Mark Reckless was our local Tory MP and has defected to UKIP.

Not that Cameron is worried or anything, but the area is being swamped
with Tories!

We've had three letter from DC 'himself', dozens of Tory politicians
visiting the area - having previously ignored it, a glossy full colour
newsletter showing the two prospective Tory candidates and today teams
of canvassers who don't know the area having been bussed in from far & wide.

Is that the sound of puckering arseholes I can hear?


--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

Business opportunity for you to advertise to fit "No Canvassers" signs
on doors?

--
Robin
reply to address is (meant to be) valid

/ Business opportunity for you to advertise to fit "No Canvassers" signs on doors?/q

With free "Vote UKIP" sign thrown in?!

Jim K

On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:16:23 +0100, Robin wrote:

Business opportunity for you to advertise to fit "No Canvassers" signs
on doors?

And to un-install cordless doorbells...



--
My posts are my copyright and if @diy_forums or Home Owners' Hub
wish to copy them they can pay me £30a message.
Use the BIG mirror service in the UK: http://www.mirrorservice.org
*lightning surge protection* - a w_tom conductor

On Saturday, October 18, 2014 5:22:46 PM UTC+1, Bob Eager wrote:
And to un-install cordless doorbells...

Replacing them with electric fence controllers?

Owain

Bob Eager wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 15:16:23 +0100, Robin wrote:

Business opportunity for you to advertise to fit "No Canvassers"
signs on doors?

And to un-install cordless doorbells...

I like it!

By taking the battery away for safe keeping ("batteries can be
dangerous, just look at all those exploding e-ciggies")? And of course
booking the job to re-fit it after 20/11 bg

--
Robin
reply to address is (meant to be) valid

On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 19:19:44 +0100, Robin wrote:

By taking the battery away for safe keeping ("batteries can be
dangerous, just look at all those exploding e-ciggies")?

Not seen the story about kids and lithium button/coin cells?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england...ester-29610570


--
Cheers
Dave.

"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Mark Reckless was our local Tory MP and has defected to UKIP.

Not that Cameron is worried or anything, but the area is being swamped
with Tories!

We've had three letter from DC 'himself', dozens of Tory politicians
visiting the area - having previously ignored it, a glossy full colour
newsletter showing the two prospective Tory candidates and today teams of
canvassers who don't know the area having been bussed in from far & wide.

Is that the sound of puckering arseholes I can hear?

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

On 19/10/2014 08:22, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:09:55 +0100, "harryagain"
wrote:


"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Mark Reckless was our local Tory MP and has defected to UKIP.

Not that Cameron is worried or anything, but the area is being swamped
with Tories!

We've had three letter from DC 'himself', dozens of Tory politicians
visiting the area - having previously ignored it, a glossy full colour
newsletter showing the two prospective Tory candidates and today teams of
canvassers who don't know the area having been bussed in from far & wide.

Is that the sound of puckering arseholes I can hear?

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

I would agree with you there, yet you're saying in your reply to Bill
Wright that UKIP's energy policy is full of drivel. Not exactly
consistent, are you?

Far be it from me to defend Harry, but you don't have to agree with
every policy of a political party to give them your vote. Its generally
a matter of which one you disagree with the least.

--
Chris

On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:23:36 +0100, Chris Hogg wrote:

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

I would agree with you there, yet you're saying in your reply to Bill
Wright that UKIP's energy policy is full of drivel. Not exactly
consistent, are you?

Far be it from me to defend Harry, but you don't have to agree with
every policy of a political party to give them your vote. Its generally
a matter of which one you disagree with the least.

Yes, of course, but he's so aggressively anti-nuclear and pro wind,
solar etc that I don't see how he could possibly stomach UKIP's energy
policy, or do anything other than vote Green.

I'm sorry, but are you seriously expecting consistent thought from those
who blindly support a party who now admits their last published manifesto
was "drivel", and whose party leader denies having read it - despite his
name being on the introduction to it?

FFS, we've got some friends, one of whom is a staunch UKIP supporter, the
other leaning gently towards. The sheer lunacy of a gay couple supporting
the most homophobic party out there has been pointed out to them, but
they just seem unwilling to accept it.

UKIPs entire campaigning seems to be to play on fears without actually
worrying about reality or consistency. They really are the Daily Mail
party.

On 19/10/2014 10:36, Adrian wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:23:36 +0100, Chris Hogg wrote:

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

I would agree with you there, yet you're saying in your reply to Bill
Wright that UKIP's energy policy is full of drivel. Not exactly
consistent, are you?

Far be it from me to defend Harry, but you don't have to agree with
every policy of a political party to give them your vote. Its generally
a matter of which one you disagree with the least.

Yes, of course, but he's so aggressively anti-nuclear and pro wind,
solar etc that I don't see how he could possibly stomach UKIP's energy
policy, or do anything other than vote Green.

I'm sorry, but are you seriously expecting consistent thought from those
who blindly support a party who now admits their last published manifesto
was "drivel", and whose party leader denies having read it - despite his
name being on the introduction to it?

FFS, we've got some friends, one of whom is a staunch UKIP supporter, the
other leaning gently towards. The sheer lunacy of a gay couple supporting
the most homophobic party out there has been pointed out to them, but
they just seem unwilling to accept it.

"We would rather the legal and religious endorsements of wedlock are
separate."

Isn't homophobic. Forcing people with deeply held religious beliefs to
perform gay marriage ceremonies isn't right.

UKIPs entire campaigning seems to be to play on fears without actually
worrying about reality or consistency. They really are the Daily Mail
party.

I think a lot of people will vote UKIP simply to give the established
political parties a good kicking. It's going to be a protest vote.

--
Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk

On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:51:21 +0100, The Medway Handyman wrote:

UKIPs entire campaigning seems to be to play on fears without
actually
worrying about reality or consistency.

I don't pay much attention to what the parties say they all lie and
bicker amongst themselves. But that is my impression of UKIP.

I think a lot of people will vote UKIP simply to give the established
political parties a good kicking. It's going to be a protest vote.

I think you are right. Trouble is people ought to be voting for the
candidate that they feel is going to work for and represent them the
best *not* the candidate that wears a particular colour.

Maybe this is why those MP's that have "defected" and been relected
under a different colour have been so. They actually care and do a
good job. not just kowtow to a particular colour of whip.

--
Cheers
Dave.

On Sunday, October 19, 2014 10:51:21 AM UTC+1, The Medway Handyman wrote:
"We would rather the legal and religious endorsements of wedlock are
separate."
Isn't homophobic. Forcing people with deeply held religious beliefs to
perform gay marriage ceremonies isn't right.

I don't see why it's any different from forcing people with deeply held religious beliefs to allow guide dogs in their shops and taxis, or gay people in their B&Bs.

If they don't wish to comply with the law they have the choice to not be a priest, taxi driver or B&B operator.

However removing the ability of discriminatory religious groups to carry out that which should be the function of the state seems sensible.

Owain

On 19/10/2014 10:51, The Medway Handyman wrote:

I think a lot of people will vote UKIP simply to give the established
political parties a good kicking. It's going to be a protest vote.

It's all very well doing that in a by-election, and I've done something
similar myself, but do it in a general election and the outcome may well
be a mess that the voters will regret for a long time.

--
F

"Adrian" wrote in message
...
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:23:36 +0100, Chris Hogg wrote:

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

I would agree with you there, yet you're saying in your reply to Bill
Wright that UKIP's energy policy is full of drivel. Not exactly
consistent, are you?

Far be it from me to defend Harry, but you don't have to agree with
every policy of a political party to give them your vote. Its generally
a matter of which one you disagree with the least.

Yes, of course, but he's so aggressively anti-nuclear and pro wind,
solar etc that I don't see how he could possibly stomach UKIP's energy
policy, or do anything other than vote Green.

I'm sorry, but are you seriously expecting consistent thought from those
who blindly support a party who now admits their last published manifesto
was "drivel", and whose party leader denies having read it - despite his
name being on the introduction to it?


No.

--
Adam

On 19/10/2014 10:36, Adrian wrote:

UKIPs entire campaigning seems to be to play on fears without actually
worrying about reality or consistency.


And the rest of the political classes seem to promising everything to
everybody but carefully wording such promises in a way that they don't
have to honour anything if they get into power.



--
mailto: news {at} admac {dot] myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

On 19/10/14 13:59, Tim Streater wrote:

They also rely on ignorance. Seen on Twitter yesterday:

kipper: tories obviously pro-Europe otherwise why did Cameron sign the
Lisbon Treaty.


One of UKIP's benefits if if popular, they WILL light a fire under all
the other buggers who have grown complacent.

If UKIP achieve anything, it might be to scare the living sh*t out of
the other politicians to get their act together.

I guess if the EDF started winning seats it would have a similar effect,
but that's not something I'd wish for...

"Tim Watts" wrote in message
...
On 19/10/14 13:59, Tim Streater wrote:

They also rely on ignorance. Seen on Twitter yesterday:

kipper: tories obviously pro-Europe otherwise why did Cameron sign the
Lisbon Treaty.


One of UKIP's benefits if if popular, they WILL light a fire under all the
other buggers who have grown complacent.

If UKIP achieve anything, it might be to scare the living sh*t out of the
other politicians to get their act together.

A single seat aint gunna do anything like that.

I guess if the EDF started winning seats it would have a similar effect,
but that's not something I'd wish for...

On 19/10/2014 10:23, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:00:07 +0100, news
wrote:

On 19/10/2014 08:22, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:09:55 +0100, "harryagain"
wrote:


"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Mark Reckless was our local Tory MP and has defected to UKIP.

Not that Cameron is worried or anything, but the area is being swamped
with Tories!

We've had three letter from DC 'himself', dozens of Tory politicians
visiting the area - having previously ignored it, a glossy full colour
newsletter showing the two prospective Tory candidates and today teams of
canvassers who don't know the area having been bussed in from far & wide.

Is that the sound of puckering arseholes I can hear?

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

I would agree with you there, yet you're saying in your reply to Bill
Wright that UKIP's energy policy is full of drivel. Not exactly
consistent, are you?

Far be it from me to defend Harry, but you don't have to agree with
every policy of a political party to give them your vote. Its generally
a matter of which one you disagree with the least.

Yes, of course, but he's so aggressively anti-nuclear and pro wind,
solar etc that I don't see how he could possibly stomach UKIP's energy
policy, or do anything other than vote Green.


He cant vote green as he doesn't do green.
Even after all his subsidy grabbing "improvements" he still uses more
energy than an average family.

"Dennis@home" wrote in message
web.com...
On 19/10/2014 10:23, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:00:07 +0100, news
wrote:

On 19/10/2014 08:22, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:09:55 +0100, "harryagain"
wrote:


"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Mark Reckless was our local Tory MP and has defected to UKIP.

Not that Cameron is worried or anything, but the area is being
swamped
with Tories!

We've had three letter from DC 'himself', dozens of Tory politicians
visiting the area - having previously ignored it, a glossy full
colour
newsletter showing the two prospective Tory candidates and today
teams of
canvassers who don't know the area having been bussed in from far &
wide.

Is that the sound of puckering arseholes I can hear?

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

I would agree with you there, yet you're saying in your reply to Bill
Wright that UKIP's energy policy is full of drivel. Not exactly
consistent, are you?

Far be it from me to defend Harry, but you don't have to agree with
every policy of a political party to give them your vote. Its generally
a matter of which one you disagree with the least.

Yes, of course, but he's so aggressively anti-nuclear and pro wind,
solar etc that I don't see how he could possibly stomach UKIP's energy
policy, or do anything other than vote Green.


He cant vote green as he doesn't do green.

Even after all his subsidy grabbing "improvements" he still uses more
energy than an average family.



Are you sure harry uses more energy than an average family?



--
Adam

"ARW" wrote in message
...
"Dennis@home" wrote in message
web.com...
On 19/10/2014 10:23, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sun, 19 Oct 2014 10:00:07 +0100, news
wrote:

On 19/10/2014 08:22, Chris Hogg wrote:
On Sat, 18 Oct 2014 20:09:55 +0100, "harryagain"
wrote:


"The Medway Handyman" wrote in message
...
Mark Reckless was our local Tory MP and has defected to UKIP.

Not that Cameron is worried or anything, but the area is being
swamped
with Tories!

We've had three letter from DC 'himself', dozens of Tory politicians
visiting the area - having previously ignored it, a glossy full
colour
newsletter showing the two prospective Tory candidates and today
teams of
canvassers who don't know the area having been bussed in from far &
wide.

Is that the sound of puckering arseholes I can hear?

Good to see the smug lying *******s crapping themselves.
Power to the people.
Vote UKIP and give them a good kicking.

I would agree with you there, yet you're saying in your reply to Bill
Wright that UKIP's energy policy is full of drivel. Not exactly
consistent, are you?

Far be it from me to defend Harry, but you don't have to agree with
every policy of a political party to give them your vote. Its
generally
a matter of which one you disagree with the least.

Yes, of course, but he's so aggressively anti-nuclear and pro wind,
solar etc that I don't see how he could possibly stomach UKIP's energy
policy, or do anything other than vote Green.


He cant vote green as he doesn't do green.

Even after all his subsidy grabbing "improvements" he still uses more
energy than an average family.



Are you sure harry uses more energy than an average family?

He just made that up. I have no heating bill for a start.
And very little transport energy costs. (Electric car)
I generate more electricity than I use.
I am getting in more PV panels too BTW all being well.
As many as our local transformer will stand.

The important aspects of UKIP are leaving the EUSSR and fixing the
immigration problems.
Much of the rest of their policies are bollix.
As you would expect with a single issue party.
There are a lot of weird people there. But no more than other political
parties.
At least they mean well.
I have been to various meetings, I can guarantee this.
Not like the crooks in the LIBLABCON parties.
(Think of the Royal Mail fiasco)
I just want to see them get sufficient leverage to force our departure from
the EU.
Or at least a referendum.
Because Cameron lies, he has no intention of having a referendum.
He can't get any concessions from the EU, it's what they are all about.
Socialist control freaks from basket case failed ex-commie economies.

The Medway Handyman wrote:

Is that the sound of puckering arseholes I can hear?

So, was that the Medway Handyvan on twitter then?