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
And thanks for the invective. It's always nice to watch people who have to resort to schoolyard cursing because they haven't got a rational counterpoint. No dummy, you don't understand. You really are an asshole and that gives everybody who swears at you all the rationalization they need. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:09:01 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
Right. I don't support stealing, the people who do, or the politicians that are their hired thugs. My failings are personal and do not generally cause harm to my fellow citizens. I also do not expect everyone around me to pick up the tab for my mistakes. This is called being a "grown up". You're about as big a hypocrite as they come. All your criticisms and comments about people on universal healthcare stealing from the system and yet you've stated outright that when the opportunity presents itself, you'll take support from that very same system. You're not even man enough to back up to your own words. That makes you a whining mouthpiece and nothing else. Fundamentally, you're a thief like everybody else you criticize. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 10:09:01 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
Right. I don't support stealing, the people who do, or the politicians that are their hired thugs. My failings are personal and do not generally cause harm to my fellow citizens. I also do not expect everyone around me to pick up the tab for my mistakes. This is called being a "grown up". That's calling you a liar. You've stated publicly that you'll support that stealing if it benefits you? You've stated publicly that you'll try to take from the system. You call that grown up? You're not man enough to live up to your very own words. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 16:19:44 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
logic. I, like you, intend to benefit from a system into which I was *forced* to pay. I, unlike you, do not support such systems and try to vote to get them dismantled. If you benefit from it, then you're evil and a thief ~ You're original words to me. And, if the time comes that you take more out of it than you've put into it? Will you continue stealing? The truth is and always has been that you're a whiner with nothing else in your life to contribute. Certainly not woodworking. Whining is all you know how to do and you can't even do it ethically. Guess assholes like you are doomed to your self torment. Oops! I swore at you again. Too bad eh? |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 7, 5:19*pm, Tim Daneliuk wrote:
*I, like you, intend to benefit from a system into which I was *forced* to pay. The Debbil makes him do it folks... |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Wed, 07 Apr 2010 23:03:47 -0500, Tim Daneliuk
Uh oh ... prepare to be called a ... oh, you know ... No one is going to call him any names. That's reserved for real assholes like you. You see Tim****, you talk down to people and that ****es them off, especially when in reality you're really a whining sanctimonious little **** without any sense of reality. |
O/T: Such A Deal
Bill wrote:
Anyone besides me offended by the flagrant use of profanity? Using it as an offensive weapon somehow makes it worse. Of course, sensitve me, I'm offended by anyone trying to be hurtful... Get used to it. That's the way liberals express themselves. It's not that they can't use civil discourse, it's that when they do what they say sounds like a rational argument that can quickly be dismantled. When they curse, hit people, throw eggs, or shout down those with whom they disagree, they are obviously acting from emotion. A "feeling" is always genuine and cannot be gainsaid. If you dispute their utterance, you are obviously insane because their feelings are true and unassailable. |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 05:59:14 -0500, "HeyBub"
wrote: Get used to it. That's the way liberals express themselves. Ah Cheney must be a liberal eh? Mark |
O/T: Such A Deal
Robatoy wrote:
*I* won't be calling busbus anything as there are several components missing in his post: He's not sanctimonious, condescending nor is he trying to baffle anybody with big words. Busbus states his position on its merits and not by torching and belittling opposite views. IOW, he has class. Holy ****!!! -- Jack The Second Amendment is in place in case the politicians ignore the others. http://jbstein.com |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 8, 9:57*am, Jack Stein wrote:
Robatoy wrote: *I* won't be calling busbus anything as there are several components missing in his post: He's not sanctimonious, condescending nor is he trying to baffle anybody with big words. Busbus states his position on its merits and not by torching and belittling opposite views. IOW, he has class. Holy ****!!! Jack is a liberal, forgive his cussing. |
O/T: Such A Deal
Robatoy wrote:
On Apr 7, 1:27 pm, Tim Daneliuk wrote: Well that, and blaming "those bankers" ... and we know who THEY are, don't we (wink)... Who are you talking about, Tim? What are you insinuating? Having a problem with straight talk? Must you bob and weave so much? Well, since you've shown yourself to be homophobic and a sexist, it shouldn't surprise many that you are also an Anti-Banker, wink, wink! -- Jack From Little A.C.O.R.N.S Mighty Marxist Grow! http://jbstein.com |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Thu, 8 Apr 2010 06:59:33 -0700 (PDT), the infamous Robatoy
scrawled the following: On Apr 8, 9:57*am, Jack Stein wrote: Robatoy wrote: *I* won't be calling busbus anything as there are several components missing in his post: He's not sanctimonious, condescending nor is he trying to baffle anybody with big words. Busbus states his position on its merits and not by torching and belittling opposite views. IOW, he has class. Holy ****!!! Jack is a liberal, forgive his cussing. Calling Jack Stein a liberal is worse than cussing, Mr. Liberal. -- Climb the mountains and get their good tidings. Nature's peace will flow into you as sunshine flows into trees. The winds will blow their own freshness into you, and the storms their energy, while cares will drop away from you like the leaves of Autumn. -- John Muir |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 8, 10:08*am, Jack Stein wrote:
Robatoy wrote: On Apr 7, 1:27 pm, Tim Daneliuk wrote: Well that, and blaming "those bankers" ... and we know who THEY are, don't we (wink)... *Who are you talking about, Tim? What are you insinuating? Having a problem with straight talk? Must you bob and weave so much? Well, since you've shown yourself to be homophobic and a sexist, it shouldn't surprise many that you are also an Anti-Banker, wink, wink! -- Jack *From Little A.C.O.R.N.S Mighty Marxist Grow!http://jbstein.com And you LIKE what bankers did/do with other people's money/mortgages? .. .. Oh, and calling you a douche-nozzle doesn't make me homophobic, that is more your area of expertise...LOL |
O/T: Such A Deal
Robatoy wrote:
On Apr 8, 10:08 am, Jack Stein wrote: Robatoy wrote: On Apr 7, 1:27 pm, Tim Daneliuk wrote: Well that, and blaming "those bankers" ... and we know who THEY are, don't we (wink)... Who are you talking about, Tim? What are you insinuating? Having a problem with straight talk? Must you bob and weave so much? Well, since you've shown yourself to be homophobic and a sexist, it shouldn't surprise many that you are also an Anti-Banker, wink, wink! And you LIKE what bankers did/do with other people's money/mortgages? It was the socialist government of Germany under Hitler that was ****ed off at the bankers. I'm more ****ed off at the socialist government... Oh, and calling you a douche-nozzle doesn't make me homophobic, No, but when you said something I said sounded "gay" I'm pretty certain you were not using the term "gay" in a complimentary fashion. And most would consider calling a woman a "coont" a sexist thing to do. Calling someone a Douche-nozzle is pretty much just worthless vitriol, but whether it's homophobic, sexist or not would probably depend on the source. Your track record is not so good. -- Jack Mr. Geithner, May I Borrow Your TurboTax? http://jbstein.com |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Thu, 08 Apr 2010 13:51:29 -0400, Jack Stein
wrote: Calling someone a Douche-nozzle is pretty much just worthless vitriol, but whether it's homophobic, sexist or not would probably depend on the source. Considering how often you mention homophobic, there's little question that you're the one who has the problem with homosexuals. Must be a problem for you when you get together with your buddy Tim. But then, you're the quintessential redneck so there never was any question where you stand. |
O/T: Such A Deal
Upscale wrote:
Must be a problem for you when you get together with your buddy Tim. Your fascination with Tim is underwhelming. -- Jack The Problem with Socialism is you eventually run out of Other Peoples Money! http://jbstein.com |
O/T: Such A Deal
On Apr 8, 1:51*pm, Jack Stein wrote:
It was the socialist government of Germany under Hitler that was ****ed off at the bankers. *I'm more ****ed off at the socialist government... I see. So when anybody dislikes the way the bankers harvest money that makes them??? What??? A nazi? You get to wear a belt with a buckle that reads "Gott mit uns?" And most would consider calling a woman a "coont" a sexist thing to do. I never called a woman a coont. I called Ann Coulter a coont. Anyway, you bore me. |
O/T: Such A Deal
Robatoy wrote:
On Apr 8, 1:51 pm, Jack Stein wrote: It was the socialist government of Germany under Hitler that was ****ed off at the bankers. I'm more ****ed off at the socialist government... I see. Obviously not! And most would consider calling a woman a "coont" a sexist thing to do. I never called a woman a coont. I called Ann Coulter a coont. I see. Anyway, you bore me. Right! -- Jack Got Change: big government ===== BIG GOVERNMENT! http://jbstein.com |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:00 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter