Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
Hello,
Downstairs we have a concrete floor on top of which are some thin but rigid "plastic" tiles. Unfortunately many are cracked, e.g. from carpet fitters hammering grips into them, uneven concrete underneath, etc. I was hoping to remove them, in fact I did lift a few from around the edge of the room. They are glued on by some black bitumen like adhesive but they came up quite easily. I have now read that asbestos was widely used in floor tiles. The house was built in the mid 1970s. I am wondering whether it is safe to remove the tiles? I have read some websites and if I understand correctly, floor tiles can be removed by yourself and do not require notifying or professional removal. The danger seems to be if they are broken; some are already broken which is why I want to remove them and there is a danger (or even likelihood) they will snap in half when removed. I did wonder about sending a tile for testing but one web site said if you had any tiles from before 1980 they would almost certainly contain asbestos and not to waste money having them tested. Is that so? Does anyone recognise these tiles as being asbestos containing? I tried flickr but it wouldn't let me register, I couldn't work out why, so I uploaded them here instead: http://img193.imageshack.us/my.php?image=flooro.jpg Other than a mask and disposal at the asbestos skip at the tip, what other precautions should I take? Thanks in advance. |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 16:28:39 +0100, Fred
wrote: I have now read that asbestos was widely used in floor tiles. The house was built in the mid 1970s. I am wondering whether it is safe to remove the tiles? Perfectly. Some floor tiles of that period contained up to 7% Chrysotile (white asbestos) but it is heavily bound into the material so release of fibres even when broken is very low. I have read some websites and if I understand correctly, floor tiles can be removed by yourself and do not require notifying or professional removal. Correct. I did wonder about sending a tile for testing but one web site said if you had any tiles from before 1980 they would almost certainly contain asbestos and not to waste money having them tested. Is that so? Yes, simply assume they contain Chrysotile and handle accordingly. This involves simply making sure you minimise dust and heavy handling. Does anyone recognise these tiles as being asbestos containing? Don't bother, simply assume they are. Other than a mask and disposal at the asbestos skip at the tip, what other precautions should I take? Keep the work area damp. Use a hand water mister to keep dust down. You can get a special "asbestos tile lifter" but all it is is a normal scraper on the end of a broom handle so you are not kneeling over the tiles as you lever them up. As you get them up put them in a strong polythene bag. Once you have levered up the tiles and bitumen if you are going to use self leveling compound to even out the floor consider using some PVA on the floor to bind all the dust. Otherwise wet it well and mop up the residue. The risk is negligible. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Jul 24, 4:28*pm, Fred wrote:
Hello, Downstairs we have a concrete floor on top of which are some thin but rigid "plastic" tiles. Unfortunately many are cracked, e.g. from carpet fitters hammering grips into them, uneven concrete underneath, etc. I was hoping to remove them, in fact I did lift a few from around the edge of the room. They are glued on by some black bitumen like adhesive but they came up quite easily. I have now read that asbestos was widely used in floor tiles. The house was built in the mid 1970s. I am wondering whether it is safe to remove the tiles? I have read some websites and if I understand correctly, floor tiles can be removed by yourself and do not require notifying or professional removal. The danger seems to be if they are broken; some are already broken which is why I want to remove them and there is a danger (or even likelihood) they will snap in half when removed. I did wonder about sending a tile for testing but one web site said if you had any tiles from before 1980 they would almost certainly contain asbestos and not to waste money having them tested. Is that so? Does anyone recognise these tiles as being asbestos containing? I tried flickr but it wouldn't let me register, I couldn't work out why, so I uploaded them here instead:http://img193.imageshack.us/my.php?image=flooro.jpg Other than a mask and disposal at the asbestos skip at the tip, what other precautions should I take? Thanks in advance. tiles can contain white asbetos, chrysotile, which is well bound by the rest of the tile material. As far as hazards go, its probably more dangerous to pop outside for a cigarette. Blue & brown asbestoses in unbonded state are nasty, bonded white asbestos is a very different animal. NT |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:30:27 +0100, Peter Parry
wrote: Perfectly. Some floor tiles of that period contained up to 7% Chrysotile (white asbestos) but it is heavily bound into the material so release of fibres even when broken is very low. Thanks for the reassurance. I was particularly reassured by the "even when broken" part because my experience is they snap in half when lifted. I wasn't sure how much asbestos was in them, so it's nice to know it is a small and highly bound quantity. That said, I will still be careful. Yes, assume they contain Chrysotile and handle accordingly. This involves simply making sure you minimise dust and heavy handling. Sorry, what does "heavy handling" mean: not smash them up more than necessary? You can get a special "asbestos tile lifter" but all it is is a normal scraper on the end of a broom handle I never knew that. Where can I buy one from and are they expensive? consider using some PVA on the floor to bind all the dust. Otherwise wet it well and mop up the residue. Should there be much dust? Reading above you implied that little should be released. So mop rather than brush because brushing might make the dust airborne? I presume the mop head has to be thrown away afterwards? The risk is negligible. Thanks, I feel more confident about starting the job now. You hear all these terrible stories about it being the most deadly substance known to man. I have artex on most ceilings. I guess that contains some asbestos too? Why was it put in everything? Did they think it would prevent the spread of fires? Thanks again. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:52:44 -0700 (PDT), NT
wrote: tiles can contain white asbetos, chrysotile, which is well bound by the rest of the tile material. As far as hazards go, its probably more dangerous to pop outside for a cigarette. Blue & brown asbestoses in unbonded state are nasty, bonded white asbestos is a very different animal. Thanks for the reassurance. I guess the horror stories all relate to the blue and brown variety then? Which was used in brake linings? I remember when changing the pads on my car, reading warning about not inhaling dust. |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:22:27 +0100, Fred
wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:30:27 +0100, Peter Parry wrote: Yes, assume they contain Chrysotile and handle accordingly. This involves simply making sure you minimise dust and heavy handling. Sorry, what does "heavy handling" mean: not smash them up more than necessary? Don't throw them into a bucket from 20 paces and miss most of the time, don't smash them up enthusiastically with a hammer to make the bits smaller to fit more in a sack. You certainly do not need to carry each piece as if it is a bottle of nitro-glycerine on hot day. You can get a special "asbestos tile lifter" but all it is is a normal scraper on the end of a broom handle I never knew that. Where can I buy one from and are they expensive? Everything from asbestos specialists is expensive - just buy a scraper and a broom handle and fix them together or a Dutch Hoe such as http://www.amazon.co.uk/Faithfull-St.../dp/B0001IWSQK consider using some PVA on the floor to bind all the dust. Otherwise wet it well and mop up the residue. Should there be much dust? Reading above you implied that little should be released. So mop rather than brush because brushing might make the dust airborne? There shouldn't be much at all but sometimes you find the concrete underneath wasn't well made and is breaking up into small particles because of heavy traffic over years. This isn't hazardous in itself but as you can't separate out the harmless dust from any which is potentially harmful it pays to keep both down. I presume the mop head has to be thrown away afterwards? Not really but as they cost so little it makes some sense to stick it in the last sack of waste. The risk is negligible. Thanks, I feel more confident about starting the job now. You hear all these terrible stories about it being the most deadly substance known to man. I have artex on most ceilings. I guess that contains some asbestos too? Why was it put in everything? Did they think it would prevent the spread of fires? The risk is, like most hazardous substances, heavily dose and exposure related. The people most at risk are the ones exposed to heavy concentrations over many years in industry. It was a popular material because it was cheap, had excellent construction qualities and was a strong binder. Artex may contain some but the best way of dealing with that is simply to plaster over it. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Aug 2, 7:23*pm, Fred wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 18:52:44 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: tiles can contain white asbetos, chrysotile, which is well bound by the rest of the tile material. As far as hazards go, its probably more dangerous to pop outside for a cigarette. Blue & brown asbestoses in unbonded state are nasty, bonded white asbestos is a very different animal. Thanks for the reassurance. I guess the horror stories all relate to the blue and brown variety then? Which was used in brake linings? I remember when changing the pads on my car, reading warning about not inhaling dust. Loose dust is the problem, not asbestos fibre bound in cement or plastic. Brake pad wear resulted in loose asbestos dust. You can't really breathe in chunks of floor tile. NT |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:52:19 -0700 (PDT), NT
wrote: Loose dust is the problem, not asbestos fibre bound in cement or plastic. Brake pad wear resulted in loose asbestos dust. You can't really breathe in chunks of floor tile. ....Unless the floor tile snaps and a fibre is released and the likelihood of that is low? By the way, how big are these fibres? Can you see them with the naked eye? Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
