Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Hi to all woodworking friends,
I am doing a little bit of furniture design. I would like to know if metric measurments would be acceptable for the US woodworker? You may request a sample drawing from me. Keep on your good work. Best wishes from Sweden and Klas |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Klas from Creum wrote:
Hi to all woodworking friends, I am doing a little bit of furniture design. I would like to know if metric measurments would be acceptable for the US woodworker? I can only answer for myself... Metric is fine! |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Klas from Creum wrote:
Hi to all woodworking friends, I am doing a little bit of furniture design. I would like to know if metric measurments would be acceptable for the US woodworker? .... Think that would depend on what/who you're after -- for the casual/hobby/weekender, I'd think "not so much". Most folks w/o technical training in the US just aren't familiar enough w/ metric to be comfortable thinking in those units (and even I, though a NucE for 30+ yrs w/ still think natively in English outside the specialized environment). -- |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Klas from Creum" wrote in message ... Hi to all woodworking friends, I am doing a little bit of furniture design. I would like to know if metric measurments would be acceptable for the US woodworker? You may request a sample drawing from me. Keep on your good work. Best wishes from Sweden and Klas If you want to appeal to more than a few people, No! |
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Leon" wrote in news:byRwk.412$Z64.123
@flpi143.ffdc.sbc.com: "Klas from Creum" wrote in message news:2f9a922f-60ca-413f-918c-80c384125c92 @k30g2000hse.googlegroups.com... Hi to all woodworking friends, I am doing a little bit of furniture design. I would like to know if metric measurments would be acceptable for the US woodworker? You may request a sample drawing from me. Keep on your good work. Best wishes from Sweden and Klas If you want to appeal to more than a few people, No! Many would (or rather should) be comfortable but are not, in part because a simple divide by 2.5 doesn't work exactly. Mostly the problem is visualizing the distances/measurements. Having grown up long ago in metric, I still find the intricacies of US measurements confounding, but on the other hand, more easy to draw in my mind. I wouldn't mind seeing metric drawings ... And I am sure there are some here who can easily transpose them into US measurements, although for precise drawings, they may need to be redone. Morris Dovey, any comments? -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Han wrote:
I wouldn't mind seeing metric drawings ... And I am sure there are some here who can easily transpose them into US measurements, although for precise drawings, they may need to be redone. Morris Dovey, any comments? I'd very much prefer inch measurements, but if the plan was for something that I found especially beautiful/exciting, I'd probably shrug and take the time to convert the measurements. If the plan requires metric hardware, then it might be important to make that absolutely clear - and a list of sources would bring you much good karma. I'm not sure I'm the right guy to ask since I don't build much furniture and almost nothing that I do build is likely to be thought beautiful by any normal person... :-) -- Morris Dovey DeSoto Solar DeSoto, Iowa USA http://www.iedu.com/DeSoto/ |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Han" wrote in message ... Many would (or rather should) be comfortable but are not, in part because a simple divide by 2.5 doesn't work exactly. Even if 2.5 did divide exactly, there is bound to be a miscalculation at least one time when manually converting a metric drawing into US measurements. Mostly the problem is visualizing the distances/measurements. Having grown up long ago in metric, I still find the intricacies of US measurements confounding, but on the other hand, more easy to draw in my mind. I wouldn't mind seeing metric drawings ... And I am sure there are some here who can easily transpose them into US measurements, although for precise drawings, they may need to be redone. Morris Dovey, any comments? I think I could go with a metric drawing If all my equipment had metric measurements. |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Leon" wrote in
: "Han" wrote in message ... Many would (or rather should) be comfortable but are not, in part because a simple divide by 2.5 doesn't work exactly. Even if 2.5 did divide exactly, there is bound to be a miscalculation at least one time when manually converting a metric drawing into US measurements. Mostly the problem is visualizing the distances/measurements. Having grown up long ago in metric, I still find the intricacies of US measurements confounding, but on the other hand, more easy to draw in my mind. I wouldn't mind seeing metric drawings ... And I am sure there are some here who can easily transpose them into US measurements, although for precise drawings, they may need to be redone. Morris Dovey, any comments? I think I could go with a metric drawing If all my equipment had metric measurements. I really like metric. Dividing or multiplying by 10 is so much easier than 2. However, I like my son-in-law's T-shirt that says: There are only 10 kinds of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't. -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Klas from Creum wrote:
Hi to all woodworking friends, I am doing a little bit of furniture design. I would like to know if metric measurments would be acceptable for the US woodworker? You may request a sample drawing from me. Keep on your good work. Best wishes from Sweden and Klas I live in Canada, ostensibly a metric country. Despite that, and because of our proximity to the US, most of our lumber at the yard is sized in the old imperial way. I drive in kilometers per hour, read celcius temps, and buy sliced meat by the gram. I'm used to it. But reading metric plans and using inch-based lumber would be very difficult. It would add to my errors, and I don't need any help in that department. Converting isn't a difficult process for me, but I think I'd avoid it because I'd end up with a measurement like 3.6984". My $0.02000000000000 -- Tanus http://www.home.mycybernet.net/~waugh/shop/ |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Tanus wrote in :
Klas from Creum wrote: Hi to all woodworking friends, I am doing a little bit of furniture design. I would like to know if metric measurments would be acceptable for the US woodworker? You may request a sample drawing from me. Keep on your good work. Best wishes from Sweden and Klas I live in Canada, ostensibly a metric country. Despite that, and because of our proximity to the US, most of our lumber at the yard is sized in the old imperial way. I drive in kilometers per hour, read celcius temps, and buy sliced meat by the gram. I'm used to it. But reading metric plans and using inch-based lumber would be very difficult. It would add to my errors, and I don't need any help in that department. Converting isn't a difficult process for me, but I think I'd avoid it because I'd end up with a measurement like 3.6984". My $0.02000000000000 To add to that confusion, lumber I saw in Holland was sold in metric measurements, but acursory examination clearly showed that the plywood panels etc were 4x8 feet ... Still they measure everything in m and cm. My €0,02 grin. -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Han wrote:
Many would (or rather should) be comfortable but are not, in part because a simple divide by 2.5 doesn't work exactly. Mostly the problem is visualizing the distances/measurements. Having grown up long ago in metric, I still find the intricacies of US measurements confounding, but on the other hand, more easy to draw in my mind. Does ANYONE not own _a_ ruler and tape that doesn't have metric markings? Anyone who has NOTHING with metric units, speak up! ** Posted from http://www.teranews.com ** |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Han" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in : I really like metric. Dividing or multiplying by 10 is so much easier than 2. To which I always ask, what is half of 1 mm? |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Stuart" wrote in message ... In article , Tanus wrote: But reading metric plans and using inch-based lumber would be very difficult. It would add to my errors, and I don't need any help in that department. Converting isn't a difficult process for me, but I think I'd avoid it because I'd end up with a measurement like 3.6984". But surely your Lumber sizes are only nominal anyway? When you want a specific size you plane it yourself to exact size. Like in the UK, if you bought "2x2" planed you got something around 1.3/4"x1.3/4" plus and minus about 1/16". These days its 44mmx44mm and that's the finished size you buy. Actually in the US, you can commonly buy rough cut, S2S, and S2S1E/S3S. Surfaced 2 sides and Surfaced 2 sides 1 edge ripped straight. All are commonly nominal and are intended to be resurfaced/planed to the desired normal thickness. There is also a very common S4S designation for lumber and this lumber is uniform in width and thickness and not normally intended to be resurfaced to aquire the common thickness of 3/4" from 4/4 stock. Speaking personally, at age 61, I've only just started using metric units for measuring timber as I always used to like imperial measure. However, trying to work out the centre of a piece of timber that is 1.13/16" thick requires more brain exercise, tiresome for my old brain, than halving 50mm. Half of 1-13/16" Convert all to the lowest common deniminator, add, then double the common deniminatior. 1" = 16/16" + 13/16" = 29/16". Half of that is 29/32". But I hear you, several years of the old fashoned way of creating mechanical drawings mades one quick with fractions. ;~) |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
|
