|
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
Maybe he has a virus.
Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
"Brian Gaff" Wrote in message:
Maybe he has a virus. Brian Eh? -- Jim K ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 31/01/2018 20:30, jim wrote:
"Brian Gaff" Wrote in message: Maybe he has a virus. Brian Eh? He means the forger has put the same message up umpteen times. Bill |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 31/01/2018 23:06, Bill Wright wrote:
On 31/01/2018 20:30, jim wrote: "Brian Gaff" Wrote in message: Maybe he has a virus. Â* Brian Eh? He means the forger has put the same message up umpteen times. Bill Err, I were thinkin' like... Does it work like this? Punter gets interested, sends real money to forger. Forger does not reply (because he isn't a forger at all). Punter can't very well go to the cops and say, "I've send some money off to buy some forged banknotes and they haven't arrived. Could you look into it please?" Bill |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On Wednesday, 31 January 2018 23:10:04 UTC, Bill Wright wrote:
On 31/01/2018 23:06, Bill Wright wrote: He means the forger has put the same message up umpteen times. Bill Err, I were thinkin' like... Does it work like this? Punter gets interested, sends real money to forger. Forger does not reply (because he isn't a forger at all). Punter can't very well go to the cops and say, "I've send some money off to buy some forged banknotes and they haven't arrived. Could you look into it please?" Bill of course. Even if they had forged notes, what would be the point in sending them once paid. They're plainly in the business of ripping folk off after all. NT |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
No just deleted a whole load of duplicate spam from this group all about
fake money, and various witty replies from members, not wanting to be left out, I merely added a new thread commenting on it. I did not expect anyone else to add to the daftness or otherwise. I guess its like the please ignore this post syndrome again. Its as we used to say, a red rag to a bull who are mostly colour blind so never did understand the proverb. Most of the bulls I have encountered are not really bothered unless you deliberately upset them. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "jim" k wrote in message o.uk... "Brian Gaff" Wrote in message: Maybe he has a virus. Brian Eh? -- Jim K ----Android NewsGroup Reader---- http://usenet.sinaapp.com/ |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 01-Feb-18 9:06 AM, Brian Gaff wrote:
No just deleted a whole load of duplicate spam from this group all about fake money, and various witty replies from members, not wanting to be left out, I merely added a new thread commenting on it. I did not expect anyone else to add to the daftness or otherwise. I guess its like the please ignore this post syndrome again. It is particularly confusing to those of us who have not seen any the posts you refer to. Its as we used to say, a red rag to a bull who are mostly colour blind so never did understand the proverb. Most of the bulls I have encountered are not really bothered unless you deliberately upset them. It is cows that are the most likely to attack, although the vets I used to know never trusted Charolais bulls. -- -- Colin Bignell |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 01/02/18 09:38, Nightjar wrote:
On 01-Feb-18 9:06 AM, Brian Gaff wrote: No just deleted a whole load of duplicate spam from this group all about fake money, and various witty replies from members, not wanting to be left out, I merely added a new thread commenting on it. I did not expect anyone elseÂ* to add to the daftness or otherwise. I guess its like the please ignore this post syndrome again. It is particularly confusing to those of us who have not seen any the posts you refer to. Its as we used to say, a red rag to a bull who are mostly colour blind so never did understand theÂ* proverb. The red cloak is traditional in bullfighting https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xD5Uz6i8who Most of the bulls I have encountered are not really bothered unless you deliberately upset them. It is cows that are the most likely to attack, although the vets I used to know never trusted Charolais bulls. That depends on how many spears you have stuck in them -- The lifetime of any political organisation is about three years before its been subverted by the people it tried to warn you about. Anon. |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
Nightjar wrote:
Most of the bulls I have encountered are not really bothered unless you deliberately upset them. It is cows that are the most likely to attack, although the vets I used to know never trusted Charolais bulls. I was always taught that it's bulls with dairy cows that are the ones to be careful of. -- Chris Green · |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 01-Feb-18 12:27 PM, Chris Green wrote:
Nightjar wrote: Most of the bulls I have encountered are not really bothered unless you deliberately upset them. It is cows that are the most likely to attack, although the vets I used to know never trusted Charolais bulls. I was always taught that it's bulls with dairy cows that are the ones to be careful of. Unless you are working on the farm, you shouldn't be in a field that has a bull of a recognised dairy breed that is more than 10 months old in it. They are banned from fields crossed by public paths. The figures for the years 2000-2015 shows that 18 members of the public, all on public footpaths, were killed by cattle. One death is alleged to have involved a bull, but this was not proven in Court. Ten involved cows with calves. All but one walker had a dog with them and, with the exception of one man who had wandered away from a family group, they were all lone walkers or were accompanied by only one other person. OTOH, half of the 56 cattle related deaths of farm workers involved a bull. -- -- Colin Bignell |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
Either way then keep clear of cattle and certainly do not cross a field with
