With respect, I don't think you know the full facts. I'm not saying you are
wrong, but there isa lot more to this than merely money and doctors
oppinions.
It was interesting that when they finally did get the US guy over that he
basically confirmed what the UK doctors had already said, in that it was of
no use in this instance
Unfortunatly the problem here is due to what happens when trust breaks
down.
brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message
news
How could we have come to this? Charlie's parents found private funding
to send their child to America for treatment with everything laid on and
not costing the taxpayer in either country a single penny piece. Then our
Big Brother State decided to step in and promptly crushed all hope for
the boy by kicking off a Kafkaesque legal process that has made Jarndyce
vs. Jarndyce look like half a morning in the small claims court by
comparison.
A government's proper role is in certain limited core functions essential
to the defence and prosperity of the country: road & rail infrastructure,
an economy that's conducive to growth, the provision of a satisfactory
education system, an incorrupt police service and so on and so on. How
did we get to the point where it can not only assume the role of parent,
but usurp that role to the extent of callously *ensuring* the certain
death of an innocent baby boy?
Charlie's father was right: the family court system not only has far too
much power, it *is* EVIL.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

On Wednesday, July 26, 2017 at 7:38:57 AM UTC+1, Brian Gaff wrote:
With respect, I don't think you know the full facts. I'm not saying you are
wrong, but there isa lot more to this than merely money and doctors
oppinions.
It was interesting that when they finally did get the US guy over that he
basically confirmed what the UK doctors had already said, in that it was of
no use in this instance
Unfortunatly the problem here is due to what happens when trust breaks
down.
brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"Cursitor Doom" wrote in message
news
How could we have come to this? Charlie's parents found private funding
to send their child to America for treatment with everything laid on and
not costing the taxpayer in either country a single penny piece. Then our
Big Brother State decided to step in and promptly crushed all hope for
the boy by kicking off a Kafkaesque legal process that has made Jarndyce
vs. Jarndyce look like half a morning in the small claims court by
comparison.
A government's proper role is in certain limited core functions essential
to the defence and prosperity of the country: road & rail infrastructure,
an economy that's conducive to growth, the provision of a satisfactory
education system, an incorrupt police service and so on and so on. How
did we get to the point where it can not only assume the role of parent,
but usurp that role to the extent of callously *ensuring* the certain
death of an innocent baby boy?
Charlie's father was right: the family court system not only has far too
much power, it *is* EVIL.



--
This message may be freely reproduced without limit or charge only via
the Usenet protocol. Reproduction in whole or part through other
protocols, whether for profit or not, is conditional upon a charge of
GBP10.00 per reproduction. Publication in this manner via non-Usenet
protocols constitutes acceptance of this condition.

The REAL problem with all of this is that it was never off the bloody news.