Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
UK diy (uk.d-i-y) For the discussion of all topics related to diy (do-it-yourself) in the UK. All levels of experience and proficency are welcome to join in to ask questions or offer solutions. |
Reply |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Hi Folks,
Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? The word "taper" implies a gradual reduction to my mind, but this doesn't square with the whole purpose of a thread. Reason behind this is my researching an alternative set of tails for a bar mixer for a power shower. I've bought a 3 bar pump and the book tells me to run the output in 22mm as far as practical. We picked up all the fittings for our new en-suite in the sales in January, and it's only now that I've got round to taking a closer look at the plumbing. My plan is to run a pair of 22mm copper pipes down a stud wall cavity and then turn these out ninety degrees into the shower bay and connect to the mixer bar. The mixer bar comes with a pair of dog-leg fittings - three quarters bsp male on one end, half inch bsp male on the other. When you look inside the dog-leg the aperture is (roughly) ten millimetres. From a 22mm pipe down to 10mm feels wasteful, hence this quest to find a better fitting. On my desk is a 22mm female to three-quarters male straight BSP fitting courtesy of Screwfix. The BSP thread isn't deep enough to attach the mixer bar (the mixer bar nut grounds out before it tightens: no use). Ecstasy would be an elbow joint taking 22mm copper pipe on one end and having (say) a two inch long 3/4" BSP male thread (so I could cut it down if necessary) on the other end. I could even find a nut for the 3/4" thread and attach the fitting to some marine plywood as part of the install (someone here posted a URL of some pictures on how they did this: can't seem to find it - would the owner reply please with the url?) I suppose a 22mm female elbow connecting to a 3/4" bsp female could be of use, especially with some "barrel nipples" (found via another thread here on uk.d-i-y; all the jokes on this phrase also covered too). Any help appreciated; thanks in advance Mungo |
#2
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On 15 Mar 2006 23:50:38 -0800, "Mungo" wrote:
Hi Folks, Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? The word "taper" implies a gradual reduction to my mind, but this doesn't square with the whole purpose of a thread. Taper fittings are often used for fittings involving gases and either PTFE tape or a sealant are used with them. An alternative sometimes used with compressed air for example, are parallel thread fittings with a flange at the top where two flat surfaces meet and an O-ring to seal. Some people do try to use taper male threaded fittings in parallel female fittings again with PTFE tape, but it is not best practice for some applications. For water, parallel threaded fittings are used. Reason behind this is my researching an alternative set of tails for a bar mixer for a power shower. I've bought a 3 bar pump and the book tells me to run the output in 22mm as far as practical. We picked up all the fittings for our new en-suite in the sales in January, and it's only now that I've got round to taking a closer look at the plumbing. My plan is to run a pair of 22mm copper pipes down a stud wall cavity and then turn these out ninety degrees into the shower bay and connect to the mixer bar. The mixer bar comes with a pair of dog-leg fittings - three quarters bsp male on one end, half inch bsp male on the other. When you look inside the dog-leg the aperture is (roughly) ten millimetres. From a 22mm pipe down to 10mm feels wasteful, hence this quest to find a better fitting. On my desk is a 22mm female to three-quarters male straight BSP fitting courtesy of Screwfix. The BSP thread isn't deep enough to attach the mixer bar (the mixer bar nut grounds out before it tightens: no use). Ecstasy would be an elbow joint taking 22mm copper pipe on one end and having (say) a two inch long 3/4" BSP male thread (so I could cut it down if necessary) on the other end. I could even find a nut for the 3/4" thread and attach the fitting to some marine plywood as part of the install (someone here posted a URL of some pictures on how they did this: can't seem to find it - would the owner reply please with the url?) I suppose a 22mm female elbow connecting to a 3/4" bsp female could be of use, especially with some "barrel nipples" (found via another thread here on uk.d-i-y; all the jokes on this phrase also covered too). Any help appreciated; thanks in advance Mungo I think that you may well have to go for the barrel option. I presume that the reason for looking at taper fittings was that some don't have the shoulder on the male part of the fitting and would screw in further. This *might* work, but I think a better solution would be to use a barrel. Possibly BES part no. 6577 would be long enough. -- ..andy |
#3
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Mungo" wrote in message ups.com... Hi Folks, Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? The word "taper" implies a gradual reduction to my mind, but this doesn't square with the whole purpose of a thread. Like Andy says: taper threads seal on the threads, with the help of hemp, gunge, ptfe, or various combinations thereof, so you have to feel the thing tighten gradually, not stop suddenly when metal meets metal. Parallel threads seal elsewhe an olive or a washer, commonly. Reason behind this is my researching an alternative set of tails for a bar mixer for a power shower. I've bought a 3 bar pump and the book tells me to run the output in 22mm as far as practical. We picked up all the fittings for our new en-suite in the sales in January, and it's only now that I've got round to taking a closer look at the plumbing. My plan is to run a pair of 22mm copper pipes down a stud wall cavity and then turn these out ninety degrees into the shower bay and connect to the mixer bar. The mixer bar comes with a pair of dog-leg fittings - three quarters bsp male on one end, half inch bsp male on the other. When you look inside the dog-leg the aperture is (roughly) ten millimetres. From a 22mm pipe down to 10mm feels wasteful, hence this quest to find a better fitting. You've got plenty of pressure from the pump, the 22mm pipe will not drop much pressure, and you're about to put the water through assorted narrow passageways in the mixer before sending both hot and cold down an 11mm hose. I wouldn't worry about an inch or two of 10mm constriction. Given that all this plumbing is likely to be a tad inaccessible once it's done: KISS. Don't even consider using any iron fittings in this setup. -- Kevin Poole **Use current month and year to reply (e.g. )*** Car Transport by Tiltbed Trailer - based near Derby |
#4
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Mungo wrote:
Hi Folks, Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? Go to local Plumbers Merchant and get a suitably sized fibre washer to fit over the 3/4" thread and slide up to the flange. Then fit. Do not use 'O' rings as probably made of EDPM rubber and may deterioate. Failing that, make a washer out of Hemp & use Boss White. I have been a C & G Plumber for 50 years and aint seen a hemp/ Boss White fail yet through the Hemp/Boss White. |
#5
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Mungo" wrote in message ups.com... Hi Folks, Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? The word "taper" implies a gradual reduction to my mind, but this doesn't square with the whole purpose of a thread. Taper threads taper and parallel threads remain parallel! Taper threads, when used with suitable sealers (usually ptfe these days) allow sealing to take place over a range of angles between one part of the fitting and another (ie you can move the joint while it remains sealed). They also don't require a mating face at all and are ideally suited to iron fittings (usually cast) that then don't have to be machined. The most likely place to find them today is the stubs for radiator valve fittings, which exit the radiator with no mating face, having a tapered thread and fitting into a (sometimes recessed) thread in the radiator. IMHO the most effective way to seal them is to wrap about 4 layers of ptfe tape on the thread and assemble, tightening a little. This will drive ptfe into the threads. I then disassemble, add another few layers and do up properly. Parallel threaded fittings require two mating faces and a washer. Once tightness is achieved you are usually stuck with whatever angle it ends up at. They can be considered neater, however. I had some problems withe the tails on my original shower pump, which seemed to require tapered fittngs and I was at a loss to undertand this. I believe the replacement pump was different (AFAICR). -- Bob Mannix (anti-spam is as easy as 1-2-3 - not) |
#6
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Bookworm wrote: Failing that, make a washer out of Hemp & use Boss White. I have been a C & G Plumber for 50 years and aint seen a hemp/ Boss White fail yet through the Hemp/Boss White. Hemp is not prohibited for use on water fittings by the Water Regulations. |
#7
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Aidan wrote: rubbish Should be Hemp is prohibited for use on water fittings by the Water Regulations. |
#8
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Aidan wrote: Hemp is prohibited for use on water fittings by the Water Regulations. So is Boss White, which is only suitable for use on non-potable water systems (heating). For water fittings, including showers, you should use Boss Super Green, Fernox Water Hawk or similar. |
#9
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Hi,
A few years ago, I posted a similar question about threads. Using Francis or fjk might pull up those threads. I came across some fascinating sites, one with a chart for mixing or not mixing the two types. If I find it again, I will post it. Francis "Mungo" wrote in message ups.com... Hi Folks, Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? The word "taper" implies a gradual reduction to my mind, but this doesn't square with the whole purpose of a thread. Reason behind this is my researching an alternative set of tails for a bar mixer for a power shower. I've bought a 3 bar pump and the book tells me to run the output in 22mm as far as practical. We picked up all the fittings for our new en-suite in the sales in January, and it's only now that I've got round to taking a closer look at the plumbing. My plan is to run a pair of 22mm copper pipes down a stud wall cavity and then turn these out ninety degrees into the shower bay and connect to the mixer bar. The mixer bar comes with a pair of dog-leg fittings - three quarters bsp male on one end, half inch bsp male on the other. When you look inside the dog-leg the aperture is (roughly) ten millimetres. From a 22mm pipe down to 10mm feels wasteful, hence this quest to find a better fitting. On my desk is a 22mm female to three-quarters male straight BSP fitting courtesy of Screwfix. The BSP thread isn't deep enough to attach the mixer bar (the mixer bar nut grounds out before it tightens: no use). Ecstasy would be an elbow joint taking 22mm copper pipe on one end and having (say) a two inch long 3/4" BSP male thread (so I could cut it down if necessary) on the other end. I could even find a nut for the 3/4" thread and attach the fitting to some marine plywood as part of the install (someone here posted a URL of some pictures on how they did this: can't seem to find it - would the owner reply please with the url?) I suppose a 22mm female elbow connecting to a 3/4" bsp female could be of use, especially with some "barrel nipples" (found via another thread here on uk.d-i-y; all the jokes on this phrase also covered too). Any help appreciated; thanks in advance Mungo |
#10
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Francis wrote: A few years ago, I posted a similar question about threads. Using Francis or fjk might pull up those threads. I came across some fascinating sites, one with a chart for mixing or not mixing the two types. If I find it again, I will post it. Nothing showed when I did an Advanced search on google groups using: thread (Francis OR fjk) group:uk.d-i-y No great rush Francis: I'll keep looking. Mungo P.S. Thanks to all repliers. |
#11
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
|
#12
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On 15 Mar 2006 23:50:38 -0800, "Mungo" wrote:
Hi Folks, Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? The word "taper" implies a gradual reduction to my mind, but this doesn't square with the whole purpose of a thread. Reason behind this is my researching an alternative set of tails for a bar mixer for a power shower. I've bought a 3 bar pump and the book tells me to run the output in 22mm as far as practical. We picked up all the fittings for our new en-suite in the sales in January, and it's only now that I've got round to taking a closer look at the plumbing. My plan is to run a pair of 22mm copper pipes down a stud wall cavity and then turn these out ninety degrees into the shower bay and connect to the mixer bar. The mixer bar comes with a pair of dog-leg fittings - three quarters bsp male on one end, half inch bsp male on the other. When you look inside the dog-leg the aperture is (roughly) ten millimetres. From a 22mm pipe down to 10mm feels wasteful, hence this quest to find a better fitting. On my desk is a 22mm female to three-quarters male straight BSP fitting courtesy of Screwfix. The BSP thread isn't deep enough to attach the mixer bar (the mixer bar nut grounds out before it tightens: no use). Ecstasy would be an elbow joint taking 22mm copper pipe on one end and having (say) a two inch long 3/4" BSP male thread (so I could cut it down if necessary) on the other end. I could even find a nut for the 3/4" thread and attach the fitting to some marine plywood as part of the install (someone here posted a URL of some pictures on how they did this: can't seem to find it - would the owner reply please with the url?) I suppose a 22mm female elbow connecting to a 3/4" bsp female could be of use, especially with some "barrel nipples" (found via another thread here on uk.d-i-y; all the jokes on this phrase also covered too). Any help appreciated; thanks in advance Mungo Have you had a look at what BES do?: http://www.bes.co.uk/nav_graf/frames_cat.htm cheers, Pete. |
#13
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Andy Hall" wrote in message ... On 15 Mar 2006 23:50:38 -0800, "Mungo" wrote: Hi Folks, Okay, showing one aspect of my vast collection of ignorance he beyond "spelling", what's the difference between a "taper thread" and a "parallel thread"? The word "taper" implies a gradual reduction to my mind, but this doesn't square with the whole purpose of a thread. Taper fittings are often used for fittings involving gases and either PTFE tape or a sealant are used with them. An alternative sometimes used with compressed air for example, are parallel thread fittings with a flange at the top where two flat surfaces meet and an O-ring to seal. Some people do try to use taper male threaded fittings in parallel female fittings again with PTFE tape, but it is not best practice for some applications. For water, parallel threaded fittings are used. What ********. Taper threads are as described. The thread tapers away from deep pitch to narrow pitch. They are for permanent joints which will not swivel. The taper locks the pipe into the fitting although maybe not making a permanent seal of the fluid or gas. Iron pipe has taper threads. The taper is usually on the male thread. The male is usually parallel, although not always. Overtightening taper threads can burst a fitting. Parallel, are usually where the joint is demountable, or undoable. A union will have a parallel thread, as would the threads on a compression nut on a compression fitting, which is there only to pull the nut and body together and not make a seal. If there is a union and washer the thread will be parallel, with the washer making the seal, not the threads. NEVER, tighten up parallel male and female thread unless a washer or O ring makes the seal. PTFE and the likes is not sufficient. |
#14
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
wrote in message ups.com... I've just piped my garage for compressed air, so have recently become very acquainted with taper threads and iron fittings I only wish i'd found gas tape before using standard ptfe on the joints. Take a hell of a lot of standard ptfe to seal at 8 bar, (100 psi or so in old money) so you soon know when your joint is dodgy i've got my garage piped for air, but i went the simple route, that pe-x type semi rigid pipe and push fit fittings, not the expensive stuff sold by some tool companies, just bog standard pe-x hose as used for diesel lines on my van, used 12mm pipe, got a few T pieces, 90 degree angles, few elbows with wall ancors for the air line connectors to the tools and so on, took about half an hour to pipe up, and i've modified the lay out a couple of times, takes minutes, no leaks what so ever first time (as long as the pipe is cut square at the ends it'll not leak) and i run my compressor at 150 psi, been in place for 3 years now, and it'll hold air for days, the place i rekon it leaks is the connector between the compressor and the pipework which is a standard pcl air-line fitting to a rubber hose, with a 12mm push fit connector on the other end, those pcl connectors never give a 100% air tight joint, but loosing 30 psi over 3 days or so isn't too bad i rekon, and total cost for the pipes and fittings was around 40 quid. |
#15
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote: The taper locks the pipe into the fitting although maybe not making a permanent seal of the fluid or gas. Gases are fluids, numbnuts..... Iron pipe has taper threads. The taper is usually on the male thread. The male is usually parallel, although not always. Overtightening taper threads can burst a fitting. So which is it? Taper on the male thread, or parallel? Make up your mind.... You need to read your Conex catalogue more carefully. Ask the rep. for a new one. -- ..andy |
#16
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote: What ********. Taper threads are as described. The thread tapers away from deep pitch to narrow pitch. What ********, there is no such thing as "deep pitch" and "narrow pitch" Machinery's Handbook 26th Edition Taper Thread: A taper thread is a screw thread projecting from a conical surface. Pitch: The pitch of a thread having uniform spacing is the distance measured parallel with its axis between corresponding points on adjacent thread forms in the same axial plane and on the same side of the axis. Pitch is equal to the lead divided by the number of thread starts. Pitch Cone: The pitch cone is an imaginary cone of such apex angle and location of its vertex and axis that its surface would pass through a taper thread in such a manner as to make the widths of the thread ridge and the thread groove equal. It is, therefore, located equidistantly between the sharp major and minor cones of a given thread form. On a theoretically perfect taper thread, these widths are equal to one-half the basic pitch. (See also Axis of Thread and Pitch Diameter.) -- |
#17
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message ... On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: The taper locks the pipe into the fitting although maybe not making a permanent seal of the fluid or gas. Gases are fluids, numbnuts..... Iron pipe has taper threads. The taper is usually on the male thread. The male is usually parallel, although not always. Overtightening taper threads can burst a fitting. So which is it? Taper on the male thread, or parallel? Make up your mind.... You need to read your Conex catalogue more carefully. Ask the rep. for a new one. Matt, do not give advise on topics you know little. |
#18
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Matt" aka Lord Hall wrote in message news On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: What ********. Taper threads are as described. The thread tapers away from deep pitch to narrow pitch. What ********, there is no such thing as "deep pitch" and "narrow pitch" Machinery's Handbook 26th Edition Taper Thread: A taper thread is a screw thread projecting from a conical surface. Pitch: The pitch of a thread having uniform spacing is the distance measured parallel with its axis between corresponding points on adjacent thread forms in the same axial plane and on the same side of the axis. Pitch is equal to the lead divided by the number of thread starts. Pitch Cone: The pitch cone is an imaginary cone of such apex angle and location of its vertex and axis that its surface would pass through a taper thread in such a manner as to make the widths of the thread ridge and the thread groove equal. It is, therefore, located equidistantly between the sharp major and minor cones of a given thread form. On a theoretically perfect taper thread, these widths are equal to one-half the basic pitch. (See also Axis of Thread and Pitch Diameter.) Lord Hall, and? |
#19
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
CampinGazz wrote: wrote in message ups.com... I've just piped my garage for compressed air, so have recently become very acquainted with taper threads and iron fittings i've got my garage piped for air, but i went the simple route, that pe-x type semi rigid pipe and push fit fittings, not the expensive stuff sold by some tool companies, just bog standard pe-x hose as used for diesel lines on my van, used 12mm pipe, got a few T pieces, 90 degree angles, few elbows with wall ancors for the air line connectors to the tools and so on, took about half an hour to pipe up, and i've modified the lay out a couple of times, takes minutes, no leaks what so ever first time (as long as the pipe is cut square at the ends it'll not leak) and i run my compressor at 150 psi, been in place for 3 years now, and it'll hold air for days, the place i rekon it leaks is the connector between the compressor and the pipework which is a standard pcl air-line fitting to a rubber hose, with a 12mm push fit connector on the other end, those pcl connectors never give a 100% air tight joint, but loosing 30 psi over 3 days or so isn't too bad i rekon, and total cost for the pipes and fittings was around 40 quid. Nice, I looked at this route, but it all looked a bit complicated and expensive from the various compressed air firms. They too have gone over to 'specialised' pushfit for compressed air. I took the low tech route and went with galvanised steel tubes, iron fittings and munson rings to the wall. I already had a BSP thread cutter and tube clamp I picked up at a local car boot. Cheers, Paul. |
#20
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
wrote in message oups.com... CampinGazz wrote: wrote in message ups.com... I've just piped my garage for compressed air, so have recently become very acquainted with taper threads and iron fittings i've got my garage piped for air, but i went the simple route, that pe-x type semi rigid pipe and push fit fittings, not the expensive stuff sold by some tool companies, just bog standard pe-x hose as used for diesel lines on my van, used 12mm pipe, got a few T pieces, 90 degree angles, few elbows with wall ancors for the air line connectors to the tools and so on, took about half an hour to pipe up, and i've modified the lay out a couple of times, takes minutes, no leaks what so ever first time (as long as the pipe is cut square at the ends it'll not leak) and i run my compressor at 150 psi, been in place for 3 years now, and it'll hold air for days, the place i rekon it leaks is the connector between the compressor and the pipework which is a standard pcl air-line fitting to a rubber hose, with a 12mm push fit connector on the other end, those pcl connectors never give a 100% air tight joint, but loosing 30 psi over 3 days or so isn't too bad i rekon, and total cost for the pipes and fittings was around 40 quid. Nice, I looked at this route, but it all looked a bit complicated and expensive from the various compressed air firms. They too have gone over to 'specialised' pushfit for compressed air. I took the low tech route and went with galvanised steel tubes, iron fittings and munson rings to the wall. I already had a BSP thread cutter and tube clamp I picked up at a local car boot. DON'T mess about with compressed air doing improvisations. It can easily kill. It only take a few bar to propel metal about the place. Use the proper fittings or don't bother at all. |
#21
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:32 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote: wrote in message roups.com... CampinGazz wrote: wrote in message ups.com... I've just piped my garage for compressed air, so have recently become very acquainted with taper threads and iron fittings i've got my garage piped for air, but i went the simple route, that pe-x type semi rigid pipe and push fit fittings, not the expensive stuff sold by some tool companies, just bog standard pe-x hose as used for diesel lines on my van, used 12mm pipe, got a few T pieces, 90 degree angles, few elbows with wall ancors for the air line connectors to the tools and so on, took about half an hour to pipe up, and i've modified the lay out a couple of times, takes minutes, no leaks what so ever first time (as long as the pipe is cut square at the ends it'll not leak) and i run my compressor at 150 psi, been in place for 3 years now, and it'll hold air for days, the place i rekon it leaks is the connector between the compressor and the pipework which is a standard pcl air-line fitting to a rubber hose, with a 12mm push fit connector on the other end, those pcl connectors never give a 100% air tight joint, but loosing 30 psi over 3 days or so isn't too bad i rekon, and total cost for the pipes and fittings was around 40 quid. Nice, I looked at this route, but it all looked a bit complicated and expensive from the various compressed air firms. They too have gone over to 'specialised' pushfit for compressed air. I took the low tech route and went with galvanised steel tubes, iron fittings and munson rings to the wall. I already had a BSP thread cutter and tube clamp I picked up at a local car boot. DON'T mess about with compressed air doing improvisations. It can easily kill. It only take a few bar to propel metal about the place. Use the proper fittings or don't bother at all. He did use one of the correct approaches. Steel tubing, iron fittings are the traditional way. I used another of the correct approaches which is Speedfit blue tube and the black push fit fittings that go with it. It has the advantage of being easy to change and to add additional components when required. However, I would agree with you that use of unsuitable materials is a really bad idea with compressed air. -- ..andy |
#22
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:53:05 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote: "Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message .. . On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: The taper locks the pipe into the fitting although maybe not making a permanent seal of the fluid or gas. Gases are fluids, numbnuts..... Iron pipe has taper threads. The taper is usually on the male thread. The male is usually parallel, although not always. Overtightening taper threads can burst a fitting. So which is it? Taper on the male thread, or parallel? Make up your mind.... You need to read your Conex catalogue more carefully. Ask the rep. for a new one. Matt, do not give advise on topics you know little. I leave that to you. -- ..andy |
#23
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Andy Hall wrote: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:32 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: [snip] However, I would agree with you [snip] Boggle! I didn't think I would ever see the combination of: - that phrase - written by Andy Hall - in reply to a posting by Doctor Drivel |
#24
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On 17 Mar 2006 05:59:41 -0800, "Martin Bonner"
wrote: Andy Hall wrote: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:32 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: [snip] However, I would agree with you [snip] Boggle! I didn't think I would ever see the combination of: - that phrase - written by Andy Hall - in reply to a posting by Doctor Drivel He does very occasionally get things right and in proportion to the discussion, so it's important to reward him when this happens even though it's quite by accident - helps with his therapy. -- ..andy Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services ---------------------------------------------------------- ** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY ** ---------------------------------------------------------- http://www.usenet.com |
#25
