Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#41
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
On Dec 12, 7:17*pm, "ARWadsworth"
wrote: ISTR 50ppm but I did not often phone her. My Mum was in the hospital next to the hotel that I was rewiring and I used to pass the hour between finishing work and start of visiting hours in room 42 of the hotel with one of the waitresses. Presumably she was showing you where to put your ducting? :-) Matt |
#42
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 04:34:40 -0800 (PST), larkim
wrote: On Dec 12, 7:17*pm, "ARWadsworth" wrote: ISTR 50ppm but I did not often phone her. My Mum was in the hospital next to the hotel that I was rewiring and I used to pass the hour between finishing work and start of visiting hours in room 42 of the hotel with one of the waitresses. Presumably she was showing you where to put your ducting? :-) In room 69, presumably. |
#43
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
in 1088410 20111213 090043 Mike Barnes wrote:
Hugh - Was Invisible : I despair of people at work who kept stuff on their local drive and relatives who have all their photos on one standalone computer. Agreed. For many years backup was difficult and expensive. But nowadays there are no excuses. I have a relative who had over 2-years-worth of photos just on her camera (including 2 weddings), I asked what she would do when the memory card was full; she said "buy another one". |
#44
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
On Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:04:49 -0000, Martin wrote:
On Mon, 12 Dec 2011 09:41:21 +0000, Terry Fields wrote: Hugh - Was Invisible wrote: Hi All. Off topic but there is so much knowledge here .... 93 year old Mum goes in to hospital on Sunday. Sim free mobile (Doro 332) is on its way. Mum will only want a sim for calls. Will have moderate use whilst in hospital for a few days and then be used only for emergencies. I am having a lot of difficulty finding out how long credit and sim lasts if unused. Anyone got any recommendations please? Hospital has reception problems with t-mobile and orange but 02 and Vodafone based networks are OK TIA for any replies. My MiL wanted a mobile phone for emergencies, and she's 85. I went with a free SIM from 3 - apparently any credit never expires (it certainly hasn't on our 3 dongle, anyway, which is used sporadically). We've had Vodafone credit expire after three months. O2 and Virgin credit doesn't appear to expire Asda paperwork says 1 call or text etc every 3 months required |
#45
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
On 12/12/11 12:21, tony sayer wrote:
Worth checking reception as although offering good deals, 3 have serious reception issues is more rural areas. ASDA mobile don't expire also, and are pretty cheap. In the 5 rural areas I frequent, 3 have the best reception. In most of these rural areas there's no 3G signal at all from Vodafone or O2, and in one of them there's no signal of any kind from O2. Can you say where this is?. Be useful when I'm having arguments re phone coverage that some seem to think covers every square inch of olde Englande;!... Some of these areas are in olde Wales... I think if you just want good voice coverage then the networks are much of a muchness - O2 and Vodafone have some advantage as their GSM networks operate at 900Mhz whereas Orange/t-Mobile operate at 1800Mhz. Orange and t-Mobile have therefore had to build more base stations to provide the same amount of coverage. Where 3G is concerned, however, all networks operate at 2100Mhz. Because most networks just added 3G capability to their existing base stations, Orange and t-mobile were at an advantage as they already had more base stations in locations better suited to the higher frequencies. 3 have built a 3G network from scratch and in the industry it is regarded as the most comprehensive, although they have now joined an agreement with t-Mobile to site share. The net effect of this is there's usually 3 coverage wherever there's t-mobile coverage and vice versa. With the merger of Orange and t-mobile into everything everywhere, their users can now roam on each others network, so O2 and Vodafone are at a serious disadvantage (unless they manage to persuade Ofcom to let them use some 900MHz spectrum for 3G) |
#46
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
In article , funkyoldcortina
wrote: On 12/12/11 12:21, tony sayer wrote: Worth checking reception as although offering good deals, 3 have serious reception issues is more rural areas. ASDA mobile don't expire also, and are pretty cheap. In the 5 rural areas I frequent, 3 have the best reception. In most of these rural areas there's no 3G signal at all from Vodafone or O2, and in one of them there's no signal of any kind from O2. Can you say where this is?. Be useful when I'm having arguments re phone coverage that some seem to think covers every square inch of olde Englande;!... Some of these areas are in olde Wales... I think if you just want good voice coverage then the networks are much of a muchness - O2 and Vodafone have some advantage as their GSM networks operate at 900Mhz whereas Orange/t-Mobile operate at 1800Mhz. Orange and t-Mobile have therefore had to build more base stations to provide the same amount of coverage. Where 3G is concerned, however, all networks operate at 2100Mhz. Because most networks just added 3G capability to their existing base stations, Orange and t-mobile were at an advantage as they already had more base stations in locations better suited to the higher frequencies. 3 have built a 3G network from scratch and in the industry it is regarded as the most comprehensive, although they have now joined an agreement with t-Mobile to site share. The net effect of this is there's usually 3 coverage wherever there's t-mobile coverage and vice versa. With the merger of Orange and t-mobile into everything everywhere, their users can now roam on each others network, so O2 and Vodafone are at a serious disadvantage (unless they manage to persuade Ofcom to let them use some 900MHz spectrum for 3G) However those that operate at 900MHz have as distinct advantage when it comes to indoor reception. -- From KT24 Using a RISC OS computer running v5.16 |
#47
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
In article , funkyoldcortina
scribeth thus On 12/12/11 12:21, tony sayer wrote: Worth checking reception as although offering good deals, 3 have serious reception issues is more rural areas. ASDA mobile don't expire also, and are pretty cheap. In the 5 rural areas I frequent, 3 have the best reception. In most of these rural areas there's no 3G signal at all from Vodafone or O2, and in one of them there's no signal of any kind from O2. Can you say where this is?. Be useful when I'm having arguments re phone coverage that some seem to think covers every square inch of olde Englande;!... Some of these areas are in olde Wales... I think if you just want good voice coverage then the networks are much of a muchness - O2 and Vodafone have some advantage as their GSM networks operate at 900Mhz whereas Orange/t-Mobile operate at 1800Mhz. Orange and t-Mobile have therefore had to build more base stations to provide the same amount of coverage. Where 3G is concerned, however, all networks operate at 2100Mhz. Because most networks just added 3G capability to their existing base stations, Orange and t-mobile were at an advantage as they already had more base stations in locations better suited to the higher frequencies. 3 have built a 3G network from scratch and in the industry it is regarded as the most comprehensive, although they have now joined an agreement with t-Mobile to site share. The net effect of this is there's usually 3 coverage wherever there's t-mobile coverage and vice versa. With the merger of Orange and t-mobile into everything everywhere, their users can now roam on each others network, so O2 and Vodafone are at a serious disadvantage (unless they manage to persuade Ofcom to let them use some 900MHz spectrum for 3G) Well I've used all nets from time to time but round this way Voodofone seem to have the edge on it.. I believe there was an Ofcom report out today where 3 the network operator weren't scored too well.... -- Tony Sayer |
#48
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:26:22 -0000, funkyoldcortina
wrote: On 12/12/11 12:21, tony sayer wrote: Worth checking reception as although offering good deals, 3 have serious reception issues is more rural areas. ASDA mobile don't expire also, and are pretty cheap. In the 5 rural areas I frequent, 3 have the best reception. In most of these rural areas there's no 3G signal at all from Vodafone or O2, and in one of them there's no signal of any kind from O2. Can you say where this is?. Be useful when I'm having arguments re phone coverage that some seem to think covers every square inch of olde Englande;!... Some of these areas are in olde Wales... I think if you just want good voice coverage then the networks are much of a muchness - O2 and Vodafone have some advantage as their GSM networks operate at 900Mhz whereas Orange/t-Mobile operate at 1800Mhz. Orange and t-Mobile have therefore had to build more base stations to provide the same amount of coverage. Where 3G is concerned, however, all networks operate at 2100Mhz. Because most networks just added 3G capability to their existing base stations, Orange and t-mobile were at an advantage as they already had more base stations in locations better suited to the higher frequencies. 3 have built a 3G network from scratch and in the industry it is regarded as the most comprehensive, although they have now joined an agreement with t-Mobile to site share. The net effect of this is there's usually 3 coverage wherever there's t-mobile coverage and vice versa. With the merger of Orange and t-mobile into everything everywhere, their users can now roam on each others network, so O2 and Vodafone are at a serious disadvantage (unless they manage to persuade Ofcom to let them use some 900MHz spectrum for 3G) I am the OP. ASDA/Vodafone sim worked for Mum in her hospital. Took my wife to a different hospital to see a consultant in a non-clinical area yesterday. No signal on my Voda or her Orange.T-mob unless we were close to a window. New building. Not sure of the construction but never had any problems around that hospital before. |
#49
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
On 22/12/11 11:31, charles wrote:
In , funkyoldcortina wrote: coverage and vice versa. With the merger of Orange and t-mobile into everything everywhere, their users can now roam on each others network, so O2 and Vodafone are at a serious disadvantage (unless they manage to persuade Ofcom to let them use some 900MHz spectrum for 3G) However those that operate at 900MHz have as distinct advantage when it comes to indoor reception. There are no 3G networks that operate at 900Mhz in the UK (yet) though... |
#50
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
OT. Sim for 93 year old with sporadic use
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 17:28:32 -0000, "Hugh - Was Invisible"
wrote: Took my wife to a different hospital to see a consultant in a non-clinical area yesterday. No signal on my Voda or her Orange.T-mob unless we were close to a window. New building. Not sure of the construction but never had any problems around that hospital before. Likely foil-faced Kinspan panels all over it. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|