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"B A R R Y" wrote in message ... Han wrote: Many would (or rather should) be comfortable but are not, in part because a simple divide by 2.5 doesn't work exactly. Mostly the problem is visualizing the distances/measurements. Having grown up long ago in metric, I still find the intricacies of US measurements confounding, but on the other hand, more easy to draw in my mind. Does ANYONE not own _a_ ruler and tape that doesn't have metric markings? I have several with out the two markings. Oddly they are kinda hard to find. IIRC FastCap makes a couple now. Working with a Festool Domino which is only metric is a bit tough at times when wanting to cut a mortise in the exact middle of a 3/4" thick piece of wood. Sooo I have been looking tape measures with the dual markings. My Rules have standard on one side and metric on the other. :~( |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
On 2008-09-07, Leon wrote:
"Han" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in : I really like metric. Dividing or multiplying by 10 is so much easier than 2. To which I always ask, what is half of 1 mm? 500 microns or 5,000,000 angstroms. |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Leon" wrote in news:dVZwk.25149$N87.16381
@nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com: "Han" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in : I really like metric. Dividing or multiplying by 10 is so much easier than 2. To which I always ask, what is half of 1 mm? I was out to dinner, sorry for the late reply. My answer is 0.5 mm (here in the US; in Holland it woud be 0,5 mm). -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Leon wrote:
I have several with out the two markings. Oddly they are kinda hard to find. IIRC FastCap makes a couple now. Working with a Festool Domino which is only metric is a bit tough at times when wanting to cut a mortise in the exact middle of a 3/4" thick piece of wood. Why measure? Divide, and units become irrelevant. A combo square used similar to a depth gauge makes a great divider. I do this with my mortiser. Set the square to protrude ~ 1/2 the board thickness. Scribe a line, flip the square to the other side, scribe again. Exactly between those two lines is the center. Use the board to set the tool. |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Han wrote in news:Xns9B12A227B8226ikkezelf@
199.45.49.11: I really like metric. Dividing or multiplying by 10 is so much easier than 2. However, I like my son-in-law's T-shirt that says: There are only 10 kinds of people: Those who understand binary and those who don't. The one real advantage of the U.S. system is that it allows for nicely graded levels of precision. Each successive division of the unit doubles the precision, whereas the metric system increases precision by a factor of 10 - not necessarily to advantage in construction. If I'm laying out a foundation, I can work to the nearest 1/4". Squaring up the deck, 1/8". Framing walls are measured to th 16th, and trim details to the 32nd. The divisions are clearly delineated on the tape. Metric gives me the choice of centimeters and millimeters - using anything in between means counting millimeters on the tape, a sure source of error. Just my 1/50 of a dollar - Scott |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Han" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in news:dVZwk.25149$N87.16381 @nlpi068.nbdc.sbc.com: "Han" wrote in message ... "Leon" wrote in : I really like metric. Dividing or multiplying by 10 is so much easier than 2. To which I always ask, what is half of 1 mm? I was out to dinner, sorry for the late reply. My answer is 0.5 mm (here in the US; in Holland it woud be 0,5 mm). Is that marking on a typical rule? |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Elrond Hubbard wrote in
.45: The one real advantage of the U.S. system is that it allows for nicely graded levels of precision. Each successive division of the unit doubles the precision, whereas the metric system increases precision by a factor of 10 - not necessarily to advantage in construction. If I'm laying out a foundation, I can work to the nearest 1/4". Squaring up the deck, 1/8". Framing walls are measured to th 16th, and trim details to the 32nd. The divisions are clearly delineated on the tape. Metric gives me the choice of centimeters and millimeters - using anything in between means counting millimeters on the tape, a sure source of error. Just my 1/50 of a dollar - Scott Why don't metric rules emphasize every 5th mark? That way, you could at least work to 1/2 cm, if you so choose. Anybody who can't do 5+5 and get 10 probably shouldn't be allowed to measure stuff anyway. If you look at a customary rule, the 1" mark is the longest, 1/2" the next, 1/4" (increments) the next, and so on. It makes measuring quite a bit faster than counting all those lines. Puckdropper -- If you're quiet, your teeth never touch your ankles. To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Stuart wrote in
: In article , Puckdropper puckdropper(at)yahoo(dot)com wrote: Why don't metric rules emphasize every 5th mark? If you mean the 5mm mark they are on all mine. 10mm divisions are longest. 5mm divisions about 2/3 that length and then othere are about 1/3 Good to know someone else thought of that. Just about every metric rule I've paid attention to has 10mm marks emphasized but the 9 other marks are the same length. Maybe I just need better rules. Puckdropper -- If you're quiet, your teeth never touch your ankles. To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Stuart wrote in
