DIYbanter

DIYbanter (https://www.diybanter.com/)
-   UK diy (https://www.diybanter.com/uk-diy/)
-   -   how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white? (https://www.diybanter.com/uk-diy/384758-how-come-harry-co-havent-posted-about-gang-criminalslike-they-do-when-they-arent-white.html)

Dennis@home September 11th 15 10:07 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
 
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235

Richard[_10_] September 11th 15 10:32 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
"dennis@home" wrote in message
eb.com...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235


****s like them should be killed. Same as the non-white ****s like them.
Happy?


Julian Barnes September 11th 15 11:15 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:32:36 +0100, Richard wrote:

"dennis@home" wrote in message
eb.com...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235


****s like them should be killed. Same as the non-white ****s like them.
Happy?


Yeah, preferably by public hanging and/or burned alive - also in public.
That's the trouble these days, we're ruled by Lib/Lefties that are
sympathetic and deliberately soft on these kind of scumbags. Burn 'em
flog 'em and hang 'em I say. (and the Lefties that support/condone them)


Andy Cap[_9_] September 12th 15 06:20 AM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
 
On 11/09/15 22:07, dennis@home wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235


Perhaps because their victims weren't exclusively of another culture ?
I don't know if that's true but if you refuse to analyses a problem
properly, you will never fix it.

Andy C

harry September 12th 15 09:17 AM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
 
On Friday, 11 September 2015 22:07:28 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235


Yep we got our own paedophiles.
But why import more people who worship a paedophile?
Whose cult book advocates it?

Brian-Gaff September 12th 15 11:10 AM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you?
Brian

--
From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active
"Julian Barnes" wrote in message
...
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:32:36 +0100, Richard wrote:

"dennis@home" wrote in message
eb.com...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235


****s like them should be killed. Same as the non-white ****s like them.
Happy?


Yeah, preferably by public hanging and/or burned alive - also in public.
That's the trouble these days, we're ruled by Lib/Lefties that are
sympathetic and deliberately soft on these kind of scumbags. Burn 'em
flog 'em and hang 'em I say. (and the Lefties that support/condone them)




ARW September 12th 15 04:34 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message
...
But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you?
Brian



Stefan Kiszko is a good example.

--
Adam


Julian Barnes September 12th 15 04:52 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:34:43 +0100, ARW wrote:

"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message
...
But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you?
Brian



Stefan Kiszko is a good example.


Yes, an excellent example. That's why I'd propose a far more stringent
standard of proof in capital cases: "guilty beyond doubt" rather than
"guilty beyond reasonable doubt." IOW, drop the "reasonable"
qualification.


Rod Speed September 12th 15 08:30 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
 


"Julian Barnes" wrote in message
...
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:34:43 +0100, ARW wrote:

"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message
...
But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you?
Brian



Stefan Kiszko is a good example.


Yes, an excellent example. That's why I'd propose a far more stringent
standard of proof in capital cases: "guilty beyond doubt" rather than
"guilty beyond reasonable doubt." IOW, drop the "reasonable"
qualification.


Trouble is that there is always some doubt, even if that
is just whether someone say deliberately put some of
the accused's DNA at the crime scene to shaft them
when they were not in fact involved in the crime at all.


Julian Barnes September 13th 15 11:08 AM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 05:30:23 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Trouble is that there is always some doubt, even if that is just whether
someone say deliberately put some of the accused's DNA at the crime
scene to shaft them when they were not in fact involved in the crime at
all.


Well, if there's "some doubt" then the case isn't proven even to the
existing standard, is it, dummy?


Julian Barnes September 13th 15 11:11 AM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:17:27 -0700, harry wrote:

On Friday, 11 September 2015 22:07:28 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235


Yep we got our own paedophiles.
But why import more people who worship a paedophile?
Whose cult book advocates it?


Well, as you know, the Quoran and the Talmud both do. But paedophilia is
rife in the Catholic church as well, where there is no 'authority' for
it. So... your question doesn't really get us anywhere.


Rod Speed September 13th 15 11:35 AM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
 


"Julian Barnes" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 05:30:23 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

Trouble is that there is always some doubt, even if that is just whether
someone say deliberately put some of the accused's DNA at the crime
scene to shaft them when they were not in fact involved in the crime at
all.


Well, if there's "some doubt" then the case isn't
proven even to the existing standard, is it, dummy?


Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage.

The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit.


Julian Barnes September 13th 15 12:15 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit.


LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll.


Jim Thomas September 13th 15 07:33 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
 


"Julian Barnes" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit.


LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll.


You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy.


Richard[_10_] September 13th 15 07:46 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
"Jim Thomas" wrote in message ...



"Julian Barnes" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit.


LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll.


You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy.


Rod's peed. Can't stand himself so he has to keep changing nyms.

Julian Barnes September 13th 15 10:38 PM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
 
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:46:03 +0100, Richard wrote:

"Jim Thomas" wrote in message ...



"Julian Barnes" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit.

LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll.


You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy.


Rod's peed. Can't stand himself so he has to keep changing nyms.


Yeah, sock puppet. And the way he keeps saying "you lot" in relation to
the Middle East indicates that Rod Speed is also a made-up name. He's
probably an Ali, a Muhammed or an Iqbal. Whatever his real name is, he's
clearly a ****ing big-time MORON.


whisky-dave[_2_] September 14th 15 11:57 AM

how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
 
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 22:40:22 UTC+1, Julian Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:46:03 +0100, Richard wrote:

"Jim Thomas" wrote in message ...



"Julian Barnes" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:

The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit.

LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll.

You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy.


Rod's peed. Can't stand himself so he has to keep changing nyms.


Yeah, sock puppet. And the way he keeps saying "you lot" in relation to
the Middle East indicates that Rod Speed is also a made-up name. He's
probably an Ali, a Muhammed or an Iqbal. Whatever his real name is, he's
clearly a ****ing big-time MORON.


That's giving him rather more credit that he deserves.



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter