Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
This is what they seem to be using for render round here
http://www.k-rend.co.uk/products/sil...nd-silicone-k1 Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On 04/11/2015 16:37, stuart noble wrote:
This is what they seem to be using for render round here http://www.k-rend.co.uk/products/sil...nd-silicone-k1 Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? When you say that the brick faces were buggered, what makes you think that they were ever any good? The bricks under the rendering were never intended to be on display. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On 04/11/2015 16:53, GB wrote:
On 04/11/2015 16:37, stuart noble wrote: This is what they seem to be using for render round here http://www.k-rend.co.uk/products/sil...nd-silicone-k1 Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? When you say that the brick faces were buggered, what makes you think that they were ever any good? The bricks under the rendering were never intended to be on display. Round here the fronts of the houses started out in 1900 as ok to display, but many were subsequently pebbledashed or rendered, especially those facing the prevailing weather --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 18:36:27 UTC, stuart noble wrote:
On 04/11/2015 16:53, GB wrote: On 04/11/2015 16:37, stuart noble wrote: Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? When you say that the brick faces were buggered, what makes you think that they were ever any good? The bricks under the rendering were never intended to be on display. Round here the fronts of the houses started out in 1900 as ok to display, but many were subsequently pebbledashed or rendered, especially those facing the prevailing weather Now you know what cement render does to soft bricks NT |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On 05/11/2015 03:57, jim wrote:
Wrote in message: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 18:36:27 UTC, stuart noble wrote: On 04/11/2015 16:53, GB wrote: On 04/11/2015 16:37, stuart noble wrote: Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? When you say that the brick faces were buggered, what makes you think that they were ever any good? The bricks under the rendering were never intended to be on display. Round here the fronts of the houses started out in 1900 as ok to display, but many were subsequently pebbledashed or rendered, especially those facing the prevailing weather Now you know what cement render does to soft bricks NT Shurely it's the chisels and hammers that do the damage? No, the problem is that the render is securely bonded to the brick faces. Not everywhere, but would be a week's work chipping off the residue --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On 04/11/2015 20:04, wrote:
On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 18:36:27 UTC, stuart noble wrote: On 04/11/2015 16:53, GB wrote: On 04/11/2015 16:37, stuart noble wrote: Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? When you say that the brick faces were buggered, what makes you think that they were ever any good? The bricks under the rendering were never intended to be on display. Round here the fronts of the houses started out in 1900 as ok to display, but many were subsequently pebbledashed or rendered, especially those facing the prevailing weather Now you know what cement render does to soft bricks NT I've known that for a long time, but some of us have to live with the mistakes of the past. This product is said to be breathable and flexible, which would seem to make it a no-brainer where render is a necessary evil --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On Thursday, 5 November 2015 08:17:51 UTC, stuart noble wrote:
On 05/11/2015 03:57, jim wrote: nt Wrote in message: On Wednesday, 4 November 2015 18:36:27 UTC, stuart noble wrote: On 04/11/2015 16:53, GB wrote: On 04/11/2015 16:37, stuart noble wrote: Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? When you say that the brick faces were buggered, what makes you think that they were ever any good? The bricks under the rendering were never intended to be on display. Round here the fronts of the houses started out in 1900 as ok to display, but many were subsequently pebbledashed or rendered, especially those facing the prevailing weather Now you know what cement render does to soft bricks NT Shurely it's the chisels and hammers that do the damage? No, the problem is that the render is securely bonded to the brick faces. Not everywhere, but would be a week's work chipping off the residue if that's all, leave it unrendered. Do a bit of chipping & aciding now & then when time permits. Unnecessary render is mad. NT |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
"stuart noble" wrote in message ... This is what they seem to be using for render round here http://www.k-rend.co.uk/products/sil...nd-silicone-k1 Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? It's expensive. £16 per bag, which is the same size as a bag of plaster (25kg), this is about enough to cover a square metre...by contrast, a m2 of normal render will be approx £2 for the materials An average hipped semi will be approx 80m2 so you can work out what it will be just for k-rend, obviously access, labour and sundries will be required as well, making it a very expensive project. In years to come, when some bright spark has done the analysis, the flexibility and breathabilty factors will be available in a gallon bottle which will be added to normal render during mixing, or more likely, just to sand, there'll probably be a polymer resin to hold it together and add waterproofing, and some kind of poly beads to add breathability, when these are available in pure form, then it might be worth looking at |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:14:09 +0000, Phil L wrote:
This is what they seem to be using for render round here http://www.k-rend.co.uk/products/sil...texture/krend- silicone-k1 Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? It's expensive. £16 per bag, which is the same size as a bag of plaster (25kg), this is about enough to cover a square metre...by contrast, a m2 of normal render will be approx £2 for the materials An average hipped semi will be approx 80m2 so you can work out what it will be just for k-rend, obviously access, labour and sundries will be required as well, making it a very expensive project. I'm not convinced the price difference IS that big an issue, when labour's taken into consideration. Normal render - £160 for 80m2. This stuff - £1300 for 80m2. Well, yes, it's a big difference - but how big a %age increase is it when all the labour, scaffolding, etc are all costed? |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
K Rend
On 05/11/2015 15:06, Adrian wrote:
On Thu, 05 Nov 2015 14:14:09 +0000, Phil L wrote: This is what they seem to be using for render round here http://www.k-rend.co.uk/products/sil...texture/krend- silicone-k1 Three houses in this road have knocked off the old render, seen that the brick faces were buggered, and chosen this option. Seems like the answer to a maiden's prayer, but any comments? It's expensive. £16 per bag, which is the same size as a bag of plaster (25kg), this is about enough to cover a square metre...by contrast, a m2 of normal render will be approx £2 for the materials An average hipped semi will be approx 80m2 so you can work out what it will be just for k-rend, obviously access, labour and sundries will be required as well, making it a very expensive project. I'm not convinced the price difference IS that big an issue, when labour's taken into consideration. Normal render - £160 for 80m2. This stuff - £1300 for 80m2. Well, yes, it's a big difference - but how big a %age increase is it when all the labour, scaffolding, etc are all costed? The latest one has had what looks like an inch of render put on. If the product is that good, wouldn't half that be sufficient? The owner reckons to get half a million for the house, so I suppose £1300 is neither here nor there. --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|