Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Low Voltage Halogen Leads
Hi
I am installing a set of 3 low voltage halogen lights in my kitchen ceiling, however I find that the lead between light 1 and 2 is too short for my purpose. I have read that the wiring rating on this side of the transformer needs to be substantial especially if its any length. What gauge wire do I need to extend it to two metres? Thanks Roger |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
"Roger" wrote in message ... Hi I am installing a set of 3 low voltage halogen lights in my kitchen ceiling, however I find that the lead between light 1 and 2 is too short for my purpose. I have read that the wiring rating on this side of the transformer needs to be substantial especially if its any length. What gauge wire do I need to extend it to two metres? Thanks Roger A 1 mm csa' (cross sectional area) is enough for a 2 mtr length. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:14:48 GMT, "BigWallop"
wrote: [snip] A 1 mm csa' (cross sectional area) is enough for a 2 mtr length. Would 1mm T+E be enough for several metres? Replace 'spam' with 'org' to reply |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Kalico" wrote in message ... On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 21:14:48 GMT, "BigWallop" wrote: [snip] A 1 mm csa' (cross sectional area) is enough for a 2 mtr length. Would 1mm T+E be enough for several metres? Taking 1mm csa' for low voltage is good for anything up to 10 mtrs really. It's the low voltage part that makes the need for larger cross sectional area on the cable a necessity. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
John Weston wrote:
BigWallop, in article Uzmyd.5358$Ar5.1408 @text.news.blueyonder.co.uk, says... Taking 1mm csa' for low voltage is good for anything up to 10 mtrs really. It's the low voltage part that makes the need for larger cross sectional area on the cable a necessity. Actually, its the high current that "makes the need for larger cross sectional area..." but I know what you mean - low voltage devices require a correspondingly high current to deliver the same wattage load so the amount of copper in the cable has to be higher the lower the voltage but the insulation can be thinner. (Follow that??) :-) According to http://tinyurl.com/67ex6, for 3 at 12v 50W Halogens, you will need 2.5mm CSA twin to deliver the 150W at 12V over only 2m and will lose 0.5V along the cable, meaning you only have 11.5v at the fitting. For 10m, you'd need 16mm cable(!) Don't forget that 150w needs 12.5A at 12V , all assuming a resistive load. IOW if the lights are very far apart you're better using more lower-power transformers near the lights than one xfmr and long cable runs. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"John Weston" wrote in message . .. BigWallop, in article Uzmyd.5358$Ar5.1408 @text.news.blueyonder.co.uk, says... Taking 1mm csa' for low voltage is good for anything up to 10 mtrs really. It's the low voltage part that makes the need for larger cross sectional area on the cable a necessity. Actually, its the high current that "makes the need for larger cross sectional area..." but I know what you mean - low voltage devices require a correspondingly high current to deliver the same wattage load so the amount of copper in the cable has to be higher the lower the voltage but the insulation can be thinner. (Follow that??) :-) According to http://tinyurl.com/67ex6, for 3 at 12v 50W Halogens, you will need 2.5mm CSA twin to deliver the 150W at 12V over only 2m and will lose 0.5V along the cable, meaning you only have 11.5v at the fitting. For 10m, you'd need 16mm cable(!) Don't forget that 150w needs 12.5A at 12V , all assuming a resistive load. John John, I must thank you for this. I meant to type 10 mm csa' for this loading up to a length of 10 mtrs, and twice I have typed 1 mm csa'. I'm slowly cracking up here. The little yellow van is waiting around the bend for me. :-) Thanks again for updating and clarifying the details in my replies. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
On Thu, 23 Dec 2004 15:13:33 GMT, "BigWallop"
wrote: "John Weston" wrote in message ... BigWallop, in article Uzmyd.5358$Ar5.1408 @text.news.blueyonder.co.uk, says... Taking 1mm csa' for low voltage is good for anything up to 10 mtrs really. It's the low voltage part that makes the need for larger cross sectional area on the cable a necessity. Actually, its the high current that "makes the need for larger cross sectional area..." but I know what you mean - low voltage devices require a correspondingly high current to deliver the same wattage load so the amount of copper in the cable has to be higher the lower the voltage but the insulation can be thinner. (Follow that??) :-) According to http://tinyurl.com/67ex6, for 3 at 12v 50W Halogens, you will need 2.5mm CSA twin to deliver the 150W at 12V over only 2m and will lose 0.5V along the cable, meaning you only have 11.5v at the fitting. For 10m, you'd need 16mm cable(!) Don't forget that 150w needs 12.5A at 12V , all assuming a resistive load. John John, I must thank you for this. I meant to type 10 mm csa' for this loading up to a length of 10 mtrs, and twice I have typed 1 mm csa'. I'm slowly cracking up here. The little yellow van is waiting around the bend for me. :-) Thanks again for updating and clarifying the details in my replies. What, 10mm2 for a lighting circuit. Surely you are not serious. Like the other poster said, more transformers is the way to go. But that does beg the question of why to step down to 12V when there are 240V halgen bulbs available. Anyone know why? Replace 'spam' with 'org' to reply |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Roger wrote:
Hi I am installing a set of 3 low voltage halogen lights in my kitchen ceiling, however I find that the lead between light 1 and 2 is too short for my purpose. I have read that the wiring rating on this side of the transformer needs to be substantial especially if its any length. What gauge wire do I need to extend it to two metres? I used normal ring mains T & E Thanks Roger |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
John Weston wrote:
BigWallop, in article Uzmyd.5358$Ar5.1408 @text.news.blueyonder.co.uk, says... Taking 1mm csa' for low voltage is good for anything up to 10 mtrs really. It's the low voltage part that makes the need for larger cross sectional area on the cable a necessity. Actually, its the high current that "makes the need for larger cross sectional area..." but I know what you mean - low voltage devices require a correspondingly high current to deliver the same wattage load so the amount of copper in the cable has to be higher the lower the voltage but the insulation can be thinner. (Follow that??) :-) Actually its both. 1v loss on 250v is not as serious as 1v loss on 12v and you get a lot more cable drop on a 5A LV 60W bulb than on a 0.25A mains one. According to http://tinyurl.com/67ex6, for 3 at 12v 50W Halogens, you will need 2.5mm CSA twin to deliver the 150W at 12V over only 2m and will lose 0.5V along the cable, meaning you only have 11.5v at the fitting. For 10m, you'd need 16mm cable(!) Don't forget that 150w needs 12.5A at 12V , all assuming a resistive load. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Kalico wrote:
What, 10mm2 for a lighting circuit. Surely you are not serious. Could be for big power. Like the other poster said, more transformers is the way to go. Depends. On thin celings with alnmostr no voids, cable in thnner than trensformers... But that does beg the question of why to step down to 12V when there are 240V halgen bulbs available. because they are 3 times as expensive and blow 10 times as quickly? Anyone know why? Replace 'spam' with 'org' to reply |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Kalico wrote:
But that does beg the question of why to step down to 12V when there are 240V halgen bulbs available. Anyone know why? I don't know the technical reasons, but from experience of having both types of halogen lighting in our new kitchen, I'd say the 12v ones have a much nicer quality of light. 12v ones produce a whiter, crisper light that creates those nice twinkles on reflective objects. They create a more modern feel to the room. The 240v ones give a more yellow light, similar to plain tungsten bulbs. I'm not so keen and would change them for 12v ones if it wasn't so much hassle. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 24 Dec 2004 00:12:20 +0000, The Natural Philosopher
wrote: Roger wrote: Hi I am installing a set of 3 low voltage halogen lights in my kitchen ceiling, however I find that the lead between light 1 and 2 is too short for my purpose. I have read that the wiring rating on this side of the transformer needs to be substantial especially if its any length. What gauge wire do I need to extend it to two metres? I used normal ring mains T & E I like the idea of mains and low voltage wires being instantly distinguishable. This must be safer than the other way round, but even so... -- On-line canal route planner: http://www.canalplan.org.uk (Waterways World site of the month, April 2001) |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
"The Natural Philosopher" wrote in message ... Kalico wrote: What, 10mm2 for a lighting circuit. Surely you are not serious. Could be for big power. Like the other poster said, more transformers is the way to go. Depends. On thin celings with alnmostr no voids, cable in thnner than trensformers... But that does beg the question of why to step down to 12V when there are 240V halgen bulbs available. because they are 3 times as expensive and blow 10 times as quickly? If only it was just 10 times as quickly. Anybody want to buy some GU10 ceiling lights ? |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Low voltage halogen lights problem | UK diy | |||
Mains voltage halogen lighting - advice? | UK diy | |||
voltage regulator that drops out of circuit | Electronics | |||
Low Voltage Halogen Spot Lights | UK diy |