On 26/09/2018 00:38, JoeJoe wrote:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ment-351909753


Give someone whose qualifications amount to 2 x E's in his A levels
(from a selective school no less), and has never done a single
productive day's work in his life a microphone, and this is what you'll
get.

"The Labour leader will pledge to tear up planning rules to allow
developers to double the number of wind turbines on land, and increase
the number at sea sixfold."

If they're on the *same* land/sea area but greater density, won't they
just block each other's wind?

--
Max Demian

After serious thinking Max Demian wrote :
If they're on the *same* land/sea area but greater density, won't they just
block each other's wind?

Not at all, Labour will create the wind too..

On Wednesday, 26 September 2018 14:29:47 UTC+1, Max Demian wrote:
On 26/09/2018 00:38, JoeJoe wrote:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ment-351909753


Give someone whose qualifications amount to 2 x E's in his A levels
(from a selective school no less), and has never done a single
productive day's work in his life a microphone, and this is what you'll
get.

"The Labour leader will pledge to tear up planning rules to allow
developers to double the number of wind turbines on land, and increase
the number at sea sixfold."

If they're on the *same* land/sea area but greater density, won't they
just block each other's wind?

they will have been built & erected by the now unemployed so it won't matter

On 26/09/2018 14:29, Max Demian wrote:
On 26/09/2018 00:38, JoeJoe wrote:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ment-351909753


Give someone whose qualifications amount to 2 x E's in his A levels
(from a selective school no less), and has never done a single
productive day's work in his life a microphone, and this is what
you'll get.

"The Labour leader will pledge to tear up planning rules to allow
developers to double the number of wind turbines on land, and increase
the number at sea sixfold."

If they're on the *same* land/sea area but greater density, won't they
just block each other's wind?

Dianne Abbot is on the case - it is going to work.

On 26/09/18 14:29, Max Demian wrote:
On 26/09/2018 00:38, JoeJoe wrote:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...ment-351909753


Give someone whose qualifications amount to 2 x E's in his A levels
(from a selective school no less), and has never done a single
productive day's work in his life a microphone, and this is what
you'll get.

"The Labour leader will pledge to tear up planning rules to allow
developers to double the number of wind turbines on land, and increase
the number at sea sixfold."

If they're on the *same* land/sea area but greater density, won't they
just block each other's wind?

Yes.

In factr Corbyn has revealed homself to be a complete l;efty**** and
lacking intelligence to boot.

More windmills+nationalise everything = bankrupt the country.

He is no more real working class labour than May is conservative



--
€œBut what a weak barrier is truth when it stands in the way of an
hypothesis!€�

Mary Wollstonecraft

On 26/09/2018 19:41, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:31:45 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:


Today Jezza tweets that railways should be nationalised because of the
signal failure at Liverpool. Even when it was pointed out that the
signals are run by Network Rail, a nationalised body.

As Jezza himself said - you couldn't make it up.

Brexit may be a bit of a rough ride before things settle down in a few
years, hard brexit or otherwise, but if Labour win the next election
and try and implement those policies that were being proposed at the
conference, it will make brexit look like nirvana!


However they are unlikely to implement them when they are elected, which
is looking possible if it stops brexit.

Its a case of is five years of labour worse than 50+ years of brexit.

On 26/09/2018 19:41, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:31:45 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:


Today Jezza tweets that railways should be nationalised because of the
signal failure at Liverpool. Even when it was pointed out that the
signals are run by Network Rail, a nationalised body.

As Jezza himself said - you couldn't make it up.

Brexit may be a bit of a rough ride before things settle down in a few
years, hard brexit or otherwise, but if Labour win the next election
and try and implement those policies that were being proposed at the
conference, it will make brexit look like nirvana!


They seemed to have gone very quiet on their promised abolition of
student fees/loan repayments recently. Is Diane Abbott busy crunching
the numbers before they make them public?

In article , The Natural Philosopher
writes
On 26/09/18 14:29, Max Demian wrote:
On 26/09/2018 00:38, JoeJoe wrote:

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...Corbyn-announc
e-green-jobs-revolution-plans-promising-400-000-new-jobs.html?offset=8
&max=100&jumpTo=comment-351909753#comment-351909753

Give someone whose qualifications amount to 2 x E's in his A levels
(from a selective school no less), and has never done a single
productive day's work in his life a microphone, and this is what
you'll get.
"The Labour leader will pledge to tear up planning rules to allow
developers to double the number of wind turbines on land, and increase
the number at sea sixfold."
If they're on the *same* land/sea area but greater density, won't
they just block each other's wind?

Yes.

In factr Corbyn has revealed homself to be a complete l;efty**** and
lacking intelligence to boot.

More windmills+nationalise everything = bankrupt the country.

The danger is that UK voters who have been brought up with the concept
of democracy and rule of law will assume that nationalisation will
involve buying up the shares of the target companies at market value.
That is a dangerous assumption when the likes of O'Donnell have power.
Once they have expropriated 10% of a company what's to stop them going
further to 20% then 30% etc. O'Donnell has already said that parliament
would decide the value of companies to be nationalised.
He is no more real working class labour than May is conservative




--
bert

In article , "dennis@home"
writes
On 26/09/2018 19:41, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:31:45 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:


Today Jezza tweets that railways should be nationalised because of the
signal failure at Liverpool. Even when it was pointed out that the
signals are run by Network Rail, a nationalised body.

As Jezza himself said - you couldn't make it up.
Brexit may be a bit of a rough ride before things settle down in a
few
years, hard brexit or otherwise, but if Labour win the next election
and try and implement those policies that were being proposed at the
conference, it will make brexit look like nirvana!


However they are unlikely to implement them when they are elected,
which is looking possible if it stops brexit.

Its a case of is five years of labour worse than 50+ years of brexit.


Yes. This is not Labour as you know it. O'Donnell's life's ambition is
to destroy the city - the largest provider of taxes to the government.
They will destroy share holder value - which is your pension fund. Many
of the highest payers of income tax who pay about 28% of the total will
leave. Council tax will double (at least).
--
bert

In article , JoeJoe
writes
On 26/09/2018 19:41, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Wed, 26 Sep 2018 19:31:45 +0100, Tim Streater
wrote:


Today Jezza tweets that railways should be nationalised because of the
signal failure at Liverpool. Even when it was pointed out that the
signals are run by Network Rail, a nationalised body.

As Jezza himself said - you couldn't make it up.
Brexit may be a bit of a rough ride before things settle down in a
few
years, hard brexit or otherwise, but if Labour win the next election
and try and implement those policies that were being proposed at the
conference, it will make brexit look like nirvana!


They seemed to have gone very quiet on their promised abolition of
student fees/loan repayments recently. Is Diane Abbott busy crunching
the numbers before they make them public?
It was abandoned almost as fast as Nick Clegg's version.
--
bert

In article ,
bert wrote:
Yes. This is not Labour as you know it. O'Donnell's life's ambition is
to destroy the city - the largest provider of taxes to the government.
They will destroy share holder value - which is your pension fund.

No need for him to bother. Brexit is quite capable of doing that anyway.

Interesting the likes of you worrying about the City when it is near
universally against Brexit.

--
*60-year-old, one owner - needs parts, make offer

Dave Plowman London SW
To e-mail, change noise into sound.