|
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
John Rumm wrote:
Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: It would seem to be a simple enough question. Is an unvented cylinder at mains pressure a greater danger than two similarly sized air receivers working at 11 bar? yes. So, something that is designed to work at about 6 bar and that normally contains an incompressible fluid is more dangerous than something working at nearly twice the pressure and that normally contains highly compressed gas? You really have no idea what you are talking about. I wonder if dribble has ever pondered why tests of steam boilers etc are carried out with water rather than gas? That would involve rational thought and at least some understanding of why and how pressure vessels explode. Colin Bignell |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: "Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: "Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: "Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... ... Reliability is more about make than type, although a system (regular-type) boiler is less complex than a combination boiler. Not much at all. A combi is system boiler with a 3-way valve and a plate heat exchanger for DHW. 90% is the same. That is still more complex than a system boiler. Not much. The other advantage of a system boiler is that the hot water is stored in a tank, which can have a backup immersion heater and that gives you belts and braces cover. An in-line instant electric heater can be fitted in the combi outlet. A small box say under the sink. They are fairly useless if you want to fill a bath though. It is for backup and will do a shower. I don't have a shower or a shower attachment. Some will fill a bath slowly. I don't want to fill a bath slowly It is backup you silly pillock! You ****ed up and bought the wrong system. Get used to it. You haven't a clue. A know it all you knows **** all. Go and live in Essex. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: It would seem to be a simple enough question. Is an unvented cylinder at mains pressure a greater danger than two similarly sized air receivers working at 11 bar? yes. So, This man is from Essex. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... John Rumm wrote: Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: It would seem to be a simple enough question. Is an unvented cylinder at mains pressure a greater danger than two similarly sized air receivers working at 11 bar? yes. So, something that is designed to work at about 6 bar and that normally contains an incompressible fluid is more dangerous than something working at nearly twice the pressure and that normally contains highly compressed gas? You really have no idea what you are talking about. I This man should live in Essex. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
On 03/05/2010 21:12, AL_z wrote:
My last c/h boiler was a combi, and it broke down about once a year, on average. Conversely, my parents had an old regular-type boiler (i.e., not a combi) which never needed any maintenance in about 30 years. I now want to install a c/h system in my new house. So, regarding my choice of boiler: Considering the cost of purchasing, plus the cost of maintenance balanced out against the difference in thermal efficiency, might I be doing myself a favour by installing a cheap, old, reliable, standard boiler, say from a demolition yard, rather than forking out for a modern condensing combi? Take an old gas cooker oven and install some sort of heat exhanger matrix piping water in and and out. A few car radiators maybe? How reliable, efficient, legal or stupid would that be? -- Adrian C |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
On 06/05/2010 00:49, Adrian C wrote:
favour by installing a cheap, old, reliable, standard boiler, say from a demolition yard, rather than forking out for a modern condensing combi? Take an old gas cooker oven and install some sort of heat exhanger matrix piping water in and and out. A few car radiators maybe? How reliable, efficient, legal or stupid would that be? Sorry, just read the rest of the thread and am jostling to look like a greater idiot than the other one. Please disregard, I should get to bed... -- Adrian C |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: John Rumm wrote: Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: It would seem to be a simple enough question. Is an unvented cylinder at mains pressure a greater danger than two similarly sized air receivers working at 11 bar? yes. So, something that is designed to work at about 6 bar and that normally contains an incompressible fluid is more dangerous than something working at nearly twice the pressure and that normally contains highly compressed gas? You really have no idea what you are talking about. I wonder if dribble has ever pondered why tests of steam boilers etc are carried out with water rather than gas? That would involve rational thought and at least some understanding of why and how pressure vessels explode. Now we have highlighted You are an idiotic Essex Chav! |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"Adrian C" wrote in message ... Sorry, just read the rest of the thread and am jostling to look like a greater idiot than the other one. You are a bigger idiot than the Essex Chav. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Reliable - so so, until the rads fail due to high heat stress or pressure, or get clogged up with soot. Soot? He hasn't a clue!!!!!! He is from Essex you know. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
Doctor Drivel wrote:
"Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: .... I don't want to fill a bath slowly It is backup you silly pillock! You ****ed up and bought the wrong system... I bought the system that will do what I want, not what you think I should want. Colin Bignell |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: "Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: ... I don't want to fill a bath slowly It is backup you silly pillock! You ****ed up and bought the wrong system... I bought the system that will do what I want, not what you think I should want. You do not know what you want. you haven't clue what the superior alternatives are. No one in their right mind buys a potential bomb!!! You even bought an overpriced boiler as well. An ATAG 51kW or W-B 550 combi would have been cheaper and done everything you want and more - and save space and not go bang!!!!!!! Bangggggggggggg!!!! |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Doctor Drivel wrote: "John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: John Rumm wrote: Nightjar "cpb"@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: It would seem to be a simple enough question. Is an unvented cylinder at mains pressure a greater danger than two similarly sized air receivers working at 11 bar? yes. So, something that is designed to work at about 6 bar and that normally contains an incompressible fluid is more dangerous than something working at nearly twice the pressure and that normally contains highly compressed gas? You really have no idea what you are talking about. I wonder if dribble has ever pondered why tests of steam boilers etc are carried out with water rather than gas? That would involve rational thought and at least some understanding of why and how pressure vessels explode. Now we have highlighted You are an idiotic Essex Chav! You are an idiotic Essex Chav! |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Adrian C wrote: On 06/05/2010 00:49, Adrian C wrote: favour by installing a cheap, old, reliable, standard boiler, say from a demolition yard, rather than forking out for a modern condensing combi? Take an old gas cooker oven and install some sort of heat exhanger matrix piping water in and and out. A few car radiators maybe? How reliable, efficient, legal or stupid would that be? Sorry, just read the rest of the thread and am jostling to look like a greater idiot than the other one. Please disregard, I should get to bed... Not much danger of that There is, you are from Essex! |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
Doctor Drivel wrote:
"Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: "Nightjar "cpb"@" "insertmysurnamehere wrote in message ... Doctor Drivel wrote: ... I don't want to fill a bath slowly It is backup you silly pillock! You ****ed up and bought the wrong system... I bought the system that will do what I want, not what you think I should want. You do not know what you want. you haven't clue what the superior alternatives are. Superior? Read the comments from ultracynic (4th), nissan (7th) and complete-heat (9th) he http://www.sheffieldforum.co.uk/showthread.php?t=306833 Or the comments he http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/...d.php?t=779745 No one in their right mind buys a potential bomb!!! As John pointed out, it would require multiple system failures to make a domestic unvented hot water cylinder dangerous. They are common in France and there is no history of a serious risk of explosion as a result. You even bought an overpriced boiler as well. That must make the ATAG very overpriced. The best price I can find for the smallest system boiler in the range is 50% more than I paid for the Vaillant An ATAG 51kW or W-B 550 combi would have been cheaper and done everything you want, Except give me an immersion heater backup. and more - and save space Not a problem. I had the side porch built with more than enough spare room to mount both boiler and hot water cylinder and still leave me room for a tumble dryer. and not go bang!!!!!!! How is the hot water cylinder built into the ATAG 51kW combination boiler safer than an external hot water cylinder? Colin Bignell |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
In article ,
Doctor Drivel wrote: "John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Now we have highlighted this lack of understanding, he will either have to carry on prattling about explosions - confirming his complete lack of a clue, or he will have to switch to insults / or the usual barrage of non sequiturs - confirming his complete lack of clue, but at least acknowledging that he knows he is clueless. I wonder which it will be? You are an idiotic Essex Chav! No surprises there, then. -- *Middle age is when it takes longer to rest than to get tired. Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
In article ,
Nightjar \cpb\@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: How is the hot water cylinder built into the ATAG 51kW combination boiler safer than an external hot water cylinder? It's inside a box. Dribble doesn't understand things like that. They don't tell you what happens inside the box in sort of advert he can understand. -- *I never drink anything stronger than gin before breakfast * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Nightjar \cpb\@ insertmysurnamehere wrote: How is the hot water cylinder built into the ATAG 51kW combination boiler safer than an external hot water cylinder? It's Please eff off as you are a plantpot |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"Dave Plowman (News)" wrote in message ... In article , Doctor Drivel wrote: "John Rumm" wrote in message o.uk... Now we have highlighted this lack of understanding, he will either have to carry on prattling about explosions - confirming his complete lack of a clue, or he will have to switch to insults / or the usual barrage of non sequiturs - confirming his complete lack of clue, but at least acknowledging that he knows he is clueless. I wonder which it will be? You are an idiotic Essex Chav! No surprises there, then. No surpise at all. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
On May 6, 12:59*am, John Rumm wrote:
Adrian C wrote: On 03/05/2010 21:12, AL_z wrote: My last c/h boiler was a combi, and it broke down about once a year, on average. Conversely, my parents had an old regular-type boiler (i.e., not a combi) which never needed any maintenance in about 30 years. I now want to install a c/h system in my new house. So, regarding my choice of boiler: Considering the cost of purchasing, plus the cost of maintenance balanced out against the difference in thermal efficiency, might I be doing myself a favour by installing a cheap, old, reliable, standard boiler, say from a demolition yard, rather than forking out for a modern condensing combi? Take an old gas cooker oven and install some sort of heat exhanger matrix piping water in and and out. A few car radiators maybe? How reliable, efficient, legal or stupid would that be? Reliable - so so, until *the rads fail due to high heat stress or pressure, or get clogged up with soot. Efficiency - pants legal - possibly since you could probably avoid modifying the gas appliance. Power output - about as dismal as half an electric shower! Still, as ideas go it a fair bit more credible than some of dribbles. ;-) Best efficiency is had with direct contact... maybe you could arrange a water feature in the oven NT |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
"John Rumm" wrote in message ... NT wrote: Best efficiency is had with direct contact... maybe you could arrange a water feature in the oven I am sure our resident bridge guardian could knock something suitable up in plastic pipe with his trusty hacksaw. Oh my God! This Chav is putting plastic pipe in an oven. |
modern condensing boiler vs. dacades old standard boiler,
In message , John
Rumm writes NT wrote: Best efficiency is had with direct contact... maybe you could arrange a water feature in the oven I am sure our resident bridge guardian could knock something suitable up in plastic pipe with his trusty hacksaw. Somewhere in the suburbs of Dampfoot -- geoff |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:39 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004 - 2014 DIYbanter