Fred wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:52:19 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: Loose dust is the problem, not asbestos fibre bound in cement or plastic. Brake pad wear resulted in loose asbestos dust. You can't really breathe in chunks of floor tile. ...Unless the floor tile snaps and a fibre is released and the likelihood of that is low? By the way, how big are these fibres? Can you see them with the naked eye? Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! This is truly not a major problem. Asbestos, whatever form, was only an issue to those regularly exposed over a very long term measured in years to dust; usually, but not only, the workers with these materials. We are going through another one of these paranoid stages with mercury at present. I suspect that this round of paranoia is being wound up by both the waste industry re striplight disposal and all the future disposal of all these energy efficient CFLs which have circa 5 mg from recollection and the guvmint needing to be seen to do something- in other words bugger all compared to that we were regularly exposed to in the past. |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Aug 4, 11:27*pm, Fred wrote:
On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:52:19 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: Loose dust is the problem, not asbestos fibre bound in cement or plastic. Brake pad wear resulted in loose asbestos dust. You can't really breathe in chunks of floor tile. ...Unless the floor tile snaps and a fibre is released and the likelihood of that is low? the amount released is trivial. People working in clouds of asbestos dust for decades have a terrible death rate, but divide that down to 10 fibres from a floor 3 of which were breathed in, and the resulting number of deaths would almost certainly be less than one per entire history of humankind. NT By the way, how big are these fibres? Can you see them with the naked eye? Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
"Clot" wrote in message ... Fred wrote: On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:52:19 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: Loose dust is the problem, not asbestos fibre bound in cement or plastic. Brake pad wear resulted in loose asbestos dust. You can't really breathe in chunks of floor tile. ...Unless the floor tile snaps and a fibre is released and the likelihood of that is low? By the way, how big are these fibres? Can you see them with the naked eye? Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! This is truly not a major problem. Asbestos, whatever form, was only an issue to those regularly exposed over a very long term measured in years to dust; usually, but not only, the workers with these materials. You really don't understand asbestos do you? You must avoid exposure to the asbestos fibres, even a single fibre lodged in the lung can and has been shown to cause a painful death. Many of the people that died were not asbestos workers but their family members who were exposed to dust on clothing. If you keep the dust down you are safe but just stating there is nothing to worry about is just plain daft. BTW radioactive stuff is perfectly safe if you know how to handle it. There have been far fewer deaths in the nuclear industry than in the asbestos industry. You don't know how to handle radioactive stuff so you don't tell people how to handle it but likewise you don't know how to handle asbestos, but do tell people how to handle it. |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Aug 2, 10:49*pm, Peter Parry wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 19:22:27 +0100, Fred wrote: On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:30:27 +0100, Peter Parry wrote: Yes, assume they contain Chrysotile and handle accordingly. This involves simply making sure you minimise dust and heavy handling. Sorry, what does "heavy handling" mean: not smash them up more than necessary? Don't throw them into a bucket from 20 paces and miss most of the time, don't smash them up enthusiastically with a hammer to make the bits smaller to fit more in a sack. *You certainly do not need to carry each piece as if it is a bottle of nitro-glycerine on *hot day. and don't do what I did (not knowing what they were at the time) cut through them with a circular saw when taking up the chipboard. :-( Robert |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
"dennis@home" wrote in message
... "Clot" wrote in message ... Fred wrote: On Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:52:19 -0700 (PDT), NT wrote: Loose dust is the problem, not asbestos fibre bound in cement or plastic. Brake pad wear resulted in loose asbestos dust. You can't really breathe in chunks of floor tile. ...Unless the floor tile snaps and a fibre is released and the likelihood of that is low? By the way, how big are these fibres? Can you see them with the naked eye? Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! This is truly not a major problem. Asbestos, whatever form, was only an issue to those regularly exposed over a very long term measured in years to dust; usually, but not only, the workers with these materials. You really don't understand asbestos do you? You must avoid exposure to the asbestos fibres, even a single fibre lodged in the lung can and has been shown to cause a painful death. No it hasn't, even if theoretically the case. Many of the people that died were not asbestos workers but their family members who were exposed to dust on clothing. If you keep the dust down you are safe but just stating there is nothing to worry about is just plain daft. Which was almost exactly what "clot" said, so what are you arguing about? -- Bob Mannix (anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not) |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:25:28 +0100, "dennis@home"
