Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tried out my new toy today - a hand-held jigsaw (as at
http://s7ondemand4.scene7.com/is/servlet/izoom/BandQ/5397007003154_001c_v001_zp?&$230x230_generic$ ). Trouble is, it doesn't cut straight. I find that I have to hold it at about 20degrees off the marked line (in a clockwise direction) in order to get it to cut in the right place. I've tried loosening my grip and also ensured that the sole plate was properly down on the work piece (which was laminate-faced chipboard about 15mm thick). Is it a technique thing? If so, what am I doing wrong? If not, is the thing defective, and how would I confirm that? -- Henry Law Manchester, England |
#2
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On May 9, 6:15 pm, Henry Law wrote:
Tried out my new toy today - a hand-held jigsaw (as athttp://s7ondemand4.scene7.com/is/servlet/izoom/BandQ/5397007003154_00... ). Trouble is, it doesn't cut straight. I find that I have to hold it at about 20degrees off the marked line (in a clockwise direction) in order to get it to cut in the right place. I've tried loosening my grip and also ensured that the sole plate was properly down on the work piece (which was laminate-faced chipboard about 15mm thick). Is it a technique thing? If so, what am I doing wrong? If not, is the thing defective, and how would I confirm that? -- Henry Law Manchester, England Fresh blade. First circular cut dulls the blade on one side, making it lead. |
#3
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 09 May 2007 23:15:19 +0100, Henry Law
wrote: Tried out my new toy today - a hand-held jigsaw (as at http://s7ondemand4.scene7.com/is/servlet/izoom/BandQ/5397007003154_001c_v001_zp?&$230x230_generic$ ). Trouble is, it doesn't cut straight. So, you bought a crap jigsaw. Most of them are. That's why every time there's a jigsaw thread hee or in uk.d-i-y, there's a chorus of people saying to spend the money and get a Bosch barrel body or maybe a Makita. You buy crap tools - they work badly. QED. |
#4
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andy Dingley" wrote in message
... On Wed, 09 May 2007 23:15:19 +0100, Henry Law wrote: Tried out my new toy today - a hand-held jigsaw (as at http://s7ondemand4.scene7.com/is/servlet/izoom/BandQ/5397007003154_001c_v001_zp?&$230x230_generic$ ). Trouble is, it doesn't cut straight. So, you bought a crap jigsaw. Most of them are. That's why every time there's a jigsaw thread hee or in uk.d-i-y, there's a chorus of people saying to spend the money and get a Bosch barrel body or maybe a Makita. You buy crap tools - they work badly. QED. Maybe if you didn't swallow the next time you suck a dick you'd be a little more helpful! -- "Anybody can have more birthdays; but it takes balls to get old!" |
#5
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Law wrote:
Tried out my new toy today - a hand-held jigsaw (as at http://s7ondemand4.scene7.com/is/servlet/izoom/BandQ/5397007003154_001c_v001_zp?&$230x230_generic$ ). Trouble is, it doesn't cut straight. Doesn't look like a Bosch or even a Milwaukee to me. Lew |
#6
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry,
First order of business, does the blade you are using match the material being cut. Just like any saw, there is a correct blade for the material. If that is ok, then see if there is a stroke adjustment for the blade. This alters the amount of forward stroke of the blade each time a cut is made. This can be affected by blade used and the material being cut. Sometime you just have to play with the amount of stroke to get a better cut. And, yes ALL jig saws wander. They are really made for following odds shaped cuts rather than straight cuts. I have used my circular saw to cut the straight sections, leaving the odd shapes to the jigsaw. However I have found after trying several others, the Bosch does seems to cut straighter than the other yellow jigsaw I have. Lastly if you do choose to use the jigsaw to make straight cuts, use a fence to guide the saw and the slower the you move the saw forward the better your control. Good Luck Paul "Henry Law" wrote in message ... Tried out my new toy today - a hand-held jigsaw (as at http://s7ondemand4.scene7.com/is/servlet/izoom/BandQ/5397007003154_001c_v001_zp?&$230x230_generic$ ) . Trouble is, it doesn't cut straight. I find that I have to hold it at about 20degrees off the marked line (in a clockwise direction) in order to get it to cut in the right place. I've tried loosening my grip and also ensured that the sole plate was properly down on the work piece (which was laminate-faced chipboard about 15mm thick). Is it a technique thing? If so, what am I doing wrong? If not, is the thing defective, and how would I confirm that? -- Henry Law Manchester, England |
#7
