Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am making a Mission Style Bedroom armoire. I'm getting close to the point
where I need to start thinking about the drawers. I am making the armoire out of Red oak and am considering either making the drawer sides, back, and bottom either out of Baltic Birch Plywood or Solid maple, except the bottom which would be maple plywood. The drawers are 40" wide x 7" tall x 22" deep. What would be your choice? Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? Thanks, Roland |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Poplar
If the guides are done right it is six of one and half a dozen of the other. Which ever you feel right with. -- Mike G. Heirloom Woods www.heirloom-woods.net "Roland Hart" wrote in message ... I am making a Mission Style Bedroom armoire. I'm getting close to the point where I need to start thinking about the drawers. I am making the armoire out of Red oak and am considering either making the drawer sides, back, and bottom either out of Baltic Birch Plywood or Solid maple, except the bottom which would be maple plywood. The drawers are 40" wide x 7" tall x 22" deep. What would be your choice? Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? Thanks, Roland |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Roland Hart" wrote in message
Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? There would, of course, be no nylon in a traditional mission piece. The width of your drawers may also make it difficult to use the more traditional methods and that would satisfy someone who is used to modern drawer slides. The problem you are going to find with traditional methods, particular with a drawer that is that much wider than it is deep, is that it is difficult to close evenly without side to side movement, which has a tendency to cause one side to bind when you have wood on wood contact. This is not insurmountable, but does require some know how and extra care. If authenticity is NOT what you're shooting for in your piece, I'd say go for the modern drawer slides of your choice. You're going to find them more friendly, all around, then wood on wood, particularly for the ladies of the house. That said, if you do want to stay with a more traditional approach, consider routing a groove in the middle of both drawer sides and using hardwood runners attached to the case for guides. Alternately, you could use a dovetail runner on the bottom, which would be traditional for sure. Have you thought about two 18 - 20" drawers, in lieu of one 40"? Make it easier to stay "rational, and a 40" wide span on a drawer bottom is going to pose some problems of its own with regard to sagging. Just some thoughts ... -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 1/16/04 |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Swingman" wrote in message ... "Roland Hart" wrote in message Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? There would, of course, be no nylon in a traditional mission piece. The width of your drawers may also make it difficult to use the more traditional methods and that would satisfy someone who is used to modern drawer slides. The problem you are going to find with traditional methods, particular with a drawer that is that much wider than it is deep, is that it is difficult to close evenly without side to side movement, which has a tendency to cause one side to bind when you have wood on wood contact. This is not insurmountable, but does require some know how and extra care. If I do use dovetails, I was considering using two per drawer to combat the binding. If authenticity is NOT what you're shooting for in your piece, I'd say go for the modern drawer slides of your choice. You're going to find them more friendly, all around, then wood on wood, particularly for the ladies of the house. I already broke from traditional already by using Red Oak instead of quartersawn White Oak. I am leading towards the ball bearing, full extension, blum slides. That said, if you do want to stay with a more traditional approach, consider routing a groove in the middle of both drawer sides and using hardwood runners attached to the case for guides. Alternately, you could use a dovetail runner on the bottom, which would be traditional for sure. Have you thought about two 18 - 20" drawers, in lieu of one 40"? Make it easier to stay "rational, and a 40" wide span on a drawer bottom is going to pose some problems of its own with regard to sagging. Yes, the thought of the 1/4" drawer bottom sagging has crossed my mind. If I go with ball bearing drawer slides, the guides would be on the outsides. One thought I had would be to but a couple of 1/2" thick hardwood strips dadoed into the front drawer face and into the back drawer face. Just some thoughts ... -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 1/16/04 Roland |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Just about any wood will work for a drawer but if you have access to
reasonably priced maple that is what I would recommend. Makes a beautiful strong drawer. Use dovetail joints for the front corners and make the bottom removable. For large drawers I like to plane my material down to 5/8" or slightly less. (5/8" is the maximum for Blum Tandem slides) Some maple tends to tear out when planned. To make maple drawers I start with my planner then use drum sander to get to final thickness. While not the traditional approach Blum Tandem slides are hidden, provide full extension and like you said are super smooth with excellent closing action. What do you have to pay for Blum Tandem slides? I found a supplier on the internet that has the 21" slides for less than $20 per set which is not that much more than side mounted slides. I bought 6 just a few weeks back and got excellent service. Ordered them on a Friday they shipped the following Monday and they Emailed me the UPS tracking number the next day. I like to use 1/4" +- plywood covered with plastic laminate for drawer bottoms. Earl Creel "Roland Hart" wrote in message ... I am making a Mission Style Bedroom armoire. I'm getting close to the point where I need to start thinking about the drawers. I am making the armoire out of Red oak and am considering either making the drawer sides, back, and bottom either out of Baltic Birch Plywood or Solid maple, except the bottom which would be maple plywood. The drawers are 40" wide x 7" tall x 22" deep. What would be your choice? Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? Thanks, Roland |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would you care to share the name of this supplier?
dean s "Earl Creel" wrote in message news:YoYPb.4197$ce2.2626@okepread03... What do you have to pay for Blum Tandem slides? I found a supplier on the internet that has the 21" slides for less than $20 per set which is not that much more than side mounted slides. I bought 6 just a few weeks back and got excellent service. Ordered them on a Friday they shipped the following Monday and they Emailed me the UPS tracking number the next day. Earl Creel |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I found some for $24.95 + $2.55 for the orange locking device at...
