More Heavy Trolling by the Senile Octogenarian Nym-Shifting Ozzie Cretin!
 

On Thu, 13 May 2021 08:10:28 +1000, Joey, better known as cantankerous
trolling senile geezer Rodent Speed, wrote:

FLUSH the trolling senile asshole's latest troll**** unread

--
Richard about senile Rodent:
"Rod Speed, a bare faced pig and ignorant ****."
MID:

Spank!
 

On Tue, 04 May 2021 19:50:13 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 4, 2021 at 10:41:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:56:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 8:44:12 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

They pretend that conservative fiscal policies will lead to liberal social
results, as if the magic market is going to go contrary to profits to
protect
human rights and the environment.

The market does what the customers request.

Sometimes.

Imagine a world with no green legislation. Now imagine 5 companies making
the same thing. Two of them advertise green-ness in manufacturing etc.
Anyone who believed in ecology would only buy from those two and the others
would go bankrupt or change their ways.

The one which is more green would likely cost more -- there are savings in not
doing the right thing. With most people barely scraping by, as happens in a
complete "free" market with no protections, people would by the cheap stuff.
We see this with Walmart and Amazon now.

What would make human nature change to get the results you speak of?

Why should we make them change? If they want to save money rather than the environment, then let them. It's none of your business if others don't want to be as green as you.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:39:37 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:

Depends on the death rate.

The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the
wrong genes.

Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce.
It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4%

So why worry?

Because most of those it has killed would prefer to not be dead.

**** happens, more often with cancer or getting run over by a bus.

We must let it happen.

Nope, it would make no difference.

It would remove those with ****ty immune systems,

Nope,

creating a better next generation.

Nope, because the vast bulk of those it kills are way past reproducing.

I know a woman who had her child at 40. Are you saying 40 year olds can't die of the virus?

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in wars.

Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything
to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat
belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc.

They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals.

Nope, **** all of those ever need hospital treatment to stop them dying.

So why do we bother with all that ****?

Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect
pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you
spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have.

Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car
make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason.

It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare
you see the point.

No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face.

In Dutch I was announcing you.

How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away!

You were blotto and drug crazed, as always.

I almost never drink enough to look like I'm drunk. No pig has ever suspected I'm drunk and breathalysed me.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:47:33 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 10:51:20 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Mon, 03 May 2021 08:58:58 +0100, Snit wrote:

rbowman wrote:
On 05/02/2021 01:30 PM, Snit wrote:
Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Tue, 27 Apr 2021 20:53:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 27, 2021 at 10:53:26 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 24 Apr 2021 20:37:00 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 24, 2021 at 11:30:05 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 16:01:42 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 3:16:17 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

I wonder why nobody ever says just "It's". For example:
John: "That engine's not running right."
Steve: "It's."

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally pronounce
the word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".
https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

You bugger. Bet I will focus on that
bloody word every time its used now.

Just watched the first ep of the Manson tapes and didn=3DE2=3D80=3D99t.

Corse that might just be because it is so ****ing bizarre.

I have caught it in some speech I hear.

Have a friend who insists it just cannot be true. I talk to her on Zoom --
she
has agreed to let me record her without her knowing (at the time) and then
see
how SHE sounds). She insists she ALWAYS pronounced the T. Will be
interesting
to find out.

Yanks can't even pronounce herb with the H.

We can if it is a name.

By the way, I did look for UK specific examples of "can't". Here is what I
found:

https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

Those are examples from the UK. "Can't" is still pronounced as "can" (in
many
cases).

I listened to the first guy and he clearly said carnt. Check your ears.

There is a slight r. Common in British English?

It's not slight. It's the same as saying tarnished. Would you mishear
that as tannished?


I=E2=80=99m still focused on the lack of a real T in can=E2=80=99t.

Just weird.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk
confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

I have. Your ears are at fault.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:49:20 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing.

Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what
each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very
"MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to
look to more verifiable evidence.

No, common sense is clearly defined. It's whatever is ****ing obvious. If I jump off that cliff, I will hit the bottom really fast and probably die. I don't need to do any scientific tests.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Wed, 12 May 2021 02:49:59 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.

So not a belief, but basic logic.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:39:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Depends on the death rate.

The death rate of coronavirus is high enough to remove those with the
wrong genes.

Nope, the death rate is minimal with those who can still reproduce.
It isnt even that high with those over 70 either, below 4%

So why worry?

Because most of those it has killed would prefer to not be dead.

**** happens, more often with cancer

Yes, but is clearly better to not have covid kill you.

or getting run over by a bus.

Nope, nowhere even remotely like 600K in the USA are
run over by a bus ever year, or 150K in the UK either.

We must let it happen.

Nope, it would make no difference.

It would remove those with ****ty immune systems,

Nope,

creating a better next generation.

Nope, because the vast bulk of those it kills are way past reproducing.

I know a woman who had her child at 40. Are you saying 40 year olds can't
die of the virus?

Nope, that most who have been killed by the virus are over 65.

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill
them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That why they have always been the cannon fodder in
wars.

Even those now don't die at a high enough rate from anything
to have any real effect on evolution, even if we scrapped seat
belts, air bags, cars with crumple zones etc etc etc.

They would if we stopped pampering them in hospitals.

Nope, **** all of those ever need hospital treatment to stop them dying.

So why do we bother with all that ****?

Because its killing far more than any other infectious disease
and leaving heaps more with very unpleasant long term
medical downsides even when it doesn't kill them.

Say you could do calculations twice as fast, you could sing perfect
pitch, you could do 1000 pushups, but the sight of a car made you
spontaneously combust. That would not be a good thing to have.

Yes but we never have evolved to have the sight of a car
make you spontaneously combust for some odd reason.

It's called an analogy, stretching something out of proportion to mare
you see the point.

No one get to mare me and don't you forget that, cow face.

In Dutch I was announcing you.

How did I miss the K and hit the R? They're miles away!

You were blotto and drug crazed, as always.

I almost never drink enough to look like I'm drunk. No pig has ever
suspected I'm drunk and breathalysed me.

Ours breathalyse everyone they pull over for random breath tests.
Do drug tests too so you would be toast the first time you are stopped.

Spank!
 

On Wed, 12 May 2021 05:47:48 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 9:23:06 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 07:49 PM, Snit wrote:
On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the
Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People
are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.


Heidegger asks the question "why there is something rather than nothing".

https://www.atheists.org/activism/re...about-atheism/

Even they manage to confuse the issue. In a few paragraphs they go from
"To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it
is a lack of belief in gods."' to "Agnostic isnt just a €œweaker€�
version of being an atheist. It answers a different question. Atheism is
about what you believe. Agnosticism is about what you know."

For the militant atheists I reject the disbelief; rather they project a
complete belief that there are no gods. Belief is belief.

Some of it might be semantics. Do you KNOW there are no Underground
Marshmallow People running the world. Well, in general conversation I assume
you do. I hope you do at least! But on a deep philosophical level you cannot
be absolutely certain of it. You cannot prove a negative.

It is so unlikely that we can assume they're not there. The same goes for god. So not a belief.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Wed, 12 May 2021 23:05:56 +0100, Joey wrote:



"rbowman" wrote in message
...
On 05/11/2021 10:47 PM, Snit wrote:
Some of it might be semantics. Do you KNOW there are no Underground
Marshmallow People running the world. Well, in general conversation I
assume
you do. I hope you do at least! But on a deep philosophical level you
cannot
be absolutely certain of it. You cannot prove a negative.


In the two truths doctrine formulated by Nagarjuna and others the is
conventional reality and there is ultimate reality. Conventional reality
is filled with handy assumptions like there are no Marshmallow people..
Ultimate reality considers all those assumptions to be empty.

Nagarjuna's principal work is based on a tetralemma.

All things exist
All things do not exist
All things both exist and do not exist
All things neither exist nor do not exist

Thats typical mindless wanking only clowns like that get up to.

Agreed, but why aren't you called Rod again?

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2021 05:47:48 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 9:23:06 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 07:49 PM, Snit wrote:
On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the
Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People
are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.


Heidegger asks the question "why there is something rather than nothing".

https://www.atheists.org/activism/re...about-atheism/

Even they manage to confuse the issue. In a few paragraphs they go from
"To be clear: Atheism is not a disbelief in gods or a denial of gods; it
is a lack of belief in gods."' to "Agnostic isnt just a €œweaker€�
version of being an atheist. It answers a different question. Atheism is
about what you believe. Agnosticism is about what you know."

For the militant atheists I reject the disbelief; rather they project a
complete belief that there are no gods. Belief is belief.

Some of it might be semantics. Do you KNOW there are no Underground
Marshmallow People running the world. Well, in general conversation I assume
you do. I hope you do at least! But on a deep philosophical level you cannot
be absolutely certain of it. You cannot prove a negative.

It is so unlikely that we can assume they're not there. The same goes
for god. So not a belief.


Agreed.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

The Two Brain Dead Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
 

On Fri, 14 May 2021 04:50:05 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded conversation between our two village idiots,
Birdbrain and Rodent Speed:

Birdbrain: "You beat me to it. Plain sex is boring."

Senile Rodent: "Then **** the cats. That wont be boring."

Birdbrain: "Sell me a de-clawing tool first."

Senile Rodent: "Wont help with the teeth."

Birdbrain: "They've never gone for me with their mouths."

Rodent Speed: "They will if you are stupid enough to try ****ing them."

Birdbrain: "No, they always use claws."

Rodent Speed: "They wont if you try ****ing them. Try it and see."

Message-ID:

Shit, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
 

On Thu, 13 May 2021 19:26:36 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Agreed.

You are one sick senile ****head, **** the Git! LOL

Spank!
 

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 12 May 2021 02:49:59 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.

So not a belief, but basic logic.


Yup.

Denial of man made climate change, in the other hand, is more comparable to
denying oxygen because you cant see it.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Shit, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
 

On Thu, 13 May 2021 19:49:59 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


Denial of man made climate change, in the other hand, is more comparable to
denying oxygen because you can¢t see it.

In [sic] the other hand, everyone can see what a devoted sucker of troll
cock you are, **** the Git! BG

Spank!
 

On May 13, 2021 at 11:19:09 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Tue, 04 May 2021 19:50:13 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 4, 2021 at 10:41:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 04:56:06 +0100, Snit wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 8:44:12 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/28/2021 12:35 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
Vote Libertarian.

In this country I only vote for the Libertarian as a 'none of the above'
statement. I may have left-libertarian tendencies but in the US the
capital L libertarians are right-libertarians.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/It_Usu..._with_Ayn_Rand

They pretend that conservative fiscal policies will lead to liberal social
results, as if the magic market is going to go contrary to profits to
protect
human rights and the environment.

The market does what the customers request.

Sometimes.

Imagine a world with no green legislation. Now imagine 5 companies making
the same thing. Two of them advertise green-ness in manufacturing etc.
Anyone who believed in ecology would only buy from those two and the others
would go bankrupt or change their ways.

The one which is more green would likely cost more -- there are savings in
not
doing the right thing. With most people barely scraping by, as happens in a
complete "free" market with no protections, people would by the cheap stuff.
We see this with Walmart and Amazon now.

What would make human nature change to get the results you speak of?

Why should we make them change? If they want to save money rather than the
environment, then let them. It's none of your business if others don't want
to be as green as you.

People working alone do not put themselves at a disadvantage. We have laws and
regulations for a reason.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Spank!
 

On May 13, 2021 at 11:37:37 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk
confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

I have. Your ears are at fault.

I will trust my ears and those of the professional who does the videos.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Spank!
 

On May 13, 2021 at 11:38:57 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 07 May 2021 20:49:20 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 10:54:59 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 05 May 2021 20:07:41 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 5, 2021 at 11:32:18 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

We asked each other.

that's very emotional

It was touching.

do you have a youtube of it we could make some money

I tried making some but the police said it was no good.

Vote Libertarian.

I prefer mature candidates.

I prefer common sense.

That comes with maturity.

No, you lose it with maturity and brainwashing.

Really the whole idea of "common sense" is all too often just tied to what
each person thinks is correct. I am not against it -- and am very
"MacGyverish" in how I problem solve, but for things that matter I tend to
look to more verifiable evidence.

No, common sense is clearly defined. It's whatever is ****ing obvious. If I
jump off that cliff, I will hit the bottom really fast and probably die. I
don't need to do any scientific tests.

There are some areas where it is clear... and other areas where it is not. And
places where you say things contrary to evidence and logic and reason and your
only excuse is you think it is correct, and then you call that "common sense"
as if it was evidence. That is where you show deep faith.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Spank!
 

On May 13, 2021 at 11:49:32 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 12 May 2021 02:49:59 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 11, 2021 at 6:13:47 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 05/11/2021 11:49 AM, Commander Kinsey wrote:

You calling a lack of faith faith is insanity. You'll be saying atheism
is a faith next.

It is. 'Who the **** knows', aka agnosticism, is a more valid stance.

I am open to the possibility, just as I am open to the idea that the
Invisible
Green Dragon created the gods and that the Underground Marshmallow People
are
running the world. These things are *possible* (when looked at from a purely
logical stance) but so grossly unlikely as to the point of not being worth
considering.

So not a belief, but basic logic.

To lack faith in a deity is not a belief... I would agree with that.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Shit, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
 

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:53:34 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:



I will trust my ears and those of the professional who does the videos.

No, you don't, **** the Git! You ONLY suck troll cock! BG

Shit, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
 

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:55:34 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


To lack faith in a deity is not a belief... I would agree with that.

What has your sick **** got to do with ANY of the three ngs you keep
crossposting it to, senile troll?

Shit, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
 

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:54:25 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


There are some areas where it is clear... and other areas where it is not. And
places where you say things contrary to evidence and logic and reason and your
only excuse is you think it is correct, and then you call that "common sense"
as if it was evidence. That is where you show deep faith.

You show that you are not only a notorious sucker of troll cock but a filthy
deranged troll yourself, **** the Git!

Shit, the Sick Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
 

On Thu, 13 May 2021 20:41:05 GMT, **** the sick git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


People working alone do not put themselves at a disadvantage. We have laws and
regulations for a reason.

Nope, **** the Git, you ONLY got **** for brains! BG

Spank!
 

On 2021-05-13 1:53 p.m., Snit wrote:
On May 13, 2021 at 11:37:37 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3DCjwqgghyW-Y

'Put the O Back in ****ry' Shooter Jennings

What's a missing letter?


When can=E2=80=99t is pronounced as can you would think it would risk
confusion.

Except I've never known anyone do that, including in your video.

All I can say is watch the videos I showed.

I have. Your ears are at fault.

I will trust my ears and those of the professional who does the videos.

you remind me of dumbo when you fly around the room like that

Spank!
 

On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:45:16 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories.

It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with
the
universe'

If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told
us?

Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged
chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen.
Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and
was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc.

Or the whole world is a computer game

They didn't have computer games in those days.

Not inside our game they didn't, no. But god has one. We've only recently invented games inside the game.

and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score.

In fact the bugger lost so spectacularly
he had to shoot himself and his slut.

He did very well actually, it took a lot of do gooders to stop him.

Pity about radioactive decay alone.

Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge. Take flipping a coin.
If you know enough about how hard you spin it etc, you can work out what
side it will land on.

Doesn't work with radioactive decay.

I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely.

No there isnt with radioactive decay because there is nothing to calculate.

That we know about so far. Think back to when we couldn't see inside an atom.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Sat, 08 May 2021 01:46:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 5:17:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s
obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that
long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global
cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in
atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that
actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more
CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2
levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct...
and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are
in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well
understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there
were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near
as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the
science.

No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine
because
it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how
much CO2
is required to kill you, right?

The earth will survive the harm we are causing...

Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at
all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did.

We are in a great extinction,

Bull**** we are.

or at least likely so,

More bull****.

and seeing the impacts now.

More bull****.

If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started:
http://climate.nasa.gov

More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult.

but we are in a great extinction

Bull****.

There is some debate -- but it seems likely.

Bull****.

and it may end up including humans.

No chance. We even survived the ice ages.

The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a
great extinction.

Bull****.

We rely on many other species

Only a few actually.

Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many
more.

More bull****.

and the ecosystems we are destroying.

The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine.

You are trying to equate all of the ice ages.

Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they
destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done.

The one man made it through was not a big one.

But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.

You reject evidence and just cry "bull****". OK.

You worry too much and look for evidence where there is none. If you look hard enough at the clouds, you can become sure they're in the shape of a dog. See! Evidence! That's the ears, that bit's the tail....

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Sat, 08 May 2021 17:59:59 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the last
word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word
"damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn
weather
is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious nutter
for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in that
case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if religion
had
not
impeded
science.

Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory? Ever
here
of
Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal?

Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both
worlds.
In
general
the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants,
particularly
the
'gimme that old time religion' branch.

In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that
is
no
longer the
case. There are still some religious scientists, but
scientists
tend
to be
atheist at a higher level than the general public. They also
tend
to
be more
liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US
conservatives
tend
to
reject our best evidence.

Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to
deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A thing
that
kills
4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world
population
growth.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There is
no
global
warming.

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the
weak.

Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing.

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it
can,
as
they're the weaker ones.

In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker
ones.

The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones
because their much better immune system grossly over reacted
and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly.

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing for
the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have.

Depends on the death rate.

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That's why they have always been the cannon fodder in
wars.

Well there's no point sending overweight old men is there?

That's not the alternative.

What other alternative is there? Girls?

Best to use the fit lads to kill.

But those with now enough sense to realise that
they arent immortal arent any use as cannon fodder.

Then use the braver ones.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2021 01:46:50 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 5:17:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s
obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t that
long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about global
cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in
atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect that
actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be more
CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the CO2
levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go extinct...
and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we are
in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not well
understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though there
were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even near
as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over the
science.

No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just fine
because
it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know how
much CO2
is required to kill you, right?

The earth will survive the harm we are causing...

Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at
all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did.

We are in a great extinction,

Bull**** we are.

or at least likely so,

More bull****.

and seeing the impacts now.

More bull****.

If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get started:
http://climate.nasa.gov

More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult.

but we are in a great extinction

Bull****.

There is some debate -- but it seems likely.

Bull****.

and it may end up including humans.

No chance. We even survived the ice ages.

The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead to a
great extinction.

Bull****.

We rely on many other species

Only a few actually.

Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from many
more.

More bull****.

and the ecosystems we are destroying.

The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine.

You are trying to equate all of the ice ages.

Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they
destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done.

The one man made it through was not a big one.

But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.

You reject evidence and just cry "bull****". OK.

You worry too much and look for evidence where there is none.

Your claim is a faith based one with no support.

If you look hard enough at the clouds, you can become sure they're in the
shape of a dog. See! Evidence! That's the ears, that bit's the tail....


If you think climate science is based on confirmation bias or the like then
show it.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They
cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel
somehow superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Shit, the Git, the Troll-feeding Senile HUGE ASSHOLE!
 

On Fri, 14 May 2021 19:45:29 GMT, **** the git, the notorious,
troll-feeding, senile asshole, blathered again:


If you think climate science is based on confirmation bias or the like then
show it.

What has your sick senile **** got to do with ANY of the three ngs you keep
crossposting it to, you sick senile ****head?

Spank!
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 07 May 2021 19:45:16 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 02 May 2021 19:14:02 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Mon, 26 Apr 2021 19:22:29 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 21:00:20 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

and was stupid enough to believe in some god too.

I doubt his religion played any part in creating his theories.

It did actually. He ran that stupid line 'god does not play dice with
the
universe'

If god had wished us to know about the universe would he not have told
us?

Unlikely that some arsehole who just yawned when 6M of its alleged
chosen people were gassed and cremated by Adolf and his henchmen.
Presumably he chose to lie to them about being chosen people and
was ****ing himself and laughing as they got gassed etc.

Or the whole world is a computer game

They didn't have computer games in those days.

Not inside our game they didn't, no. But god has one.

There is no god, just an endless variety of crutches for pathetically
inadequate 'minds' like Muggles and the lowbrowman.

We've only recently invented games inside the game.

There is no game, just evolution.

and the guy playing Hitler got a new high score.

In fact the bugger lost so spectacularly
he had to shoot himself and his slut.

He did very well actually,

Nope, he was another pathetic vegy who got
his rocks off by getting his slut to **** on him.

it took a lot of do gooders to stop him.

It actually took just one bullet to stop him.

At least he did have the balls to do that.

Pity about radioactive decay alone.

Randomness is simply lack of detailed knowledge.

Take flipping a coin. If you know enough about how hard you spin it
etc, you can work out what side it will land on.

Doesn't work with radioactive decay.

I don't believe you, there must be a way of calculating it precisely.

No there isnt with radioactive decay because there is nothing to
calculate.

That we know about so far. Think back to when we couldn't see inside an
atom.

It will never be possible to calculate, just like it still
isnt with where a rain drop will form in a cloud.

Spank!
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 08 May 2021 17:59:59 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 30 Apr 2021 20:40:43 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 21:34:37 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:28:34 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 19:24:27 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 20:28:16 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 19:09:40 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 16, 2021 at 11:00:16 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey""
wrote
:

On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 03:44:18 +0100, Snit

wrote:

On Apr 15, 2021 at 7:14:23 PM MST, "rbowman" wrote
:

On 04/15/2021 12:02 PM, Commander Kinsey wrote:
On Wed, 14 Apr 2021 19:12:00 +0100, Rod Speed

wrote:

Commander Kinsey wrote

Another account must be made so they don't get the
last
word
in.
The
silliest thing I got banned for was saying the word
"damn".
And
not
even
in a rude way, probably something like "the damn
weather
is
awful
today".
Turns out the admin was a religious nutter.

Yeah, I got the same thing from another religious
nutter
for
using the term "hell of a lot", not a moderator in
that
case.

You have to wonder how far we would be today if
religion
had
not
impeded
science.

Do you know who first formulated the Big Bang theory?
Ever
here
of
Gregor Mendel? Blaise Pascal?

Quite a few scientists manage to have a foot in both
worlds.
In
general
the Catholics seem more flexible than the Protestants,
particularly
the
'gimme that old time religion' branch.

In the past the two were heavily tied together... but that
is
no
longer the
case. There are still some religious scientists, but
scientists
tend
to be
atheist at a higher level than the general public. They
also
tend
to
be more
liberal, which makes sense given how at least in the US
conservatives
tend
to
reject our best evidence.

Scientists are liberal because they want funding for free.

Scientists are liberal because the conservative mindset is to
deny
evidence.
We can see this with COVID,

No, we just don't make such a fuss over a small thing. A
thing
that
kills
4 times less than cancer and 40 times less than the world
population
growth.

man-made global climate change,

It was 1C here in Scotland a few days ago, in spring. There
is
no
global
warming.

research on reduction of abortions,

That's not science, that's morals.

and in some cases even things like evolution.

Evolution could take place if we let coronavirus kill off the
weak.

Nope, because it mostly kills those way past reproducing.

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it
can,
as
they're the weaker ones.

In fact there isnt any evidence that it does kill of the weaker
ones.

The Spanish Flu didn't, in fact it killed off the stronger ones
because their much better immune system grossly over reacted
and it was the cytokine storm that killed them very quickly.

Grossly overreacting was therefore a trait that needed removing
for
the
next generation.

Nope because it means they do much better with the
non pandemic infections and don't have to bother to
wash their hands all the time and can get away with
doing what is more convenient like not throwing
away food that has had a fly walk on it etc etc etc.

Having a trait that makes you better at 9 things but worse at
another,
getting you killed, is not a good trait to have.

Depends on the death rate.

In fact we evolved like that with kids sure that nothing can kill
them
and in fact that works fine.

What kids are you referring to?

Late teenagers. That's why they have always been the cannon fodder in
wars.

Well there's no point sending overweight old men is there?

That's not the alternative.

What other alternative is there?

Teenagers who still havent noticed that they arent immortal.

Girls?

Too useless for wartime. Fine for making the meals
and changing the bandages of the wounded.

Best to use the fit lads to kill.

But those with enough sense to realise that they arent immortal arent any
use as cannon fodder.

Then use the braver ones.

There arent enough stupid enough to not care if they live or die.

The Two Brain Dead Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
 

On Sat, 15 May 2021 08:12:01 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Another typical retarded "conversation" between Birdbrain and senile Rodent:

Senile Rodent: " Did you ever dig a hole to bury your own ****?"

Birdbrain: "I do if there's no flush toilet around."

Senile Rodent: "Yeah, I prefer camping like that, off by myself with
no dunnys around and have always buried the ****."

MID:

The Two Brain Dead Inseparable Trolling Resident Sociopaths together again
 

On Sat, 15 May 2021 08:16:59 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:

FLUSH the two subnormal sociopathic cretins' endless absolutely idiotic
blather

--
Typical retarded "conversation" between the Scottish ****** and the senile
Ozzietard:

Birdbrain: "Horse **** doesn't stink."

Senile Rodent: "It does if you roll in it."

Birdbrain: "I've never worked out why, I assumed it was maybe meateaters
that made stinky ****, but then why does vegetarian human **** stink? Is it
just the fact that we're capable of digesting meat?"

Senile Rodent: "Nope, some cow **** stinks too."

Message-ID:

Spank!
 

On Sat, 08 May 2021 08:29:23 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 8, 2021 at 12:27:39 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

reams of your troll**** flushed where it belongs

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You responded by saying you will agree evidence. Why do you keep saying it.
OK, you like ignorance. Whatever.

If you find a counter from an internationally recognized scientific group
please share.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Saying the same ****e over and over again might con most of the sheeple population, but me and Rod are more intelligent than that. Basic logic and common sense supercedes made up "scientific" bull**** with the results skewed towards what the scientists think or want the outcome to be.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Sat, 08 May 2021 05:54:08 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 7, 2021 at 8:23:34 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"%" wrote in message
...
On 2021-05-07 7:13 p.m., Rod Speed wrote:


"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 5:17:04 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 5:01:01 PM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 7, 2021 at 10:36:54 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Wed, 28 Apr 2021 20:41:40 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 28, 2021 at 11:34:41 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Thu, 22 Apr 2021 20:46:21 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 22, 2021 at 11:21:47 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey""
wrote
:

And that=E2=80=99s just as true of purported man made
climate change.

Its obvious that climate does change, that=E2=80=99s
obvious from
the ice ages etc, but its much less clear how much of
the
change we have seen is man made. It wasn=E2=80=99t
that long ago
that most scientists were hyperventilating about
global cooling.

Yes, we can certainly measure a substantial hike in
atmospheric
CO2 levels, but its much less clear how much effect
that actually
has on world temperatures, let alone climate change.

It's bloody obvious to me. We know there used to be
more CO2 in the air.
And the world was perfectly fine back then.

There has been no time in the history of man when the
CO2 levels were as
high
as they are now.

Why does man have to be there?

Just a personal preference I prefer to not have man go
extinct... and am
none
too happy about man creating the current mass extinction we
are in.

Surely you know that's not what I meant.

Yes, you were trying to pretend that man's influence is not
well understood
because in the past there were other times of high CO2, though
there were
other reasons and none of the times it has been anywhere even
near as high
have the changes happened so quickly.

You are working to push your intuition, based on faith, over
the science.

No, I was pointing out the earth survives high CO2 levels just
fine because
it did in the past. And that we would manage also. You do know
how much CO2
is required to kill you, right?

The earth will survive the harm we are causing...

Its far from clear that we are actually doing great harm at
all, particularly when compared with what the ice ages did.

We are in a great extinction,

Bull**** we are.

or at least likely so,

More bull****.

and seeing the impacts now.

More bull****.

If you want to learn more about it this is a good site to get
started:
http://climate.nasa.gov

More bull****. Its just the spewing of the MMGCC cult.

but we are in a great extinction

Bull****.

There is some debate -- but it seems likely.

Bull****.

and it may end up including humans.

No chance. We even survived the ice ages.

The ice ages man made it through (the most recent one) did not lead
to a great extinction.

Bull****.

We rely on many other species

Only a few actually.

Quite a few... give how they rely on each other. And we benefit from
many more.

More bull****.

and the ecosystems we are destroying.

The ice ages destroyed far more and we survived that fine.

You are trying to equate all of the ice ages.

Nope, rubbing your stupid nose in the fact that they
destroyed far more ecosystems than man has done.

The one man made it through was not a big one.

But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.

You reject evidence

You presented no evidence what so ever.


can you prove no evidence was presented

Just did.

First you must figure out what evidence is.

It's not what you're looking at, that's commonly referred to as "lies, damn lies, and statistics".

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Sat, 08 May 2021 10:22:27 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Snit" wrote in message
...
On May 8, 2021 at 12:26:55 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

Snit wrote
Rod Speed wrote

First you must figure out what evidence is.
I have known that for most of my life, since before you were even
born.
You presented none above.
You reject what internationally recognized scientific organizations
say

I actually rub your troll nose in the fact that they say nothing about
whether man has destroyed more ecosystems than the ice ages did.

reams of your lying troll**** flushed where it belongs

Congratulations, he gave up first.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Sat, 08 May 2021 20:08:31 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:33:24 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:20 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:47:48 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:46:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it
can, as
they're the weaker ones.

As you call for these deaths wby don't you volunteer? Set an
example?

I am, by not wearing a mask.

Go get the disease.

It's too unlikely to worry about, and if I got it, chances are I
wouldn't
even get symptoms. What a fuss about nothing. The whole world has
turned
into a bunchy of pathetic pansies. Except locally, about 80-90% of
people I
see are not bothering with masks or social distancing, and haven't for
the
whole year.

You says turned into as if this is the first pandemic.

I don't remember the world ever overreacting before.

That's because you weren't around when the spanish flu happened.

The bubonic plague is the only one I know of that killed a lot of people. The number killed by coronavirus is negligible.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On Sat, 08 May 2021 20:12:31 +0100, Rod Speed wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:33:55 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:33:48 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Language is weird. Heck, how do you think people generally
pronounce the
word
"can't".

Without the t. So it sounds more like "can".

https://youtu.be/6bszZZlvj4E

Just weird.

No. There are two differences for anyone who speaks English
properly
(as in
everyone outside the US). It's "cann" or "carnt". Not "cayan" or
"cayant".

These are UK samples: https://youtu.be/dGnBi6giZw0

is this the line for the free soup

Well Snit is a radical left winger, so yes, everything is magically
free.

How duos figure thongs would be magically free? Do you think they are in
Nordic countries?

All left wingers want something for nothing.

Not all of them. Some of them are bleeding heart ******s
who believe that the useless and unemployables should be
given handouts so they can live reasonable lives.

That money from the government, they don't just print it, they have to
steal it from somebody.

It isnt stealing, its collecting it from most to do what
the voters have decided that they want govt to do,
particularly with stuff like welfare instead of leaving
that to charity etc which has its own downsides.

The trouble is, it's wrong to take your money to pay for X, just because 55 out of 100 people believe it to be a good thing to do. 45% of the population are now paying for something they don't want.

--
Sent from my iPhone, this spam courtesy of Apple incorporated.

Spank!
 

On May 16, 2021 at 10:45:19 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

But they destroyed far more ecosystems than man ever has.

You reject evidence

You presented no evidence what so ever.


can you prove no evidence was presented

Just did.

First you must figure out what evidence is.

It's not what you're looking at, that's commonly referred to as "lies, damn
lies, and statistics".

Again, I will take:

* Peer review research
* The strong consensus of experts
* The view of every scientific organization with a stated view
* The physical evidence of how predictions are coming true

Over:

* Intuition / faith

I just do not have the faith you do.

--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Spank!
 

On May 16, 2021 at 10:44:15 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sat, 08 May 2021 08:29:23 +0100, Snit wrote:

On May 8, 2021 at 12:27:39 AM MST, ""Rod Speed"" wrote
:

reams of your troll**** flushed where it belongs

What you snipped:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
You responded by saying you will agree evidence. Why do you keep saying it.
OK, you like ignorance. Whatever.

If you find a counter from an internationally recognized scientific group
please share.
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Saying the same ****e over and over again might con most of the sheeple
population, but me and Rod are more intelligent than that. Basic logic and
common sense supercedes made up "scientific" bull**** with the results skewed
towards what the scientists think or want the outcome to be.

I do tend to give Gremlin FAR too much attention... as I used to do with
Carroll. Neither of them has any intention to have a discussion in good faith.


--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Spank!
 

"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 08 May 2021 20:08:31 +0100, Rod Speed
wrote:



"Commander Kinsey" wrote in message
...
On Thu, 29 Apr 2021 21:33:24 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 29, 2021 at 12:35:20 PM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

On Sun, 25 Apr 2021 19:47:48 +0100, Snit
wrote:

On Apr 25, 2021 at 11:46:00 AM MST, ""Commander Kinsey"" wrote
:

Irrelevant if it kills those or not. And they can hide
indoors.

The point is we should let it kill off any younger folk that it
can, as
they're the weaker ones.

As you call for these deaths wby don't you volunteer? Set an
example?

I am, by not wearing a mask.

Go get the disease.

It's too unlikely to worry about, and if I got it, chances are I
wouldn't
even get symptoms. What a fuss about nothing. The whole world has
turned
into a bunchy of pathetic pansies. Except locally, about 80-90% of
people I
see are not bothering with masks or social distancing, and haven't for
the
whole year.

You says turned into as if this is the first pandemic.

I don't remember the world ever overreacting before.

That's because you weren't around when the spanish flu happened.

The bubonic plague is the only one I know of that killed a lot of people.

The spanish flu did too. Wiped out some of the smaller communitys
completely.

The number killed by coronavirus is negligible.

Still better if they arent dead. And plenty who recover get
very unpleasant long term medical downsides too, long covid.