Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only
got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "FMurtz" wrote in message ... I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. Google doesn't decide anything, all it can do is show you what has been discussed. |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FMurtz wrote:
I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. It has probably been tried and not found to be a beneficial mix. As you probably know, propane and butane have different characteristics- propane is better at lower temperatures (in simple terms) for example. However. Sometimes they mix the two to get the best of both worlds. Some of the cylinders used in camping etc are a mix of butane and propane. Some are just propane. Ones used indoors tend to be butane- at least the larger ones. LPG for cars is a mix I believe. The energy each releases is slightly different which used to be compensated for, at least in some applications, by using different regulators to give different pressures. However, at least in some applications, a common pressure is used and you can switch between the two or use a mix these days. Having said that, at least for larger cylinders (the exchangeable sized ones), butane tends to be indoors and propane outdoors. Interestingly, bottled LPG is widely used in France domestically. Weve hired Gites in the past and found the cooker ran from LPG cylinders. Nearly every supermarket and most garages stock it. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FMurtz wrote:
I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. For what reason, just looking for hotter? Given how acetylene is stored in solution, would a convenient single cylinder mixed with propane or butane even be possible? Seems the danger of acetylene storage is "tolerated" for oxy/acetylene, where two cylinders mixed at the torch gives you the advantage of controlling oxidising vs reducing flame ... but if you can't control the oxygen in your propane/acetylene (or butane/acetylene) mix would it bring any advantage for the increased risk? |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Reay wrote:
FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. It has probably been tried and not found to be a beneficial mix. Map gas is a mixture of methylacetylene (propyne) and propadiene what ever they are. As you probably know, propane and butane have different characteristics- propane is better at lower temperatures (in simple terms) for example. However. Sometimes they mix the two to get the best of both worlds. Some of the cylinders used in camping etc are a mix of butane and propane. Some are just propane. Ones used indoors tend to be butane- at least the larger ones. LPG for cars is a mix I believe. The energy each releases is slightly different which used to be compensated for, at least in some applications, by using different regulators to give different pressures. However, at least in some applications, a common pressure is used and you can switch between the two or use a mix these days. Having said that, at least for larger cylinders (the exchangeable sized ones), butane tends to be indoors and propane outdoors. Interestingly, bottled LPG is widely used in France domestically. Weve hired Gites in the past and found the cooker ran from LPG cylinders. Nearly every supermarket and most garages stock it. same here in Australi and vehicles run on it |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
FMurtz wrote:
Brian Reay wrote: FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. It has probably been tried and not found to be a beneficial mix. Map gas is a mixture of methylacetylene (propyne) and propadiene what ever they are. Propyne is C3H4, as is propadiene. They are isomers- ie they have the same formula but the molecule is assembled differently. How that makes a difference when the burn I dont know/ cant remember how to work out beyond the basic theory below. Propane is C3H8, butane C4H10. There are some rough rules / guidelines re energy you get from from the formula ( you can work it out, here I mean general guides, not numbers). Butane tends to release more energy than propane due to the longer carbon chain. Propyne more than propane due to the more complex (double) bounding which is another factor in energy released. Acetylene is C2H2. While it has a short chain, the triple C to C bond releases a lot of energy when it burns. There are other factors* but that is the basic theory, at least as I remember my Chemistry from school. *eg butane isnt good at low temperatures so propane is better. |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 16:39:15 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Google doesn't decide anything, all it can do is show you what has been discussed. You are the most ridiculous, auto-contradicting, senile asshole I ever encountered in any part on this globe, you abnormal senile Australian pest! LOL -- Sqwertz to Rot Speed: "This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative asshole. MID: |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Maybe everyone who tried it is dead?
Brian -- ----- -- This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please Note this Signature is meaningless.! "FMurtz" wrote in message ... I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 04:43, FMurtz wrote:
I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. I'm pretty sure that acetylene would react vigorously with butane etc but I don't know what sort of shock you'd need to start it. Cheers -- Clive |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 04:43, FMurtz wrote:
I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. I suspect that acetylene is just a bit too unforgiving for anyone to want to risk selling a mix to people unused to its fickle behaviour. -- Regards, Martin Brown |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 13:40, Martin Brown wrote:
On 15/12/2019 04:43, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. I suspect that acetylene is just a bit too unforgiving for anyone to want to risk selling a mix to people unused to its fickle behaviour. +1. It might help if you said what you were trying to find out. |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote:
I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf |
#13
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Air bubbles mixed with water are a bad mix, as the customers
of Anglia Water have discovered in Bedfordshire this weekend. Just think of all those useless Combi boilers right now :-( Plumbers are going to be licking their chops at all the extra work, getting boilers going, replacing ball cocks that have been affected by crud coming through the mains, etc . On 15/12/2019 10:15, Brian Gaff (Sofa 2) wrote: Maybe everyone who tried it is dead? Brian |
#14
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Brian Gaff (Sofa 2) wrote
Maybe everyone who tried it is dead? Unlikely given that we would have heard about those deaths. "FMurtz" wrote in message ... I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. |
#15
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
harry wrote:
On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. |
#16
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 07:35:48 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: Maybe everyone who tried it is dead? Unlikely given that we would have heard about those deaths. What "we" hear here, every day, is you auto-contradicting in your pathological abnormal manner, you forsaken senile pest! -- More senile "wisdom" from Australian bull**** artist, senile Rodent: "Some things are much harder to do than others." Message-ID: |
#17
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 21:16, Brian Reay wrote:
harry wrote: On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. Yes. We were all handed one of those when visiting the Ice Caves near Werfen in 1999. SteveW |
#18
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 21:16, Brian Reay wrote:
harry wrote: On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. The point being that carbide lamps produced the gas as they went along so did not involve acetylene under high pressure. -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
#19
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sunday, 15 December 2019 21:16:48 UTC, Brian Reay wrote:
harry wrote: On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. Only relatively recently they gave up selling calcium carbide in Halfords You filled a container with it and adjusted the outflow of acetylene by regulating a water drip into the container. The only advantage is compared with a battery, an acetylene lamp runs for much longer. Maybe no longer true with LED lamps. |
#20
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
harry wrote:
On Sunday, 15 December 2019 21:16:48 UTC, Brian Reay wrote: harry wrote: On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. Only relatively recently they gave up selling calcium carbide in Halfords You filled a container with it and adjusted the outflow of acetylene by regulating a water drip into the container. The only advantage is compared with a battery, an acetylene lamp runs for much longer. Maybe no longer true with LED lamps. Id quite like one. I remember seeing one as a youngster and being fascinated by the principle. I am a bit surprised they were on sale relatively recently- at least in the time scale of LED lamps- I was thinking more like 40 years ago but I dont doubt what you say. |
#21
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 15/12/2019 22:30, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 21:16:42 +0000 (UTC), Brian Reay wrote: I still have my carbide lamp from my pot-holing days in the early 1960's. Made by "The Premier Lamp and Eng. Co. Ltd. Leeds Eng" I don't doubt it would still work perfectly, given a supply of carbide. It used to be available in tall narrow red tins, say 2.5" dia. x 8" long. It was also used in bird scarers and moisture meters. You can still buy carbide for lamps on Amazon, and yes its in a red tin! Mike |
#22
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. They also produced a small amount of Hydrogen Sulphide ,which gives the bad-egg smell, from impurities in the Calcium Carbide. |
#23
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/12/2019 07:13, harry wrote:
On Sunday, 15 December 2019 21:16:48 UTC, Brian Reay wrote: harry wrote: On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. Only relatively recently they gave up selling calcium carbide in Halfords You filled a container with it and adjusted the outflow of acetylene by regulating a water drip into the container. The only advantage is compared with a battery, an acetylene lamp runs for much longer. Maybe no longer true with LED lamps. Didn't Wheeler Dealers make up battery powered LED replacements to fit in place of the carbide lamps in a Daraqs headlamps? SteveW |
#24
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 16 Dec 2019 09:20:09 +0000 (UTC), Brian Reay wrote:
Id quite like one. I remember seeing one as a youngster and being fascinated by the principle. I am a bit surprised they were on sale relatively recently- at least in the time scale of LED lamps- I was thinking more like 40 years ago but I dont doubt what you say. "Petzl Ariane", a modern carbide haedlamp. Possibly discontinued, but sometimes available used. Thomas Prufer |
#25
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 16 December 2019 09:20:12 UTC, Brian Reay wrote:
harry wrote: On Sunday, 15 December 2019 21:16:48 UTC, Brian Reay wrote: harry wrote: On Sunday, 15 December 2019 04:43:50 UTC, FMurtz wrote: I asked google, about a mix of propane or butane and acetylene but only got answers around propane butane mixes, I can not believe that people have not experimented but google seem to have decided no one would be interested. The reason is very simple. Acetylene has to be dissolved in acetone for delivery because it is unstable and only liquifies at low temperture/high pressures. Acetylene bottles are filled with a rigid foam and ecatone. This is why they always have to be kept upright in use. If you lay it on it's side and open the vlve, the acetone will run out with acetylene still dissolved but foaming as it comes out. Very dangerous situation. https://www.hse.gov.uk/pubns/indg327.pdf I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. Only relatively recently they gave up selling calcium carbide in Halfords You filled a container with it and adjusted the outflow of acetylene by regulating a water drip into the container. The only advantage is compared with a battery, an acetylene lamp runs for much longer. Maybe no longer true with LED lamps. Id quite like one. I remember seeing one as a youngster and being fascinated by the principle. I am a bit surprised they were on sale relatively recently- at least in the time scale of LED lamps- I was thinking more like 40 years ago but I dont doubt what you say. Yes it's strange. We used to buy it as schoolkids to mess around with. But there were no acetylene lamps around at that time so why they had any is a mystery. |
#26
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Monday, 16 December 2019 09:23:51 UTC, Muddymike wrote:
On 15/12/2019 22:30, Chris Hogg wrote: On Sun, 15 Dec 2019 21:16:42 +0000 (UTC), Brian Reay wrote: I still have my carbide lamp from my pot-holing days in the early 1960's. Made by "The Premier Lamp and Eng. Co. Ltd. Leeds Eng" I don't doubt it would still work perfectly, given a supply of carbide. It used to be available in tall narrow red tins, say 2.5" dia. x 8" long. It was also used in bird scarers and moisture meters. You can still buy carbide for lamps on Amazon, and yes its in a red tin! Yes, that's the one that was for sale in Halfords. |
#27
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 16/12/2019 09:31, Robert wrote:
I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps.Â* They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. They also produced a small amount of Hydrogen Sulphide ,which gives the bad-egg smell, from impurities in the Calcium Carbide. Interesting. I've only seen such lamps a few times and not noticed that. I wonder if, for cavers etc, they produce better quality (pure) Calcium Carbide as H2S is dangerous. I believe it was used in WW1. |
#28
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Am 17.12.2019 um 11:23 schrieb harry:
[carbide] Yes it's strange. We used to buy it as schoolkids to mess around with. But there were no acetylene lamps around at that time so why they had any is a mystery. It was used for killing moles. |
#29
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Tuesday, 17 December 2019 11:11:24 UTC, Brian Reay wrote:
On 16/12/2019 09:31, Robert wrote: I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps.Â* They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. They also produced a small amount of Hydrogen Sulphide ,which gives the bad-egg smell, from impurities in the Calcium Carbide. Interesting. I've only seen such lamps a few times and not noticed that. I wonder if, for cavers etc, they produce better quality (pure) Calcium Carbide as H2S is dangerous. I believe it was used in WW1. It's also flammable and so would be burned up. |
#30
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/12/2019 12:52, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Tue, 17 Dec 2019 11:11:20 +0000, Brian Reay wrote: On 16/12/2019 09:31, Robert wrote: I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps.Â* They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. They also produced a small amount of Hydrogen Sulphide ,which gives the bad-egg smell, from impurities in the Calcium Carbide. Interesting. I've only seen such lamps a few times and not noticed that. I wonder if, for cavers etc, they produce better quality (pure) Calcium Carbide as H2S is dangerous. I believe it was used in WW1. The acetylene from a carbide lamp always had a very characteristic slightly sweetish smell, and no, AFAIK the carbide wasn't particularly pure. H2S is almost as poisonous as cyanide gas, or so I was taught at school, but when generated from a carbide lamp it's immediately burnt, so never builds up to anywhere near a lethal concentration. Nor do I think it would do even if unburnt unless for an extended period in a very confined space. It's not as though you'd drop dead from the slightest whiff of H2S, any more that you'd drop dead from the slightest whiff of HCN (I have smelt both, and I'm still here!). I think some people may be assuming caves are prone to be short of air circulation. That was not my experience in the few I explored - not even when a podgy like me was plugging a squeeze. -- Robin reply-to address is (intended to be) valid |
#31
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 17/12/2019 11:11, Brian Reay wrote:
On 16/12/2019 09:31, Robert wrote: I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps.Â* They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. They also produced a small amount of Hydrogen Sulphide ,which gives the bad-egg smell, from impurities in the Calcium Carbide. Interesting. I've only seen such lamps a few times and not noticed that. I wonder if, for cavers etc, they produce better quality (pure) Calcium Carbide as H2S is dangerous.Â* I believe it was used in WW1. ISTR that if you can smell it, it is okay, when the concentration is higher, the effect stops you smelling it. At least that is what we were told in "O"-level chemistry - so it could be completely wrong! SteveW |
#32
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steve Walker" wrote in message ... On 17/12/2019 11:11, Brian Reay wrote: On 16/12/2019 09:31, Robert wrote: I dont doubt what you post etc but not that long ago in the scheme of things, people used acetylene lamps. They were used on the early cars and in caving into the 1970s at least. (I recall seeing some potholers use them in my teens.) They worked by producing acetylene from the reaction between calcium carbide and water from memory. They also produced a small amount of Hydrogen Sulphide ,which gives the bad-egg smell, from impurities in the Calcium Carbide. Interesting. I've only seen such lamps a few times and not noticed that. I wonder if, for cavers etc, they produce better quality (pure) Calcium Carbide as H2S is dangerous. I believe it was used in WW1. ISTR that if you can smell it, it is okay, when the concentration is higher, the effect stops you smelling it. At least that is what we were told in "O"-level chemistry - so it could be completely wrong! No its not. There have been a few examples of people ending up dead in submarines and other naval vessels when the system used to process the **** and **** has failed and some have been killed by H2S levels that they can no longer smell. |
#33
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 18 Dec 2019 07:26:28 +1100, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again: ISTR that if you can smell it, it is okay, when the concentration is higher, the effect stops you smelling it. At least that is what we were told in "O"-level chemistry - so it could be completely wrong! No its not. LOL In auto-contradicting mode again, you clinically insane, auto-contradicting senile idiot? -- Kerr-Mudd,John addressing senile Rot: "Auto-contradictor Rod is back! (in the KF)" MID: |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Refrigeration gasses | UK diy | |||
mixed gasses question | Metalworking | |||
Ready mixed Polly filler or ready mixed plaster ? | UK diy | |||
FA: Mattheson regulator (propane/butane/hydrogen/etc) probably ok for MIG gasses as well | Metalworking | |||
Well water gasses, spits at faucet, toilet etc | Home Repair |