Hi all

Hoping for some clarification and opinions here please.

Some syphons are advertised with the wording "can be used as internal
overflow" associated.
Does this mean that water is expected to overflow through the syphon?
Therefore the max level will be a bit higher than the underside of the top
horizontal "leg" IYSWIM.
So for this to work, the height of the syphon will be dicated by the height
of the cistern and the required max water level in it?

What are the implications of fitting a shorter (less tall) syphon, if the
previously installed model actually stuck above the top of the cistern wall?
Is it simply that the water will have been lifted maybe 6" more so the
velocity will be slightly less into the pan?


Is anyone using the Torbeck Variflush valve as an alternative.
This looks like a hybrid arrangement (incorporating an external float) when
compared to the sleeker, but far more expensive, offerings from Grohe and
Geberit.
Any comments on the Torbeck gratefully received as they are available from
Screwfix at £10.50.
Is the button quality OK? Will the button and flush valve last?

TIA

Phil

On Fri, 18 May 2007 15:22:58 +0100, "TheScullster"
wrote:


Any comments on the Torbeck gratefully received as they are available from
Screwfix at £10.50.
Is the button quality OK? Will the button and flush valve last?

It's also available from BES Ltd for £7.52 http://tinyurl.com/27ao6b
I'd hope you get some responses to your other questions, as I'm
interested in them too.

Jim

TheScullster wrote:

Is anyone using the Torbeck Variflush valve as an alternative.
This looks like a hybrid arrangement (incorporating an external float)
when compared to the sleeker, but far more expensive, offerings from Grohe
and Geberit.
Any comments on the Torbeck gratefully received as they are available from
Screwfix at £10.50.
Is the button quality OK? *Will the button and flush valve last?

Just fitted one of these (Screwfix 43148) a few weeks ago. The main reason
was that the toilet was originally installed with absolutely no overflow
and the layout of the house is such that adding an external overflow now
isn't an option.

It performs OK, it leaves more water in the cistern than the original syphon
did so even the full flush is less volume than before but seems to have
more force so it still does the job. It's described as "dual flush" but you
can think of it as "triple flush" because you can get an even larger flush
(nearly as much as the old syphon) by keeping your finger on the button
until it stops.

For a full flush the central blue plunger rises to a point where it's held
by a catch which is released when the float falls far enough as the water
runs out. The size of the full flush is adjusted by moving the float up or
down it's rod. Keeping the button pressed stops the valve from falling when
the float releases it, hence the even longer flush. The button for the
short flush only raises the plunger part way so it starts to go down
straight away. The small blue lever at the bottom opens up some extra holes
inside providing some adjustment for the size of the small flush but I
don't understand how this actually achieves it.

Too early to comment on reliability but the mechanism is remarkably simple
so hopefully there's not much to go wrong. Allegedly this type of flush is
inclined to leak after a while, apparently due to limescale build-up but
our water is very soft so I'm hoping we'll be OK in that respect.

Fitting was simple and straightforward, I used a new doughnut seal (Screwfix
17405) between the close coupled cistern and toilet - the old one looked
like it might have still been OK but I didn't fancy having to remove and
refit the cistern if the old joint leaked afterwards with the old ring.

The hollow blue plunger acts as a large bore internal overflow and needs
cutting down to the desired height, it will easily cope with a full flow of
water from a complete failure of the float valve.

The lightweight "chrome plated" plastic button looks a bit on the cheap side
but seems OK.

--
Mike Clarke

"Mike Clarke" wrote

Just fitted one of these (Screwfix 43148) a few weeks ago. The main reason
was that the toilet was originally installed with absolutely no overflow
and the layout of the house is such that adding an external overflow now
isn't an option.

It performs OK, it leaves more water in the cistern than the original
syphon
did so even the full flush is less volume than before but seems to have
more force so it still does the job. It's described as "dual flush" but
you
can think of it as "triple flush" because you can get an even larger flush
(nearly as much as the old syphon) by keeping your finger on the button
until it stops.

For a full flush the central blue plunger rises to a point where it's held
by a catch which is released when the float falls far enough as the water
runs out. The size of the full flush is adjusted by moving the float up or
down it's rod. Keeping the button pressed stops the valve from falling
when
the float releases it, hence the even longer flush. The button for the
short flush only raises the plunger part way so it starts to go down
straight away. The small blue lever at the bottom opens up some extra
holes
inside providing some adjustment for the size of the small flush but I
don't understand how this actually achieves it.

Too early to comment on reliability but the mechanism is remarkably simple
so hopefully there's not much to go wrong. Allegedly this type of flush is
inclined to leak after a while, apparently due to limescale build-up but
our water is very soft so I'm hoping we'll be OK in that respect.

Fitting was simple and straightforward, I used a new doughnut seal
(Screwfix
17405) between the close coupled cistern and toilet - the old one looked
like it might have still been OK but I didn't fancy having to remove and
refit the cistern if the old joint leaked afterwards with the old ring.

The hollow blue plunger acts as a large bore internal overflow and needs
cutting down to the desired height, it will easily cope with a full flow
of
water from a complete failure of the float valve.

The lightweight "chrome plated" plastic button looks a bit on the cheap
side
but seems OK.

Mike

Thanks for the informative response.
ISWYM about the float arrangement leaving water in the bottom of the
cistern.
Also appreciate the comment on the plastic chrome button - might not get
passed the clerk of works that one (er indoors)

Phil

thescullster wrote:

Also appreciate the comment on the plastic chrome button - might not get
passed the clerk of works that one (er indoors)

Her opinion shouldn't count as much as yours, on the grounds that she always
sits with her back to it when she's there.

Actually it's not too bad considering it's only plastic, in some ways a bit
neater than a clunky big handle.

--
Mike Clarke