Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

I think with stable and well tuned equipment one can typically hold
better than a 32nd over 24 inches. Larger spans become a challenge.

Regadring gaps and "plane to fit" type situations, the best approach
is to "design in" methods of fit so you have a plan about how all
critical fits will work and can be gauged as milling and fit-up
progesses. Yes. miters often need to be trimmed to fit well but hiding
edge gaps under moldings, utilizing rabbet ledges to let butts hide
under an overhang and keeping a shoulder plane on the bench and having
some filler on hand and learn about burnishing to push the edges of
wood around when needed all server to make it all look good in the
end.

For me a cardinal rule is to cut every item as true and square as
possible and fix things along the way. This is where we have the
debate sometimes about using that shiney miter saw for a finish cut vs
doing all possible finish cuts on the TS. I always use the TS where I
have more control, vs relying on a miter saw for instance.

On Feb 12, 9:07*am, wrote:
Hi, All,

I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. *I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.

I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. *Same
thing with right angles. *I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.

What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

On Feb 12, 12:07*pm, wrote:
Hi, All,

I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. *I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.

I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. *Same
thing with right angles. *I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.

What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

Keep at it and you'll continue to get better.

I try as much as possible to 'production cut' everything. Doing
things like cutting all of the similar rabbits or tenons at the same
time gives you consistency when fitting the mortises or vicey-versey.
Anytime you need to reset the fence, blade height, angle, etc. you are
allowing for error.

As far as being out of square I use a panel cutting sled to square up
panels. Once you take the time and make all your test cuts when
building the sled you'll never have problems again.
I use a simple one like this:
http://www.woodworkingtips.com/etips/etip030822wb.html
(without the runner on the edge of the saw)
But some go with a double runner sled:
http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mrwiz...tes/sled01.pdf

wrote:
....
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.
....

Something's not set up to have that much error in 24" -- have you
verified the miter slot is actually parallel to the blade? If it isn't,
even though the miter gauge is perpendicular to much higher tolerance,
the panel will "move" towards or away from the plane of the blade as it
passes by.

--

wrote in message
...
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

Set your saw up properly, .005" is typically acceptable. Cut to exact
measurements, if you are not worried about 1/32" you will continue to see
gaps.
Then there is practice that makes you better.

wrote in message
...
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.

I'm pretty tolerant of other's religious views, sexual preferences, but I've
gotten into some discussions on politics.

paraphrased from Tolpins book "Workshops"

carpenters work to the nearest 1/8", furnituremakers to the nearest 1/64"
and boat builders to the nearest boat.

That advice given, strive to continually get better and you will.

Personally, I'm constantly striving for my tolerences to get better or my
eyesight to get worse.
jc

wrote in message
...
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

I used to make all my own bee hives. There are 9 or 10 frames (of 4
pieces each) per super, so there are a lot of pieces to make over and
over again. I was able to hold +/-0.003 in dry pine to make all the
parts. Table saw and router where the main cutting tools.

Pete Stanaitis
-------------------

wrote:
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:07:24 -0800, cwo4cno7325 wrote:

Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general. I
am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2 real
ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of what I
had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas that I
have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due to
being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same thing
with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's square,
and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can still get a
1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

This reply is a bit OT:

The goal is not the tolerances you want, but in finding the source of the
errors. Eliminate, reduce, or control the sources of errors and the
tolerances will take care of themselves.

I know that sounds like some Monthly Quality meeting in the lunch room
BS, but it is true. Why is your saw giving you 1/16 inch error on a 24
inch board? Why are there gaps in your assembly? The longer you are in
woodworking, the more you will find out about your tools and the sources
of errors.

By learning to think through the process you are using to cut shape the
wood you will find the sources and by trial and error learn how to
control the sources of error. You will then learn a lot more about your
hobby and yourself.

BTW: 100 years ago, in woodworking the greatest source of error was lack
of practice in using hand tools. Nobody today has the time or
inclination to serve many years as an apprenticeship learning to use hand
tools. We trade money for power tools, jigs, fixtures, and carbide
blades instead of spending time doing very boring and repetitive tasks.
But even back then, thinking through a problem to reduce the causes of
errors was an important part of learning woodworking, IMHO.

Now back to other replies that may actually help you.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:07:24 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....


Working with wood is very different than metal or plastic. Wood moves
so we often use joinery that overlaps, slides past each other, etc. To
check to see if two boards are the same length, I'd butt them up to a
stop. If I can not feel a step on the other, I say, for all practical
purposes that they are the same length. A 1/16" error is telling me
the table saw is in need of a tuneup.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:50:54 -0500, "Edwin Pawlowski"
wrote:


wrote in message
...
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.

I'm pretty tolerant of other's religious views, sexual preferences, but I've
gotten into some discussions on politics.


I'm very tolerant, of political parties, race, religion, gay marriage,
abortion, etc. But I am very intolerent about the bailouts and lack
of privacy in the USA.

wrote:
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

I don't think you can do better than this book for table saws. It will
guide you through some of the setups the guys are talking about and help
you tune your saw. Of all the woodworking books I own, this is in the top 5

http://tinyurl.com/almhzs

Kelly Mehler describes the topic very well, and is a wealth of knowledge.

Tanus

"Joe" wrote in message
news
paraphrased from Tolpins book "Workshops"

carpenters work to the nearest 1/8", furnituremakers to the nearest 1/64"
and boat builders to the nearest boat.


I must be a carpenter.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:53:31 -0800 (PST), "SonomaProducts.com"
wrote:

I think with stable and well tuned equipment one can typically hold
better than a 32nd over 24 inches. Larger spans become a challenge.

Regadring gaps and "plane to fit" type situations, the best approach
is to "design in" methods of fit so you have a plan about how all
critical fits will work and can be gauged as milling and fit-up
progesses. Yes. miters often need to be trimmed to fit well but hiding
edge gaps under moldings, utilizing rabbet ledges to let butts hide
under an overhang and keeping a shoulder plane on the bench and having
some filler on hand and learn about burnishing to push the edges of
wood around when needed all server to make it all look good in the
end.

For me a cardinal rule is to cut every item as true and square as
possible and fix things along the way. This is where we have the
debate sometimes about using that shiney miter saw for a finish cut vs
doing all possible finish cuts on the TS. I always use the TS where I
have more control, vs relying on a miter saw for instance.

On Feb 12, 9:07Â*am, wrote:
Hi, All,

I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. Â*I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.

I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Â*Same
thing with right angles. Â*I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.

What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....
I always set my miters so that if there is an "open" edge it's on the
blind side - outside mitered corners go for 89 degrees instead of 90,
insides go for 91. That way the visible edge is ALWAYS tight.

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:01:08 GMT, "Joe" wrote:

paraphrased from Tolpins book "Workshops"

carpenters work to the nearest 1/8", furnituremakers to the nearest 1/64"
and boat builders to the nearest boat.

That advice given, strive to continually get better and you will.

Personally, I'm constantly striving for my tolerences to get better or my
eyesight to get worse.
jc
Well, like death and taxes, the latter is inevitable if you live long
enough. SWMBO never seams to have that problem when looking at your
work though!!!!

On Thu, 12 Feb 2009 18:56:10 -0500, Tanus wrote:

wrote:
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????

Thanks.....

I don't think you can do better than this book for table saws. It will
guide you through some of the setups the guys are talking about and help
you tune your saw. Of all the woodworking books I own, this is in the top 5

http://tinyurl.com/almhzs

Kelly Mehler describes the topic very well, and is a wealth of knowledge.

Tanus
Google "dave woodland" or "sawshop" for common sense saw setup
information that will make your saw predictable and accurate.

Try http://store.thesawshop.com/catalogue/docs/tune-up.pdf

wrote:
Hi, All,


I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.


I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. Same
thing with right angles. I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.


What do you guys get on the average?????


I feel I have failed in life if I can't keep it within 1/64 over eight feet.

I fail a lot so I just beat it into submission with a hammer.



--

dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
....a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it at http://mysite.verizon.net/xico

Thanks for a ton of good ideas! I think I have all tools well tuned
up, and I may have overstated the 1/16 inch error. That 1/16 inch
usually comes from the combination of a number of parts, each with a
very small error that when added together may yield a total 1/16 inch
error at most.


One thing that I have found that helps is to cut all the same size
pieces at the same time, as mentioned above. They may not be exact in
dimension, but they are the same!


The tolerences mentioned for house carpenters, and furniture makers at
1/64 is a good target. I think if I can get 1/64 from the power
tools, then I can "fix" things with hand tools during assembly, to MY
tolerence.


And practice! I just looked at one of my first projects, a wood box
for camping, done on a Workmate, with a really bad circular saw. It
looks "very authentic" and at least shows some improvement when
compared to current projects.


Anyway, thanks for all the help.

Rich.....

On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:42:35 -0800 (PST), wrote:

Thanks for a ton of good ideas! I think I have all tools well tuned
up, and I may have overstated the 1/16 inch error. That 1/16 inch
usually comes from the combination of a number of parts, each with a
very small error that when added together may yield a total 1/16 inch
error at most.

Cumulative error is a bit stickier problem. You would think that the
errors would tend to go at random directions, effectively cancelling
each other out over the entire project, but I tend to find that they
always are strictly additive, leading to sometimes rather significant
error at the end.

No answers for you, but you are not alone.

--
"We need to make a sacrifice to the gods, find me a young virgin... oh, and bring something to kill"

Tim Douglass

http://www.DouglassClan.com

Tim Douglass wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:42:35 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Thanks for a ton of good ideas! I think I have all tools well
tuned
up, and I may have overstated the 1/16 inch error. That 1/16 inch
usually comes from the combination of a number of parts, each with
a
very small error that when added together may yield a total 1/16
inch
error at most.

Cumulative error is a bit stickier problem. You would think that the
errors would tend to go at random directions, effectively cancelling
each other out over the entire project, but I tend to find that they
always are strictly additive, leading to sometimes rather
significant
error at the end.

No answers for you, but you are not alone.

Statistical analysis of tolerance stacks is in itself an interesting
exercise.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

1/32 over 24 inches.
"J. Clarke" wrote in message
...
Tim Douglass wrote:
On Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:42:35 -0800 (PST),
wrote:

Thanks for a ton of good ideas! I think I have all tools well
tuned
up, and I may have overstated the 1/16 inch error. That 1/16 inch
usually comes from the combination of a number of parts, each with
a
very small error that when added together may yield a total 1/16
inch
error at most.

Cumulative error is a bit stickier problem. You would think that the
errors would tend to go at random directions, effectively cancelling
each other out over the entire project, but I tend to find that they
always are strictly additive, leading to sometimes rather
significant
error at the end.

No answers for you, but you are not alone.

Statistical analysis of tolerance stacks is in itself an interesting
exercise.

--
--
--John
to email, dial "usenet" and validate
(was jclarke at eye bee em dot net)

On Feb 13, 6:23*am, "dadiOH" wrote:
wrote:
Hi, All,

I'm wondering what tolerence one uses when cutting pieces in general.
I am currently making an end table from pine as a prototype for the 2
real ones for the LR. *I can usually cut boards to 1/32 of an inch of
what I had on my plans, but when assembled, I see small gaps or areas
that I have to plane down.

I rather enjoy the "extra" woodworking, but am wondering if this due
to being a poor woodworker, or if this is normal procedure. *Same
thing with right angles. *I set the table saw up with a machinist's
square, and a "tight eyeball", and get pretty good results, but can
still get a 1/16 inch error on a 24 inch square board.

What do you guys get on the average?????

I feel I have failed in life if I can't keep it within 1/64 over eight feet.

I fail a lot so I just beat it into submission with a hammer.

--

dadiOH
____________________________

dadiOH's dandies v3.06...
...a help file of info about MP3s, recording from
LP/cassette and tips & tricks on this and that.
Get it athttp://mysite.verizon.net/xico

..004 over 100". Time and time again. Sometimes better, never worse.