http://www.scherrs.com/shop/index.ht...tml&lang=en-us Rockler wants $40 for a 21" slide which includes the lock and the rear mounting bracket. Where's the source you found? If I use the Blum tandems I won't be able to keep the drawer sides flush with the drawer front and use a dovetail joint. The sides need to be inset 3/8. Unless your thinking that the slides are behind the face frame any way, which means the slides can move out rather than the sides of the drawer moving in. Hmmm, that could work. Roland. "Earl Creel" wrote in message news:YoYPb.4197$ce2.2626@okepread03... Just about any wood will work for a drawer but if you have access to reasonably priced maple that is what I would recommend. Makes a beautiful strong drawer. Use dovetail joints for the front corners and make the bottom removable. For large drawers I like to plane my material down to 5/8" or slightly less. (5/8" is the maximum for Blum Tandem slides) Some maple tends to tear out when planned. To make maple drawers I start with my planner then use drum sander to get to final thickness. While not the traditional approach Blum Tandem slides are hidden, provide full extension and like you said are super smooth with excellent closing action. What do you have to pay for Blum Tandem slides? I found a supplier on the internet that has the 21" slides for less than $20 per set which is not that much more than side mounted slides. I bought 6 just a few weeks back and got excellent service. Ordered them on a Friday they shipped the following Monday and they Emailed me the UPS tracking number the next day. I like to use 1/4" +- plywood covered with plastic laminate for drawer bottoms. Earl Creel "Roland Hart" wrote in message ... I am making a Mission Style Bedroom armoire. I'm getting close to the point where I need to start thinking about the drawers. I am making the armoire out of Red oak and am considering either making the drawer sides, back, and bottom either out of Baltic Birch Plywood or Solid maple, except the bottom which would be maple plywood. The drawers are 40" wide x 7" tall x 22" deep. What would be your choice? Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? Thanks, Roland |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Look here. I prefer Accuride but they also carry Blum.
http://www.cabinetparts.com/cgi-loca...74829243.57156 RB Roland Hart wrote: I found some for $24.95 + $2.55 for the orange locking device at... http://www.scherrs.com/shop/index.ht...tml&lang=en-us Rockler wants $40 for a 21" slide which includes the lock and the rear mounting bracket. Where's the source you found? If I use the Blum tandems I won't be able to keep the drawer sides flush with the drawer front and use a dovetail joint. The sides need to be inset 3/8. Unless your thinking that the slides are behind the face frame any way, which means the slides can move out rather than the sides of the drawer moving in. Hmmm, that could work. Roland. "Earl Creel" wrote in message news:YoYPb.4197$ce2.2626@okepread03... Just about any wood will work for a drawer but if you have access to reasonably priced maple that is what I would recommend. Makes a beautiful strong drawer. Use dovetail joints for the front corners and make the bottom removable. For large drawers I like to plane my material down to 5/8" or slightly less. (5/8" is the maximum for Blum Tandem slides) Some maple tends to tear out when planned. To make maple drawers I start with my planner then use drum sander to get to final thickness. While not the traditional approach Blum Tandem slides are hidden, provide full extension and like you said are super smooth with excellent closing action. What do you have to pay for Blum Tandem slides? I found a supplier on the internet that has the 21" slides for less than $20 per set which is not that much more than side mounted slides. I bought 6 just a few weeks back and got excellent service. Ordered them on a Friday they shipped the following Monday and they Emailed me the UPS tracking number the next day. I like to use 1/4" +- plywood covered with plastic laminate for drawer bottoms. Earl Creel "Roland Hart" wrote in message ... I am making a Mission Style Bedroom armoire. I'm getting close to the point where I need to start thinking about the drawers. I am making the armoire out of Red oak and am considering either making the drawer sides, back, and bottom either out of Baltic Birch Plywood or Solid maple, except the bottom which would be maple plywood. The drawers are 40" wide x 7" tall x 22" deep. What would be your choice? Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? Thanks, Roland |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think Stickley would have gone for the modern slides had they been
available. If you can't see it, who cares? Unless your going to be competing in some kind of contest. Just my opinion. manzanar "Roland Hart" wrote in message ... I am making a Mission Style Bedroom armoire. I'm getting close to the point where I need to start thinking about the drawers. I am making the armoire out of Red oak and am considering either making the drawer sides, back, and bottom either out of Baltic Birch Plywood or Solid maple, except the bottom which would be maple plywood. The drawers are 40" wide x 7" tall x 22" deep. What would be your choice? Another question is the drawer slide hardware. It would seem that traditional furniture would be to use wood on wood drawer dovetails with nylon slides on the outsides. This would allow the drawer sides to be flush with the drawer front lending itself to either a dovetail joint or an interlocking rabbet joint. I am also considering the Blum Tandem hidden underneath drawer slides. They are super smooth and can hold 100 pounds. Again, what would be your choice? Thanks, Roland |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Position of holes in Ikea drawer fronts | UK diy | |||
Question about building a drawer | Woodworking | |||
Oak end table drawer - wooden slides and M&T questions (Long) Repostdue to crazy ISP/net problem | Woodworking | |||
In my exuberance (ok, stupidity) I glued a drawer together without the bottom... | Woodworking |