them in if you have a dog. Brian -- ----- - This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from... The Sofa of Brian Gaff... Blind user, so no pictures please! "Nightjar" wrote in message ... On 01-Feb-18 12:27 PM, Chris Green wrote: Nightjar wrote: Most of the bulls I have encountered are not really bothered unless you deliberately upset them. It is cows that are the most likely to attack, although the vets I used to know never trusted Charolais bulls. I was always taught that it's bulls with dairy cows that are the ones to be careful of. Unless you are working on the farm, you shouldn't be in a field that has a bull of a recognised dairy breed that is more than 10 months old in it. They are banned from fields crossed by public paths. The figures for the years 2000-2015 shows that 18 members of the public, all on public footpaths, were killed by cattle. One death is alleged to have involved a bull, but this was not proven in Court. Ten involved cows with calves. All but one walker had a dog with them and, with the exception of one man who had wandered away from a family group, they were all lone walkers or were accompanied by only one other person. OTOH, half of the 56 cattle related deaths of farm workers involved a bull. -- -- Colin Bignell |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 01-Feb-18 7:19 PM, Brian Gaff wrote:
Either way then keep clear of cattle and certainly do not cross a field with them in if you have a dog. The biggest mistake is not letting the dog go if being threatened by cattle. They stand a much better chance of outrunning cows and you cease to be a threat without it. -- -- Colin Bignell |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On Thu, 01 Feb 2018 22:17:50 +0000, Tim Streater
wrote: In article , Nightjar wrote: On 01-Feb-18 7:19 PM, Brian Gaff wrote: Either way then keep clear of cattle and certainly do not cross a field with them in if you have a dog. The biggest mistake is not letting the dog go if being threatened by cattle. They stand a much better chance of outrunning cows and you cease to be a threat without it. The big mistake is having the dog in the first place. I guess that depends on just how much you are relying on it to say, round up your sheep, sniff out drugs / guns / cash / disease, guide the blind, assist people in the home or just go for a 10 mile walk with you. Being a Brexiteer you are probably getting confused and it's cats that we could all do without, especially re those people who do own gardens but don't actually own cats. Actually the cat lover - Brexiteer parallel goes even further ... like Brexiteers, cats 'owners' want the benefits (like being able to let them out without any real responsibility) but don't want the responsibility (like making sure they know where they are and what damage they are doing). Joking aside g, I wonder if anyone has done a survey of pet ownership and attitudes towards the EU? Cheers, T i m |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On Thursday, 1 February 2018 23:26:27 UTC, T i m wrote:
Joking aside g, I wonder if anyone has done a survey of pet ownership and attitudes towards the EU? We could also do a survey on what pets kill the most humans. and if a dog is a mans best friend then that is obviously sexist too :-). |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On Friday, 2 February 2018 11:12:00 UTC, whisky-dave wrote:
On Thursday, 1 February 2018 23:26:27 UTC, T i m wrote: Joking aside g, I wonder if anyone has done a survey of pet ownership and attitudes towards the EU? We could also do a survey on what pets kill the most humans. and if a dog is a mans best friend then that is obviously sexist too :-). According to the Center of Disease Control, dogs bite 4.5 million in the US every year. There are 78 million dogs in the US. In 2016, 41 people died from dog attacks. NT |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 01-Feb-18 11:26 PM, T i m wrote:
.... Joking aside g, I wonder if anyone has done a survey of pet ownership and attitudes towards the EU? A study back in 2010 found that 47.2% of homes with a cat had at least one person educated to degree level, as compared to 38.4% of homes with dogs. Education level also had the strongest correlation to the referendum vote of any measured demographic, with areas that had higher numbers of degree level educated people being less likely to vote leave. Hence, if there is any correlation between pet ownership and attitudes towards Brexit, it is probably that cat owners were more likely to vote remain. -- -- Colin Bignell |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On 02/02/18 18:25, Nightjar wrote:
On 01-Feb-18 11:26 PM, T i m wrote: ... Joking aside g, I wonder if anyone has done a survey of pet ownership and attitudes towards the EU? A study back in 2010 found that 47.2% of homes with a cat had at least one person educated to degree level, as compared to 38.4% of homes with dogs. Education level also had the strongest correlation to the referendum vote of any measured demographic, with areas that had higher numbers of degree level educated people being less likely to vote leave. Hence, if there is any correlation between pet ownership and attitudes towards Brexit, it is probably that cat owners were more likely to vote remain. Aren't these surveys so useful? Perhaps there needs to be one to find out how many people really do give a toss about the findings of surveys. |
Mr forger seems to have got his spammer stuck.
On Fri, 2 Feb 2018 18:25:10 +0000, Nightjar wrote:
On 01-Feb-18 11:26 PM, T i m wrote: ... Joking aside g, I wonder if anyone has done a survey of pet ownership and attitudes towards the EU? A study back in 2010 found that 47.2% of homes with a cat had at least one person educated to degree level, as compared to 38.4% of homes with dogs. Education level also had the strongest correlation to the referendum vote of any measured demographic, with areas that had higher numbers of degree level educated people being less likely to vote leave. Hence, if there is any correlation between pet ownership and attitudes towards Brexit, it is probably that cat owners were more likely to vote remain. I like the extrapolation. ;-) Cheers, T i m |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter