Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
Woodworking (rec.woodworking) Discussion forum covering all aspects of working with wood. All levels of expertise are encouraged to particiapte. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
The other day I was watching an auction program and the host was
showing an antique kitchen table. He made the comment that the top was made from sycamore so it was good for food preparation. He also showed the shelf underneath the table which had two turned sycamore bowls on it. ????? Has sycamore got some kind of special quality when it comes to using it for food-related items? FoggyTown |
#2
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
"foggytown" wrote in message oups.com... The other day I was watching an auction program and the host was showing an antique kitchen table. He made the comment that the top was made from sycamore so it was good for food preparation. He also showed the shelf underneath the table which had two turned sycamore bowls on it. ????? Has sycamore got some kind of special quality when it comes to using it for food-related items? It tastes just like chicken... -- -Mike- |
#3
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
"foggytown" wrote in message oups.com... The other day I was watching an auction program and the host was showing an antique kitchen table. He made the comment that the top was made from sycamore so it was good for food preparation. He also showed the shelf underneath the table which had two turned sycamore bowls on it. ????? Has sycamore got some kind of special quality when it comes to using it for food-related items? It's what it _doesn't_ have that makes it suitable. Big pores for crap to hide in, taste or color to leach out into your food. |
#4
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
|
#5
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
|
#6
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
foggytown wrote: sycamore ,,, for food preparation. ????? food-related items? FoggyTown Does anyone remember the name of the guy that used to be on the Grape Nuts commercials? He said, " This here pine tree is totally edible." :-) Tom in KY, the doctor said that I needed more fiber to keep myself regular. I ate bran and broccoli, drank Metamucil, took fiber pills. 2 days later, I pooped out an oriental rug. |
#7
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
wrote in message
oups.com... foggytown wrote: sycamore ,,, for food preparation. ????? food-related items? FoggyTown Does anyone remember the name of the guy that used to be on the Grape Nuts commercials? Euell Gibbons? IIRC, he died in his early 60's of a heart attack. -- www.e-woodshop.net Last update: 12/13/05 |
#8
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
Swingman wrote: wrote in message Does anyone remember the name of the guy that used to be on the Grape Nuts commercials? Euell Gibbons? IIRC, he died in his early 60's of a heart attack. That sounds about right, the nutritional value of pine trees is probably not very high. |
#9
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
In article , Swingman
wrote: Euell Gibbons? IIRC, he died in his early 60's of a heart attack. December 29, 1975, actually. "Hi. I'm Euell Gibbons. Ever eat a rock? It's outdoorsy taste reminds me of wild hickory nuts!" http://www.motherearthnews.com/Natur...2_September_Oc tober/Euell_s_Country for a short bio and a bibliography. djb -- Any government will work if authority and responsibility are equal and coordinate. This does not insure "good" government; it simply insures that it will work. But such governments are rare ‹ most people want to run things but want no part of the blame. ‹ Robert A. Heinlein |
#10
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
Dave Balderstone wrote: Euell Gibbons? ,, died. December 29, 1975, actually. "Hi. I'm Euell Gibbons. Ever eat a rock? It's outdoorsy taste reminds me of wild hickory nuts!" http://www.motherearthnews.com/Natur...2_September_Oc tober/Euell_s_Country for a short bio and a bibliography. Heh-heh, thank you for the link. A character worth remembering. Tom in KY |
#11
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
IIRC Mr. Gibbons passed away from *cancer* (of which sort I don't know).