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() Is it a technique thing? If so, what am I doing wrong? If not, is the thing defective, and how would I confirm that? Henry Law Manchester, England Henry, congrats on your new toy. These aren't the sturdiest machines, and it could be the machine is at fault. But a couple of things to consider. As pointed out above, make sure you have a quality blade on the machine. Those little stamped gizmo blades are almost of no value at all. I use this rule for a wood cutting blade: you should be able to easily prick your finger on the blade. If you can't, buy a better blade. Try the "swiss filed" type of blades for the saw. The laminated chip board can be tough on blades since the resin in the laminate will get soft and clog up your blades if it starts to get hot (which cheap blades do). Also, the hotter the blade gets, the more it will wander. Worse, some of those blades are of such low quality they flex in the saw, and then you are totally screwed. For something like that (oatmeal grade chipboard laminated with plastic) I use the 5-6 tooth swiss file Bosch blades. These cute quite well, last a reasonable amount of time, and won't give you a rough cut. This evening I cut five poker table tops (36" X 95") out of 3/4 birch ply and10 build up trim rings of mdf with my Bosch using these blades, and only used three! Don't push the saw. Lower powered saws overload easily, and make good cutting almost impossible. To see if it is you or the saw, try this: Get a good, sharp blade. (See above). Put a straight line on a piece of your laminate board, and try cutting just a straight line, no curves. If it cuts at ninety degrees in a straight line, then you are set as you know it was probably the blade. If it is still at 20 degrees, take the saw back and let go of some more dough. If it does cut straight along the line, try a gentle curve. Still straight? Looking more like the blade all the time. a few degrees of slant? Probably technique. You may need to slow down with the saw, or speed up the blade. Like anything else, it take some practice. Good luck! Oh yeah, don't get discouraged when someone trashes your tools or ideas around here. Like any other group, sometimes the peckerheads are the loudest. There are plenty of good folks and plenty of great info here. Robert |
#8
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The best answer yet. Good one.
wrote in message oups.com... Henry, congrats on your new toy. These aren't the sturdiest machines, and it could be the machine is at fault. But a couple of things to consider. As pointed out above, make sure you have a quality blade on the machine. Those little stamped gizmo blades are almost of no value at all. I use this rule for a wood cutting blade: you should be able to easily prick your finger on the blade. If you can't, buy a better blade. Try the "swiss filed" type of blades for the saw. The laminated chip board can be tough on blades since the resin in the laminate will get soft and clog up your blades if it starts to get hot (which cheap blades do). Also, the hotter the blade gets, the more it will wander. Worse, some of those blades are of such low quality they flex in the saw, and then you are totally screwed. For something like that (oatmeal grade chipboard laminated with plastic) I use the 5-6 tooth swiss file Bosch blades. These cute quite well, last a reasonable amount of time, and won't give you a rough cut. This evening I cut five poker table tops (36" X 95") out of 3/4 birch ply and10 build up trim rings of mdf with my Bosch using these blades, and only used three! Don't push the saw. Lower powered saws overload easily, and make good cutting almost impossible. To see if it is you or the saw, try this: Get a good, sharp blade. (See above). Put a straight line on a piece of your laminate board, and try cutting just a straight line, no curves. If it cuts at ninety degrees in a straight line, then you are set as you know it was probably the blade. If it is still at 20 degrees, take the saw back and let go of some more dough. If it does cut straight along the line, try a gentle curve. Still straight? Looking more like the blade all the time. a few degrees of slant? Probably technique. You may need to slow down with the saw, or speed up the blade. Like anything else, it take some practice. Good luck! Oh yeah, don't get discouraged when someone trashes your tools or ideas around here. Like any other group, sometimes the peckerheads are the loudest. There are plenty of good folks and plenty of great info here. Robert |
#9
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
just do it normal
----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==---- http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- |
#10
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#11
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Henry Law wrote:
But I'm getting the message that a jig saw isn't good for long straight cuts; I guess I'll still be using my hand saws for a while yet! Do you have a router? Before I had access to a table saw, made proud cuts with a saber (jig) saw, then cleaned them up with a router and a straight edge. Lew |
#12
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 May 2007 19:00:46 +0100, Henry Law
wrote: But I'm getting the message that a jig saw isn't good for long straight cuts; I guess I'll still be using my hand saws for a while yet! No, jigsaws are for short cuts, usually curved or oddly shaped. If you want long, straight cuts and don't have a tablesaw, get a circular saw and a straight-edge. You just can't get that very well from a jigsaw. |
#13
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 May 2007 22:26:00 GMT, Brian Henderson
wrote: No, jigsaws are for short cuts, usually curved or oddly shaped. If you want long, straight cuts and don't have a tablesaw, get a circular saw and a straight-edge. You just can't get that very well from a jigsaw. FWIW, I do all of my rough outs of sheet stock with a straight edge and a Bosch jigsaw. With good tools and decent technique, it can work out quite well! |
#14
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 May 2007 22:34:52 GMT, B A R R Y
wrote: FWIW, I do all of my rough outs of sheet stock with a straight edge and a Bosch jigsaw. With good tools and decent technique, it can work out quite well! I'm not saying it's not possible, it's just not made for it. You can do all of your cuts with a scrollsaw too if you're really slow and careful but that's really not what a scrollsaw is for. |
