Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Well, the time has finally come to shift most of the computers out into
the garage (apparently). Having already got enough power out there I need to put in a fat data pipe to connect the lot to the house switch - cat5e will do nicely because I have lots. Wireless is an absolute worst case scenario both for speed and price and we need to connect to the servers for data (video/music etc). The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? I'm aware that pushing it through the same conduit as the power is a no-go and I really don't want to dig up the drive unless I have to. I suppose I could take it under a patio and through some of the lawn if I must. On top of that I naturally don't want to spend very much time or effort. Chips. -- ----------- Chips'll make it better. ----------- |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
The message
from Chips contains these words: Any suggestions for running the cable ? Anything wrong with wireless? -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Guy King wrote:
The message from Chips contains these words: Any suggestions for running the cable ? Anything wrong with wireless? Other than the OP says he doesn't want it - worst case (cost / bandwidth). .... on the other hand, I can stream 720p HD to the XBox-360 on 802.11g |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
The message
from Mike Dodd contains these words: Any suggestions for running the cable ? Anything wrong with wireless? Other than the OP says he doesn't want it - worst case (cost / bandwidth). Well, it's not /that/ expensive, and some systems do vast bandwidths these days. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Guy King wrote:
The message from Mike Dodd contains these words: Any suggestions for running the cable ? Anything wrong with wireless? Other than the OP says he doesn't want it - worst case (cost / bandwidth). Well, it's not /that/ expensive, and some systems do vast bandwidths these days. So how much is a wireless link that goes as fast as Gigabit ethernet? Gigabit routers are now quite cheap (I bought my 8 port one for about £70) and many motherboards have Gigabit NICs built in. -- Chris Green |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Chips wrote :
The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? Catenary wire supporting a length of 20mm plastic conduit? -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
"Chips" wrote... Well, the time has finally come to shift most of the computers out into the garage (apparently). Having already got enough power out there I need to put in a fat data pipe to connect the lot to the house switch - cat5e will do nicely because I have lots. Wireless is an absolute worst case scenario both for speed and price and we need to connect to the servers for data (video/music etc). The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? I'm aware that pushing it through the same conduit as the power is a no-go and I really don't want to dig up the drive unless I have to. I suppose I could take it under a patio and through some of the lawn if I must. On top of that I naturally don't want to spend very much time or effort. How about a pair of fibre media convertors and a short run of multimode fibre in the conduit with the power? Even figure-8 patch cord will do for this short a distance. You get: 1) Noise immunity as the power won't interfere with the light; 2) Electrical isolation; 3) Lightning protection; 4) A Very Cool Thing to brag about ;o) They're available in 10M, 100M and 1Gbit versions, depending on how fat a pipe you want... prices depend on whether you scour Ebay/IT surplus outlets etc. or buy new (ouch!), but start around £25 each if you're lucky. BTW, cat5e cable isn't specified for immersion or wet environments, and can/will be permeable to groundwater, resulting in Horrible Corrosion and Degradation and eventual loss of its signal-carrying abilities, so don't bury it ( Dave H. (The engineer formerly known as Homeless) (...who has a pair of fibre-connected Ethernet switches to get to his garage - geek, eh?) |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
On 2006-05-22, Dave H. wrote:
"Chips" wrote... Well, the time has finally come to shift most of the computers out into the garage (apparently). Having already got enough power out there I need to put in a fat data pipe to connect the lot to the house switch - cat5e will do nicely because I have lots. Wireless is an absolute worst case scenario both for speed and price and we need to connect to the servers for data (video/music etc). ....... How about a pair of fibre media convertors and a short run of multimode fibre in the conduit with the power? Even figure-8 patch cord will do for this short a distance. ....... Whatever you end up doing (personally I'd go with an optical solution), I would suggest you run some redundant circuits, either down the same conduit or in a parallel channel. It's easier to do this now all in one go than to have to start digging up the garden if you get a failure in the future. Oh yes, don't forget to label the corresponding ends with a permanent marker :-) Pete -- .................................................. ......................... .. never trust a man who, when left alone ...... Pete Lynch . .. in a room with a tea cosy ...... Marlow, England . .. doesn't try it on (Billy Connolly) ..................................... |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