wrote: "Clot" wrote This is truly not a major problem. Asbestos, whatever form, was only an issue to those regularly exposed over a very long term measured in years to dust; usually, but not only, the workers with these materials. You must avoid exposure to the asbestos fibres, even a single fibre lodged in the lung can and has been shown to cause a painful death. No it hasn't. What has occurred is that in court it is not possible to prove that one single exposure _did not_ cause asbestos related injury and that it is accepted that mesothelioma is indicative of asbestos exposure. This unusual situation, which makes suing companies without having to prove they caused the injury rather easy, is responsible for the enthusiasm lawyers have for asbestos. Mesothelioma was the best thing to happen to solicitors since the National Coal Board and many have run yachts and educated their children on it for years. Mesothelioma can in fact come from a number of sources, it is common in some areas of Turkey where there are high natural occurrences of Erionite, one of the zeolites. Asbestos isn't particularly special, it follows much the same dose/exposure/response relationship as many harmful substances. It makes sense to minimise exposure, it makes no sense to _worry_ about occasional exposure - you get it every day. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Aug 4, 11:27*pm, Fred wrote:
Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! But asbestos *is* just as dangerous as radioactivity. - Exposure can cause cancer - There are different sorts, some of which are more dangerous than others - If you are exposed to a lot of it, you are more likely to suffer - If you are exposed to it for a long time, you are more likely to suffer - There is a detectable amount of it in the natural environment .... so now you just need to be more relaxed about radioactiviy too :-) |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Aug 5, 1:21*pm, Martin Bonner wrote:
On Aug 4, 11:27*pm, Fred wrote: Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! But asbestos *is* just as dangerous as radioactivity. but tiles containing asbestos *are not* as dangerous as radioactive ones might be. MBQ |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
"Man at B&Q" wrote in message ... On Aug 5, 1:21 pm, Martin Bonner wrote: On Aug 4, 11:27 pm, Fred wrote: Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! But asbestos *is* just as dangerous as radioactivity. but tiles containing asbestos *are not* as dangerous as radioactive ones might be. But some tiles are radioactive. Even some worktops are radioactive and people prepare food on them. MBQ |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:17:48 +0100, "Clot"
wrote: We are going through another one of these paranoid stages with mercury at present. I suspect that this round of paranoia is being wound up by both the waste industry re striplight disposal and all the future disposal of all these energy efficient CFLs and dental fillings and barometers! |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
Fred wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:26:46 +0100, Peter Parry wrote: Breaking up floor tiles and dancing on the remains is unlikely to come anywhere near either of these levels. Indeed a single journey on the tube would probably expose you to more asbestos dust. Thanks for such an informative reply. I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek when I talked about radioactive floor tiles but I agree that both asbestos and radioactivity are perfectly safe if handled properly. The problem with asbestos seems to be that there is so much contradictory advice, people like me don't know which is correct. This thread is a good example with some people saying there is only a risk from long term exposure and other people arguing one fibre is fatal. The consensus is that the risk from floor tiles is minimal and so, wearing a mask, I lifted them as carefully as I could. Some of them were not glued down very well so lifted whole and easily. Some were stuck firmer and snapped, which was a worry, but I have been reassured by the posts here that I shouldn't worry too much. I have read that we get daily exposure to asbestos. Where does it come from? You mentioned the tube: do they use it in the brake linings still? What about above ground? Is it just fibres floating from natural sources and worn brake linings? I wouldn't have thought there would be any asbestos brakes left by now? Generally dust from former and current uses. I've no idea of the relative proportions. Asbestos cement sheets in garden sheds and garages, dust still knocking about from old brakes, fireproof claddings of buildings, demolition - though this seems to be well controlled where significant amounts are identified. Any other offers? workers were almost certain to suffer, and also a good chance of their family too, if they took overalls home to wash. Why were the families affected: were the overalls especially dusty or was it a low exposure over a very long time that proved dangerous? Yes to both. |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