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Andy Hall wrote: "Doctor Drivel" zymurgy wrote CampinGazz wrote: zymurgy wrote I've just piped my garage for compressed air, so have recently become very acquainted with taper threads and iron fittings i've got my garage piped for air, but i went the simple route, that pe-x type semi rigid pipe and push fit fittings,. Nice, I looked at this route, but it all looked a bit complicated and expensive I took the low tech route and went with galvanised steel tubes, iron fittings and munson rings to the wall. I already had a BSP thread cutter and tube clamp I picked up at a local car boot. DON'T mess about with compressed air doing improvisations. It can easily kill. It only take a few bar to propel metal about the place. Use the proper fittings or don't bother at all. Heh, I feel honoured, i've been 'Drivelled' He did use one of the correct approaches. Steel tubing, iron fittings are the traditional way. Yep, no improvisation here I used another of the correct approaches which is Speedfit blue tube and the black push fit fittings that go with it. It has the advantage of being easy to change and to add additional components when required. However, I would agree with you that use of unsuitable materials is a really bad idea with compressed air. Oh, I dunno, that 22/25mm Blue Pex water pipe looks pretty sturdy ;-) Cheers Paul. |
#26
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote: The thread tapers away from deep pitch to narrow pitch. No they don't. The pitch is constant and so is the thread depth. It's the base diameter that tapers. |
#27
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Mungo wrote: Hi Paul, zymurgy wrote: Ta for the reply. np Don't sweat it. I have 22mm isolators that my pump drags water through, then pumps out via a right angled 15mm chromed isolator in the shower pipework. It has great pressure still, and it's not even set to max What size pump Paul (are we comparing like with like)? I'd have to go into the loft to check the box for the exact pressure, but I know it's a showerforce one. Cheers Paul. |
#28
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:32:17 +0000, Andy Dingley
wrote: |On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" |wrote: | | The thread tapers away from deep pitch to narrow pitch. | |No they don't. The pitch is constant and so is the thread depth. It's |the base diameter that tapers. When I learned to cut tapered threads mumble years ago, the thread profile was constant and both the base diameter, and the thread top diameters tapered. -- Dave Fawthrop dave hyphenologist co uk Freedom of Speech, Expression, Religion, and Democracy are the keys to Civilization, together with legal acceptance of Fundamental Human rights. |
#29
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message ... On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:53:05 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: "Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message . .. On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: The taper locks the pipe into the fitting although maybe not making a permanent seal of the fluid or gas. Gases are fluids, numbnuts..... Iron pipe has taper threads. The taper is usually on the male thread. The male is usually parallel, although not always. Overtightening taper threads can burst a fitting. So which is it? Taper on the male thread, or parallel? Make up your mind.... You need to read your Conex catalogue more carefully. Ask the rep. for a new one. Matt, do not give advise on topics you know little. I leave that to you. Matt, just do not give advise on topics you know little. |
#30
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Dave Fawthrop" wrote in message ... On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:32:17 +0000, Andy Dingley wrote: |On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" |wrote: | | The thread tapers away from deep pitch to narrow pitch. | |No they don't. The pitch is constant and so is the thread depth. It's |the base diameter that tapers. When I learned to cut tapered threads mumble years ago, the thread profile was constant and both the base diameter, and the thread top diameters tapered. Look at the dies and cut one and it is obvious. |
#31
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message ... On 17 Mar 2006 05:59:41 -0800, "Martin Bonner" wrote: Andy Hall wrote: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:32 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: [snip] However, I would agree with you [snip] Boggle! I didn't think I would ever see the combination of: - that phrase - written by Andy Hall - in reply to a posting by Doctor Drivel He Matt, and another thing. DON'T use pushfits. If the grab ring goes you will know about it. |
#32
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:25:12 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote: "Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message .. . On 17 Mar 2006 05:59:41 -0800, "Martin Bonner" wrote: Andy Hall wrote: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:32 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: [snip] However, I would agree with you [snip] Boggle! I didn't think I would ever see the combination of: - that phrase - written by Andy Hall - in reply to a posting by Doctor Drivel He Matt, and another thing. DON'T use pushfits. If the grab ring goes you will know about it. I always use the correct tools, so don't run into the problems that you do. -- ..andy |
#33
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
Doctor Drivel wrote: zymurgy wrote CampinGazz wrote: zymurgy wrote I took the low tech route and went with galvanised steel tubes, iron fittings and munson rings to the wall. I already had a BSP thread cutter and tube clamp I picked up at a local car boot. DON'T mess about with compressed air doing improvisations. It can easily kill. It only take a few bar to propel metal about the place. Use the proper fittings or don't bother at all. LOL. I did use the correct fittings and the correct method of assembly. BTW, I ride a 180MPH motorbike, I think a bit of compressed air is the least of my worries :-) HTH Paul. |
#34
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
wrote in message
oups.com... BTW, I own a 180MPH motorbike, I think a bit of compressed air is the least of my worries :-) Post edited for accuracy... ;-) |
#35
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
"Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message ... On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:25:12 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: "Andy Hall" aka Matt wrote in message . .. On 17 Mar 2006 05:59:41 -0800, "Martin Bonner" wrote: Andy Hall wrote: On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:37:32 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" wrote: [snip] However, I would agree with you [snip] Boggle! I didn't think I would ever see the combination of: - that phrase - written by Andy Hall - in reply to a posting by Doctor Drivel He Matt, and another thing. DON'T use pushfits. If the grab ring goes you will know about it. I always use the correct tools, so don't run into the problems that you do. Matt, I know you an total amateur, and slow as well, but fittings and tools are two very different things. Hint: you will not find fittings in Makita manuals. |
#36
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
wrote in message oups.com... Doctor Drivel wrote: zymurgy wrote CampinGazz wrote: zymurgy wrote I took the low tech route and went with galvanised steel tubes, iron fittings and munson rings to the wall. I already had a BSP thread cutter and tube clamp I picked up at a local car boot. DON'T mess about with compressed air doing improvisations. It can easily kill. It only take a few bar to propel metal about the place. Use the proper fittings or don't bother at all. LOL. I did use the correct fittings and the correct method of assembly. BTW, I ride a 180MPH motorbike, I think a bit of compressed air is the least of my worries :-) Kill yourself by all mean, but don't take others with you. |
#37
Posted to uk.d-i-y
|
|||
|
|||
Taper versus Parallel thread
On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:22:54 -0000, "Doctor Drivel"
wrote: "Dave Fawthrop" wrote in message .. . On Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:32:17 +0000, Andy Dingley wrote: |On Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:59:48 -0000, "Doctor Drivel" |wrote: | | The thread tapers away from deep pitch to narrow pitch. | |No they don't. The pitch is constant and so is the thread depth. It's |the base diameter that tapers. When I learned to cut tapered threads mumble years ago, the thread profile was constant and both the base diameter, and the thread top diameters tapered. Look at the dies and cut one and it is obvious. Dribble, you are really dim and completely out of your depth. Many days ago I posted a quote from a well respected engineering reference handbook that many in the engineering profession would consider a reasonably definitive definition of "pitch" together with its application to a taper thread. (see Message-ID: ) THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS DEEP PITCH OR NARROW PITCH -- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Questions regarding thread diameter and pitch for special design case with limited thread length | Metalworking | |||
BT versus CAT taper | Metalworking | |||
High Alloys and turning threads | Metalworking | |||
Questions on repairing/replacing damaged thread in aluminum engine head. | Metalworking | |||
Threads - BSP - Parallel - Tapered - BS746 | UK diy |