I know that Comms wiring practise does not recc. for running copper
comms between buildings due to risk of electrical faults, lightning strikes etc. The approved way is fibre (as mentioned) Why not use WiFi 802.11g will give you 54Mbs or up top 100 Mb if you use HSM compatible devices. or go nuts and use pre-N |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Osprey wrote:
I know that Comms wiring practise does not recc. for running copper comms between buildings due to risk of electrical faults, lightning strikes etc. Ah. Thats prolly why my comms here is over 2 miles of copper..underground. The approved way is fibre (as mentioned) Why not use WiFi 802.11g will give you 54Mbs or up top 100 Mb if you use HSM compatible devices. Cos its crap? Fibre is the best answer. To this particular set of specs. or go nuts and use pre-N |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
You missed the point ... the exchange running copper to you is one
thing, it's earthed at a single point. If you run copper comms from your house to an out building there is a proscribed risk due to linking of earth paths in the event of the mains losing it's earth ... or in event of lightning strike. |
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Well proven even before WWII: even buried wires suffer from direct
lightning strikes like overhead cables. Even before WWII, both underground and overhead wires were properly earthed when entering a building - and therefore damage from lightning was routinely averted. Technology is that old and that well proven. An October 1960 paper in Bell System Technical Journal from Bodle and Gresh desribes standard protection. Their question was whether buried and overhead wire protection - generations standard even before 1960 - was sufficient for semiconductors: The problem of protecting apparatus against lightnng surges from connection transmision facilities has become more complex with the use of solid state devicesin apparatus design. ... The results of this field investigation and supplemental laboratory surge tests indicate that in well shielded underground cable pairs, electrical surges do not exceed approximately 90 volts peak ... In aerial and buried cable, however, transistorized apparatus requries protection up to the full sparkover potential ... to about 600 volts peak. Those who never learned basic protection techniqes then recommend expensive solutions such as fiber optics. Any connection between buildings - as has been standard practices for most of the past 100 years - enters and earths all utility and communication wires at a common service entrance. Makes little difference if wire is 2km above or below earth. It still requires well proven and standard protection. The Natural Philosopher wrote: Osprey wrote: I know that Comms wiring practise does not recc. for running copper comms between buildings due to risk of electrical faults, lightning strikes etc. Ah. Thats prolly why my comms here is over 2 miles of copper..underground. ... Fibre is the best answer. To this particular set of specs. ... |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
On 30 May 2006 02:20:54 -0700 someone who may be "w_tom"
wrote this:- Any connection between buildings - as has been standard practices for most of the past 100 years - enters and earths all utility and communication wires at a common service entrance. Those who never learned basic wiring practices then recommend potentially dangerous "solutions" such as earthing communications cables. This exposes the communications cable and those in contact with it to all sorts of dangers. There is a difference between functional earths and protective conductors, which is why the cables concerned are identified by different colours. I mention this in case anyone is foolish enough to believe what you typed and act on it. They should instead understand the difference, contact the owner of the cable and follow BS 7671. -- David Hansen, Edinburgh I will *always* explain revoked encryption keys, unless RIP prevents me http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/00023--e.htm#54 |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Everything as posted conforms to both BS7671 and BS6651. If David
really had a problem with what was posted, then he would have defined specific problems. He did not. He just posted BS numbers with no reference to what creates dangers. Accurately noted and specifically defined by BS6651: Even before WWII, both underground and overhead wires were properly earthed when entering a building - and therefore damage from lightning was routinely averted. Earthing is essential to transient protection and also necessary to protect occupants in one building from electrical failures in another building. Communication cables must be earthed at the service entrance as even defined by BS6651 to protect electronics within that building AND to protect human life. Protective conductors also make a same earthing connection for human safety. David Hansen wrote: On 30 May 2006 02:20:54 -0700 someone who may be "w_tom" wrote this:- Any connection between buildings - as has been standard practices for most of the past 100 years - enters and earths all utility and communication wires at a common service entrance. Those who never learned basic wiring practices then recommend potentially dangerous "solutions" such as earthing communications cables. This exposes the communications cable and those in contact with it to all sorts of dangers. There is a difference between functional earths and protective conductors, which is why the cables concerned are identified by different colours. I mention this in case anyone is foolish enough to believe what you typed and act on it. They should instead understand the difference, contact the owner of the cable and follow BS 7671. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
