Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Woodworking Question on chipcarving
I recently tried some chip carving. Naturally, the first few efforts are
not turning out well. While looking at what I did, I wondered what it would look like if I filled in the carved areas with some type of filler and sanded smooth. Has anyone tried this? What would people recommend to try to use as filler? Some of the wood fillers I looked at can shrink. Would pore filler work? I have seen a Minwax two part epoxy type wood filler. Would that work? I think I would need something that will bond very well with the wood, not shrink and accept stain/finish. Any suggestions or comments would be appreciated. Jim Moyseenko |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Woodworking Question on chipcarving
On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:37:05 -0500, Jim Moyseenko
wrote: I wondered what it would look like if I filled in the carved areas with some type of filler and sanded smooth. 1. Try it ! 2. Ugly (IMHE). Chip carving (certainly the way I do it) is a fairly random process. This looks OK, and in keeping with the overall spirit of the piece (medieval repro is great camouflage!). However drawing a plane through your work (ie filling and sanding) makes the variation even more obvious, because it draws a direct comparison between the shape in a single plane. This is more obvious to the eye than an "overall" 3D shape. You cetainly need to sand heavily after filling. Chip carving will tend to sink the ridges below the original surface and filling to this level makes the whole lot disappear. -- Smert' spamionam |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Woodworking Question on chipcarving
Andy Dingley wrote: On Mon, 29 Mar 2004 14:37:05 -0500, Jim Moyseenko wrote: I wondered what it would look like if I filled in the carved areas with some type of filler and sanded smooth. 1. Try it ! 2. Ugly (IMHE). Chip carving (certainly the way I do it) is a fairly random process. This looks OK, and in keeping with the overall spirit of the piece (medieval repro is great camouflage!). However drawing a plane through your work (ie filling and sanding) makes the variation even more obvious, because it draws a direct comparison between the shape in a single plane. This is more obvious to the eye than an "overall" 3D shape. You cetainly need to sand heavily after filling. Chip carving will tend to sink the ridges below the original surface and filling to this level makes the whole lot disappear. Thanks for your opinion. I don't quite understand your reasons but the drift I get is that it will look bad. I may try it just to see just how bad. - Jim |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
*** Rec.Woodorking Mini-FAQ *** 128 (w/How to Filter!) | Woodworking |