DIYbanter

DIYbanter (https://www.diybanter.com/)
-   UK diy (https://www.diybanter.com/uk-diy/)
-   -   Supplying power to a computer desktop (https://www.diybanter.com/uk-diy/635786-supplying-power-computer-desktop.html)

David May 17th 19 05:24 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


Cheers


Dave R


--
AMD FX-6300 in GA-990X-Gaming SLI-CF running Windows 7 Pro x64

---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus


Michael Chare[_4_] May 17th 19 07:05 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I would not mount 13A sockets on a desktop computer. You could use C13
to C14 cables and then have a C13 Power Distribution Unit which would be
smaller than a row of 13Amp sockets.


--
Michael Chare

Graham.[_11_] May 17th 19 07:15 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I would not mount 13A sockets on a desktop computer. You could use C13
to C14 cables and then have a C13 Power Distribution Unit which would be
smaller than a row of 13Amp sockets.


We used UPSs with that socketery when I was working. The problem with
them is all the wall-warts for your routers & switches etc, so they
ended up plugged into raw mains.




--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%

Dave Plowman (News) May 17th 19 07:19 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
In article ,
David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.


I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer
units with a desktop across up against one wall.


There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the
opposite wall.


My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the
desktop down to them.


Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in
the wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on
top.


Fit a switched FCU spurred off your ring in a convenient position feeded a
socket in another convenient position. Then multiway socket extension
lead(s) from that. Nothing domestic computer wise take much in the way of
current.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.


Is there a downside?


Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple
of switched sockets?


It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently
use.


I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting
more load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A
ring main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads
beloved by computer users.


The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.



Cheers



Dave R


--
*Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm *

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.

Fredxx[_3_] May 17th 19 07:51 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I'd be thinking of angled bench sockets attached to the rear of your
desktop with a long lead to your socket. Like:

https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/cate...ng-bench-units

Although I would avoid CEF like the plague!

Rod Speed May 17th 19 09:25 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 


"Fredxx" wrote in message
...
On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the
desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently
use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I'd be thinking of angled bench sockets attached to the rear of your
desktop with a long lead to your socket. Like:

https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/cate...ng-bench-units


What is it with these stupid ****ers so ****ing stupid
having very light grey images on a white background.

Although I would avoid CEF like the plague!



Peeler[_3_] May 17th 19 10:12 PM

Lonely Psychopathic Senile Ozzie Troll Alert!
 
On Sat, 18 May 2019 06:25:37 +1000, cantankerous trolling geezer Rodent
Speed, the auto-contradicting senile sociopath, blabbered, again:


What is it with these stupid ****ers so ****ing stupid
having very light grey images on a white background.


Oh, ****! And this senile trolling asshole from Oz HAD to **** also in this
thread. tsk

--
Sqwertz to Rodent Speed:
"This is just a hunch, but I'm betting you're kinda an argumentative
asshole.
MID:


Roger Hayter[_2_] May 17th 19 10:56 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
Graham. wrote:

On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I would not mount 13A sockets on a desktop computer. You could use C13
to C14 cables and then have a C13 Power Distribution Unit which would be
smaller than a row of 13Amp sockets.


We used UPSs with that socketery when I was working. The problem with
them is all the wall-warts for your routers & switches etc, so they
ended up plugged into raw mains.


I use a standard cheap 4 way extension lead and replace the plug with
the male version of C13/4 whichever it is. I then mark the socket
strip with lots of permanent marker to remind me these are for small
loads connected to the UPS.

--

Roger Hayter

Bob Eager[_7_] May 17th 19 11:16 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
On Fri, 17 May 2019 19:51:09 +0100, Fredxx wrote:

On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer
units with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the
opposite wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the
desktop down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in
the wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on
top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having
extension leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple
of switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes
and switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I
currently use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting
more load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A
ring main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads
beloved by computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I'd be thinking of angled bench sockets attached to the rear of your
desktop with a long lead to your socket. Like:

https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/cate...ng-bench-units

Although I would avoid CEF like the plague!


As it happens, I took delivery of a new bench yesterday and have spent
part of today fitting exactly such angled units!

--
My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

Brian Gaff May 18th 19 08:07 AM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
One other thing about these 6 way sockets, they are too close together if
any of the peripherals have odball plugs with the psu inside them, or the
cable coming out of the side or back. I have several of these and also a
plug in wireless switched socket all of which block the next socket along in
each direction so if using discrete sockets space them accordingly!
Brian

--
----- --
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"Michael Chare" wrote in message
...
On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the
desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently
use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I would not mount 13A sockets on a desktop computer. You could use C13 to
C14 cables and then have a C13 Power Distribution Unit which would be
smaller than a row of 13Amp sockets.


--
Michael Chare




Graham.[_11_] May 18th 19 04:09 PM

Supplying power to a computer desktop
 
Graham. wrote:

On 17/05/2019 17:24, David wrote:
Checking my thinking for any gotchas.

I am reorganising the office and putting a couple of kitchen drawer units
with a desktop across up against one wall.

There is only one double socket at the moment and this is on the opposite
wall.

My plan is to take power to the wall under the desktop then fit some
switched 13A sockets into the desktop itself, instead of having several
sockets in the wall below and distribution boards feeding from the desktop
down to them.

Now it looks fairly simple to put a switched fused spur into a box in the
wall below the desk, then just wire from the box to the sockets on top.

It seems that the electrical load would be no more than having extension
leads with loads of sockets.

Is there a downside?

Apart from one switch taking out the whole desktop instead of a couple of
switched sockets?

It looks neater, but probably far more expensive through using boxes and
switched sockets instead of the 6 way extension leads that I currently use.

I suppose one downside is the temptation for me (or another) to plug
another multi-socket extension lead into the desktop socket, putting more
load on the spur than you would get if plugged directly into a 13A ring
main. A bit like the traditional cascade of extension leads beloved by
computer users.

The alternative would be to extend the 13A ring main to the desktop but
I'm not sure quite how to wire that.


I would not mount 13A sockets on a desktop computer. You could use C13
to C14 cables and then have a C13 Power Distribution Unit which would be
smaller than a row of 13Amp sockets.


We used UPSs with that socketery when I was working. The problem with
them is all the wall-warts for your routers & switches etc, so they
ended up plugged into raw mains.


I use a standard cheap 4 way extension lead and replace the plug with
the male version of C13/4 whichever it is. I then mark the socket
strip with lots of permanent marker to remind me these are for small
loads connected to the UPS.


I did something like that on occasion but received wisdom was we
"weren't insured" to do modifications like change a plug...

--
Graham.

%Profound_observation%


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter