Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
Hi All,
I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. What is the best way to run cables between floors? I'm looking at 50+ cables. The mains wiring drops into the cupboard under the stairs but this is a very small passage that cannot be enlarged and I wouldn't want to run the low-voltage CAT5 alongside the mains. IEE wiring regs. Thanks in advance, Martin. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:25:44 -0000, "Martin"
wrote: Hi All, I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. What is the best way to run cables between floors? I'm looking at 50+ cables. Up the walls? The mains wiring drops into the cupboard under the stairs but this is a very small passage that cannot be enlarged and I wouldn't want to run the low-voltage CAT5 alongside the mains. IEE wiring regs. A duct from the ground to top floor would be your best bet, either larger size PVC electrical conduit or a wastepipe of whatever size you want. I would make sure you have access to each end of this for future upgrades. The other way is to use the inside of cupboards or similar to run the cat5's up inside, easy enough to get to in the future and out of the way, that's the way I've done it. ... SJW A.C.S. Ltd. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
"Lurch" wrote in message
... On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:25:44 -0000, "Martin" wrote: Hi All, I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. What is the best way to run cables between floors? I'm looking at 50+ cables. Up the walls? The mains wiring drops into the cupboard under the stairs but this is a very small passage that cannot be enlarged and I wouldn't want to run the low-voltage CAT5 alongside the mains. IEE wiring regs. A duct from the ground to top floor would be your best bet, either larger size PVC electrical conduit or a wastepipe of whatever size you want. I would make sure you have access to each end of this for future upgrades. The other way is to use the inside of cupboards or similar to run the cat5's up inside, easy enough to get to in the future and out of the way, that's the way I've done it. .. SJW A.C.S. Ltd. Thanks for your reply. I totally agree a duct with access at both end is the ideal solution. The problem is concealing it, I only have one downstairs cupboard and that's under the stairs, unfortunately any holes drilled in the top of the cupboard come out on the stairs. Maybe I can get some slim but wide ducting that would not protrude the plaster. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
A duct from the ground to top floor would be your best bet, either
larger size PVC electrical conduit or a wastepipe of whatever size you want. I would make sure you have access to each end of this for future upgrades. The other way is to use the inside of cupboards or similar to run the cat5's up inside, easy enough to get to in the future and out of the way, that's the way I've done it. .. SJW A.C.S. Ltd. Thanks for your reply. I totally agree a duct with access at both end is the ideal solution. The problem is concealing it, I only have one downstairs cupboard and that's under the stairs, unfortunately any holes drilled in the top of the cupboard come out on the stairs. Maybe I can get some slim but wide ducting that would not protrude the plaster. You could cut a chase into the brickwork giving you more depth for bigger conduit. The other option is buy a bending spring, then you can route the conduit up to wherever you want. Just make sure it's not got too many sharp bends, long smooth bends are better if possible. This way you would have to run several smaller curved conduits rather than one larger straight one. ... SJW A.C.S. Ltd. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
Martin wrote:
The other way is to use the inside of cupboards or similar to run the cat5's up inside, easy enough to get to in the future and out of the way, that's the way I've done it. .. SJW A.C.S. Ltd. Thanks for your reply. I totally agree a duct with access at both end is the ideal solution. The problem is concealing it, I only have one downstairs cupboard and that's under the stairs, unfortunately any holes drilled in the top of the cupboard come out on the stairs. Maybe I can get some slim but wide ducting that would not protrude the plaster. Have you not got any waste pipes boxed in anywhere? This is what I have used in our (even older) house, there are a couple of boxed in pipes from upstairs loos. The alternative is to go outside and find an inconspicuous place to run some trunking up the wall (adjacent to a pipe for example). -- Chris Green |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
"Martin" wrote in message ... Hi All, I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. What is the best way to run cables between floors? I'm looking at 50+ cables. The mains wiring drops into the cupboard under the stairs but this is a very small passage that cannot be enlarged and I wouldn't want to run the low-voltage CAT5 alongside the mains. IEE wiring regs. Thanks in advance, Martin. I put a false side on the chimney breast and run everything in there. MrCheerful |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
On 17/02/2004 Martin opined:-
I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. What is the best way to run cables between floors? I'm looking at 50+ cables. You might be able to drop the cables down the cavity between the inner and outer walls, assuming an outer wall might be a suitable location and you have not had cavity insulation fitted. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.org |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
"MrCheerful" wrote in message
... "Martin" wrote in message ... Hi All, I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. What is the best way to run cables between floors? I'm looking at 50+ cables. The mains wiring drops into the cupboard under the stairs but this is a very small passage that cannot be enlarged and I wouldn't want to run the low-voltage CAT5 alongside the mains. IEE wiring regs. Thanks in advance, Martin. I put a false side on the chimney breast and run everything in there. MrCheerful Thats what I'm planning upstairs, as I have a small peice of wall 4" (100mm). I'm going to remove the plaster and run two large pecies of conduit floor to ceiling and fill the gaps with plaster. Chimney breast is a good idea but ideally I want the run from the hall to landing for easy access in the future and its more central. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message
.uk... On 17/02/2004 Martin opined:- I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. What is the best way to run cables between floors? I'm looking at 50+ cables. You might be able to drop the cables down the cavity between the inner and outer walls, assuming an outer wall might be a suitable location and you have not had cavity insulation fitted. Thanks, To my delilght I've found I do have cavity insulation. Found this when I started installing security lighting outside, thought then I could drop the wires down the cavity, in the end I located the lights at the first floor level and drilled a hole straight in under the floorboards. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
On 17/02/2004 Martin opined:-
Thanks, To my delilght I've found I do have cavity insulation. Found this when I started installing security lighting outside, thought then I could drop the wires down the cavity, in the end I located the lights at the first floor level and drilled a hole straight in under the floorboards. You are not allowed to run mains cabling in the cavity, though obviously you can pass cables straight through them. Cat5 would not be a problem run in the cavities. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.org |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
"Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message
.uk... On 17/02/2004 Martin opined:- Thanks, To my delilght I've found I do have cavity insulation. Found this when I started installing security lighting outside, thought then I could drop the wires down the cavity, in the end I located the lights at the first floor level and drilled a hole straight in under the floorboards. You are not allowed to run mains cabling in the cavity, though obviously you can pass cables straight through them. Cat5 would not be a problem run in the cavities. Didn't know that, I'm not disagreeing but do you have a reference in the regs where this is stipulated. I have seen lots of houses where the mains wiring is run in the cavity, mainly for outside lights. Also why would this be a problem? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
Martin wrote on Tuesday (17/02/2004) :
Didn't know that, I'm not disagreeing but do you have a reference in the regs where this is stipulated. I have seen lots of houses where the mains wiring is run in the cavity, mainly for outside lights. Also why would this be a problem? I don't have a copy of the regs to refer to, but this point was recently mentioned in this ng. Other than the possibility than the cables might become overheated due to the cavities being later filled with insulation, I cannot think of any other obvious reasons. It used to be permitted. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.org |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
I don't have a copy of the regs to refer to, but this point was recently mentioned in this ng. Other than the possibility than the cables might become overheated due to the cavities being later filled with insulation, I cannot think of any other obvious reasons. It used to be permitted. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.org Interesting. I don't have a copy of the Regs to hand, but can't recall that it's addressed in the Regs either way and would welcome a reference. Personally, I wouldn't install mains cables in a cavity wall! |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
wrote in message
... Martin wrote: The other way is to use the inside of cupboards or similar to run the cat5's up inside, easy enough to get to in the future and out of the way, that's the way I've done it. .. SJW A.C.S. Ltd. Thanks for your reply. I totally agree a duct with access at both end is the ideal solution. The problem is concealing it, I only have one downstairs cupboard and that's under the stairs, unfortunately any holes drilled in the top of the cupboard come out on the stairs. Maybe I can get some slim but wide ducting that would not protrude the plaster. Have you not got any waste pipes boxed in anywhere? This is what I have used in our (even older) house, there are a couple of boxed in pipes from upstairs loos. The alternative is to go outside and find an inconspicuous place to run some trunking up the wall (adjacent to a pipe for example). -- Chris Green ----- Original Message ----- From: Newsgroups: uk.d-i-y Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 2:44 PM Subject: Running wires between floors 1930 Semi Martin wrote: The other way is to use the inside of cupboards or similar to run the cat5's up inside, easy enough to get to in the future and out of the way, that's the way I've done it. .. SJW A.C.S. Ltd. Thanks for your reply. I totally agree a duct with access at both end is the ideal solution. The problem is concealing it, I only have one downstairs cupboard and that's under the stairs, unfortunately any holes drilled in the top of the cupboard come out on the stairs. Maybe I can get some slim but wide ducting that would not protrude the plaster. Have you not got any waste pipes boxed in anywhere? This is what I have used in our (even older) house, there are a couple of boxed in pipes from upstairs loos. The alternative is to go outside and find an inconspicuous place to run some trunking up the wall (adjacent to a pipe for example). -- Chris Green CAT-5 outside is a potential lightning risk and personally I've suffered broken NICs from a nearby strike. This has been mentioned before so a Google search should find the relevant messages. The other possibility is not to install CAT5 cables at all, but use Wi-Fi. I've installed it recently, and I now wonder why I spent time and effort running cables in the house. I would not do it again! |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
John wrote:
The other possibility is not to install CAT5 cables at all, but use Wi-Fi. I've installed it recently, and I now wonder why I spent time and effort running cables in the house. I would not do it again! I use 54g Wi-Fi myself, for my notebook, and whilst it's fine for internet access, it is *much* slower than a wired connection for anything else. It's also shared bandwidth, so depending on the OPs intended use, number of devices etc, it may be so slow as to be virtually unusable Then there is the security aspect and the cost... Lee |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
On 17/02/2004 John a wrote :
CAT-5 outside is a potential lightning risk and personally I've suffered broken NICs from a nearby strike. This has been mentioned before so a Google search should find the relevant messages. I doubt that wiring inside the walls of a building will make any significant difference to protection from lightening, unless the building was metal faced. The other possibility is not to install CAT5 cables at all, but use Wi-Fi. I've installed it recently, and I now wonder why I spent time and effort running cables in the house. I would not do it again! The number of CAT 5 cables mentioned was 50+. Assuming this was not a mistake, then it would completely swamp a wireless network. It does rather leave me wondering why so many. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.org |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
In uk.d-i-y, Harry Bloomfield wrote:
The number of CAT 5 cables mentioned was 50+. Assuming this was not a mistake, then it would completely swamp a wireless network. It does rather leave me wondering why so many. Unlikely to be a mistake, just reflecting the incremental cost (in time and materials) of running 4 or 8 cables from each location to the central point, rather than a measly 1 or 2. As I've bored the group with a month or so back, I've just got 3 of the rooms in this place done so far, and there's 8 cables in one, and 10 in each of the other 2. Of the just-installed SWMBO-study, 6 of the 10 are spoken for (1 ISDN, 2 Ethernet to the hub in the loft (no need for a local hub in the room), 3 for analogue phone lines (to be picky, one is a real POTS line, the other 2 are HomeHighway split-out analogue lines). And in the corresponding ex-study downstairs which has the 8 lines in, 4 bring the telephony lines up to the loft, and one takes the local hub's uplink to the loft. Ironically enough, it's my study which has 10 lines and only 1 in use - ethernet uplink from local hub - since the *second* (employer-provided) ISDN line terminates in this room and is fed nowhere else, while its (work-paid) analogue split-outs from the TA are similarly room-local, while DECT provides links to the POTS and first HomeHighway lines. Speaking of SWMBO, blessings upon her. We're even now: the time she saved me by providing a plasterer to scrape & skim over two ceilings (her study and our lad's bedroom) instead of me titting about with plasterboarding over and trying to make the joins invisible has now been swallowed up in the following: 'mmm, yes, I'll have those cheapie IKEA IVAR shelves, the 50cm deep ones will be just right for the A3+ papers I store, and I'll have a couple of the 30cm standard-depth ones on the other side. I'll paint them white myself, love.' Realities of elder-care meant that muggins here ends up doing the painting, of course: that's 25 shelves (10 deep, 15 standard), two sides each, primer and eggshell on top: 100 tedious paint applications, plus the 5 frames. (Put up a scaffolding pole in the downstairs den to hang them off while drying!). [time passes, c. 13 hours of painting time later, I'm building the shelves] 'Mmm, you know when you said rather than the std-depth freestanding shelves, I'd do better to have a wallfull of nice long Spur-bracketed shelves just like in your study? You were right, love. I'll fill up the two freestanders with books for now, but in a few months we'll put the std-depth ones down in the den and you can put up the Spur shelving'. Add to that this evening's cracker: I've sweated blood to do a minimal-wires- showing installation of the Mac in the new study - powerstrips attached to the underneath of the big new desk, CPU suspended from said desk, lots of velcro and flexi-tounged trunking under the desk too to keep the wires off the floor and out of sight, more velcro cable ties to keep the various data/phone lines running up the back of the desk legs, PSUs cable-tied to the underframe of the desk; a luvverly job, if I say so myself. Reward for all this? 'Hmm, love the way the wires have gone away. Not sure if I can stand the *noise* of the new Mac, though.' This referring to a G4, notably quieter than most PCs. 'Oh it's not the overall noise level, love, there's a particular high note that bothers me'. Drawing on the special reserve tank of patience, Stefek suggests that the echoey nature of the as-yet-unbookfilled room may accentuate the noise [quietly seething that it's the one aspect of the machine I can't magic away], and further suggests in a dangerously calm voice that living with it for a month might result in habituation. But I've offered to house the CPU in my study next door, leaving just the display in her room (the flashy Apple LCD monitor has a single cable taking video+USB, while the keyboard and trackball are wireless anyway). The plasterboard wall between the two will readily support removal of a little slot on each side for the connector to pass through, and a little bit of discrete trim over same once the cable's through. Eeh, Gawd give me strength... Stefek |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
wrote: [snip SWMBO semi-rant] So this would be a bad time to suggest that power to an electric shower is constant, that amps go down as volts go up, and that the safest thing to do is up the capacity of the MCB anyway? ;-] Al PS Info about the iMac was particularly useful - I didn't realise they could be detached. Also, I think you're right about the books softening the noise. |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
In uk.d-i-y, Al Reynolds wrote:
PS Info about the iMac was particularly useful - I didn't realise they could be detached. Also, I think you're right about the books softening the noise. Sorry to mislead - it's not an iMac (they *can't* be detached, very much an all-in-one) but the tower Macs (a G4 in this case, pretty sure it's true for the G5 also) and the (VESA-standard?) LCD display screen (a bit overpriced but pretty): that's the thing with the single cable which carried video and USB (multicore, not some encoding magick ;-) which would make put-the-CPU-in-the-room-next-door feasible. I'm sure I'm right about the books too: it's whether SWMBO's ears will be convinced ;-) Cheers, Stefek |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
John wrote:
Have you not got any waste pipes boxed in anywhere? This is what I have used in our (even older) house, there are a couple of boxed in pipes from upstairs loos. The alternative is to go outside and find an inconspicuous place to run some trunking up the wall (adjacent to a pipe for example). -- Chris Green CAT-5 outside is a potential lightning risk and personally I've suffered broken NICs from a nearby strike. This has been mentioned before so a Google search should find the relevant messages. The other possibility is not to install CAT5 cables at all, but use Wi-Fi. I've installed it recently, and I now wonder why I spent time and effort running cables in the house. I would not do it again! All my network runs at 100Mb/s, difficult to get that fast with wireless at the moment (and/or expensive). Wires *anywhere* are potential lightning risk. OK, outside is worse but it does very much depends where you are and what the surroundings are like whether it's a significant problem. -- Chris Green |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
The other possibility is not to install CAT5 cables at all, but use Wi-Fi.
I've installed it recently, and I now wonder why I spent time and effort running cables in the house. I would not do it again! Sooner or later every electrical device in your home will want an internet connection (the next 5 - 10 years, or now if your prepared to pay for it) and Wi-fi just wont be able to cope (even the new 802.11g 54 Mbps version), especially as you are sharing bandwidth with your neighbours. Also Wi-fi is not the bandwidth is says on the box 11 Mbps or 54 Mbps these rates can only be achieved in open spaces without obstacles like walls. Inside a house you'd be lucky to achieve a 1/4 of that. So your not likely to achieve DVD quality between a video server and your TV. Admittedly Broadband (ADSL) connections are currently only being made available at 1 Mbps but the technology is capable of much more than that, its the backhaul network that limiting it. I agree if your house is completely decorated and your looking for a short term fix then use Wi-fi, but as soon as you get the opportunity run as much CAT5 as you can. At least 2 cables to the 4 corners of every room. CAT5 can also be used for telephone lines and alarm systems. Then there is the issue of health, the carrier frequency of Wi-fi is 2.4 GHz this is the same as your microwave. Clearly the Tx power levels of Wi-Fi are a fraction of the Microwave but its the same debate about mobile phones only with Wi-fi laptops on your lap your putting the transmitter closer to sensitive skin. I have no evidence to support this its just my own opinion. I might be tempted to install Wi-fi outside so I can work from the garden and when cars have Wi-fi the car could upload maintenance data to my PC. Martin. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
Oh I know the feeling.
The challenge of planning mains wiring so that no matter where 'the boss' moved the furnature there were still handy mains sockets meant that when it came to Cat5 I followed the same proceedure. However I used twin plates with one socket for the phone & one for the computer. It is worth the effort in the end. 'Can I move the phone over there?' 'Yes dear, just plug the adapter in the right hand socket of that plate.' Mind you I lost the battle to have each socket with a number just like at work so I rely on a master planning sheet when moving jumpers. Some people are just too fussy over looks! John wrote in message ... In uk.d-i-y, Harry Bloomfield wrote: The number of CAT 5 cables mentioned was 50+. Assuming this was not a mistake, then it would completely swamp a wireless network. It does rather leave me wondering why so many. Unlikely to be a mistake, just reflecting the incremental cost (in time and materials) of running 4 or 8 cables from each location to the central point, rather than a measly 1 or 2. As I've bored the group with a month or so back, I've just got 3 of the rooms in this place done so far, and there's 8 cables in one, and 10 in each of the other 2. Of the just-installed SWMBO-study, 6 of the 10 are spoken for (1 ISDN, 2 Ethernet to the hub in the loft (no need for a local hub in the room), 3 for analogue phone lines (to be picky, one is a real POTS line, the other 2 are HomeHighway split-out analogue lines). And in the corresponding ex-study downstairs which has the 8 lines in, 4 bring the telephony lines up to the loft, and one takes the local hub's uplink to the loft. Ironically enough, it's my study which has 10 lines and only 1 in use - ethernet uplink from local hub - since the *second* (employer-provided) ISDN line terminates in this room and is fed nowhere else, while its (work-paid) analogue split-outs from the TA are similarly room-local, while DECT provides links to the POTS and first HomeHighway lines. Speaking of SWMBO, blessings upon her. We're even now: the time she saved me by providing a plasterer to scrape & skim over two ceilings (her study and our lad's bedroom) instead of me titting about with plasterboarding over and trying to make the joins invisible has now been swallowed up in the following: 'mmm, yes, I'll have those cheapie IKEA IVAR shelves, the 50cm deep ones will be just right for the A3+ papers I store, and I'll have a couple of the 30cm standard-depth ones on the other side. I'll paint them white myself, love.' Realities of elder-care meant that muggins here ends up doing the painting, of course: that's 25 shelves (10 deep, 15 standard), two sides each, primer and eggshell on top: 100 tedious paint applications, plus the 5 frames. (Put up a scaffolding pole in the downstairs den to hang them off while drying!). [time passes, c. 13 hours of painting time later, I'm building the shelves] 'Mmm, you know when you said rather than the std-depth freestanding shelves, I'd do better to have a wallfull of nice long Spur-bracketed shelves just like in your study? You were right, love. I'll fill up the two freestanders with books for now, but in a few months we'll put the std-depth ones down in the den and you can put up the Spur shelving'. Add to that this evening's cracker: I've sweated blood to do a minimal-wires- showing installation of the Mac in the new study - powerstrips attached to the underneath of the big new desk, CPU suspended from said desk, lots of velcro and flexi-tounged trunking under the desk too to keep the wires off the floor and out of sight, more velcro cable ties to keep the various data/phone lines running up the back of the desk legs, PSUs cable-tied to the underframe of the desk; a luvverly job, if I say so myself. Reward for all this? 'Hmm, love the way the wires have gone away. Not sure if I can stand the *noise* of the new Mac, though.' This referring to a G4, notably quieter than most PCs. 'Oh it's not the overall noise level, love, there's a particular high note that bothers me'. Drawing on the special reserve tank of patience, Stefek suggests that the echoey nature of the as-yet-unbookfilled room may accentuate the noise [quietly seething that it's the one aspect of the machine I can't magic away], and further suggests in a dangerously calm voice that living with it for a month might result in habituation. But I've offered to house the CPU in my study next door, leaving just the display in her room (the flashy Apple LCD monitor has a single cable taking video+USB, while the keyboard and trackball are wireless anyway). The plasterboard wall between the two will readily support removal of a little slot on each side for the connector to pass through, and a little bit of discrete trim over same once the cable's through. Eeh, Gawd give me strength... Stefek |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
Could it be that there is a danger of drilling through them since they will
be unlikely to follow a marked path? JohnB "Harry Bloomfield" wrote in message .uk... Martin wrote on Tuesday (17/02/2004) : Didn't know that, I'm not disagreeing but do you have a reference in the regs where this is stipulated. I have seen lots of houses where the mains wiring is run in the cavity, mainly for outside lights. Also why would this be a problem? I don't have a copy of the regs to refer to, but this point was recently mentioned in this ng. Other than the possibility than the cables might become overheated due to the cavities being later filled with insulation, I cannot think of any other obvious reasons. It used to be permitted. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.org |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
In uk.d-i-y, JohnB wrote:
Mind you I lost the battle to have each socket with a number just like at work so I rely on a master planning sheet when moving jumpers. Some people are just too fussy over looks! In Casa Zaba, the Cat5 sockets are so labelled; but they're mostly in relatively obscure corners or otherwise discretely positioned, and all three of the wired-up rooms are 'working' rather than 'kick back and relax' rooms, so we've not had the aesthetics-versus-manageability issue. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
JohnB wrote:
Oh I know the feeling. The challenge of planning mains wiring so that no matter where 'the boss' moved the furnature there were still handy mains sockets meant that when it came to Cat5 I followed the same proceedure. However I used twin plates with one socket for the phone & one for the computer. It is worth the effort in the end. 'Can I move the phone over there?' 'Yes dear, just plug the adapter in the right hand socket of that plate.' Mind you I lost the battle to have each socket with a number just like at work so I rely on a master planning sheet when moving jumpers. Some people are just too fussy over looks! UV marker pen, the kind used for security marking things. That would enable you to mark the sockets but the missus wouldn't know you'd done it. Next time you want to ID a socket, check the coast is clear and whip out the UV light. -- James... www.jameshart.co.uk |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
I like it! Could save a lot of real problems.
JohnB "James Hart" wrote in message ... JohnB wrote: Oh I know the feeling. The challenge of planning mains wiring so that no matter where 'the boss' moved the furnature there were still handy mains sockets meant that when it came to Cat5 I followed the same proceedure. However I used twin plates with one socket for the phone & one for the computer. It is worth the effort in the end. 'Can I move the phone over there?' 'Yes dear, just plug the adapter in the right hand socket of that plate.' Mind you I lost the battle to have each socket with a number just like at work so I rely on a master planning sheet when moving jumpers. Some people are just too fussy over looks! UV marker pen, the kind used for security marking things. That would enable you to mark the sockets but the missus wouldn't know you'd done it. Next time you want to ID a socket, check the coast is clear and whip out the UV light. -- James... www.jameshart.co.uk |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
"Martin" wrote
"Lurch" wrote "Martin" wrote: Hi All, I'm planning on running CAT5 between all the rooms in my house and a central point. A duct from the ground to top floor would be your best bet, either larger size PVC electrical conduit or a wastepipe of whatever size you want. I would make sure you have access to each end of this for future upgrades. The other way is to use the inside of cupboards or similar to run the cat5's up inside, easy enough to get to in the future and out of the way, that's the way I've done it. My house was floodwired with CAT-5 before I moved in. A note not lost on me when I viewed the property. Some of the runs were a bit heath robinson (e.g. up a conduit in the middle of the lounge wall) :-/ These go through the back of cupboards and disappear into floor voids and emerge in the attic. Problem is, I only have 1 port per room, and sometimes I want to use desktop and laptop simultaneously (e.g. during a delicate download !) I'm not a big fan of wireless at the moment, due to cost and security implications. Thanks for your reply. I totally agree a duct with access at both end is the ideal solution. The problem is concealing it, I only have one downstairs cupboard and that's under the stairs, unfortunately any holes drilled in the top of the cupboard come out on the stairs. Maybe I can get some slim but wide ducting that would not protrude the plaster. I relocated the ducting to an unobtrusive corner and wired behind the skirting. My plaster is pretty thin, so I couldn't channel the wall. Cheers, Paul. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Running wires between floors 1930 Semi
In uk.d-i-y, Zymurgy wrote:
Problem is, I only have 1 port per room, and sometimes I want to use desktop and laptop simultaneously (e.g. during a delicate download !) If you're not running Gigabit ethernet, the usual wiring schemes (10BaseT and 100BaseTX) use only two of the four pairs in each cable, and you can buy inexpensive (fiver a throw sort of cost) 'port splitters', of which you'll need one at each end, to give you two ports for each wirepair. They introduce a bit more reflection and crosstalk, but in a domestic setup where the wire lengths are far below the 100m worst-case of the spec, they should see you right for the simultaneous use of desktop and laptop. Scarcely any more expensive, mind you, would be a hub or unmanaged switch: 10/100 8-port switches now sell for 25-30 quid a throw, and will let you connect up a suitably Large number of Ethernet talkers and send the combined traffic up the single uplink port. HTH - Stefek |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|