Must have been from those dandelion greens with DDT vinaigrette. J. wrote: Dave Balderstone wrote: Euell Gibbons? ,, died. December 29, 1975, actually. "Hi. I'm Euell Gibbons. Ever eat a rock? It's outdoorsy taste reminds me of wild hickory nuts!" http://www.motherearthnews.com/Natur...2_September_Oc tober/Euell_s_Country for a short bio and a bibliography. Heh-heh, thank you for the link. A character worth remembering. Tom in KY |
#12
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
In article , John
wrote: IIRC Mr. Gibbons passed away from *cancer* (of which sort I don't know). Must have been from those dandelion greens with DDT vinaigrette. A Google search reports heart attack, probably from cardiovascular disease caused by smoking, saturated fats he added to his diet, and lack of exercise later in his life. djb -- "The thing about saying the wrong words is that A, I don't notice it, and B, sometimes orange water gibbon bucket and plastic." -- Mr. Burrows |
#13
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
Here is the listing for Gibbons on the Dead People Server
(http://216.92.255.170/dps/): "Euell Gibbons (naturalist/writer) -- Dead. Natural causes. Died December 29, 1975. Born September 8, 1911. Did a series of memorable commercials for Post Grape Nuts in the early '70s, one of which started "Did you know most parts of a pine tree are edible?" , wrote Stalking the Wild Asparagus. " He came for a publicity tour/interview to the place I was working in '75 and naturally there was a bit of hubbub because a "celebrity" was in our midst. While joking around with a couple of my co-workers I said "Here, Mr. Gibbons, have a snack" and held out a pencil. I then discovered that he was sitting just on the other side of a cubicle partition, about 5 feet away and probably heard what I said. Lee -- To e-mail, replace "bucketofspam" with "dleegordon" _________________________________ Lee Gordon http://www.leegordonproductions.com |
#14
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
"John" wrote in message ... IIRC Mr. Gibbons passed away from *cancer* (of which sort I don't know). Must have been from those dandelion greens with DDT vinaigrette. J. Probably not......DDT is generally safe to drink...at least I believe no one has ever documented any human harm from drinking it....However if you are a Bald Eagle it is murder on the quality of your egg shell production. Rod |
#15
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
In article , "Rod & Betty Jo" wrote:
DDT is generally safe to drink... Yeah, suuuure it is. You wanna substantiate that? at least I believe no one has ever documented any human harm from drinking it.... This could be evidence that: a) no human being has ever been stupid enough to drink it; b) you're ignorant of whatever documentation of harm may exist; c) it really is safe to drink. Which strikes you as being the most likely? -- Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) It's time to throw all their damned tea in the harbor again. |
#16
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
On Thu, 5 Jan 2006 01:55:57 -0800, "Rod & Betty Jo"
wrote: Probably not......DDT is generally safe to drink...at least I believe no one has ever documented any human harm from drinking it... Yes, it's documented in breastfeeding, and there's some concern at eating pigs (fatty meat) that may have been exposed to it. DDT never harmed aything that ate it itself, it's when it's concentrated further up the food chain that it was a problem. Humans tend not to eat predators, so we get at most one level of concentration. Irish Red Setters were very badly affected by it (kidney failure at a couple of years old), but then in those days that was a breed of dog suffering badly from inbreeding. |
#17
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
Lee Gordon wrote: Here is the listing for Gibbons on the Dead People Server (http://216.92.255.170/dps/): "Euell Gibbons (naturalist/writer) -- Dead. Natural causes. Died December 29, 1975. Born September 8, 1911. ! He was obviously destined to greatness,, or maybe insanity. My birthday is also September 8, a different year. I was born on my uncle's 12th birthday. Yep, there's something about that day. Maybe the stars align to form a perfect bull's eye on that day.? Peter Sellers who starred in The Pink Panther, was also born on that magical day. Tom in KY, Ya' know, I always felt a connection to Euell while working in my woodshop and smiling. I probably eat a pound of sawdust per month :-) |
#18
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
"Doug Miller" wrote in message om... In article , "Rod & Betty Jo" wrote: DDT is generally safe to drink... Yeah, suuuure it is. You wanna substantiate that? at least I believe no one has ever documented any human harm from drinking it.... This could be evidence that: a) no human being has ever been stupid enough to drink it; b) you're ignorant of whatever documentation of harm may exist; c) it really is safe to drink. Which strikes you as being the most likely? DDT was spread over the malarial marshes and rice paddies for years. They were the source of drinking water for millions. people ate it, but it was tough to drink a quantity of it, because it's almost insoluble in water. Soluble in fat, however, which is the rub. Farther up the food chain you get, more of the oil-soluble stuff you get. Ignorance appears to be from your side. |
#19
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
"Doug Miller" wrote in message om... In article , "Rod & Betty Jo" wrote: DDT is generally safe to drink... Yeah, suuuure it is. You wanna substantiate that? http://www.junkscience.com/ddtfaq.htm 36. Men who voluntarily ingested 35 mgs of DDT daily for nearly two years were carefully examined for years and "developed no adverse effects". at least I believe no one has ever documented any human harm from drinking it.... This could be evidence that: a) no human being has ever been stupid enough to drink it; b) you're ignorant of whatever documentation of harm may exist; c) it really is safe to drink. Which strikes you as being the most likely? Regards, Doug Miller (alphageek at milmac dot com) The part where environmental politics trumps truth.....and is quite willing to sacrifice millions of human lives to malaria to save us from a reasonably benign (limited use) chemical. Rod |
#20
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:40:52 -0800, "Rod & Betty Jo"
wrote: The part where environmental politics trumps truth. In the era of the DDT issue there was no environmental politics. It's generally agreed that this was the issue that started it, as a coherent movement. Ever actually _read_ Rachel Carson ? DDT kills things you don't want killed. Outside of Florida and Africa, you're better off overall without it (and there are alternatives). |
#21
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:51:02 +0000, with neither quill nor qualm, Andy
Dingley quickly quoth: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:40:52 -0800, "Rod & Betty Jo" wrote: The part where environmental politics trumps truth. In the era of the DDT issue there was no environmental politics. It's No? Then why was her book so quickly successful? generally agreed that this was the issue that started it, as a coherent movement. Ever actually _read_ Rachel Carson ? Have you read Michael Crichton's "State of Fear"? His advocate discussed a few of her worst mistakes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Carson shows that she, herself, didn't want a ban on pesticides, just more controlled usage. But she had created a monster. DDT kills things you don't want killed. Outside of Florida and Africa, you're better off overall without it (and there are alternatives). http://reason.com/rb/rb061202.shtml has some good stats on countries outside Africa and the southeast tip of USA. A quote from that, regarding your killing statement: "On June 14, 1972, 30 years ago this week, the EPA banned DDT despite considerable evidence of its safety offered in seven months of agency hearings. After listening to that testimony, the EPA’s own administrative law judge declared, "DDT is not a carcinogenic hazard to man...DDT is not a mutagenic or teratogenic hazard to man...The use of DDT under the regulations involved here [does] not have a deleterious effect on freshwater fish, estuarine organisms, wild birds or other wildlife." Today environmental activists celebrate the EPA’s DDT ban as their first great victory." What and where is it killing, Andy? Cites? DDT's inventor got a Nobel Peace Prize for it. We'd probably have killed the spread of West Nile virus if DDT were still around. DDT doesn't have to be spread by the kiloton (as it was in the 50s and 60s) to be effective. Against Base regulations and my parents' wishes, I ran behind the fogger truck every season for 9 years, along with all the other kids, sucking up DDT fumes by the truckload. AFAIK, I didn't suffer from it. buuuurp -- To change one's self is sufficient. It's the idiots who want to change the world who are causing all the trouble --Anonymous ---------------------------------------------------------------------- www.diversify.com We help you change your website for the better! |
#22
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
DDT (was Wood for food use)
"Larry Jaques" wrote in message ... Against Base regulations and my parents' wishes, I ran behind the fogger truck every season for 9 years, along with all the other kids, sucking up DDT fumes by the truckload. AFAIK, I didn't suffer from it. buuuurp -- Ah, that explains it :-) -- ******** Bill Pounds http://www.billpounds.com |
#23
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:02:07 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote: What and where is it killing, Andy? As the simplest and most obvious local examples, the three top level avian predators in England, Scotland and Wales (Golden Eagles, Ospreys, Red Kites) were driven almost to extinction by it. |
#24
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
In article , Andy Dingley
wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:02:07 -0800, Larry Jaques wrote: What and where is it killing, Andy? As the simplest and most obvious local examples, the three top level avian predators in England, Scotland and Wales (Golden Eagles, Ospreys, Red Kites) were driven almost to extinction by it. You mean because of thin shells? Nope. http://www.sciencenews.org/pages/sn_arc98/4_25_98/fob2.htm And http://dwb.unl.edu/Teacher/NSF/C06/C...com.au/Chemica ls/ddt.html Eggshells in the UK started thinning 47 years before DDT. -- The moral difference between a soldier and a civilian is that the soldier accepts personal responsibility for the safety of the body politic of which he is a member. The civilian does not. ‹ Robert A. Heinlein |
#25
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 22:26:52 +0000, with neither quill nor qualm, Andy
Dingley quickly quoth: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:02:07 -0800, Larry Jaques wrote: What and where is it killing, Andy? As the simplest and most obvious local examples, the three top level avian predators in England, Scotland and Wales (Golden Eagles, Ospreys, Red Kites) were driven almost to extinction by it. Cites? Proper use or haphazard overuse? IIRC, they proved that things other than DDT caused peregrine falcon egg thinning. -- To change one's self is sufficient. It's the idiots who want to change the world who are causing all the trouble --Anonymous ---------------------------------------------------------------------- www.diversify.com We help you change your website for the better! |
#26
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:28:17 -0600, Dave Balderstone
wrote: You mean because of thin shells? If I'd meant thin shells, I'd have said so. This was never thought a problem for the UK raptors - they nest differently to the US species where broken eggs would be a likely result of fragile shells. I'm thinking more of liver and kidney damage in predators. And before you quote the old US studies that found no evidence for this, _mice_ aren't predators. You need to look at species that are eating fatty DDT consumers, not DDT consumers themselves. |
#27
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:02:07 -0800, Larry Jaques
wrote: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:51:02 +0000, with neither quill nor qualm, Andy Dingley quickly quoth: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 01:40:52 -0800, "Rod & Betty Jo" wrote: The part where environmental politics trumps truth. In the era of the DDT issue there was no environmental politics. It's No? Then why was her book so quickly successful? generally agreed that this was the issue that started it, as a coherent movement. Ever actually _read_ Rachel Carson ? Have you read Michael Crichton's "State of Fear"? His advocate discussed a few of her worst mistakes. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rachel_Carson shows that she, herself, didn't want a ban on pesticides, just more controlled usage. But she had created a monster. DDT kills things you don't want killed. Outside of Florida and Africa, you're better off overall without it (and there are alternatives). http://reason.com/rb/rb061202.shtml has some good stats on countries outside Africa and the southeast tip of USA. A quote from that, regarding your killing statement: "On June 14, 1972, 30 years ago this week, the EPA banned DDT despite considerable evidence of its safety offered in seven months of agency hearings. After listening to that testimony, the EPA’s own administrative law judge declared, "DDT is not a carcinogenic hazard to man...DDT is not a mutagenic or teratogenic hazard to man...The use of DDT under the regulations involved here [does] not have a deleterious effect on freshwater fish, estuarine organisms, wild birds or other wildlife." Today environmental activists celebrate the EPA’s DDT ban as their first great victory." What and where is it killing, Andy? Cites? DDT's inventor got a Nobel Peace Prize for it. We'd probably have killed the spread of West Nile virus if DDT were still around. DDT doesn't have to be spread by the kiloton (as it was in the 50s and 60s) to be effective. Don't have the cite handy, but there is significant evidence that a very large number of deaths in Africa due to malaria could have been prevented had DDT been allowed to be used. Against Base regulations and my parents' wishes, I ran behind the fogger truck every season for 9 years, along with all the other kids, sucking up DDT fumes by the truckload. AFAIK, I didn't suffer from it. buuuurp That 12'th toe don't mean nothin' :-) +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ If you're gonna be dumb, you better be tough +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------+ |
#28
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
In article , Andy Dingley
wrote: If I'd meant thin shells, I'd have said so. This was never thought a problem for the UK raptors - they nest differently to the US species where broken eggs would be a likely result of fragile shells. I'm thinking more of liver and kidney damage in predators. And before you quote the old US studies that found no evidence for this, _mice_ aren't predators. You need to look at species that are eating fatty DDT consumers, not DDT consumers themselves. You referred to birds. The reasonable assuption, given the hysteria from the anti-DDT crew, is that thin shells is what you meant as that is what is screamed about regularly, even though it's at best questionable. Recent studies SINCE the 50s and 60s have pretty much discredited the research that inspired the ban on DDT and there is something of a movement to bring it back as a mechanisi to help fight mosquito-borne disease (which are certainly not that big a concern in the UK, but it is in Canada.) I'm open to evidence, Andy. Please post the cites that support your assertions. I promise I'm not being combatitive and am sincerely interested in real studies. djb -- The moral difference between a soldier and a civilian is that the soldier accepts personal responsibility for the safety of the body politic of which he is a member. The civilian does not. ‹ Robert A. Heinlein |
#29
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
OT: DDT (was Wood for food use)
On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:33:31 -0700, with neither quill nor qualm, Mark
& Juanita quickly quoth: On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 10:02:07 -0800, Larry Jaques Don't have the cite handy, but there is significant evidence that a very large number of deaths in Africa due to malaria could have been prevented had DDT been allowed to be used. John's cite had 2.7 million per year for countries who also abandoned its use. I guess that's one way to do population control, huh? Against Base regulations and my parents' wishes, I ran behind the fogger truck every season for 9 years, along with all the other kids, sucking up DDT fumes by the truckload. AFAIK, I didn't suffer from it. buuuurp That 12'th toe don't mean nothin' :-) I'm quintradextrous. Could it be my prehensile fore-appendage that makes you uneasy? -- To change one's self is sufficient. It's the idiots who want to change the world who are causing all the trouble --Anonymous ---------------------------------------------------------------------- www.diversify.com We help you change your website for the better! |
#30
Posted to rec.woodworking
|
|||
|
|||
Wood for food use
Yes, it's also used to make wooden Peels, the paddles they use to move
pizza around in the oven. Bugs |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
### micro-FAQ on wood # 048 | Woodworking | |||
### micro-FAQ on wood # 039 | Woodworking | |||
### micro-FAQ on wood # 036 | Woodworking | |||
### micro-FAQ on wood # 029 | Woodworking | |||
### micro-FAQ on wood # 023 | Woodworking |