#15
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 12 May 2007 19:00:46 +0100, Henry Law
wrote: Thank you all (with the possible exception of Andy Dingley, whose contribution wasn't worth a lot). That's as may be Henry, but you're the one whose jigsaw doesn't cut straight. Mine works fine. |
#16
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Andy Dingley" wrote in message
... On Sat, 12 May 2007 19:00:46 +0100, Henry Law wrote: Thank you all (with the possible exception of Andy Dingley, whose contribution wasn't worth a lot). That's as may be Henry, but you're the one whose jigsaw doesn't cut straight. Mine works fine. Then use it on your fingers, moron! -- "Anybody can have more birthdays; but it takes balls to get old!" |
#17
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#19
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 May, 01:02, Andrew Barss wrote:
I'm not aware of any tool where the difference in quality between a lower-end unit and a good one is more apparent than a jigsaw. Why is that? As an empirical observation, few would disagree with it. But _why_ ? What's so special about jigsaws? Is there a particular component that's not doing its bit? How do you tell a good one from a bad one? I'm assuming it's the blade guides more than anything (as a total guess). So what's a good design of guide that works, and what doesn't? |
#20
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Dingley wrote:
On 17 May, 01:02, Andrew Barss wrote: I'm not aware of any tool where the difference in quality between a lower-end unit and a good one is more apparent than a jigsaw. Why is that? As an empirical observation, few would disagree with it. But _why_ ? What's so special about jigsaws? Is there a particular component that's not doing its bit? How do you tell a good one from a bad one? I'm assuming it's the blade guides more than anything (as a total guess). So what's a good design of guide that works, and what doesn't? I suspect it is partly how robust the units are, which can at base reduce vibration which in a jigsaw will make it wander. I have almost given up using my B&D circular saw as the motor is so heavy wrt the baseplate with most of that weight lateral that it almost never cuts square as the join between the baseplate and the motor flexes. It is actually worse if you set the depth of cut apropriately. Of course at the time I bought it.... Peter -- Add my middle initial to email me. It has become attached to a country www.the-brights.net |
#21
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andy Dingley" wrote in message On 17 May, 01:02, Andrew Barss wrote: I'm not aware of any tool where the difference in quality between a lower-end unit and a good one is more apparent than a jigsaw. Why is that? As an empirical observation, few would disagree with it. But _why_ ? Because it is flawed empiricism ... a trip to any Harbor Freight will conclusively prove that his "awareness" is lacking. -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 2/20/07 KarlC@ (the obvious) |
#22
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I think this is a pretty subjective statement - as someone who got
scared away from cheap equipment by my craftsman router and a now twisted bit, I would've said the same thing about routers. On May 16, 8:02 pm, Andrew Barss wrote: Henry Law wrote: : wrote: : : Henry, congrats on your new toy. These aren't the sturdiest machines, : and it could be the machine is at fault. : ... and numerous others wrote good stuff too. Thank you all (with the : possible exception of Andy Dingley, whose contribution wasn't worth a : lot). Yes it was. I'm not aware of any tool where the difference in quality between a lower-end unit and a good one is more apparent than a jigsaw. A cheapo sander, drill, circular saw all work, but a cheapo jigsaw can just ruin whatever you're trying to cut. It may be hard to hear that you've wasted your money, but the photo you sent is of a brand I never heard of, so I'm guessing it's not spiffy. Spend the $125-150 necessary to get a good one; it'll be a pleasure to use. -- Andy Barss |
#23
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Dingley wrote in
s.com: Why is that? As an empirical observation, few would disagree with it. But _why_ ? What's so special about jigsaws? Is there a particular component that's not doing its bit? How do you tell a good one from a bad one? *snip* It's one of the few common tools that relies on the motor to produce an up and down motion rather than just spinning a bit or a blade. More parts = less tolerance. That's my guess anyway. Anyone here familiar with scroll saws enough to say if this may hold true? Puckdropper -- Wise is the man who attempts to answer his question before asking it. To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#24
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I have never opened one up but I would say that the difference is
counterbalancing. Converting a rotary motion to linear motion is common. Think about an engine crankshaft. The crank has counterbalance lobes to smooth vibration. Same principal would apply to a jigsaw. "Puckdropper" wrote in message reenews.net... Andy Dingley wrote in s.com: Why is that? As an empirical observation, few would disagree with it. But _why_ ? What's so special about jigsaws? Is there a particular component that's not doing its bit? How do you tell a good one from a bad one? *snip* It's one of the few common tools that relies on the motor to produce an up and down motion rather than just spinning a bit or a blade. More parts = less tolerance. That's my guess anyway. Anyone here familiar with scroll saws enough to say if this may hold true? Puckdropper -- Wise is the man who attempts to answer his question before asking it. To email me directly, send a message to puckdropper (at) fastmail.fm |