: Would you mind referring to the *imperial system* - feet and inches aren't unique to the USA. Indeed, you took them across from here with the first english settlers. They are still normal to those of us of my generation here in the UK. Feet, inches, pounds, gallons, ounces are all "imperial" measure, metres, millimetres, kilogrammes, litres are all "metric" Until about a year ago I was a fierce defendant of the imperial system but now see some of the advantages of working metric - largely through working with my daughter in her blacksmith's shop. I've done enough with both systems to see advantages and disadvantages to either system. I prefer woodworking with the US system, but precision measurements with tools like a Vernier caliper are easier with metric. I'm not even against mixing systems when the need arises. Did you know that HO scale uses a proportion of ~3.5mm to the 1ft? Purists are screaming, while pragmatists are getting work done. :-) Puckdropper -- If you're quiet, your teeth never touch your ankles. To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Stuart wrote:
Just giving an example, perhaps I should have chosen a length such as 5ft 1.15/16. I tend to halve the 5ft, halve the inch and then halve the 16ths so when marking out I eye up the 2'6" mark, move an inch, then the 15/32 and make my mark. You can't divide metric measurements by 2? 1.416 meters... 1416mm/2 = 708mm The most convoluted metric measure we'd find in woodworking still can be easily stated in millimeters that are easily divided. It's 10's, just like US money and our hands. |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Stuart wrote in
: In article , Han wrote: I was out to dinner, sorry for the late reply. My answer is 0.5 mm (here in the US; in Holland it woud be 0,5 mm). It's 0.5mm in the UK too :-) It was at first very confusing, the switch in delimiters. 50.000,00 Dutch guilders in Holland, 15,000.00 US dollars in the US (except the exchange rate was really different, amounts only for illustration purposes). From a Dutch car web page http://www.autoweek.nl/carbase_data.php?id=48641&cache=no: Chrysler Grand Voyager 2.8 CRD Limited price as new car: € 62.300 road taxes: € 496 - € 526/quarter delivery costs: € 1.080 Exchange rate today: $1.4121/€ -- Best regards Han email address is invalid |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
Stuart wrote:
In article , Tanus wrote: But reading metric plans and using inch-based lumber would be very difficult. It would add to my errors, and I don't need any help in that department. Converting isn't a difficult process for me, but I think I'd avoid it because I'd end up with a measurement like 3.6984". But surely your Lumber sizes are only nominal anyway? Yes it is. I didn't mention that because it would add another layer of confusion. When you want a specific size you plane it yourself to exact size. Like in the UK, if you bought "2x2" planed you got something around 1.3/4"x1.3/4" plus and minus about 1/16". These days its 44mmx44mm and that's the finished size you buy. Speaking personally, at age 61, I've only just started using metric units for measuring timber as I always used to like imperial measure. However, trying to work out the centre of a piece of timber that is 1.13/16" thick requires more brain exercise, tiresome for my old brain, than halving 50mm. Why convert - just get a metric rule :-) You've been more successful with that than I. I tried that a few times, for the same reason, but imperial thinking got in the way and I gave it up. With the work that I do, halving 13/16" normally isn't an issue. Think currency, you guys should be used to working in 10s, here in the UK we used to have to put up with 12 pennies to the shilling and twenty shillings to the pound. -- Tanus http://www.home.mycybernet.net/~waugh/shop/ |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Elrond Hubbard" wrote in message Metric gives me the choice of centimeters and millimeters - using anything in between means counting millimeters on the tape, a sure source of error. Just my 1/50 of a dollar - Scott It what why all of Europe is built crooked? |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Plan and measurments
"Edwin Pawlowski" wrote in news:cTkxk.20380$jI5.5279
@flpi148.ffdc.sbc.com: Metric gives me the choice of centimeters and millimeters - using anything in between means counting millimeters on the tape, a sure source of error. It what why all of Europe is built crooked? If the civil engineers in Pisa had been using a Lee Valley sliding bevel instead of one from the local Depot della Casa, things would have turned out very differently. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Looking for a plan, | Woodworking | |||
Y Plan Vs S Plan | UK diy | |||
S Plan or Y Plan | UK diy | |||
device for taking down cuting measurments | Woodworking |