Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte.

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 30
Default Porter Cable cordless router

Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?

Thanks,

S.


  #2   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 111
Default Porter Cable cordless router

Do not expect 690 performance nor excellence on any inside cut.
Do expect light duty work for short periods where there is no way to
get power.
Worth it? Perhaps, but if you have power at your side: Maybe not.
More on routers?
See http://www.patwarner.com
**********************************************
samson wrote:
Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?

Thanks,

S.


  #3   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
Jim Jim is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 131
Default Porter Cable cordless router


wrote in message
ups.com...
Do not expect 690 performance nor excellence on any inside cut.
Do expect light duty work for short periods where there is no way to
get power.
Worth it? Perhaps, but if you have power at your side: Maybe not.
More on routers?
See http://www.patwarner.com
**********************************************
samson wrote:
Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?

Thanks,

S.


The guys in The Router Workshop have at least one with at least 2 batteries.
Every now and then, the router would run out of power during a cut. So,
they just popped the dead battery off and put on a live one. I have
wondered about the smoothness of cut that a router that must be way
underpowered will yield.

Jim


  #4   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
CW CW is offline
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 926
Default Porter Cable cordless router

At that voltage, there is no reason that that router would have to be any
less powerfull than a 690 other than battery life. bably kept to a lower
current draw just to make it last a while. Couldn't be to low powered
though, the way the guys on the Router Workshop like to horse routers
around, if it was to underpowered, they would stall them. In any case, if it
develops more that 1/4 horse, it should cut just fine. I really don't see
the need though.
"Jim" wrote in message
et...

The guys in The Router Workshop have at least one with at least 2

batteries.
Every now and then, the router would run out of power during a cut. So,
they just popped the dead battery off and put on a live one. I have
wondered about the smoothness of cut that a router that must be way
underpowered will yield.

Jim




  #5   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 20
Default Porter Cable cordless router

Jim wrote:


wrote in message
ups.com...
Do not expect 690 performance nor excellence on any inside cut.
Do expect light duty work for short periods where there is no way to
get power.
Worth it? Perhaps, but if you have power at your side: Maybe not.
More on routers?
See http://www.patwarner.com
**********************************************
samson wrote:
Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?

Thanks,

S.


The guys in The Router Workshop have at least one with at least 2
batteries.
Every now and then, the router would run out of power during a cut. So,
they just popped the dead battery off and put on a live one. I have
wondered about the smoothness of cut that a router that must be way
underpowered will yield.

Jim


It would probably cut better than the Craftsman Professional router I
ebay'ed when I bought a real router.
I liked the idea since I have a small garage/shop I tend to carry things out
to the back yard and lay them on the picnic table so the cordless tools
work well there. Doesn't seem to be a current selling product though.



  #6   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 8
Default Porter Cable cordless router

I use it to do some initial pattern cuts when I do my poker tables (I cut
the bulk outside when its nice)
anyways - works fine - I maybe use it for 10-20 mins total each table I do.
(I have a dedicated bit in it so Its kind of nice just to pick it up and go)

Would I every trade it for one of my corded ones - hell no.


"samson" wrote in message
...
Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?

Thanks,

S.




  #7   Report Post  
Posted to rec.woodworking
external usenet poster
 
Posts: 10,043
Default Porter Cable cordless router

"samson" wrote in message
Has anyone tried one of these? Is it worth the money?


I own one ... if you don't have a real need, don't bother. If you do, it
does the job handsomely.

--
www.e-woodshop.net
Last update: 12/25/06


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Porter Cable Bammer Cordless Nailer - BEWARE David Rhoades Woodworking 7 June 7th 21 08:17 PM
Recall Alert - Porter-Cable Cordless Nailer - Notice 29 June 06 BobS Woodworking 1 July 10th 06 03:34 AM
router for a Porter-Cable router table? Dave Gower Home Repair 8 March 2nd 05 05:55 AM
Porter Cable 690 router [email protected] Woodworking 2 January 23rd 05 04:29 PM
Porter-Cable 9978 & 9878 cordless drill opinions? Greg M Woodworking 0 April 12th 04 09:43 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:28 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 DIYbanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about DIY & home improvement"