Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
![]() |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
![]()
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I am about to convert my standard open vented DHW system with indirect
tank to a HeatBank system following the wiki @ http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php?title=DIY_Heat_Bank - many thanks to John Stumbles for that. While trying to figure out what specification I require for the plate heat exchanger, I happened upon this article, which suggests hot water should be *distributed* as well as stored at 60degC. http://www.bsee.co.uk/news/fullstory..._is_vital.html DHW storage is not an issue with the Heat Bank idea. However, is it really neccessary to distribute water at this temperature? The same article suggests that water 45degC can cause serious scalding; I have been figuring on using a TMV just after the output from the PHE secondary to mix the hot down to a max of 50degC lets say, rather than 60degC. As I get about 30l/min flow from th rising main, to be able to guarantee my DHW is at 60degC, would mean either a very high Heat Bank/ PHE primary temperature ie probably 80degC, or a really high ouput PHE ie 100kW. At the end of the day the environment and costs are an issue; the environment because I don't want to heat the store any hotter than necc (have read in another thread that heatbanks work well with the store as low as 70degC); costs because a the higher output PHEs obviously cost more Thanks Mike |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Legionella in vented system? | UK diy | |||
Legionella & Flexible Tap Hoses | UK diy | |||
Avoiding hed base rot | UK diy | |||
Splitting, avoiding of | Woodworking | |||
Avoiding PMI via 80/15/5 - follow up | Home Ownership |