#25
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17 May 2007 09:14:14 -0700, Richk wrote:
I think this is a pretty subjective statement If it is, it's a commony held one. I'd never advocate spending big money on a cordless drill, rarely for circular saws or sanders, but always for jigsaws. A cheap jigsaw -- every cheap jigsaw -- is tirign to use and performs poorly compared to a good one. - as someone who got scared away from cheap equipment by my craftsman router and a now twisted bit, I would've said the same thing about routers. Cheap routers are often unpleasant to use and sometimes downright dangerous, but I've rarely seen one that couldn't be persuaded to deliver good results (on smaller work within its capacity) |
#26
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Andy Dingley wrote:
- as someone who got scared away from cheap equipment by my craftsman router and a now twisted bit, I would've said the same thing about routers. Cheap routers are often unpleasant to use and sometimes downright dangerous, but I've rarely seen one that couldn't be persuaded to deliver good results (on smaller work within its capacity) Agreed, the way to go with routers on a budget is to put your money into good bits. A crap bit in an expensive router will still give crap results. Peter -- Add my middle initial to email me. It has become attached to a country www.the-brights.net |
#27
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Swingman wrote:
: "Andy Dingley" wrote in message : On 17 May, 01:02, Andrew Barss wrote: : : I'm not aware of any tool where the difference in quality : between a lower-end unit and a good one is more apparent than : a jigsaw. : : Why is that? As an empirical observation, few would disagree with : it. But _why_ ? : Because it is flawed empiricism ... a trip to any Harbor Freight will : conclusively prove that his "awareness" is lacking. Well, if you've gotten a good inexpensive jigsaw at HF, then good for you. The way to be useful and helpful to other woodworkers would be, for example, to post the model number. Not to cast general aspersions on a mild statement. And you might want to find out what "empiricism" means before you use it. -- Andy Barss |
#28
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Andrew Barss" wrote in message Swingman wrote: : "Andy Dingley" wrote in message : On 17 May, 01:02, Andrew Barss wrote: : : I'm not aware of any tool where the difference in quality : between a lower-end unit and a good one is more apparent than : a jigsaw. : : Why is that? As an empirical observation, few would disagree with : it. But _why_ ? : Because it is flawed empiricism ... a trip to any Harbor Freight will : conclusively prove that his "awareness" is lacking. Well, if you've gotten a good inexpensive jigsaw at HF, then good for you. The way to be useful and helpful to other woodworkers would be, for example, to post the model number. Not to cast general aspersions on a mild statement. And you might want to find out what "empiricism" means before you use it. Well, Andrew me lad, you consistently show that your awareness of issues is insufficient to make judgments based on observation and experience, and the above is no exception ... too damn bad taxpayers have to foot the bill for your twaddle. -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 2/20/07 KarlC@ (the obvious) |
#29
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 19 May 2007 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC), Andrew Barss wrote:
.... And you might want to find out what "empiricism" means before you use it. Ref: Merriam Webster Online Dictionary Main Entry: em·pir·i·cism Pronunciation: im-'pir-&-"si-z&m, em- Function: noun 1 a : a former school of medical practice founded on experience without the aid of science or theory b : QUACKERY, CHARLATANRY 2 a : the practice of relying on observation and experiment especially in the natural sciences b : a tenet arrived at empirically 3 : a theory that all knowledge originates in experience - em·pir·i·cist /-sist/ noun Seems like definition 2b is pretty close to what was meant. |
#30
![]()
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tom Veatch wrote in message
On Sat, 19 May 2007 17:33:43 +0000 (UTC), Andrew Barss wrote: ... And you might want to find out what "empiricism" means before you use it. Ref: Merriam Webster Online Dictionary Main Entry: em·pir·i·cism Pronunciation: im-'pir-&-"si-z&m, em- Function: noun 1 a : a former school of medical practice founded on experience without the aid of science or theory b : QUACKERY, CHARLATANRY 2 a : the practice of relying on observation and experiment especially in the natural sciences b : a tenet arrived at empirically 3 : a theory that all knowledge originates in experience - em·pir·i·cist /-sist/ noun Seems like definition 2b is pretty close to what was meant. Give that man a cigar! Don't be too hard on Andrew, he just forgot to do his usual DAGS and he's historically lost without it. -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 2/20/07 KarlC@ (the obvious) |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FA: Kreg Jig # K2, Pocket Hole Jig, w/ 200 Face Frame Screws | Woodworking |