Fred wrote:
On Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:17:48 +0100, "Clot" wrote: We are going through another one of these paranoid stages with mercury at present. I suspect that this round of paranoia is being wound up by both the waste industry re striplight disposal and all the future disposal of all these energy efficient CFLs and dental fillings and barometers! Indeed; the amount generated in crematoria is calculated to rise until about 2030 and thereafter decline, I seem to recall reading in a report. Many folk being cremated today have few teeth but the proportion of folk with teeth and fillings is expected to rise until 2030. That's only old barometers. You can't get new ones using mercury. Emissions from coal- fired power stations. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
On Aug 5, 6:32*pm, "dennis@home"
wrote: "Man at B&Q" wrote in ... On Aug 5, 1:21 pm, Martin Bonner wrote: On Aug 4, 11:27 pm, Fred wrote: Thanks to the reassurance here I have carefully lifted the tiles now.. So thanks again. Before I posted I thought they were as dangerous as radioactive ones! But asbestos *is* just as dangerous as radioactivity. but tiles containing asbestos *are not* as dangerous as radioactive ones might be. But some tiles are radioactive. Even some worktops are radioactive and people prepare food on them. Your point is? MBQ |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
In article ,
Peter Parry wrote: Why were the families affected: were the overalls especially dusty or was it a low exposure over a very long time that proved dangerous? Especially dusty and long period. The roads around asbestos factories often looked as if it had been snowing there was so much waste blowing around. Seem to recall a woman in Yorkshire (?) winning a compensation claim some 10-20years ago. The judgement was along the lines that a (traditional type) housewife doing her bloke's laundry when he came home from the asbestos factory, had developed an industrial disease, even though she'd never worked in a factory herself John -- John Mulrooney NOTE Email address IS correct but might not be checked for a while. I bet being with gamblers anonymous will work this time |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
asbestos?
Fred wrote:
On Wed, 05 Aug 2009 10:26:46 +0100, Peter Parry wrote: Breaking up floor tiles and dancing on the remains is unlikely to come anywhere near either of these levels. Indeed a single journey on the tube would probably expose you to more asbestos dust. Thanks for such an informative reply. I was being a bit tongue-in-cheek when I talked about radioactive floor tiles but I agree that both asbestos and radioactivity are perfectly safe if handled properly. The problem with asbestos seems to be that there is so much contradictory advice, people like me don't know which is correct. This thread is a good example with some people saying there is only a risk from long term exposure and other people arguing one fibre is fatal. Its precisely teh same with radiatioon. One particle of plutonium lodged in the wrong place in your lungs will kill you eventually. BUT its extremely unlikely. Unless you are regularly around it. Its the same with any statistical stuff. It only takes one car to kill you, but if you regularly jaywalk down a motorway, its a lot more likely. That's one aspect of the statistics. The other aspect is that there may be a limit - like with poisons, where your body fails to eliminate the offending substance, goes down fats and gets overwhelmed The consensus is that the risk from floor tiles is minimal and so, wearing a mask, I lifted them as carefully as I could. Some of them were not glued down very well so lifted whole and easily. Some were stuck firmer and snapped, which was a worry, but I have been reassured by the posts here that I shouldn't worry too much. I have read that we get daily exposure to asbestos. Where does it come from? You mentioned the tube: do they use it in the brake linings still? What about above ground? Is it just fibres floating from natural sources and worn brake linings? I wouldn't have thought there would be any asbestos brakes left by now? There is virtually no asbestos being used anywhere anymore. Better things exist at less risk. workers were almost certain to suffer, and also a good chance of their family too, if they took overalls home to wash. Why were the families affected: were the overalls especially dusty or was it a low exposure over a very long time that proved dangerous? yes. Its the long term exposure that seems to be the damaging thing. Thanks. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
DryLok over Asbestos Tile? (or how to waterproof over asbestos tile) | Home Repair | |||
Asbestos | UK diy | |||
What is it, asbestos? | UK diy | |||
Asbestos - what do you do? | UK diy | |||
Is it asbestos? | UK diy |