![]() |
Bonding of extraneous-conductive-parts
I am about to install a grab-rail and cabinet, both of stainless steel,
in my bathroom. My query is whether they should be included in the equipotential bonding. BS7671 is not specific in this regard. It lists examples of extraneous-conductive-parts that must be included, and also some that need not be considered, but offers no definitive list or characteristics. The OSG includes "metal handrails"in the examples of items that do not need to be bonded, but this is not mentioned in the examples in the regulations themselves. My view is that as these items will be isolated from earth and as there is no foreseeable single fault condition or circumstance that would put them at an electrical potential relative to earth (for all practical purposes), then bonding is not necessary. CRB |
"crb" wrote in message ups.com... I am about to install a grab-rail and cabinet, both of stainless steel, in my bathroom. My query is whether they should be included in the equipotential bonding. BS7671 is not specific in this regard. It lists examples of extraneous-conductive-parts that must be included, and also some that need not be considered, but offers no definitive list or characteristics. The OSG includes "metal handrails"in the examples of items that do not need to be bonded, but this is not mentioned in the examples in the regulations themselves. My view is that as these items will be isolated from earth and as there is no foreseeable single fault condition or circumstance that would put them at an electrical potential relative to earth (for all practical purposes), then bonding is not necessary. CRB If they're fixed half way up a wall, away from any electrical source, then they don't need to have an earth. If they are installed in a vicinity where they are, or could, come into contact with an electrical source, then they do need bonded. |
crb wrote:
BS7671 is not specific in this regard. It lists examples of extraneous-conductive-parts that must be included, and also some that need not be considered, but offers no definitive list or characteristics. But it does contain a definition, which includes the words "a part liable to introduce a potential." My view is that as these items will be isolated from earth and as there is no foreseeable single fault condition or circumstance that would put them at an electrical potential relative to earth (for all practical purposes), then bonding is not necessary. Agreed, on the assumption that they are fixed to dry insulating building materials and not to, for example, any structural metalwork which may be in contact with either earth or the main bonding. -- Andy |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:29 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter