Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
SWMBO was doing some watering the other day, using a hose. When she
finished, she turned off the nozzle - but forgot to turn off the tap at the other end of the hose, leaving the hose under pressure. This wouldn't normally matter, because hoses and fittings seem to stand up to continuous mains pressure fairly well - as they need to in automatic watering systems. However, on this occasion, the fitting on the end of the hose sprung a leak in the middle of the night (pressure surge when demand is low?) and was peeing out water in the morning. We're on a meter! Best estimate is we lost between 20 and 25 quid's worth of water - not a fortune, but we don't want it to happen too often! The fitting which leaked was a plastic one (Hozelock or Gardena or similar) where the end of the hose pushes over a tube, and you tighten a threaded ring to clamp some 'fingers' onto the pipe. I've got lots of these on various hoses, and they're generally ok - but I don't generally leave them under pressure for a long time. Would brass fittings of the same design be any more secure? Or would I be better off by using conventional tap connectors[1] on each end of the hose, plus versions of the quick-release fittings which have a male thread at one end rather than a pipe clamp? Although I hope we won't forget to turn the tap off again(!) it would be useful to have something less prone to leaks - particularly if we ever install an automatic system, using a timer. Have any of you had a similar problem, and how have you fixed it? [1] The sort with a 3/4" BSP female fitting one end and the fluted pipe the other end - and with the hose retained on the fluted pipe with a jubilee clip -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
On Monday, June 24, 2013 3:10:11 PM UTC+1, Roger Mills wrote:
"Best estimate is we lost between 20 and 25 quid's worth of water - not a fortune, but we don't want it to happen too often! " Are you sure it's that much money? It used to take me over an hour to fill my boat's tank with water and that was 500 litres IIRC. So even 10 hours of hosepipe flow would be a only few tons and therefore a few pounds. Robert |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
On 24/06/2013 15:33, RobertL wrote:
On Monday, June 24, 2013 3:10:11 PM UTC+1, Roger Mills wrote: "Best estimate is we lost between 20 and 25 quid's worth of water - not a fortune, but we don't want it to happen too often!" Are you sure it's that much money? It used to take me over an hour to fill my boat's tank with water and that was 500 litres IIRC. So even 10 hours of hosepipe flow would be a only few tons and therefore a few pounds. Robert Each cubic metre (tonne) of water costs me about £2.50 when taking into account the fact that Severn Trent assumes it all goes down the sewer, and adds a sewerage charge to the water supply charge. I read my meter every month, so I was able to estimate the loss by seeing how much higher the meter reading was than I would have expected. I can't tell exactly because our usage fluctuates, and we spend quite a lot of time away from home. My best estimate is that the extra usage is in the region of 8 - 10 tonnes - hence my figure of £20 - £25. I don't know exactly how long it had been leaking. It could have been anything up to 24 hours. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
On 24/06/13 15:10, Roger Mills wrote:
Would brass fittings of the same design be any more secure? Yes, IME. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
Chris Bartram wrote:
On 24/06/13 15:10, Roger Mills wrote: Would brass fittings of the same design be any more secure? Yes, IME. From time to time these appear at Aldi, and I have found them more durable than the plastic ones. Chris -- Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK Plant amazing Acers. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
On 25/06/2013 07:05, Chris J Dixon wrote:
Chris Bartram wrote: On 24/06/13 15:10, Roger Mills wrote: Would brass fittings of the same design be any more secure? Yes, IME. From time to time these appear at Aldi, and I have found them more durable than the plastic ones. Chris But am I right in thinking that the way in which the end of the hose is retained in the fitting is the same as for plastic fittings? - i.e. the hose pushes over a central tube and is gripped by a plastic bit with fingers, which is squeezed onto the outside of the hose with a retaining collar. I've found that the hose tends to pull out of this type of fitting - particularly at the nozzle end, where it is subjected to a lot of articulation. Would a brass fitting be any better in this respect - since, as far as I can see, the vital bit is still made of plastic? I'm inclined to think that a fitting where the hose is pushed over a fluted tube, and retained by a jubilee clip, would be better. -- Cheers, Roger ____________ Please reply to Newsgroup. Whilst email address is valid, it is seldom checked. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
On 27/06/2013 10:36, Roger Mills wrote:
On 25/06/2013 07:05, Chris J Dixon wrote: Chris Bartram wrote: On 24/06/13 15:10, Roger Mills wrote: Would brass fittings of the same design be any more secure? Yes, IME. From time to time these appear at Aldi, and I have found them more durable than the plastic ones. Chris But am I right in thinking that the way in which the end of the hose is retained in the fitting is the same as for plastic fittings? - i.e. the hose pushes over a central tube and is gripped by a plastic bit with fingers, which is squeezed onto the outside of the hose with a retaining collar. I've found that the hose tends to pull out of this type of fitting - particularly at the nozzle end, where it is subjected to a lot of articulation. Would a brass fitting be any better in this respect - since, as far as I can see, the vital bit is still made of plastic? I'm inclined to think that a fitting where the hose is pushed over a fluted tube, and retained by a jubilee clip, would be better. Yes, I've wondered the same thing but, for whatever reason, the brass does last longer IME |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
On Mon, 24 Jun 2013 15:10:11 +0100, Roger Mills
wrote: SWMBO was doing some watering the other day, using a hose. When she finished, she turned off the nozzle - but forgot to turn off the tap at the other end of the hose, leaving the hose under pressure. This wouldn't normally matter, because hoses and fittings seem to stand up to continuous mains pressure fairly well - as they need to in automatic watering systems. However, on this occasion, the fitting on the end of the hose sprung a leak in the middle of the night (pressure surge when demand is low?) and was peeing out water in the morning. We're on a meter! Best estimate is we lost between 20 and 25 quid's worth of water - not a fortune, but we don't want it to happen too often! The fitting which leaked was a plastic one (Hozelock or Gardena or similar) where the end of the hose pushes over a tube, and you tighten a threaded ring to clamp some 'fingers' onto the pipe. I've got lots of these on various hoses, and they're generally ok - but I don't generally leave them under pressure for a long time. Would brass fittings of the same design be any more secure? Or would I be better off by using conventional tap connectors[1] on each end of the hose, plus versions of the quick-release fittings which have a male thread at one end rather than a pipe clamp? Although I hope we won't forget to turn the tap off again(!) it would be useful to have something less prone to leaks - particularly if we ever install an automatic system, using a timer. Have any of you had a similar problem, and how have you fixed it? [1] The sort with a 3/4" BSP female fitting one end and the fluted pipe the other end - and with the hose retained on the fluted pipe with a jubilee clip My plastic tap connector has always refused to let us connect anything to it. It broke last week and a neighbour supplied a shiny new brass one. Oh joy. Everything now connects effortlessly to the tap and one finger pressure removes it from the tap connector. Long live brass! |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Garden host fittings - (mechanical) security
On 24/06/2013 15:10, Roger Mills wrote:
Have any of you had a similar problem, and how have you fixed it? SOP is to roll the hose up on its reel and put it away. This avoids wiggly lines on the lawn and any leaks. Andy |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
American garden hose fittings (in the UK) | UK diy | |||
Need new one- web host has terminated. | UK diy | |||
Spray head and dual garden hose fittings? | UK diy | |||
FAQ: New host for the DIY FAQ | UK diy | |||
WTB: O-rings for garden hose fittings? | UK diy |