w_tom wrote: Those who never learned basic protection techniqes then recommend expensive solutions such as fiber optics. The Natural Philosopher wrote: Osprey wrote: I know that Comms wiring practise does not recc. for running copper comms between buildings due to risk of electrical faults, lightning strikes etc. Ah. Thats prolly why my comms here is over 2 miles of copper..underground. ... Fibre is the best answer. To this particular set of specs. ... The problem is that your average d-i-yer, who can put up a set of shelves, is actively discouraged by Part P from gaining any understanding of electrical installations, and as a result, is unlikely even to be aware of the need for earthing of data communications cables, let alone how to do it properly. At least using fiber-optic cables is fail safe (electrically), and not especially expensive. Think of the extra cost as being an insurance premium against ignorance. Personally, I too would favour the use of fibre-optic - always remembering not to look into the laser with the remaining eye. Sid |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
There is a mail order company called Tait Components who do external
cat5 or you could use 2x dlink wireless bridges DWL-2000AP+ with a couple of external arials. using the fibre with dlink fibre media converters would also work. Running the fibre, might find it difficult getting through the conduit where your power cable is. |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
"Chips" wrote in message ... Well, the time has finally come to shift most of the computers out into the garage (apparently). Having already got enough power out there I need to put in a fat data pipe to connect the lot to the house switch - cat5e will do nicely because I have lots. Wireless is an absolute worst case scenario both for speed and price and we need to connect to the servers for data (video/music etc). The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? I'm aware that pushing it through the same conduit as the power is a no-go and I really don't want to dig up the drive unless I have to. I suppose I could take it under a patio and through some of the lawn if I must. On top of that I naturally don't want to spend very much time or effort. My solution to running telephone, data and an air line between two buildings a couple of metres apart was a piece of 100mm square 6mm wall steel tube 3m above ground. Colin Bignell |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
"Chips" wrote in message ... snip If you don't want wireless, then fibre is definately the way to go. If 100Mb/s would hack it, then a couple of D-link or ATI media converters shouldn't cost too much. If space in the conduit is a problem, make sure you use use fibe with ST connectors these are only about 1/4" diameter and you can always split the figure of eight "cable" so that you can feed them through individualy. if push comes to shove, you could probably isolate, disconnect and remove the mains, pull the fibre in and then pull the mains back in. Check the fibre is ok first!! |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
|
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
The message
from "nightjar" nightjar@insert my surname here.uk.com contains these words: My solution to running telephone, data and an air line between two buildings a couple of metres apart was a piece of 100mm square 6mm wall steel tube 3m above ground. Don't you thing 1/4" thick walls was a bit OTT? To span a couple of meters a bit of plastic drain pipe would have been fine. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
"Guy King" wrote in message ... The message from "nightjar" nightjar@insert my surname here.uk.com contains these words: My solution to running telephone, data and an air line between two buildings a couple of metres apart was a piece of 100mm square 6mm wall steel tube 3m above ground. Don't you thing 1/4" thick walls was a bit OTT? To span a couple of meters a bit of plastic drain pipe would have been fine. The bloke in the factory next door used the stuff to make playground equipment, so it had the advantage of being free. Colin Bignell |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
The message
from "nightjar" nightjar@insert my surname here.uk.com contains these words: The bloke in the factory next door used the stuff to make playground equipment, so it had the advantage of being free. Don't suppose you've got any more? I've used a fair bit to make the climbing frame, but the kids keep pestering me to get the welder out and add more. -- Skipweasel Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain. |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
"Guy King" wrote in message ... The message from "nightjar" nightjar@insert my surname here.uk.com contains these words: The bloke in the factory next door used the stuff to make playground equipment, so it had the advantage of being free. Don't suppose you've got any more? I've used a fair bit to make the climbing frame, but the kids keep pestering me to get the welder out and add more. He retired a couple of years back, so I don't have access to the stuff anymore. Colin Bignell |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Chips wrote: Well, the time has finally come to shift most of the computers out into the garage (apparently). Having already got enough power out there I need to put in a fat data pipe to connect the lot to the house switch - cat5e will do nicely because I have lots. Wireless is an absolute worst case scenario both for speed and price and we need to connect to the servers for data (video/music etc). The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? I'm aware that pushing it through the same conduit as the power is a no-go and I really don't want to dig up the drive unless I have to. I suppose I could take it under a patio and through some of the lawn if I must. On top of that I naturally don't want to spend very much time or effort. Chips. -- ----------- Chips'll make it better. ----------- Stick your cat5e in the conduit with the power - you won't get any problems. In industry, it's rarely possible to get any separation of the two - I've never had a problem. |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Phil wrote:
Chips wrote: Well, the time has finally come to shift most of the computers out into the garage (apparently). Having already got enough power out there I need to put in a fat data pipe to connect the lot to the house switch - cat5e will do nicely because I have lots. Wireless is an absolute worst case scenario both for speed and price and we need to connect to the servers for data (video/music etc). The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? I'm aware that pushing it through the same conduit as the power is a no-go and I really don't want to dig up the drive unless I have to. I suppose I could take it under a patio and through some of the lawn if I must. On top of that I naturally don't want to spend very much time or effort. Chips. -- ----------- Chips'll make it better. ----------- Stick your cat5e in the conduit with the power - you won't get any problems. In industry, it's rarely possible to get any separation of the two - I've never had a problem. It won't conform to the IEE wiring regulations though, they require either 50mm separation or 'physical' separation which seems to mean in practice a divider in the conduit/trunking. I agree that it will almost certainly work perfectly well. -- Chris Green |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
|
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
So? The IEE won't be inspecting it. Presumably the power installation has already been passed. It will work perfectly well, but that does not mean it is safe. Probably the only inspection will be after someone is killed or injured should the insulation fail and 240v get onto the CAT5. -- Regards, Harry (M1BYT) (L) http://www.ukradioamateur.co.uk So two layers of double insulation laid in a conduit are going to fail? At the same instant that someone makes accidental contact? |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
On Tue, 23 May 2006 08:26:44 UTC, "Phil"
wrote: It won't conform to the IEE wiring regulations though, they require either 50mm separation or 'physical' separation which seems to mean in practice a divider in the conduit/trunking. I agree that it will almost certainly work perfectly well. -- Chris Green So? The IEE won't be inspecting it. Presumably the power installation has already been passed. pedant Especially since the IEE doesn't exist any more! :-) /pedant -- The information contained in this post is copyright the poster, and specifically may not be published in, or used by Avenue Supplies, http://avenuesupplies.co.uk |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Phil wrote:
wrote: Stick your cat5e in the conduit with the power - you won't get any problems. In industry, it's rarely possible to get any separation of the two - I've never had a problem. It won't conform to the IEE wiring regulations though, they require either 50mm separation or 'physical' separation which seems to mean in practice a divider in the conduit/trunking. I agree that it will almost certainly work perfectly well. -- Chris Green So? The IEE won't be inspecting it. Presumably the power installation has already been passed. You *might* have trouble if/when you sell the house, it would need a thorough survey to spot it though. I agree totally that it almost certainly wouldn't be an issue though. -- Chris Green |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
|
#32
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
|
#33
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
T i m wrote:
As if any 250V is going to 'escape' from (say) some SWA, through 3 layers of insulation and a bundle of steel (earthed) wires then melt through another two layers of insulation to get to the Cat5 copper wires (that are optically isolated anyway) ... shrug. Cat 5 is not optically isolated. Ethernet uses pulse transformers. I hope the rest of what you said is correct. Who actually has the stats re deaths through such failings and how much greater is the risk to anyone else (other than the installer in most cases) than say driving / smoking / overeating / stabbing or boredom from reading through bucket loads of well meaning but OTT (for most of us sensible people) regs ..? All the best .. T i m |
#34
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
On Tue, 23 May 2006 18:46:19 GMT, "dennis@home"
wrote: T i m wrote: As if any 250V is going to 'escape' from (say) some SWA, through 3 layers of insulation and a bundle of steel (earthed) wires then melt through another two layers of insulation to get to the Cat5 copper wires (that are optically isolated anyway) ... shrug. Cat 5 is not optically isolated. Ethernet uses pulse transformers. Ok, 'isolated' .. (the line drivers i used to repair were 'optically isolated', typically run over what used to be called an EPS8 ccts I think?) but the spirit of what I was saying remains. I hope the rest of what you said is correct. Pass? ;-) All the best .. T i m |
#35
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Phil wrote:
Chips wrote: Well, the time has finally come to shift most of the computers out into the garage (apparently). Having already got enough power out there I need to put in a fat data pipe to connect the lot to the house switch - cat5e will do nicely because I have lots. Wireless is an absolute worst case scenario both for speed and price and we need to connect to the servers for data (video/music etc). The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? I'm aware that pushing it through the same conduit as the power is a no-go and I really don't want to dig up the drive unless I have to. I suppose I could take it under a patio and through some of the lawn if I must. On top of that I naturally don't want to spend very much time or effort. Chips. -- ----------- Chips'll make it better. ----------- Stick your cat5e in the conduit with the power - you won't get any problems. In industry, it's rarely possible to get any separation of the two - I've never had a problem. I know this to be true having worked in numerous University retro-fitted buildings. However, it's known to be unsafe and I know that it'd be picked up when/if we sell - just my luck that is. For those who are suggesting wireless - I have experience with it and I know that it will present more hassles than it's worth. There are the security issues too. No point in physically securing an outbuilding then blasting your data to everyone within 100m. Fibre looks best but I'm a bit iffy about some of the radii between here and there. I'll go and check the specs. Chips. -- ----------- Chips'll make it better. ----------- |
#36
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
On Tue, 23 May 2006 13:56:00 +0100, Chips wrote:
Stick your cat5e in the conduit with the power - you won't get any problems. In industry, it's rarely possible to get any separation of the two - I've never had a problem. I know this to be true having worked in numerous University retro-fitted buildings. However, it's known to be unsafe and I know that it'd be picked up when/if we sell - just my luck that is. Possibly (my luck as well) ;-( For those who are suggesting wireless - I have experience with it and I know that it will present more hassles than it's worth. Hmm, I know Wireless can have it's issues but set up properly can also be fine (most folk don't actually need Terabit networking as they are only browsing the web over it at ~2Mb/s) ? There are the security issues too. True, but can be locked down pretty tight with some simple proceedures ... and unless you have any secrets ... ;-) No point in physically securing an outbuilding then blasting your data to everyone within 100m. Indeed, so use a pair of directional aerials facing each other then you will only be blasting data at a much narrower selection ;-) Fibre looks best but I'm a bit iffy about some of the radii between here and there. I'll go and check the specs. Armoured Cat5, tack it to the fence, drape it out the way as a temp measure .. It'll be easier to pull out the way when you move in 15 years time .. ;-) http://tinyurl.com/pr97z All the best .. T i m |
#37
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Chips wrote:
snip I know this to be true having worked in numerous University retro-fitted buildings. However, it's known to be unsafe and I know that it'd be picked up when/if we sell - just my luck that is. It's known to be unsafe - for very small values of 'unsafe'. Yes, if the rats chew the cables, or the mains cables insulation melts through, the network cabling can become live. How likely is that in practice though. If it was me - and in fact it is - as I'm doing a similar thing. Buy two small network hubs. Fit these inside the boxes where the conduit terminates. Connect the shield of the cat5 cable to the earth of the RCD, in such a manner that if any current flows in the shield, it'll trip off the RCD. Connect the outside world to the cable through the conduit via the hubs. Cat5 hubs are electrically isolated, with typical isolation ratings of a kilovolt or so on the isolation transformers. Stick a label in there saying "In the event of multiple faults, this network cable may be live". |
#38
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Running Cat5e cable underground
Chips wrote:
The garage is not connected to the house and is separated by about 3m of paving/drive/whatnot. Any suggestions for running the cable ? Galvanised conduit (25mm). |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Coax cable carries electrical current? What is wrong? | Home Repair | |||
Running new cable through or under joists? | Home Repair | |||
slightly OT NTL/Telewest cable descrambler | UK diy | |||
Is it OK to put standard "twin & earth" cable directly into the cavity of a dwarf wall? | UK diy | |||
Routeing Electrical FTE cable | UK diy |