Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello,
I have just removed the wallpaper ready to redecorate. It looks as though at some point in the past (1) the plaster was painted. At a later point, (2) the paint must have been papered over. Then this paper was (3) removed and took half of the paint off with it. It seems whoever lived here at the time then (4) emulsioned over the wall and (5) papered on top. I have just removed this paper. I am concerned that the jagged patches of paint from (2) and (3) will show through my new paper. I think the new paper is much thinner that what I have taken off and I know from using it in other parts of the house, it is not very tolerant of anything left on the wall behind it. I'm thinking that lining the wall with lining paper might be the easiest way forward. What do you think? Is there another way to remove the paint (2) under the paint (4)? I was wondering whether it could sand off, but that would take longer than lining it, I think. I'm not sure a wire brush and the group favorite: angle grinder, would help as it might be too harsh and damage the plaster too. I can't steam it effectively because the jagged paint is underneath a second coat of paint. Thanks in advance, Stephen. |
#2
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen coughed up some electrons that declared:
Hello, I have just removed the wallpaper ready to redecorate. It looks as though at some point in the past (1) the plaster was painted. At a later point, (2) the paint must have been papered over. Then this paper was (3) removed and took half of the paint off with it. It seems whoever lived here at the time then (4) emulsioned over the wall and (5) papered on top. I have just removed this paper. I am concerned that the jagged patches of paint from (2) and (3) will show through my new paper. I think the new paper is much thinner that what I have taken off and I know from using it in other parts of the house, it is not very tolerant of anything left on the wall behind it. I'm thinking that lining the wall with lining paper might be the easiest way forward. What do you think? Is there another way to remove the paint (2) under the paint (4)? I was wondering whether it could sand off, but that would take longer than lining it, I think. I'm not sure a wire brush and the group favorite: angle grinder, would help as it might be too harsh and damage the plaster too. I can't steam it effectively because the jagged paint is underneath a second coat of paint. Thanks in advance, Stephen. Perhaps an orbital sander might blend the paint edges in enough. Otherwise lining paper would be the normal solution. Have you enough spare new paper just to hang a piece and see how it turns out when dry? Unless the paper is really thin and fine, I wouldn't normally imagine paint on plaster would show through. Cheers Tim |
#3
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Tim S wrote:
Have you enough spare new paper just to hang a piece and see how it turns out when dry? Unless the paper is really thin and fine, I wouldn't normally imagine paint on plaster would show through. I _thought_ I'd get away with hanging paper over a surface like that - I didn't - it showed through. |
#4
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , Tim S
writes Perhaps an orbital sander might blend the paint edges in enough. Otherwise lining paper would be the normal solution. Need to be wary of doing this if the house is old, possibly lead based paint. Have you enough spare new paper just to hang a piece and see how it turns out when dry? Unless the paper is really thin and fine, I wouldn't normally imagine paint on plaster would show through. Cheers Tim -- Clint Sharp |
#5
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Clint Sharp wrote: Perhaps an orbital sander might blend the paint edges in enough. Otherwise lining paper would be the normal solution. Need to be wary of doing this if the house is old, possibly lead based paint. On a wall? I doubt it. Woodwork, yes. Walls and ceilings used distemper. -- *Why is it that most nudists are people you don't want to see naked?* Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#6
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)"
writes In article , Clint Sharp wrote: Perhaps an orbital sander might blend the paint edges in enough. Otherwise lining paper would be the normal solution. Need to be wary of doing this if the house is old, possibly lead based paint. On a wall? I doubt it. Woodwork, yes. Walls and ceilings used distemper. Wouldn't want to put money on that, I'd definitely do a lead test before sanding it down if it appears to be . Just because it *should* be distemper and lead based pain *should* only be used on woodwork... I've seen painted plaster in houses around here (1930s era) that was definitely not distemper. It's cheap insurance to find out before you start sanding on unknowns. -- Clint Sharp |
#7
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Clint Sharp wrote:
In message , "Dave Plowman (News)" writes In article , Clint Sharp wrote: Perhaps an orbital sander might blend the paint edges in enough. Otherwise lining paper would be the normal solution. Need to be wary of doing this if the house is old, possibly lead based paint. On a wall? I doubt it. Woodwork, yes. Walls and ceilings used distemper. Wouldn't want to put money on that, I'd definitely do a lead test before sanding it down if it appears to be . Just because it *should* be distemper and lead based pain *should* only be used on woodwork... Oh FFS. Lead isn't that poisonous. I've seen painted plaster in houses around here (1930s era) that was definitely not distemper. It wasn't lead either. It's cheap insurance to find out before you start sanding on unknowns. |
#8
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Clint Sharp wrote: On a wall? I doubt it. Woodwork, yes. Walls and ceilings used distemper. Wouldn't want to put money on that, I'd definitely do a lead test before sanding it down if it appears to be . Just because it *should* be distemper and lead based pain *should* only be used on woodwork... How many old houses have you worked on? Lead paint was *far* more expensive than water based stuff and no one with any sense would use it on an ordinary plastered wall. Only one you might find it on is direct to brick. I've seen painted plaster in houses around here (1930s era) that was definitely not distemper. It's cheap insurance to find out before you start sanding on unknowns. My comment applies even more to houses of that era. It makes sense to take precautions when sanding anything. -- *This message has been ROT-13 encrypted twice for extra security * Dave Plowman London SW To e-mail, change noise into sound. |
#9
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen wrote:
Hello, I have just removed the wallpaper ready to redecorate. It looks as though at some point in the past (1) the plaster was painted. At a later point, (2) the paint must have been papered over. Then this paper was (3) removed and took half of the paint off with it. It seems whoever lived here at the time then (4) emulsioned over the wall and (5) papered on top. I have just removed this paper. I am concerned that the jagged patches of paint from (2) and (3) will show through my new paper. I think the new paper is much thinner that what I have taken off and I know from using it in other parts of the house, it is not very tolerant of anything left on the wall behind it. I'm thinking that lining the wall with lining paper might be the easiest way forward. What do you think? Is there another way to remove the paint (2) under the paint (4)? I was wondering whether it could sand off, but that would take longer than lining it, I think. I'm not sure a wire brush and the group favorite: angle grinder, would help as it might be too harsh and damage the plaster too. I can't steam it effectively because the jagged paint is underneath a second coat of paint. Thanks in advance, Stephen. Polyskim and a sander is your fiend |
#10
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
We were somewhere around Barstow, on the edge of the desert, when the
drugs began to take hold. I remember The Natural Philosopher saying something like: Polyskim and a sander is your fiend Rough little devil. |
#11
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Stephen wrote:
Hello, I have just removed the wallpaper ready to redecorate. It looks as though at some point in the past (1) the plaster was painted. At a later point, (2) the paint must have been papered over. Then this paper was (3) removed and took half of the paint off with it. It seems whoever lived here at the time then (4) emulsioned over the wall and (5) papered on top. I have just removed this paper. I am concerned that the jagged patches of paint from (2) and (3) will show through my new paper. I think the new paper is much thinner that what I have taken off and I know from using it in other parts of the house, it is not very tolerant of anything left on the wall behind it. I'm thinking that lining the wall with lining paper might be the easiest way forward. What do you think? Is there another way to remove the paint (2) under the paint (4)? Heavy duty lining paper, no question. -- Dave - The Medway Handyman www.medwayhandyman.co.uk |
#12
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The Medway Handyman wrote:
Stephen wrote: Hello, I have just removed the wallpaper ready to redecorate. It looks as though at some point in the past (1) the plaster was painted. At a later point, (2) the paint must have been papered over. Then this paper was (3) removed and took half of the paint off with it. It seems whoever lived here at the time then (4) emulsioned over the wall and (5) papered on top. I have just removed this paper. I am concerned that the jagged patches of paint from (2) and (3) will show through my new paper. I think the new paper is much thinner that what I have taken off and I know from using it in other parts of the house, it is not very tolerant of anything left on the wall behind it. I'm thinking that lining the wall with lining paper might be the easiest way forward. What do you think? Is there another way to remove the paint (2) under the paint (4)? Heavy duty lining paper, no question. Or skim with filler if your plastering skills are up to it. I prefer it to the Polyskim finish and it holds up very well in a thin layer. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
What a surprise... | UK diy | |||
Floral Surprise | Home Repair | |||
Removing wallpaper border from painted (vinyl?) wallpaper | UK diy | |||
What's your most unpleasant DIY task | UK diy | |||
What's your most unpleasant DIY task | UK diy |