Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426

On 7/7/2016 5:04 PM, whisky-dave wrote:

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426


One outcome we ought to be able to predict!

On 07/07/16 17:04, whisky-dave wrote:

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426


Well - May has Thatcher's nose, whereas Leadsom has her hair.

Out of the two, I think the latter is actually trying to be Thatcher
visually, whereas the former perhaps is trying to orate more like the
Iron Lady.

Just my perception based on a couple of YT vids

On 07/07/16 17:45, Tim Watts wrote:
On 07/07/16 17:04, whisky-dave wrote:

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426


Well - May has Thatcher's nose, whereas Leadsom has her hair.

Out of the two, I think the latter is actually trying to be Thatcher
visually, whereas the former perhaps is trying to orate more like the
Iron Lady.

Just my perception based on a couple of YT vids



Well...


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3290621.html

She's not going to make any friends with that.

OTOH at least she has scored +100 on the "not a weasel" scale.

Pity she fibbed like **** about her employment, which is minus several
hundred weaselness.

As for gay marriage - I'm all for it. But I am surprised that a
politician actually dared to say what they really think...

On 07/07/2016 18:48, Tim Watts wrote:
On 07/07/16 17:45, Tim Watts wrote:
On 07/07/16 17:04, whisky-dave wrote:

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426


Well - May has Thatcher's nose, whereas Leadsom has her hair.

Out of the two, I think the latter is actually trying to be Thatcher
visually, whereas the former perhaps is trying to orate more like the
Iron Lady.

Just my perception based on a couple of YT vids



Well...


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3290621.html


She's not going to make any friends with that.

OTOH at least she has scored +100 on the "not a weasel" scale.

Pity she fibbed like **** about her employment, which is minus several
hundred weaselness.

As for gay marriage - I'm all for it. But I am surprised that a
politician actually dared to say what they really think...

Much more worrying is her desire to rush and sign Clause 50, which makes
me think that she does not understand all the implications.


--
Michael Chare

In article ,
Michael Chare wrote:
On 07/07/2016 18:48, Tim Watts wrote:
On 07/07/16 17:45, Tim Watts wrote:
On 07/07/16 17:04, whisky-dave wrote:

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426


Well - May has Thatcher's nose, whereas Leadsom has her hair.

Out of the two, I think the latter is actually trying to be Thatcher
visually, whereas the former perhaps is trying to orate more like the
Iron Lady.

Just my perception based on a couple of YT vids



Well...


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3290621.html


She's not going to make any friends with that.

OTOH at least she has scored +100 on the "not a weasel" scale.

Pity she fibbed like **** about her employment, which is minus several
hundred weaselness.

As for gay marriage - I'm all for it. But I am surprised that a
politician actually dared to say what they really think...

Much more worrying is her desire to rush and sign Clause 50, which makes
me think that she does not understand all the implications.

she was a banker - that explains it all.

--
from KT24 in Surrey, England

On 07/07/2016 18:48, Tim Watts wrote:

Well...


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3290621.html


She's not going to make any friends with that.


I'm not so sure! The 'electorate' here includes a lot of Conservative
Party members in the shire counties - many of whom have rather more
traditional views than those of Cameron and his modernising liberal elite.
--
Cheers,
Roger
____________
Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom
checked.

On 7/7/2016 7:51 PM, charles wrote:
In article ,

she was a banker - that explains it all.

Not even a proper one, to judge from the interviews.

In article ,
whisky-dave writes

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426
We don't trust politicians
We hate bankers.
So who would vote for a banker-turned-politician
--
bert

On 07/07/2016 22:41, bert wrote:
In article ,
whisky-dave writes

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426
We don't trust politicians
We hate bankers.

Why? They were doing as their shareholders' demanded. And within the
regulations current at the time.

So who would vote for a banker-turned-politician.

Someone who can add up? Why not?

On Thu, 07 Jul 2016 22:16:33 +0100, newshound wrote:

On 7/7/2016 7:51 PM, charles wrote:
In article ,

she was a banker - that explains it all.

Not even a proper one, to judge from the interviews.

I saw something that said she thought all these slurs on her CV were
nonsense, and she never had this kind of thing when she was an
astronaut...

--
My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
wish to copy them they can pay me £1 a message.
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

"bert" wrote in message
...
In article ,
whisky-dave writes

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426

We don't trust politicians

But it is likely that quite a few of the Tory party
members who get to vote on who will be the PM do.

We hate bankers.

It is unlikely that many of the Tory party members
who get to vote on who the be the PM do.

So who would vote for a banker-turned-politician

Bet it is quite a few of the Tory party members who are
the only ones who get a vote on who will be the PM.

On 07/07/16 21:56, Roger Mills wrote:
On 07/07/2016 18:48, Tim Watts wrote:

Well...


http://www.standard.co.uk/news/polit...-a3290621.html



She's not going to make any friends with that.


I'm not so sure! The 'electorate' here includes a lot of Conservative
Party members in the shire counties - many of whom have rather more
traditional views than those of Cameron and his modernising liberal elite.

Yup. Set the damned hounds on all those nancy boys and run em out of our
church!

etc etc.



--
"I guess a rattlesnake ain't risponsible fer bein' a rattlesnake, but ah
puts mah heel on um jess the same if'n I catches him around mah chillun".

On Thursday, 7 July 2016 17:04:30 UTC+1, whisky-dave wrote:
Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

The real bitch fight will be the Conservative woman PM and Ruth Davidson ganging up on the Sturgeon.

Owain

I hope the former wins, the latter reminds me of the similar views of an
American called unfortunately.
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426

Sarah.
Brian

--
----- -
This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...

Blind user, so no pictures please!
"whisky-dave" wrote in message
...

Theresa May v Andrea Leadsom to be next prime minister

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-36737426

Brian Gaff wrote:

I hope the former wins, the latter reminds me of the similar views of
an American called ... Sarah

Yeah, she should have kept her religion under her hat ... then again
I know little about the views of paid-up Conservative members regarding
sky faeries.

May will do, she has shown some balls Mckinnon and Hamza.