 |
|
| UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
| Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
|
|
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
"dennis@home" wrote in message
eb.com... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235 ****s like them should be killed. Same as the non-white ****s like them. Happy? |
|
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:32:36 +0100, Richard wrote:
"dennis@home" wrote in message eb.com... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235 ****s like them should be killed. Same as the non-white ****s like them. Happy? Yeah, preferably by public hanging and/or burned alive - also in public. That's the trouble these days, we're ruled by Lib/Lefties that are sympathetic and deliberately soft on these kind of scumbags. Burn 'em flog 'em and hang 'em I say. (and the Lefties that support/condone them) |
|
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
On 11/09/15 22:07, dennis@home wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235 Perhaps because their victims weren't exclusively of another culture ? I don't know if that's true but if you refuse to analyses a problem properly, you will never fix it. Andy C |
|
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
On Friday, 11 September 2015 22:07:28 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235 Yep we got our own paedophiles. But why import more people who worship a paedophile? Whose cult book advocates it? |
|
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you?
Brian -- From the Sofa of Brian Gaff Reply address is active "Julian Barnes" wrote in message ... On Fri, 11 Sep 2015 22:32:36 +0100, Richard wrote: "dennis@home" wrote in message eb.com... http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235 ****s like them should be killed. Same as the non-white ****s like them. Happy? Yeah, preferably by public hanging and/or burned alive - also in public. That's the trouble these days, we're ruled by Lib/Lefties that are sympathetic and deliberately soft on these kind of scumbags. Burn 'em flog 'em and hang 'em I say. (and the Lefties that support/condone them) |
|
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message
... But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you? Brian Stefan Kiszko is a good example. -- Adam |
|
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:34:43 +0100, ARW wrote:
"Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you? Brian Stefan Kiszko is a good example. Yes, an excellent example. That's why I'd propose a far more stringent standard of proof in capital cases: "guilty beyond doubt" rather than "guilty beyond reasonable doubt." IOW, drop the "reasonable" qualification. |
|
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
"Julian Barnes" wrote in message ... On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 16:34:43 +0100, ARW wrote: "Brian-Gaff" wrote in message ... But what if you get the wrong person. Can't bring em back can you? Brian Stefan Kiszko is a good example. Yes, an excellent example. That's why I'd propose a far more stringent standard of proof in capital cases: "guilty beyond doubt" rather than "guilty beyond reasonable doubt." IOW, drop the "reasonable" qualification. Trouble is that there is always some doubt, even if that is just whether someone say deliberately put some of the accused's DNA at the crime scene to shaft them when they were not in fact involved in the crime at all. |
|
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 05:30:23 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
Trouble is that there is always some doubt, even if that is just whether someone say deliberately put some of the accused's DNA at the crime scene to shaft them when they were not in fact involved in the crime at all. Well, if there's "some doubt" then the case isn't proven even to the existing standard, is it, dummy? |
|
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
On Sat, 12 Sep 2015 01:17:27 -0700, harry wrote:
On Friday, 11 September 2015 22:07:28 UTC+1, dennis@home wrote: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-34219235 Yep we got our own paedophiles. But why import more people who worship a paedophile? Whose cult book advocates it? Well, as you know, the Quoran and the Talmud both do. But paedophilia is rife in the Catholic church as well, where there is no 'authority' for it. So... your question doesn't really get us anywhere. |
|
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
"Julian Barnes" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 05:30:23 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: Trouble is that there is always some doubt, even if that is just whether someone say deliberately put some of the accused's DNA at the crime scene to shaft them when they were not in fact involved in the crime at all. Well, if there's "some doubt" then the case isn't proven even to the existing standard, is it, dummy? Even more pig ignorant than you usually manage. The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit. |
|
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote:
The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit. LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll. |
|
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
"Julian Barnes" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit. LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy. |
|
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminals like they do when they aren't white?
"Jim Thomas" wrote in message ...
"Julian Barnes" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit. LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy. Rod's peed. Can't stand himself so he has to keep changing nyms. |
|
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang ofcriminals like they do when they aren't white?
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:46:03 +0100, Richard wrote:
"Jim Thomas" wrote in message ... "Julian Barnes" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit. LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy. Rod's peed. Can't stand himself so he has to keep changing nyms. Yeah, sock puppet. And the way he keeps saying "you lot" in relation to the Middle East indicates that Rod Speed is also a made-up name. He's probably an Ali, a Muhammed or an Iqbal. Whatever his real name is, he's clearly a ****ing big-time MORON. |
|
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
|
how come harry and co haven't posted about this gang of criminalslike they do when they aren't white?
On Sunday, 13 September 2015 22:40:22 UTC+1, Julian Barnes wrote:
On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 19:46:03 +0100, Richard wrote: "Jim Thomas" wrote in message ... "Julian Barnes" wrote in message ... On Sun, 13 Sep 2015 20:35:11 +1000, Rod Speed wrote: The word REASONABLE is there for a reason, ****wit. LOL! Get back on your mescaline, you delirious troll. You never could bull**** your way out of a wet paper bag, bigot boy. Rod's peed. Can't stand himself so he has to keep changing nyms. Yeah, sock puppet. And the way he keeps saying "you lot" in relation to the Middle East indicates that Rod Speed is also a made-up name. He's probably an Ali, a Muhammed or an Iqbal. Whatever his real name is, he's clearly a ****ing big-time MORON. That's giving him rather more credit that he deserves. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Linear Mode
